Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 19 de 19
Filtrar
1.
Seizure ; 112: 128-138, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37832279

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe the evolution in use and cost of antiseizure medications (ASM) in the United States of America (USA). METHODS: Retrospective descriptive study using the IBM MarketScan Commercial Database (data of privately-insured patients) for the years 2006 to 2021. We identified patients with epilepsy who were on ASM. We adjusted cost for inflation with the Gross Domestic Product Implicit Price Deflator. RESULTS: We evaluated 347,158 patients (46.9 % males; median (p25-p75) age: 33 (17-49) years; 28 % with pediatric-onset epilepsy and 72 % with adult-onset epilepsy) with a total of 1,385,382 person-years and 588,285,065 ASM prescription days. The most commonly prescribed (as percentage of prescription days) ASMs in 2006 were valproate (18 %) and lamotrigine (17 %) in pediatric-onset epilepsy and phenytoin (21 %) and carbamazepine (17 %) in adult-onset epilepsy, but starting in the 2010s, levetiracetam and lamotrigine became the most commonly prescribed ASMs in both pediatric-onset (in 2021, levetiracetam 25 %, lamotrigine 16 %) and adult-onset (in 2021, levetiracetam 27 %, lamotrigine 20 %) epilepsy. The proportion of generic ASM use increased 3.6-fold: from 23 % of prescription days in 2006 to 83 % of prescription days in 2021. The median (p25-p75) average wholesale price (AWP) per person-year increased by 102 % from $2,684 ($990-$5,509) in 2006 to $5,417 ($2,858-$12,310) in 2021. The increases were greater in absolute terms for brand-name ASMs by 419 %: $3,109 ($1,564-$5,068 in 2006 and $16,149 ($12,950-$23,377) in 2021 than for generic ASMs by 462 %: $699 ($457-$1,678) in 2006 and $3,931 ($2,618-$6,081) in 2021. The costs directly borne by the patient (copay, coinsurance, deductibles, and pharmacy processing fees) increased by 69 % for brand-name ASMs from $393 ($246-$570) in 2006 to $665 ($335-$1,308) in 2021, but decreased by 37 % for generic ASMs from $147 ($98-$213) in 2006 to $92 ($51-$141) in 2021. CONCLUSIONS: The median cost of ASMs per person-year approximately doubled from 2006 to 2021. The increase in use of generic ASMs probably helped buffer the growing costs of ASMs. However, generic ASMs already represent 83 % of prescription days in 2021, with limited room to further contain costs by just increasing the proportion of generics.


Asunto(s)
Epilepsia , Fenitoína , Adulto , Masculino , Niño , Humanos , Femenino , Lamotrigina , Levetiracetam , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medicamentos Genéricos/uso terapéutico , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Epilepsia/epidemiología , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico
2.
Seizure ; 111: 51-55, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37523933

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Delayed treatment in status epilepticus (SE) is independently associated with increased treatment resistance, morbidity, and mortality. We describe the prehospital management pathway and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) timeliness in children who developed refractory convulsive status epilepticus (RCSE). METHODS: Retrospective multicenter study in the United States using prospectively collected observational data from June 2011 to March 2020. We selected pediatric patients (one month-21 years) with RCSE initiated outside the hospital and transported to the hospital by EMS. RESULTS: We included 91 patients with a median (percentile25-percentile75) age of 3.0 (1.5-7.3) years. The median time from seizure onset to hospital arrival was 45 (30-67) minutes, with a median time cared for by EMS of 24 (15-36) minutes. Considering treatment by caregivers and EMS before hospital arrival, 20 (22%) patients did not receive any anti-seizure medications (ASM) and 71 (78%) received one to five doses of benzodiazepines (BZD), without non-BZD ASM. We provided the prehospital treatment flow path of these patients through caregivers and EMS including relevant time points. Patients with a history of SE were more likely to receive the first BZD in the prehospital setting compared to patients without a history of SE (adjusted HR 3.25, 95% CI 1.72-6.12, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In this multicenter study of pediatric RCSE, prehospital treatment may be streamlined further. Patients with a history of SE were more likely to receive prehospital rescue medication.

