Through-the-scope esophageal stent for the relief of malignant dysphagia: Results of a multicentric study (with video).

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In presence of malignant dysphagia, in patients unfit for surgery, the placement of a self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) represents a safe and effective palliative treatment. Esophageal stents (ES) present an over-the-wire mechanism where the stent is deployed under X-ray control. Recently a through-the-scope (TTS) ES was launched. The aim of our retrospective study is to assess the technical and clinical success of the new TTS-ES. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with malignant dysphagia caused by esophageal cancer or ab-extrinsic compression, who underwent TTS esophageal stent in six Italian endoscopic referral centers, were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were enrolled. TTS stent placement was successful in 39/40 patients (97.5%). 31 patients had an Ogilvie score of 4, nine an Ogilvie 3. After 2 weeks from stent placement 29 reported Ogilvie score of 0, eight a score of 1. None of the patients developed retrosternal pain requiring drugs. No patient experienced perforation, bleeding or migration. A total of seven patients (18%) developed dysphagia as late adverse event (AE). CONCLUSION: Through-the-scope ES presented less AEs, in terms of bleeding and perforation, if compared to the previous published data. An anti-migration system could be helpful, especially when the stent is placed for "ab-extrinseco" malignant dysphagia.

Bowel Preparation for Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Procedures With Sodium Picosulphate-Magnesium Citrate Is an Effective, Safe, and Well-Tolerated Option in Pediatric Patients: A Single-Center Experience.

To obtain optimal visualization of the colonic mucosa during gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures, an adequate bowel preparation is mandatory, but a standardized protocol is still lacking for pediatric patients. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is currently the most used laxative, but the amount of liquid to be taken orally is a large volume for the pediatric population and it may not be well tolerated. The aim of our preliminary trial was to evaluate efficacy, tolerability, and safety of sodium picosulphate-magnesium citrate (SPMC) used as bowel preparation before colonoscopy in children. Fifty children who needed a colonoscopy were prospectively enrolled between April and December 2013 and SPMC was administered to them as bowel preparation. A questionnaire about the product tolerance was completed by the patients' parents. The grade of bowel preparation and any related side effect were evaluated. The mean value of the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale was 7, out of a maximum of 9. Only 5 patients had an inadequate bowel preparation. Seventy percent of the patients considered the taste of the preparation very palatable. The remaining 26% considered it not palatable or not palatable at all. During the preparation, 18% of children complained of nausea, 20% abdominal pain, 2% vomiting, and 2% manifested headache. Bowel preparation with SPMC offers an efficient alternative to PEG and allows, on equal terms of efficacy, tolerability and safety, a much lower amount of laxative to ingest, and remarkable quality, especially in infants and toddlers.

Cost analysis of laparoendoscopic rendezvous versus preoperative ERCP and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis.

BACKGROUND: Evidence from controlled trials and meta-analyses suggests that laparoendoscopic rendezvous (LERV) is preferable to sequential treatment in the management of common bile duct stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With this retrospective analysis of a prospective database that included consecutive patients treated for cholecystocholedocholithiasis at our institution between January 2007 and July 2015, we compared LERV with sequential treatment. The primary endpoint was global cost, defined as the cost/patient/hospital stay, and the secondary end points were efficacy and morbidity. Fisher's exact test or Mann-Whitney test was used. RESULTS: Of a total of 249 consecutive patients, 143 underwent LERV (group A) and 106 a two-stage procedure (group B). Based on an average cost of €613 for 1 day of hospital stay in the General Surgery Department, the overall median cost of treatment was €6403 for group A and €8194 for group B (p < 0.001). Operative time was significantly shorter (p < 0.001), and length of hospital stay was significantly longer for group B (p < 0.001). No mortality in either group was observed. The postoperative complications rate was significantly higher in group B than in group A (24.5 vs. 10.5%; p = 0.003). No significant difference in the postoperative pancreatitis rate or the number of patients with increased serum amylase at 24 h was observed in either group. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that LERV is preferable to sequential treatment not only in terms of less morbidity, but also of lower costs accrued by a shorter hospital stay. However, the longer operative time raises multiple organizational issues in the coordination of surgery and endoscopy services.

