Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
J Pediatr ; 233: 51-57.e3, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33676934

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess trends in racial disparity in supine sleep positioning (SSP) across racial/ethnic groups of infants born early preterm (Early preterm; <34 weeks) and late preterm (Late preterm; 34-36 weeks) from 2000 to 2015. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System data (a population-based perinatal surveillance system) from 16 US states from 2000 to 2015 (Weighted N = 1 020 986). Marginal prevalence of SSP by year was estimated for infants who were early preterm and late preterm, adjusting for maternal and infant characteristics. After stratifying infants who were early preterm and late preterm, we compared the aOR of SSP trends across racial/ethnic groups by testing the time-race interaction. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2015, Non-Hispanic Black infants had lower odds of SSP compared with Non-Hispanic White infants for early preterm (aOR 0.61; 95% CI 0.47-0.78) and late preterm (aOR 0.44; 95% CI 0.34-0.56) groups. For Hispanic infants, there was no statistically significant difference for either preterm group when compared with Non-Hispanic White infants. aOR of SSP increased (on average) annually by 10.0%, 7.3%, and 7.7%, respectively, in Non-Hispanic White, Non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic early preterm infants and by 5.8%, 5.9%, and 4.8% among Non-Hispanic White, Non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic late preterm infants. However, there were no significant between-group differences in annual changes (Early preterm: P = .11; Late preterm: P = .25). CONCLUSIONS: SSP increased for all racial/ethnic preterm groups from 2000 to 2015. However, the racial/ethnic disparity in SSP among early preterm and late preterm groups persists.


Asunto(s)
Recien Nacido Prematuro , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Sueño , Posición Supina , Adulto , Escolaridad , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Estado Civil , Edad Materna , Madres , Vigilancia de la Población , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
3.
J Pediatr ; 227: 114-120.e1, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32698029

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission and breastfeeding practices, infant supine sleep positioning, and postnatal smoking among mothers of late preterm infants. STUDY DESIGN: Data from 36 states using the 2000-2013 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System were analyzed. χ2 tests and 95% CI assessed infant and maternal characteristics and recommended care practices for late preterm infants based on NICU admission after birth. Adjusted prevalence ratios (APR) for breastfeeding initiation and continuation at 10 weeks, supine sleep position, and postnatal smoking were estimated using multivariable logistic regression models, controlling for infant and maternal characteristics. Analyses were weighted and SEs accounted for the complex survey design. RESULTS: Our sample included 62 494 late preterm infants, representing a weighted population of 1 441 451 late preterm infants. In the adjusted analysis, mothers of late preterm infants admitted to a NICU were more likely to initiate breastfeeding (APR 1.07; 95% CI 1.05-1.09) and place their infants in supine sleep position (1.04; 95% CI 1.01-1.06) than mothers of late preterm infants not admitted to a NICU. There was no significant difference between groups for breastfeeding continuation or postnatal smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Mothers of late preterm infants admitted to a NICU were more likely to initiate breastfeeding and practice supine sleep position than mothers of late preterm infants not admitted to a NICU. Future work should seek to identify the drivers of these differences to develop effective strategies to engage mothers in these health promoting infant care practices.


Asunto(s)
Lactancia Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Fumar Cigarrillos/epidemiología , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Posición Supina , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Madres/educación , Atención Posnatal/métodos , Embarazo , Muerte Súbita del Lactante/prevención & control , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
5.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 66(22): 574-578, 2017 Jun 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28594787

RESUMEN

Zika virus infection during pregnancy remains a serious health threat in Puerto Rico. Infection during pregnancy can cause microcephaly, brain abnormalities, and other severe birth defects (1). From January 1, 2016 through March 29, 2017, Puerto Rico reported approximately 3,300 pregnant women with laboratory evidence of possible Zika virus infection (2). There is currently no vaccine or intervention to prevent the adverse effects of Zika virus infection during pregnancy; therefore, prevention has been the focus of public health activities, especially for pregnant women (3). CDC and the Puerto Rico Department of Health analyzed data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System Zika Postpartum Emergency Response (PRAMS-ZPER) survey conducted from August through December 2016 among Puerto Rico residents with a live birth. Most women (98.1%) reported using at least one measure to avoid mosquitos in their home environment. However, only 45.8% of women reported wearing mosquito repellent daily, and 11.5% reported wearing pants and shirts with long sleeves daily. Approximately one third (38.5%) reported abstaining from sex or using condoms consistently throughout pregnancy. Overall, 76.9% of women reported having been tested for Zika virus by their health care provider during the first or second trimester of pregnancy. These results can be used to assess and refine Zika virus infection prevention messaging and interventions for pregnant women and to reinforce measures to promote prenatal testing for Zika.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Práctica de Salud Pública , Infección por el Virus Zika/prevención & control , Adulto , Condones/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Repelentes de Insectos , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Control de Mosquitos/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Ropa de Protección/estadística & datos numéricos , Puerto Rico , Medición de Riesgo , Abstinencia Sexual/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
6.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 23(1): 74-82, 2017 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27805547

RESUMEN

We modeled the potential cost-effectiveness of increasing access to contraception in Puerto Rico during a Zika virus outbreak. The intervention is projected to cost an additional $33.5 million in family planning services and is likely to be cost-saving for the healthcare system overall. It could reduce Zika virus-related costs by $65.2 million ($2.8 million from less Zika virus testing and monitoring and $62.3 million from avoided costs of Zika virus-associated microcephaly [ZAM]). The estimates are influenced by the contraception methods used, the frequency of ZAM, and the lifetime incremental cost of ZAM. Accounting for unwanted pregnancies that are prevented, irrespective of Zika virus infection, an additional $40.4 million in medical costs would be avoided through the intervention. Increasing contraceptive access for women who want to delay or avoid pregnancy in Puerto Rico during a Zika virus outbreak can substantially reduce the number of cases of ZAM and healthcare costs.