3.
Acta Paediatr ; 112(10): 2202-2209, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37338177

RESUMEN

AIM: To describe the prevalence, severity, risk factors, and clinical relevance of electrolyte disturbances and acute kidney injury (AKI) during febrile urinary tract infection (fUTI). METHODS: Retrospective observational study of well/fair-appearing patients between 2 months and 16 years, with no previous relevant medical history, diagnosed with fUTI in the paediatric emergency department (PED) with subsequent microbiological confirmation. Analytical alteration (AA) data were considered: AKI (creatinine elevation × 1.5 the median for age), plasma sodium alteration (≤130 or ≥150 mEq/L), and potassium alteration (≤3 or ≥6 mEq/L). RESULTS: We included 590 patients, 17.8% presented AA (13 hyponatremia, 7 hyperkalaemia, and 87 AKI). No patient presented severe analytic alterations or a higher frequency of symptoms potentially attributable to these alterations (seizures, irritability, or lethargy). Risk factors associated with these AA were clinical dehydration (OR = 3.5 95% CI: 1.04-11.7; p = 0.044) and presenting a temperature >39°C (OR = 1.9 95% CI: 1.14-3.1; p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Electrolyte and renal function disturbances are infrequent in the previously healthy paediatric population with a fUTI. If present, they are asymptomatic and not severe. Based on our results, performing systematic blood analysis to rule out AA appears no longer justified, especially in the absence of risk factors.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Infecciones Urinarias , Niño , Humanos , Infecciones Urinarias/complicaciones , Infecciones Urinarias/diagnóstico , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Electrólitos , Riñón , Lesión Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología
4.
Neurology ; 101(5): e546-e557, 2023 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37295955

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine patient-specific factors known proximate to the presentation to emergency care associated with the development of refractory convulsive status epilepticus (RSE) in children. METHODS: An observational case-control study was conducted comparing pediatric patients (1 month-21 years) with convulsive SE whose seizures stopped after benzodiazepine (BZD) and a single second-line antiseizure medication (ASM) (responsive established status epilepticus [rESE]) with patients requiring more than a BZD and a single second-line ASM to stop their seizures (RSE). These subpopulations were obtained from the pediatric Status Epilepticus Research Group study cohort. We explored clinical variables that could be acquired early after presentation to emergency medical services with univariate analysis of the raw data. Variables with p < 0.1 were retained for univariable and multivariable regression analyses. Multivariable logistic regression models were fit to age-matched and sex-matched data to obtain variables associated with RSE. RESULTS: We compared data from a total of 595 episodes of pediatric SE. Univariate analysis demonstrated no differences in time to the first BZD (RSE 16 minutes [IQR 5-45]; rESE 18 minutes [IQR 6-44], p = 0.068). Time to second-line ASM was shorter in patients with RSE (RSE 65 minutes; rESE 70 minutes; p = 0.021). Both univariable and multivariable regression analyses revealed a family history of seizures (OR 0.37; 95% CI 0.20-0.70, p = 0.0022) or a prescription for rectal diazepam (OR 0.21; 95% CI 0.078-0.53, p = 0.0012) was associated with decreased odds of RSE. DISCUSSION: Time to initial BZD or second-line ASM was not associated with progression to RSE in our cohort of patients with rESE. A family history of seizures and a prescription for rectal diazepam were associated with a decreased likelihood of progression to RSE. Early attainment of these variables may help care for pediatric rESE in a more patient-tailored manner. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that patient and clinical factors may predict RSE in children with convulsive seizures.


Asunto(s)
Epilepsia Refractaria , Estado Epiléptico , Humanos , Niño , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estado Epiléptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Convulsiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Epilepsia Refractaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Diazepam/uso terapéutico
5.
Epilepsia ; 64(3): 630-640, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36600453

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe the temporal trends in the cost and use of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), oral prednisolone, and vigabatrin, the first-line treatments for infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS). METHODS: Retrospective observational study using the MarketScan Commercial database from 2006 to 2020. We identified patients with IESS diagnosed between birth and 18 months of age who received at least one of the first-line treatments within 60 days of diagnosis. Costs were adjusted for inflation using the Gross Domestic Product Implicit Price Deflator. RESULTS: A total of 1131 patients received at least one first-line treatment (median [p25 -p75 ] age: 6.3 [4.5-8.3] months, 55% male), of whom 592 patients received ACTH, 363 patients received oral prednisolone, and 355 patients received vigabatrin. After adjusting for inflation, the median average wholesale price of a 14-day course of treatment increased for ACTH from $3718 in 2006 to $100 457 in 2020, ~2700% (by a factor of 27), whereas it decreased for oral prednisolone from $169 in 2006 to $89 in 2020, ~50% (by a factor of 0.5), and increased for vigabatrin from $1206 in 2009 (first year with data on vigabatrin used for IESS) to $4102 in 2020, ~340% (by a factor of 3.4). During the first 60 days after diagnosis, inpatient admission days and costs where higher for ACTH than for oral prednisolone and vigabatrin-5.0 (3.0-8.3) days vs 2.0 (0.0-5.0) days vs 2.0 (0.0-6.0) days, p < .0001; and $32 828 ($14 711-$67 216) vs $16 227 ($0-$35 829) vs $17 844 ($0-$47 642), p < .0001. ACTH use decreased from representing 78% of first-line treatments in 2006 to 18% in 2020 (p < .0001). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. SIGNIFICANCE: The gap between the cost of ACTH and the cost of oral prednisolone or vigabatrin has widened markedly from 2006 to 2020, whereas the relative proportion of ACTH use has decreased.


Asunto(s)
Espasmos Infantiles , Vigabatrin , Humanos , Masculino , Lactante , Niño , Recién Nacido , Femenino , Vigabatrin/uso terapéutico , Espasmos Infantiles/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Hormona Adrenocorticotrópica/uso terapéutico , Prednisolona/uso terapéutico , Síndrome , Espasmo/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Seizure ; 104: 22-31, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36463710

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe the demographics of epilepsy surgery utilization and its impact on health care resource use. METHODS: Retrospective descriptive study using the MarketScan commercial claims database. We studied children and adults who underwent epilepsy surgery in the USA in the period 2006-2019. Our main outcome was health care resource utilization. RESULTS: Among the 87,368 patients with refractory epilepsy, 2,011 (2.3%) patients underwent resective epilepsy surgery, 188 (0.2%) patients underwent partial or total hemispherectomy, and 183 (0.2%) patients underwent corpus callosotomy. The proportion of patients undergoing epilepsy surgery has barely increased in the period 2006 to 2019. The year of resective epilepsy surgery was associated with high healthcare costs per person-year [median (p25-p75): $140,322 ($88,749-$225,862)], but healthcare costs per person-year substantially decreased in the 5 years after compared to the 5 years before the year of resective epilepsy surgery [$7,691 ($2,738-$22,092) versus $18,750 ($7,361-$47,082), p-value < 0.0001]. This result held in all resective epilepsy surgery subgroups: children, adults, temporal, extratemporal, subdural EEG monitoring, stereoEEG monitoring, and no intracranial monitoring. Similarly, the year of hemispherectomy was associated with high healthcare costs per person-year [$260,983 ($154,791-$453,986)], but healthcare costs per person-year substantially decreased in the 5 years after compared to the 5 years before the year of hemispherectomy [$26,834 ($12,842-$52,627) versus $54,596 ($19,547-$136,412), p-value < 0.0001]. In contrast, the year of corpus callosotomy was associated with high healthcare costs per person-year [$162,399 ($108,150-$253,156)], but healthcare costs per person-year did not substantially decrease in the 5 years after than in the 5 years before the year of corpus callosotomy [$25,464 ($10,764-$69,338) versus $36,221 ($12,841-$85,747), p-value = 0.2142]. CONCLUSION: In privately insured patients in the USA, resective epilepsy surgery and hemispherectomy substantially decrease healthcare utilization in subsequent years. Epilepsy surgery may help contain costs in the field of epilepsy.


Asunto(s)
Epilepsia , Hemisferectomía , Niño , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Epilepsia/cirugía , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Costos de la Atención en Salud
8.
Epilepsia ; 62(11): 2766-2777, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34418087

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to evaluate benzodiazepine (BZD) administration patterns before transitioning to non-BZD antiseizure medication (ASM) in pediatric patients with refractory convulsive status epilepticus (rSE). METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study in the United States and Canada used prospectively collected observational data from children admitted with rSE between 2011 and 2020. Outcome variables were the number of BZDs given before the first non-BZD ASM, and the number of BZDs administered after 30 and 45 min from seizure onset and before escalating to non-BZD ASM. RESULTS: We included 293 patients with a median (interquartile range) age of 3.8 (1.3-9.3) years. Thirty-six percent received more than two BZDs before escalating, and the later the treatment initiation was after seizure onset, the less likely patients were to receive multiple BZD doses before transitioning (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = .998, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .997-.999 per minute, p = .01). Patients received BZDs beyond 30 and 45 min in 57.3% and 44.0% of cases, respectively. Patients with out-of-hospital seizure onset were more likely to receive more doses of BZDs beyond 30 min (IRR = 2.43, 95% CI = 1.73-3.46, p < .0001) and beyond 45 min (IRR = 3.75, 95% CI = 2.40-6.03, p < .0001) compared to patients with in-hospital seizure onset. Intermittent SE was a risk factor for more BZDs administered beyond 45 min compared to continuous SE (IRR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.01-2.06, p = .04). Forty-seven percent of patients (n = 94) with out-of-hospital onset did not receive treatment before hospital arrival. Among patients with out-of-hospital onset who received at least two BZDs before hospital arrival (n = 54), 48.1% received additional BZDs at hospital arrival. SIGNIFICANCE: Failure to escalate from BZDs to non-BZD ASMs occurs mainly in out-of-hospital rSE onset. Delays in the implementation of medical guidelines may be reduced by initiating treatment before hospital arrival and facilitating a transition to non-BZD ASMs after two BZD doses during handoffs between prehospital and in-hospital settings.


Asunto(s)
Epilepsia Refractaria , Estado Epiléptico , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Epilepsia Refractaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Convulsiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Estado Epiléptico/tratamiento farmacológico
9.
Epilepsia ; 62(9): 2190-2204, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34251039

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to describe long-term clinical and developmental outcomes in pediatric refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and identify factors associated with new neurological deficits after RSE. METHODS: We performed retrospective analyses of prospectively collected observational data from June 2011 to March 2020 on pediatric patients with RSE. We analyzed clinical outcomes from at least 30 days after RSE and, in a subanalysis, we assessed developmental outcomes and evaluated risk factors in previously normally developed patients. RESULTS: Follow-up data on outcomes were available in 276 patients (56.5% males). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up duration was 1.6 (.9-2.7) years. The in-hospital mortality rate was 4% (16/403 patients), and 15 (5.4%) patients had died after hospital discharge. One hundred sixty-six (62.9%) patients had subsequent unprovoked seizures, and 44 (16.9%) patients had a repeated RSE episode. Among 116 patients with normal development before RSE, 42 of 107 (39.3%) patients with available data had new neurological deficits (cognitive, behavioral, or motor). Patients with new deficits had longer median (IQR) electroclinical RSE duration than patients without new deficits (10.3 [2.1-134.5] h vs. 4 [1.6-16] h, p = .011, adjusted odds ratio = 1.003, 95% confidence interval = 1.0008-1.0069, p = .027). The proportion of patients with an unfavorable functional outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended score ≥ 4) was 22 of 90 (24.4%), and they were more likely to have received a continuous infusion. SIGNIFICANCE: About one third of patients without prior epilepsy developed recurrent unprovoked seizures after the RSE episode. In previously normally developing patients, 39% presented with new deficits during follow-up, with longer electroclinical RSE duration as a predictor.