Fontan circulation causes early, severe liver damage. Should we offer patients a tailored strategy?

BACKGROUND: In patients with Fontan circulation, the liver is profoundly affected by chronic venous stasis. Little is known about early hepatic changes in this population. METHODS: We performed echocardiography, abdominal ultrasound, liver elastography, cardiac catheterization, esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy and calculated MELD-XI score in 64 Fontan patients (69% minors), at an interval of 1-15years since Fontan. RESULTS: Cardiac output remained stable in the first 5years after Fontan, then significantly decreased (r=-0.45, p(r=0)=0.003). NYHA class significantly increased after Fontan. Patients in NYHA class II/III (n=21, 14 minors) had significantly higher hepatic pressures, but normal ventricular function and pulmonary vascular resistances (PVR). Patients with pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) ≥15mmHg (n=12, 6 minors) and those with PVR≥2WU*m(2) (n=27, 25 minors), had higher hepatic pressures (p<0.0001), a higher incidence of liver collaterals and/or esophageal varices (p<0.0001) and splenomegaly (p<0.02). Liver stiffness (LS) was elevated in most patients (median, 25th-75th percentile:17.3KPa, 14.1-21.4). It rapidly increased during the first 5-years after Fontan, compared to the following 5-years (from 12.2KPa, 9.8-14.1 to 17.5KPa, 14.3-24.5, p=0.007), then remained stable (19.1KPa, 16.9-22.6, p=0.60). MELD-XI score increased linearly with the time interval since Fontan (r=0.31, p(r=0)=0.01). For patients above 12years we found a linear correlation between LS and MELD-XI score in the 6-15years period after Fontan (r=0.40. p(r=0)=0.04). The overall incidence of established liver cirrhosis was 22%. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study showing that Fontan circulation prompts early, progressive and eventually irreversible liver damage. Precautions should be taken immediately after Fontan, to protect this fragile population.

Gastrostomy Intraperitoneal Bumper Migration in a Three-Year-Old Child: A Rare Complication following Gastrostomy Tube Replacement.

Feeding gastrostomy is used worldwide for adults and children with feeding impairment to obtain long-term enteral nutrition. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion is considered the gold standard, but after the first months requires gastrostomy tube replacement with a low-profile button. The replacement is known as an easy procedure, but several minor and major complications may occur during and after the manoeuvre. We describe intraperitoneal bumper migration in a 3-year-old boy, a rare complication following gastrostomy tube replacement, and we discuss the recent literature regarding similar cases.

Safety of propofol in cirrhotic patients undergoing colonoscopy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography: results of a prospective controlled study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Safety of propofol sedation in patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing colonoscopy or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) remains to be studied. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the use of propofol is safe for endoscopic procedures more complex than gastroscopy in patients with liver cirrhosis in a prospective controlled study. METHODS: Two hundred and fourteen consecutive patients, with or without cirrhosis, who underwent colonoscopy or ERCP with propofol sedation were recruited between January and June 2009. Administration of sedation was performed by anesthesiologists and outcome measures were recorded. Main outcomes were complication rates and recovery times. RESULTS: Sixty-one (28.5%) cirrhotic patients and 153 (71.5%) noncirrhotic patients were included. The incidence of sedation-related complications did not significantly differ between the two populations (11.5 vs. 17.0%, respectively, P=0.31). The mean (±SD) dose of propofol administered (213±86 vs. 239±100 mg, P=0.07), the mean time to achieve adequate sedation (3.3±1.1 vs. 3.0±1.2 min, P=0.21), the mean total duration of the endoscopic procedure (24.5±10.6 vs. 27.4±11.8 min, P=0.08), the mean time to reach Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation Scale 5 (17.2±4.4 vs. 18.4±5.6 min, P=0.15), the mean time from completion of the procedure to release (9.0±2.5 vs. 9.1±3.2 min, P=0.86), and the mean time to full recovery (42.2±7.3 vs. 42.3±7.8 min, P=0.88) were very similar between the two groups. The limitation of this study was lack of randomization, and a control group of cirrhotic patients using standard sedation with benzodiazepines and opioids. CONCLUSION: Propofol deep sedation administered by an anesthesiologist with appropriate monitorings seems to be a safe procedure during colonoscopy or ERCP in cirrhotic patients.

Safety and efficacy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with post-liver transplant biliary complications: results of a cohort study with long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the standard approach for the management of biliary complications in liver transplant patients; however, its safety and efficacy have not been established in this setting. This study was performed to evaluate the safety and long-term efficacy of ERCP in transplant patients. METHODS: The case reports of 1,500 liver transplant patients were reviewed. Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) patients were matched 1:2 with non-OLT patients and followed-up for long-term outcome (median, 7.4 years). RESULTS: Of the 1,500 liver transplant patients, 94 (6.3%) underwent 150 ERCPs after OLT. Anastomotic strictures were present in 45 patients, biliary stones in 24, biliary leaks in 7, papillary stenosis in 2, and primary sclerosing cholangitis in 1. An ERCP success rate of 90.7% was achieved; biliary stenting led to resolution of the bile leak in 7/7 (100%) patients, and biliary stones were removed in 21/24 (87.5%) patients. In addition, 34 of 45 patients with anastomotic stricture underwent endoscopic dilation. We obtained complete resolution in 22/34 (64.7%) patients. OLT patients did not show a higher probability of complications (odds ratio [OR], 1.04), of pancreatitis (OR, 0.80) or of bleeding (OR, 1.34). CONCLUSIONS: ERCP is safe and effective for the treatment of post-OLT biliary complications, has a low rate of pancreatitis and results in a durable effect.

Digestive endoscopy is not a major risk factor for transmitting hepatitis C virus.

BACKGROUND: The potential role of digestive endoscopy as a mode for transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is controversial. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of digestive endoscopy in transmitting HCV by comparing the incidence of HCV infection in a cohort of patients undergoing endoscopy and in a cohort of blood donors. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: 3 endoscopic units and 2 blood banks in northwestern Italy. PATIENTS: The potentially exposed cohort consisted of 9188 outpatients consecutively recruited from 3 endoscopic units. Of 9008 patients negative for antibody to HCV (anti-HCV), 8260 (92%) were retested for anti-HCV 6 months after endoscopy. The unexposed cohort consisted of 51,230 healthy, anti-HCV-negative persons who donated blood at 2 blood banks in the same area and during the same time period; 38,280 of them (75%) were tested again for anti-HCV 6 to 48 months after the first blood donation (95,317 person-years of observation). MEASUREMENTS: Differences in the anti-HCV seroconversion rate between the exposed cohort (patients undergoing endoscopy) and the unexposed cohort (blood donors). Seroconversion was evaluated by a third-generation enzyme immunoassay for anti-HCV; persons positive for anti-HCV were tested for HCV RNA by polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: All 8260 persons undergoing endoscopy remained negative for anti-HCV 6 months after the procedure (risk per 1000 persons, 0 [95% CI, 0 to 0.465]); in particular, none of the 912 patients who underwent endoscopy with the same instrument previously used on HCV carriers showed anti-HCV seroconversion (risk per 1000 persons, 0 [CI, 0 to 4.195]). Four blood donors became positive for anti-HCV and HCV RNA (mean follow-up, 2.49 years; 0.042 case per 1000 person-years [CI, 0.011 to 0.107 case per 1000 person-years]); each had undergone minor surgery before the second test. LIMITATIONS: In the endoscopy cohort, 8.3% of patients were lost to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the hypothesis that properly performed digestive endoscopy is not a major risk factor for the transmission of HCV.

Effects of long-term Irbesartan in reducing portal pressure in cirrhotic patients: comparison with propranolol in a randomised controlled study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The role of angiotensin II (AT-II) type I receptor antagonists in the treatment of portal hypertension remains controversial. We tested the efficacy of Irbesartan (Irb) vs. Propranolol (Pro) in reducing portal pressure and evaluated its systemic haemodynamic effects. METHODS: Thirty-four patients were randomly assigned to receive either Irb 300 mg/day (19 patients) or Pro 40-120 mg/day (15 patients) for 2 months. RESULTS: Irb was discontinued in five patients (26%). No major side effect occurred in the Pro group. On an average, the portal pressure gradient decreased significantly more in the Pro than in the Irb group (median -19.5%, range -11/-31% vs. -4.8%, +2.5/-10%, P<0.001). A clinically significant decrease was seen in one (7%) of the patients given Irb vs. five (33%) given Pro (P<0.02). The fall in mean arterial pressure was significantly higher with Irb than with Pro (median -29%, range -15/-45% vs. -4.9%, +8/-19%, P<0.02). Irb significantly modified the blood creatinine clearance (median -29 ml/m, range +9/-61 ml/m, -30, -24/-35% P<0.0001 vs. basal). CONCLUSIONS: Irb offers no advantage over Pro in the control of portal hypertension. Moreover, its therapeutic profile is limited by important side effects.

Renal failure in cirrhotic patients: role of terlipressin in clinical approach to hepatorenal syndrome type 2.

OBJECTIVES: Renal failure secondary to hepatorenal syndrome or to organic renal disease occurs frequently in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension. The present prospective study investigates the usefulness of terlipressin in both the diagnostic and the therapeutic approach to cirrhotics with renal failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients were studied: 11 with hepatorenal syndrome type 2 (group 1) and five with organic renal disease (group 2). All received terlipressin (1 mg/4 h intravenously) for 7 days. Subsequently, 12 patients (nine from group 1 and three from group 2) underwent a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. RESULTS: Terlipressin significantly improved renal function (serum creatinine, 1.8 +/- 0.8 versus 2.4 +/- 0.9 mg/dl; blood creatinine clearance, 53 +/- 8 versus 21.3 +/- 8.7 ml/min; P < 0.05) in group 1 [8/11 patients (73%) versus 1/5 (20%) of group 2; P < 0.05]. The only patient in group 2 who responded to terlipressin had a mixed renal dysfunction. Renal function improved significantly after transjugular portosystemic shunt in all patients who responded to terlipressin. CONCLUSIONS: Terlipressin administration significantly improves renal function in cirrhotic patients with hepatorenal syndrome type 2 but not in organic kidney failure. By providing the critical information that a patient's kidney function is (or is not) reversible, a trial with terlipressin may be useful when selecting cirrhotic patients with renal failure as candidates for a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt or liver transplantation.

Efficacy of irbesartan, a receptor selective antagonist of angiotensin II, in reducing portal hypertension.

The use of angiotensin II antagonists in the treatment of portal hypertension remains controversial. Our aims were to assess the effect of Irbesartan on portal pressure and to evaluate its safety in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension. Twenty-five cirrhotic patients were treated in a pilot study with Irbesartan 300 mg orally once daily for 60 days. Hemodynamic evaluations and biochemical tests were performed before therapy and after two months of treatment. Three patients (12%) discontinued treatment for symptomatic arterial hypotension (mean arterial pressure -26.% +/- 3.1 versus basal). In the 18 responders, the hepatic venous pressure gradient diminished by a mean of 18.1% +/- 10.5 from baseline (p = 0.02); the gradient decreased by 20% or more in only 5 patients (23%). The mean arterial pressure decreased significantly during therapy (92 +/- 7 vs 109 +/- 25 mm Hg, P < 0.001). In conclusions, Irbesartan induced a marginal reduction in portal pressure and its safety was limited by the pronounced effects on arterial pressure.