RESUMEN
The field of neuromodulation has evolved significantly over the past decade. Developments include novel indications and innovations of hardware, software, and stimulation techniques leading to an expansion in scope and role of these techniques as powerful therapeutic interventions. In this review, which is the second part of an effort to document and integrate the basic fundamentals and recent successful developments in the field, we will focus on classic paradigms for electrode placement as well as new exploratory targets, mechanisms of neuromodulation using this technique and new developments, including focused ultrasound driven ablative procedures.
O campo da neuromodulação evoluiu significativamente na última década. Esse progresso inclui novas indicações e inovações de hardware, software e técnicas de estimulação, levando a uma expansão das áreas clínicas cobertas e no papel dessas técnicas como intervenções terapêuticas eficazes. Nesta revisão, que é a segunda parte de um esforço para documentar e integrar os fundamentos básicos e os desenvolvimentos recentes e bem-sucedidos no campo, vamos nos concentrar em paradigmas clássicos para colocação de eletrodos, bem como em novos alvos exploratórios, mecanismos de neuromodulação usados por esta técnica e novos desenvolvimentos, incluindo procedimentos ablativos orientados por ultrassom focalizado.
Asunto(s)
Estimulación Encefálica Profunda , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Estimulación Encefálica Profunda/métodos , Humanos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/terapia , Electrodos ImplantadosRESUMEN
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is recognized as an established therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD) and other movement disorders in the light of the developments seen over the past three decades. Long-term efficacy is established for PD with documented improvement in the cardinal motor symptoms of PD and levodopa-induced complications, such as motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. Timing of patient selection is crucial to obtain optimal benefits from DBS therapy, before PD complications become irreversible. The objective of this first part review is to examine the fundamental concepts of DBS for PD in clinical practice, discussing the historical aspects, patient selection, potential effects of DBS on motor and non-motor symptoms, and the practical management of patients after surgery.
Nas últimas três décadas, a estimulação cerebral profunda (ECP) se tornou um tratamento bem estabelecido para doença de Parkinson (DP) e outros transtornos do movimento. A eficácia a longo prazo na DP foi bem documentada para a melhora dos sintomas motores cardinais da DP e das complicações induzidas pelo uso do levodopa, como as flutuações motoras e as discinesias. O momento da seleção do paciente é crucial para se obter os benefícios ideais da ECP, antes que as complicações da DP se tornem irreversíveis. O objetivo desta primeira parte da revisão é examinar os conceitos fundamentais da ECP na prática clínica, discutindo os aspectos históricos, a seleção de pacientes, os potenciais efeitos da ECP nos sintomas motores e não motores da doença e o manejo prático dos pacientes após a cirurgia.
Asunto(s)
Estimulación Encefálica Profunda , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Humanos , Estimulación Encefálica Profunda/métodos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/terapia , Selección de Paciente , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
A doença de Parkinson (DP) é uma doença neurodegenerativa deri¬vada de uma redução da produção de dopamina. O seu tratamento é basicamente por medidas farmacológicas. No entanto, nos está¬dios avançados da doença, especialmente devido às flutuações do motor, o tratamento farmacológico por si só não é completamente bem-sucedido. Assim, surge a possibilidade de benefícios ao pacien¬te pela técnica de estimulação cerebral profunda (DBS). O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar o impacto do DBS palidal ou subtalâmica sobre a qualidade de vida desses pacientes (QoL). Para tanto, em¬pregaram-se duas escalas, comparando os resultados pré e pós-ope¬ratórios: o Inventário de Depressão de Beck - BDI (avalia o aspecto emocional dos pacientes) e o PDQ-39 (avalia os aspectos motores e as relações sociais). Podemos observar que a avaliação do BDI apon¬tou para uma melhora média de 9,5% e os escores do PDQ-39 me¬lhoraram 10,28%. Há evidências que pacientes submetidos à técnica de DBS subalâmicos ou paliativos mostraram uma QoL de melhoria importante, assim, o DBS surge como um adjuvante na luta contra a doença de Parkinson. (AU)
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder derived from a reduction of dopamine production. The treatment of PD is basically by pharmacological measures. However, in the advanced stages of the disease, especially due to motor fluctuations, phar¬macological treatment by itself is not completely successful. At that moment, the possibility of the patient´s benefits by the technique of deep brain stimulation (DBS) comes up. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of pallidal or subthalamic DBS on PD patients' quality of life (QoL). To do so, two scales were employed, comparing the pre and post-operative results: Beck Depression Inventory - BDI (evaluates the patients' emotional aspect) and PDQ-39 (evaluates mo¬tor aspects and social relations). We could observe that BDI evalua¬tion pointed to an average improvement of 9.5% and PDQ-39 scores improved 10.28%. We can conclude that patients who have undergo¬ne the technique of subthalamic or pallidal DBS showed an important improvement QoL. DBS comes up as an adjuvant in the fight against Parkinson's disease. (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Enfermedad de Parkinson/cirugía , Enfermedad de Parkinson/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/terapia , Estimulación Encefálica Profunda/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento , Depresión/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated neuropsychological tests to compare cognitive impairment between two types of multiple system atrophy: predominant parkinsonism (MSA-P) and predominant cerebellar ataxia (MSA-C). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 14 patients diagnosed with MSA: four with MSA-C and ten with MSA-P. Presence of motor symptoms was determined by using the Unified Rating MSA Scale (URMSAS). Non-motor symptoms were evaluated by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson's disease Autonomic (SCOPA-AUT), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Neuropsychological tests were used to evaluate general cognition, verbal and visual memory, working memory, constructional ability, visuospatial, language, and executive function. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 62 years, median disease duration was 3.5 years, and median education level was 10 years. The median Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score was 26.5 points, and median Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS) score was 131.5. We compared the continuous data between the two MSA subtypes and observed that bodily pain reported in the quality of life questionnaire, SF-36, was worse in MSA-P (p<0.05), and attention function evaluated by MDRS was significantly lower in MSA-C than MSA-P (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Our comparative study of cognitive impairment in MSA-P and MSA-C showed that both groups had impaired executive and visuospatial functions, while the attention deficit was predominant only in MSA-C. These findings support the concept that cognitive deficit originates from striatofrontal dysfunction and cerebellar degeneration. Our study also suggests that cognitive impairment is relevant in MSA, and clinical neurologists should not neglect evaluation of these aspects in their daily clinical practice.