Asunto(s)
Estado Epiléptico , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Niño , Epilepsia Generalizada/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Convulsiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Estado Epiléptico/diagnóstico , Estado Epiléptico/epidemiología , Estado Epiléptico/terapia
10.
Epilepsia ; 62(7): 1629-1642, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34091885

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize the clinical profile and outcomes of new onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) in children, and investigated the relationship between fever onset and status epilepticus (SE). METHODS: Patients with refractory SE (RSE) between June 1, 2011 and October 1, 2016 were prospectively enrolled in the pSERG (Pediatric Status Epilepticus Research Group) cohort. Cases meeting the definition of NORSE were classified as "NORSE of known etiology" or "NORSE of unknown etiology." Subgroup analysis of NORSE of unknown etiology was completed based on the presence and time of fever occurrence relative to RSE onset: fever at onset (≤24 h), previous fever (2 weeks-24 h), and without fever. RESULTS: Of 279 patients with RSE, 46 patients met the criteria for NORSE. The median age was 2.4 years, and 25 (54%) were female. Forty (87%) patients had NORSE of unknown etiology. Nineteen (48%) presented with fever at SE onset, 16 (40%) had a previous fever, and five (12%) had no fever. The patients with preceding fever had more prolonged SE and worse outcomes, and 25% recovered baseline neurological function. The patients with fever at onset were younger and had shorter SE episodes, and 89% recovered baseline function. SIGNIFICANCE: Among pediatric patients with RSE, 16% met diagnostic criteria for NORSE, including the subcategory of febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES). Pediatric NORSE cases may also overlap with refractory febrile SE (FSE). FIRES occurs more frequently in older children, the course is usually prolonged, and outcomes are worse, as compared to refractory FSE. Fever occurring more than 24 h before the onset of seizures differentiates a subgroup of NORSE patients with distinctive clinical characteristics and worse outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Epilepsia Refractaria/diagnóstico , Convulsiones Febriles/diagnóstico , Estado Epiléptico/diagnóstico , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Bases de Datos Factuales , Electroencefalografía , Femenino , Fiebre/complicaciones , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Convulsiones Febriles/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Estado Epiléptico/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Seizure ; 91: 81-90, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34130195

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To develop and test a deep learning model to automatically detect malformations of cortical development (MCD). METHODS: We trained a deep learning model to distinguish between diffuse cortical malformation (CM), periventricular nodular heterotopia (PVNH), and normal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We trained 4 different convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures. We used batch normalization, global average pooling, dropout layers, transfer learning, and data augmentation to minimize overfitting. RESULTS: There were 45 subjects (866 images) with a normal MRI, 52 subjects (790 images) with CM, and 32 subjects (750 images) with PVNH. There was no subject overlap between the training, validation, and test sets. The InceptionResNetV2 architecture performed best in the validation set in all models and was evaluated in the test set with the following results: 1) the model distinguishing between CM and normal MRI yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89 and accuracy of 0.81; 2) the model distinguishing between PVNH and normal MRI yielded an AUC of 0.90 and accuracy of 0.84; 3) the model distinguishing between the three classes (CM, PVNH, and normal MRI) yielded an AUC of 0.88 and accuracy of 0.74. Visualization with gradient-weighted class activation maps and saliency maps showed that the deep learning models classified images based on relevant areas within each image. SIGNIFICANCE: This study showed that CNNs can detect MCD at a clinically useful performance level with a fully automated workflow without image feature selection.


Asunto(s)
Aprendizaje Profundo , Área Bajo la Curva , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Redes Neurales de la Computación
12.
Pediatr Neurol ; 120: 71-79, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34022752

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Time to treatment in pediatric refractory status epilepticus is delayed. We aimed to evaluate the influence of weekends and holidays on time to treatment of this pediatric emergency. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected observational data of pediatric patients with refractory status epilepticus. RESULTS: We included 329 patients (56% males) with a median (p25 to p75) age of 3.8 (1.3 to 9) years. The median (p25 to p75) time to first BZD on weekdays and weekends/holidays was 20 (6.8 to 48.3) minutes versus 11 (5 to 35) minutes, P = 0.01; adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 1.20 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95 to 1.55), P = 0.12. The time to first non-BZD ASM was longer on weekdays than on weekends/holidays (68 [42.8 to 153.5] minutes versus 59 [27 to 120] minutes, P = 0.006; adjusted HR = 1.38 [95% CI: 1.08 to 1.76], P = 0.009). However, this difference was mainly driven by status epilepticus with in-hospital onset: among 108 patients, the time to first non-BZD ASM was longer during weekdays than during weekends/holidays (55.5 [28.8 to 103.5] minutes versus 28 [15.8 to 66.3] minutes, P = 0.003; adjusted HR = 1.65 [95% CI: 1.08 to 2.51], P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The time to first non-BZD ASM in pediatric refractory status epilepticus is shorter on weekends/holidays than on weekdays, mainly driven by in-hospital onset status epilepticus. Data on what might be causing this difference may help tailor policies to improve medication application timing.


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/administración & dosificación , Benzodiazepinas/administración & dosificación , Epilepsia Refractaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Estado Epiléptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Factores de Tiempo
14.
Seizure ; 87: 7-16, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33639504

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiology and health resource utilization for convulsive status epilepticus (SE) in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: Retrospective descriptive study in the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS). Primary SE and secondary SE (SE in a case who visited the ED for other primary reason) were compared with non-SE seizures. Secondary SE is expected to have worse outcomes and higher costs because of another primary cause for ED visit. RESULTS: In the period 2010-2014, there were 149,750 ED visits with primary SE; 83,459 ED with secondary SE; and 5,359,103 ED visits with non-SE seizures. On multivariable analysis adjusting for potential confounders, the odds of hospital admission were 7 times higher for primary SE than for non-SE seizures, and 5 times higher for secondary SE than for non-SE seizures; the odds of transfer to another hospital were 9 times higher for primary SE than for non-SE seizures, and 3 times higher for secondary SE than for non-SE seizures; the odds of death were 2.5 times higher for primary SE than for non-SE seizures, and 12 times higher for secondary SE than for non-SE seizures; and the charges (in January 2020 USA dollars) were $9000 higher in primary SE than in non-SE seizures, and $35,000 higher in secondary SE than in non-SE seizures. CONCLUSION: Among all reasons for ED visits, SE, and in particular, secondary SE, are among the most resource-consuming conditions, being much more expensive than non-SE seizures in the ED.


Asunto(s)
Recursos en Salud , Estado Epiléptico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Hospitalización , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estado Epiléptico/epidemiología , Estado Epiléptico/terapia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
15.
Epilepsia ; 62(2): 347-357, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33417252

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and oral steroids as first-line treatment for infantile spasm resolution, we performed a systematic review, meta-analysis, and cost-effectiveness study. METHODS: A decision analysis model was populated with effectiveness data from a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing literature and cost data from publicly available prices. Effectiveness was defined as the probability of clinical spasm resolution 14 days after treatment initiation. RESULTS: We included 21 studies with a total of 968 patients. The effectiveness of ACTH was not statistically significantly different from that of oral steroids (.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .60-.79 vs. .63, 95% CI = .56-.70; p = .28). Considering only the three available randomized trials with a total of 185 patients, the odds ratio of spasm resolution at 14 days with ACTH compared to high-dose prednisolone (4-8 mg/kg/day) was .92 (95% CI = .34-2.52, p = .87). Adjusting for potential publication bias, estimates became even more favorable to high-dose prednisolone. Using US prices, the more cost-effective treatment was high-dose prednisolone, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $333 per case of spasms resolved, followed by ACTH, with an ICER of $1 432 200 per case of spasms resolved. These results were robust to multiple sensitivity analyses and different assumptions. Prednisolone at 4-8 mg/kg/day was more cost-effective than ACTH under a wide range of assumptions. SIGNIFICANCE: For infantile spasm resolution 2 weeks after treatment initiation, current evidence does not support the preeminence of ACTH in terms of effectiveness and, especially, cost-effectiveness.


Asunto(s)
Hormona Adrenocorticotrópica/uso terapéutico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Hormonas/uso terapéutico , Prednisolona/uso terapéutico , Espasmos Infantiles/tratamiento farmacológico , Hormona Adrenocorticotrópica/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Glucocorticoides/economía , Hormonas/economía , Humanos , Lactante , Prednisolona/economía , Espasmos Infantiles/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Semin Neurol ; 40(6): 661-674, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33155182

RESUMEN

Status epilepticus (SE) is one of the most common neurological emergencies in children and has a mortality of 2 to 4%. Admissions for SE are very resource-consuming, especially in refractory and super-refractory SE. An increasing understanding of the pathophysiology of SE leaves room for improving SE treatment protocols, including medication choice and timing. Selecting the most efficacious medications and giving them in a timely manner may improve outcomes. Benzodiazepines are commonly used as first line and they can be used in the prehospital setting, where most SE episodes begin. The diagnostic work-up should start simultaneously to initial treatment, or as soon as possible, to detect potentially treatable causes of SE. Although most etiologies are recognized after the first evaluation, the detection of more unusual causes may become challenging in selected cases. SE is a life-threatening medical emergency in which prompt and efficacious treatment may improve outcomes. We provide a summary of existing evidence to guide clinical decisions regarding the work-up and treatment of SE in pediatric patients.


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Estado Epiléptico/diagnóstico , Estado Epiléptico/terapia , Niño , Humanos , Estado Epiléptico/etiología
17.
Epilepsia ; 61(10): 2150-2162, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32959410

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Treatments for convulsive status epilepticus (SE) have a wide range of effectiveness. The estimated effectiveness of non-intravenous benzodiazepines (non-IV BZDs) ranges from approximately 70% to 90% and the estimated effectiveness of non-benzodiazepine antiseizure medications (non-BZD ASMs) ranges from approximately 50% to 80%. This study aimed to quantify the clinical and economic burden of decisional uncertainty in the treatment of SE. METHODS: We performed a decision analysis that evaluates how decisional uncertainty on treatment choices for SE impacts hospital admissions, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and costs in the United States. We evaluated treatment effectiveness based on the available literature. RESULTS: Use of a non-IV BZD with high estimated effectiveness, like intranasal midazolam, rather than one with low estimated effectiveness, like rectal diazepam, would result in a median (p25 -p75 ) reduction in hospital admissions from 6 (3.9-8.8) to 1.1 (0.7-1.8) per 100 cases and associated cost reductions of $638 ($289-$1064) per pediatric patient and $1107 ($972-$1281) per adult patient. For BZD-resistant SE, use of a non-BZD ASM with high estimated effectiveness, like phenobarbital, rather than one with low estimated effectiveness, like phenytoin/fosphenytoin, would result in a reduction in ICU admissions from 9.1 (7.3-11.2) to 3.9 (2.6-5.5) per 100 cases and associated cost reduction of $1261 ($445-$2223) per pediatric patient and $319 ($-93-$806) per adult patient. Sensitivity analyses showed that relatively minor improvements in effectiveness may lead to substantial reductions in downstream hospital admissions, ICU admissions, and costs. SIGNIFICANCE: Decreasing decisional uncertainty and using the most effective treatments for SE may substantially decrease hospital admissions, ICU admissions, and costs.