Asunto(s)
Anticoncepción/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Brotes de Enfermedades , Microcefalia/prevención & control , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Infección por el Virus Zika/prevención & control , Adulto , Anticoncepción/métodos , Árboles de Decisión , Femenino , Predicción , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Microcefalia/economía , Microcefalia/epidemiología , Microcefalia/virología , Vigilancia de la Población , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/economía , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/virología , Puerto Rico/epidemiología , Virus Zika/patogenicidad , Virus Zika/fisiología , Infección por el Virus Zika/economía , Infección por el Virus Zika/epidemiología , Infección por el Virus Zika/virología
7.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 215(6): 772.e1-772.e6, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27565048

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Perinatal regionalization is a system of maternal and neonatal risk-appropriate health care delivery in which resources are ideally allocated for mothers and newborns during pregnancy, labor and delivery, and postpartum, in order to deliver appropriate care. Typically, perinatal risk-appropriate care is provided in-person, but with the advancement of technologies, the opportunity to provide care remotely has emerged. Telemedicine provides distance-based care to patients by consultation, diagnosis, and treatment in rural or remote US jurisdictions (states and territories). OBJECTIVE: We sought to summarize the telemedicine policies of states and territories and assess if maternal and neonatal risk-appropriate care is specified. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a 2014 systematic World Wide Web-based review of publicly available rules, statutes, regulations, laws, planning documents, and program descriptions among US jurisdictions (N = 59) on telemedicine care. Policies including language on the topics of consultation, diagnosis, or treatment, and those specific to maternal and neonatal risk-appropriate care were categorized for analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 36 jurisdictions (32 states; 3 territories; and District of Columbia) (61%) had telemedicine policies with language referencing consultation, diagnosis, or treatment; 29 (49%) referenced consultation, 30 (51%) referenced diagnosis, and 35 (59%) referenced treatment. In all, 26 jurisdictions (22 states; 3 territories; and District of Columbia) (44%), referenced all topics. Only 3 jurisdictions (3 states; 0 territories) (5%), had policy language specifically addressing perinatal care. CONCLUSION: The majority of states have published telemedicine policies, but few specify policy language for perinatal risk-appropriate care. By ensuring that language specific to the perinatal population is included in telemedicine policies, access to maternal and neonatal care can be increased in rural, remote, and resource-challenged jurisdictions.


Asunto(s)
Política de Salud , Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/legislación & jurisprudencia , Obstetricia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Atención Perinatal/legislación & jurisprudencia , Telemedicina/legislación & jurisprudencia , Samoa Americana , Servicios Centralizados de Hospital , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Micronesia , Embarazo , Puerto Rico , Derivación y Consulta , Medición de Riesgo , Estados Unidos , Islas Virgenes de los Estados Unidos
8.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 65(12): 311-4, 2016 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27031817

RESUMEN

Zika virus is a flavivirus transmitted primarily by Aedes species mosquitoes. Increasing evidence links Zika virus infection during pregnancy to adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes, including pregnancy loss, intrauterine growth restriction, eye defects, congenital brain abnormalities, and other fetal abnormalities. The virus has also been determined to be sexually transmitted. Because of the potential risks associated with Zika virus infection during pregnancy, CDC has recommended that health care providers discuss prevention of unintended pregnancy with women and couples who reside in areas of active Zika virus transmission and do not want to become pregnant. However, limitations in access to contraception in some of these areas might affect the ability to prevent an unintended pregnancy. As of March 16, 2016, the highest number of Zika virus disease cases in the United States and U.S. territories were reported from Puerto Rico. The number of cases will likely rise with increasing mosquito activity in affected areas, resulting in increased risk for transmission to pregnant women. High rates of unintended and adolescent pregnancies in Puerto Rico suggest that, in the context of this outbreak, access to contraception might need to be improved. CDC estimates that 138,000 women of reproductive age (aged 15-44 years) in Puerto Rico do not desire pregnancy and are not using one of the most effective or moderately effective contraceptive methods, and therefore might experience an unintended pregnancy. CDC and other federal and local partners are seeking to expand access to contraception for these persons. Such efforts have the potential to increase contraceptive access and use, reduce unintended pregnancies, and lead to fewer adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes associated with Zika virus infection during pregnancy. The assessment of challenges and resources related to contraceptive access in Puerto Rico might be a useful model for other areas with active transmission of Zika virus.


Asunto(s)
Anticoncepción/estadística & datos numéricos , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Evaluación de Necesidades , Infección por el Virus Zika/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Puerto Rico/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Infección por el Virus Zika/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA