Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
GE Port J Gastroenterol ; 31(4): 262-272, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39114325

RESUMEN

Introduction: We aimed to characterize the initial healthcare journey of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) patients in Portugal, including healthcare provision and factors affecting therapeutic decisions, namely BRCA mutations testing. Methods: This is a descriptive cross-sectional, web-based survey using a convenience sampling approach. Portuguese oncologists and pathologists that routinely work with mPDAC patients from the different geographical regions and settings were invited to participate in the study via email (December 2020). Descriptive statistical analyses were performed, with categorical variables reported as absolute and relative frequencies, and continuous variables with non-normal distribution as median and interquartile range (IQR) (Stata v.15.0). Results: Seventy physicians participated in the study (43 oncologists, 27 pathologists). According to the responses, a median of 28 patients per center (IQR 12-70) was diagnosed with PDAC in the previous year; 22 of them referring (IQR 8-70) to mPDAC. The pointed median time from patients' first hospital admission until disease diagnosis/staging is between 2 and 4 weeks. Endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle biopsy is available in most hospitals (86%). Around 50% of physicians request BRCA testing; the assessment of additional biomarkers besides BRCA is requested by 40% of professionals. Half of them stated that BRCA testing should be requested earlier-upon histological diagnosis, especially because the median time for results is of 4.0 weeks (IQR 4-8). PARP inhibitors such as olaparib, when available, would be the therapy of choice for most oncologists (71%) if no disease' progression occurs after 4 months. Treatments' selection is usually grounded on clinical criteria (e.g., performance status, liver function). Around 45% of patients use FOLFIRINOX/mFOLFIRINOX as the first-line therapy. Gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel is used by 35% of patients as the second-line therapy. Conclusions: Physicians in Portugal support the increasing role of patient-tailored treatments in mPDAC, whose selection should be grounded on tumoral subtyping and molecular profiling. Further efforts to develop multidisciplinary teams, standardized clinical practice, and optimize the implementation of new target therapies are needed.


Introdução: Este estudo teve como objetivo caracterizar o percurso inicial dos doentes com adenocarcinoma ductal pancreático metastático (ACDPm) em Portugal, incluindo a prestação de cuidados de saúde e determinação de fatores que afetam as decisões terapêuticas, nomeadamente o teste de mutações BRCA. Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo descritivo transversal (web-based) usando uma abordagem de amostragem por conveniência. Médicos oncologistas e anatomopatologistas portugueses dedicados ao ACDPm e de diferentes regiões geográficas e instituições foram convidados a participar do estudo por email (Dez-2020). Foram realizadas análises estatísticas descritivas, com variáveis categóricas relatadas como frequências absolutas e relativas, e variáveis contínuas com distribuição não-normal como mediana e intervalo interquartil (IIQ) (Stata v.15.0). Resultados: Setenta médicos participaram do estudo (43 oncologistas, 27 patologistas). De acordo com as respostas, uma mediana de 28 doentes por centro (IIQ 12­70) foi diagnosticada com ACDP no ano anterior; 22 deles (IIQ 8­70) referentes a ACDPm. O tempo médio desde a primeira admissão hospitalar dos doentes até o diagnóstico/estadiamento da doença foi entre 2­4 semanas. A ultrassonografia endoscópica com biópsia por agulha fina é realizada pela maioria dos hospitais (86%). Aproximadamente 50% dos médicos referem solicitar o teste BRCA; a avaliação de biomarcadores adicionais além do BRCA é solicitada por 40% dos profissionais. Metade dos médicos assume que o teste BRCA deveria ser solicitado mais precocemente ­ durante o diagnóstico histológico, principalmente porque o tempo médio para obtenção do resultado é de 4,0 semanas (IIQ 4­8). Os inibidores PARP, como o olaparibe, quando disponíveis, seriam a terapia de escolha para a maioria dos oncologistas (71%) caso não haja progressão da doença após quatro meses. A seleção dos tratamentos é usualmente baseada em critérios clínicos (por exemplo, performance status, função hepática). Em cerca de 45% dos doentes é utilizado FOLFIRINOX/mFOLFIRINOX como terapia de primeira linha. Um esquema com Gemcitabina + nab-paclitaxel é usado em 35% dos doentes como terapia de segunda linha. Conclusões: Os médicos em Portugal apoiam o papel crescente do tratamento individualizado no ACDPm, cuja seleção deve ser baseada na subtipagem tumoral e no perfil molecular. São necessários mais esforços para capacitar as equipas multidisciplinares, desenvolver práticas clínicas padronizadas e otimizar a implementação de novas terapias-alvo.

2.
Support Care Cancer ; 32(2): 133, 2024 Jan 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38280025

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Health literacy is a current Public Health priority in Portugal. The participation of well-informed patients in their care and shared decision making are essential, especially in chronic aggressive and debilitating pathologies such as recurrent or metastatic (R/M) Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC). AIMS: This study aimed to characterize R/M HNSCC patients' and caregivers' information needs identified by healthcare professionals (HCPs). METHODS: Two online Focus Groups, one with only medical doctors and the other with other HCPs involved in the treatment of R/M HNSCC patients, were conducted, using a modified Metaplan, Lean or adapted PDCA methodology. The discussions were audio recorded in full and content analysis was performed using ATLAS.ti qualitative data analysis software. RESULTS: Topics addressed were diagnosis, treatment, quality of life, and global evaluation. In general, all experts agreed that only essential information should be cautiously given, according to patients' and caregivers' wishes. It was consensual that patients are given the necessary information to adhere to treatment. Two main barriers were identified: one barrier was associated with verbal communication due to the lack of health literacy of these patients, and the other barrier regarded healthcare access. It was also considered important to remind patients of the daily and social activities that they could and should maintain, as well as providing sufficient social resources and problem-solving training to caregivers. CONCLUSIONS: This qualitative study highlights the complexity of R/M HNSCC patients' care. Immediate availability of psychologists and psychiatrists should be implemented in all centers that treat HNSCC patients. The differences found between the physicians' Focus Group and other HCPs' Focus Group in some of the addressed topics emphasize the importance of a multidisciplinary and holistic approach, in a biomedical model integrated with a biopsychosocial model.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Alfabetización en Salud , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello , Alfabetización en Salud/métodos , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/terapia , Grupo de Atención al Paciente
3.
Int J Oncol ; 59(6)2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34859257

RESUMEN

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal malignant tumor types, being the sixth leading cause of mortality worldwide and the fourth in Europe. Globally, it has a mortality/incidence ratio of 98%, and the 5­year survival rate in Europe is only 3%. Although risk factors, such as obesity, diabetes mellitus, smoking, alcohol consumption and genetic factors, have been identified, the causes of PDAC remain elusive. Additionally, the only curative treatment for PDAC is surgery with negative margins. However, upon diagnosis, ~30% of the patients already present with locally advanced disease. In these cases, a multidisciplinary approach is required to improve disease­related symptoms and prolong patient survival. In the present article, a comprehensive review of PDAC epidemiology, physiology and treatment is provided. Moreover, guidelines on patient treatment are suggested. Among the different available therapeutic options for the treatment of advanced PDAC, results are modest, most likely due to the complexity of the disease, and so the prognostic remains poor. Molecular approaches based on multi­omics research are promising and will contribute to groundbreaking personalized medicine. Thus, economic investment that promotes research of pancreatic cancer will be critical to the development of more efficient diagnostic and treatment strategies.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/terapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Medicina de Precisión/normas , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/secundario , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Factores de Riesgo
4.
Int J Pharm ; 570: 118646, 2019 Oct 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31465836

RESUMEN

Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, with half of patients developing metastasis within 5 years after curative treatment. Moreover, many patients cannot tolerate or complete systemic treatment due severe side-effects, reducing their effectiveness. Thus, targeted therapeutics are warranted to improve treatment outcomes and reduce toxicity. Herein, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles loaded with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and paclitaxel were surface-functionalized with a monoclonal antibody targeting sialyl-Lewis A (sLeA), a known glycan mediating hematogenous metastasis. Nanoparticles, ranging from 137 to 330 nm, enabled the controlled release of cytotoxic drugs at neutral and acid pH, supporting potential for intravenous and oral administration. Nanoencapsulation also reduced the initial toxicity of the drugs against gastric cells, suggesting it may constitute a safer administration vehicle. Furthermore, nanoparticle functionalization significantly enhanced targeting to sLeA cells in vitro and ex vivo (over 40% in comparison to non-targeted nanoparticles). In summary, a glycoengineered nano-vehicle was successfully developed to deliver 5-FU and paclitaxel therapeutic agents to metastatic gastric cancer cells. We anticipate that this may constitute an important milestone to establish improved targeted therapeutics against gastric cancer. Given the pancarcinomic nature of the sLeA antigen, the translation of this solution to other models may be also envisaged.


Asunto(s)
Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/química , Nanopartículas/administración & dosificación , Nanopartículas/química , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/química , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/química , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/química , Línea Celular Tumoral , Portadores de Fármacos/química , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos/métodos , Humanos , Tamaño de la Partícula , Copolímero de Ácido Poliláctico-Ácido Poliglicólico/química
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA