Incomes to Outcomes: A Global Assessment of Disparities in Cleft and Craniofacial Treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Recent investigations focused on health equity have enumerated widespread disparities in cleft and craniofacial care. This review introduces a structured framework to aggregate findings and direct future research. DESIGN: Systematic review was performed to identify studies assessing health disparities based on race/ethnicity, payor type, income, geography, and education in cleft and craniofacial surgery in high-income countries (HICs) and low/middle-income countries (LMICs). Case reports and systematic reviews were excluded. Meta-analysis was conducted using fixed-effect models for disparities described in three or more studies. SETTING: N/A. PATIENTS: Patients with cleft lip/palate, craniosynostosis, craniofacial syndromes, and craniofacial trauma. INTERVENTIONS: N/A. RESULTS: One hundred forty-seven articles were included (80% cleft, 20% craniofacial; 48% HIC-based). Studies in HICs predominantly described disparities (77%,) and in LMICs focused on reducing disparities (42%). Level II-IV evidence replicated delays in cleft repair, alveolar bone grafting, and cranial vault remodeling for non-White and publicly insured patients in HICs (Grades A-B). Grade B-D evidence from LMICs suggested efficacy of community-based speech therapy and remote patient navigation programs. Meta-analysis demonstrated that Black patients underwent craniosynostosis surgery 2.8 months later than White patients (P < .001) and were less likely to undergo minimally-invasive surgery (OR 0.36, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Delays in cleft and craniofacial surgical treatment are consistently identified with high-level evidence among non-White and publicly-insured families in HICs. Multiple tactics to facilitate patient access and adapt multi-disciplinary case in austere settings are reported from LMICs. Future efforts including those sharing tactics among HICs and LMICs hold promise to help mitigate barriers to care.

A critical eye on metopic craniosynostosis: A retrospective study assessing orbital dysmorphology as a marker of disease.

This investigation sought to ascertain whether orbital morphology could predict genuine metopic craniosynostosis (MCS). The study retrospectively analyzed preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) scans of patients who underwent surgical correction for MCS. MCS severity was evaluated using the interfrontal angle (IFA). Orbital dysmorphology was assessed based on multiple angles, including supraorbital notches and nasion (SNS), infraorbital foramina and nasion (INI), zygomaticofrontal suture-supraorbital notch-dacryon (ZSD), and orbital long axis (OLA). Results were juxtaposed against age/gender-matched controls and individuals with non-synostotic metopic ridge (MR). The study included 177 patients: 68 MCS, 35 MR, and 74 control subjects. All orbital measurements exhibited significant differences across groups. IFA demonstrated a strong association with all orbital measurements, particularly SNS (B = 0.79, p < 0.001). SNS showed the highest area under the curve among orbital measurements (0.89). Using a 95% sensitivity threshold, the optimal diagnostic angle for SNS was 129.23° (specificity 54%, sensitivity 96%). These findings suggest a correlation between orbital dysmorphology and trigonocephaly severity. The observed dysmorphology manifested in a superomedially accentuated rotational pattern. Importantly, SNS angle predicted MCS, with an angle greater than 130° indicating <5% likelihood of MCS diagnosis. The simplicity of measuring SNS angle on any 3D-CT scan highlights its practical use for assisting with MCS diagnosis.

Validating the Supraorbital Notch-Nasion-Supraorbital Notch Angle as a Marker for Metopic Craniosynostosis Severity.

OBJECTIVE: Metopic craniosynostosis (MCS) can be difficult to differentiate from metopic ridge (MR) or normal frontal morphology. This study assess whether the supraorbital notch-nasion-supraorbital notch (SNS) angle can help identify MCS. METHODS: Records of 212 patients with preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography scans were examined. The SNS angles, surgeon craniofacial dysmorphology rankings, and CranioRate metopic severity scores (MSSs) were compared with the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with Youden J-statistic and cross-validation of regression models assessed the ability of these measures to predict surgery. RESULTS: A total of 212 patients were included, consisting of 78 MCS, 37 MR, and 97 controls. Both the mean SNS angle (MCS: 111.7 ± 10.7 degrees, MR: 126.0 ± 8.2 degrees, controls: 130.7 ± 8.8 degrees P < 0.001) and MSS (MCS: 5.9 ± 2.0, MR: 1.4 ± 1.9, controls: 0.2 ± 1.9, P < 0.001) were different among the cohorts. The mean SNS angle (111.5 ± 10.7 versus 129.1 ± 8.8, P < 0.001) was lower in those who had surgery and CranioRate score (5.9 ± 2.1 versus 0.8 ± 2.2, P < 0.001) was higher in those who underwent surgery. SNS angles were positively correlated with surgeon craniofacial dysmorphology rankings ( r = 0.41, P < 0.05) and CranioRate MSS ( r = 0.54, P < 0.05). The ROC curve requiring high sensitivity revealed an SNS angle of 124.8 degrees predicted surgery with a sensitivity of 88.7% and a specificity of 71.3%. A ROC curve using the CranioRate MCC values ≥3.19 predicted surgery with 88.7% sensitivity and 94.7% specificity. CONCLUSION: Orbital dysmorphology in patients with MCS is well captured by the supraorbital-nasion angle. Both the SNS angle and CranioRate MSS scores accurately predict surgical intervention.

Orthognathic Considerations of Maxillary and Mandibular Asymmetry at Skeletal Maturity in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate.

BACKGROUND: Improving occlusion and aesthetics is the primary objective of orthognathic surgery for patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP). However, these patients often suffer from horizontal, vertical, and rotational asymmetry in addition to maxillary retrusion. This study aims to describe maxillary and mandibular asymmetry in patients with CLP undergoing orthognathic surgery and analyze its anatomic basis. METHODS: Patients with isolated CLP undergoing CT imaging prior to orthognathic surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Maxillary and mandibular positioning and dimensional symmetry were evaluated. Incidence of clinically significant asymmetry, correlations between areas of asymmetry, and associations with clinical history were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients, with mean age 17 years were analyzed, including 32 patients with unilateral CLP and 26 with bilateral CLP. Twenty (34%) patients demonstrated chin deviation ≥4mm and 21 (36%) had a ≥5% discrepancy in mandibular ramus lengths. Horizontal occlusal plane cant of ≥2° was seen in 20 (34%) maxillae and 28 (48%) mandibles, with dental arch yaw ≥2° noted in 32 (55%) of both maxillae and mandibles. Chin deviation correlated with maxillary cant, discrepancy in ramus length, discrepancy in mandibular body length, and discrepancy in condylar volume (p<0.05). Bilateral and unilateral CLP did not show significantly different asymmetry on any measure (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both maxillary and mandibular asymmetry is common in skeletally mature patients with CLP and frequently results in notable chin deviation. Preoperative three-dimensional imaging and virtual surgical planning of orthognathic surgery aid in recognition of facial asymmetries and reveal opportunities to optimize results in this population.

Sociodemographic Factors Predict Long-Term Attrition from Multidisciplinary Cleft Clinic.

OBJECTIVE: Identify and describe factors associated with retention and attrition of patients during longitudinal follow-up at multidisciplinary cleft clinic. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single, tertiary care center. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: Patients born between 1995 and 2007 with a diagnosis of cleft palate with or without cleft lip attending multidisciplinary cleft clinic. INTERVENTIONS: None tested, observational study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Age at last clinical appointment with a multidisciplinary cleft team provider. Attrition was defined as absence of an outpatient appointment following 15 years of age. RESULTS: Six hundred seventy-eight patients were included. The average age at last appointment across the entire cohort was 13.1 years (IQR 6.6-17.2). Patients who were Black (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.10-2.32, p = 0.014) and other races (HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.22-2.98, p = 0.004) were more likely to be lost to follow-up compared to white patients. Publicly insured patients were more likely to experience attrition than those who were privately insured (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.03-1.65, p = 0.030). Estimated income was not significantly associated with length of follow-up (p = 0.259). Those whose residence was in the fourth quartile of driving distance from our center experienced loss to follow-up significantly more than those who lived the closest (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.50-2.78, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is a high degree of follow-up attrition among patients with cleft lip and palate. Race, insurance status, and driving distance to our center were associated with attrition in a large, retrospective cohort of patients who have reached the age of cleft clinic graduation.

Psychosocial Status and Self-Perception in Patients with Cleft Lip and/or Palate.

OBJECTIVE: To describe how the psychosocial status of patients with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) relates to patient-reported outcomes (PROs). DESIGN: Cross-sectional retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary care pediatric hospital. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 8 to 29 years attending cleft team evaluations during a 1-year period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: CLEFT-Q. RESULTS: Patients (N = 158) with isolated or syndromic CL/P and mean age 13.4 ± 3.0 years were included. Fifteen (9%) patients had siblings who also had CL/P. Of 104 patients who met with the team psychologist, psychosocial concerns were identified in 49 (47%) patients, including 25 (24%) with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder or behavior concerns, 28 (27%) with anxiety, and 14 (13%) with depression or mood concerns. Younger age and having siblings with cleft were associated with better PROs, while psychosocial concerns were associated with worse PROs on Speech, Psychosocial, and Face Appearance scales. CONCLUSIONS: Patient perception of cleft outcomes is linked to psychosocial factors.

Putting our heads together: The future of craniopagus twin separation.

Computer-assisted design and computer-assisted modeling (CAD/CAM), virtual surgical planning (VSP) and augmented/virtual reality (AR/VR) aid our ability to plan and perform complex craniofacial procedures. This study seeks to define the role of the aforementioned techniques in the separation of craniopagus conjoined twins. Six teams were identified who had successfully performed craniopagus twin separation with the use of CAD/CAM, VSP and/or AR/VR. Surgeons involved in separating craniopagus twins have increasingly utilized tools such as CAD/CAM models, VSP and AR/VR to plan and execute successful separation, and these tools are associated with higher success rates than historical controls.

Long-Term Orbito-ocular Outcomes Following LeFort III and Monobloc Distraction Osteogenesis in Patients with Syndromic Craniosynostosis.

INTRODUCTION: Exorbitism in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis is often managed by LeFort III (LF3) or Monobloc (MB) distraction osteogenesis (DO). This study compared short- and long-term orbital craniometrics after LF3DO/MBDO and related these findings to symptom relief. METHODS: Patients undergoing LF3DO or MBDO from 2000-2021 with pre- and postoperative imaging were included. Postoperative CTs were categorized as early (<1 year) or late (>1 year), and age-matched control CTs were compared to late postoperative scans. Superior/inferior orbital rim position, relative globe position, and orbital volume were analyzed. Symptoms were assessed by a patient-reported outcome (PRO) analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (16 LF3DO, 18 MBDO) were matched by age at surgery, sex, syndrome, and age at imaging. Time to late CT was 6.2 years (LF3DO) and 7.5 years (MBDO). Between early and late postoperative time points, LF3DO patients experienced no change in inferior rim position. MBDO patients experienced a decrease in inferior orbital rim position of 4.7mm (p=0.005), but superior orbital rim distance remained stable. Comparison of late scans and age-matched controls revealed no difference in inferior or superior orbital rim position in LF3DO patients, but the superior orbital rim distance was longer in MBDO patients (p=0.015). PRO response rate was 76% with a median follow up of 13.7 years. Most (81%) symptomatic patients improved, 19% remained symptomatic, and no patients worsened. CONCLUSIONS: LF3DO and MBDO achieved stable orbital craniometric changes, with improved stability at the inferior orbital rim after LF3DO. Craniometric changes were associated with long-term exorbitism symptom relief.

Predisposing Factors for Postoperative Complications in the Year Following Fronto-Orbital Advancement and Remodeling: A Single Institution Study of 267 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling (FOAR) is a common surgical approach used for craniosynostosis conferring functional and aesthetic benefit. There are few reports examining predisposing factors for postoperative complications within the first year after surgery. This study aimed to establish complication rates and identify risk factors for inferior outcomes in a large population of patients undergoing FOAR. METHODS: All patients who underwent fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling from 2013-2022 at our institution were retrospectively studied. Perioperative and postoperative data were collected to yield outcomes analyses. Multivariable logistic regression with backwards selection was performed to identify predictors of postoperative complications. RESULTS: 267 patients underwent FOAR. The overall complication rate was 14.2%, most commonly delayed wound healing (7.4%), postoperative blood transfusion (5.8%), and infection requiring readmission (1.9%). Tense closure independently predicted delayed wound healing (p<0.001) and infection requiring readmission (p=0.03). Syndromic patients were more likely than non-syndromic children to have undergone prior craniofacial surgery (45.3% vs 23.8%, p=0.003). Syndromic status and prior craniofacial surgery were associated with increased risk of developing infection requiring readmission (p=0.012 and p=0.004, respectively). A greater proportion of malnourished patients experienced postoperative complications compared to patients without malnourishment (24.4% vs 12.1%, p=0.031), though there were no significant differences in individual postoperative outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Identified risk factors for complications included syndromic status, tense closure, and prior craniofacial surgery. Most complications were managed nonoperatively. These factors may be considered in preoperative planning and when counseling patient families.