Asunto(s)
Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Costo de Enfermedad , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Estado Epiléptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Incertidumbre , Adulto , Benzodiazepinas/economía , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Admisión del Paciente/economía , Admisión del Paciente/tendencias , Estado Epiléptico/diagnóstico , Estado Epiléptico/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
Neurology ; 95(9): e1222-e1235, 2020 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32611646

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether publication of evidence on delays in time to treatment shortens time to treatment in pediatric refractory convulsive status epilepticus (rSE), we compared time to treatment before (2011-2014) and after (2015-2019) publication of evidence of delays in treatment of rSE in the Pediatric Status Epilepticus Research Group (pSERG) as assessed by patient interviews and record review. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected dataset from June 2011 to September 2019 on pediatric patients (1 month-21 years of age) with rSE. RESULTS: We studied 328 patients (56% male) with median (25th-75th percentile [p25-p75]) age of 3.8 (1.3-9.4) years. There were no differences in the median (p25-p75) time to first benzodiazepine (BZD) (20 [5-52.5] vs 15 [5-38] minutes, p = 0.3919), time to first non-BZD antiseizure medication (68 [34.5-163.5] vs 65 [33-142] minutes, p = 0.7328), and time to first continuous infusion (186 [124.2-571] vs 160 [89.5-495] minutes, p = 0.2236). Among 157 patients with out-of-hospital onset whose time to hospital arrival was available, the proportion who received at least 1 BZD before hospital arrival increased after publication of evidence of delays (41 of 81 [50.6%] vs 57 of 76 [75%], p = 0.0018), and the odds ratio (OR) was also increased in multivariable logistic regression (OR 4.35 [95% confidence interval 1.96-10.3], p = 0.0005). CONCLUSION: Publication of evidence on delays in time to treatment was not associated with improvements in time to treatment of rSE, although it was associated with an increase in the proportion of patients who received at least 1 BZD before hospital arrival.


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Brechas de la Práctica Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Estado Epiléptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Parálisis Cerebral/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Discapacidades del Desarrollo/epidemiología , Epilepsia/epidemiología , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitales Pediátricos , Humanos , Lactante , Infusiones Intravenosas , Discapacidad Intelectual/epidemiología , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estado Epiléptico/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
19.
Seizure ; 71: 295-303, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31518880

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Estimate the cost of status epilepticus (SE) admissions in the USA using claim databases based on ICD-10 codes. METHOD: Descriptive retrospective study using national estimates for the year 2016 from the KID's Inpatient Database (KID) for pediatric patients and from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) for adults. These databases are comprehensive collections of all-payer, encounter-level hospital care data in the United States of America. RESULTS: From a population of 6,106,405 pediatric admissions there were 580 admissions related to SE. From a population of 29,274,158 adult admissions there were 1,405 admissions related to SE. The median (p25-p75) cost of pediatric admissions related to SE was $8,749 ($4,875-$19,067) in 2016 USA dollars [$9,295 ($5,180-$20,258) in inflation-adjusted 2019 USA dollars], and for adult admissions related to SE it was $14,678 ($7,203-$28,388) in 2016 USA dollars [$15,595 ($7,653-$30,161) in inflation-adjusted 2019 USA dollars]. Transforming to 2019 USA dollars, the values from the current study are consistent with prior estimates in the literature from the KID and NIS databases with a progressive increase, except for the cost of super-refractory SE in children that has increased disproportionately. CONCLUSIONS: This study estimates that the cost of admissions related to SE in the USA is approximately $9,000 in children and $15,000 in adults and shows that the cost estimates have not markedly changed with the advent of ICD-10.


Asunto(s)
Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Admisión del Paciente/economía , Estado Epiléptico/economía , Estado Epiléptico/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...