RESUMEN
Objetivo: identificar e avaliar o nível de conhecimento de agentes comunitários de saúde antes e após a realização de uma educação permanente em saúde sobre diabetes mellitus. Método: pesquisa quantitativa, analítica e prospectiva; realizada com agentes comunitários de saúde de uma Unidade Básica de Saúde em uma cidade do Triângulo Mineiro. Foram utilizados dois questionários: um contendo questões sociodemográficas e laborais e outro sobre a diabetes mellitus. Foram realizados três encontros com cada equipe, sendo o primeiro e terceiro para a coleta dos dados e o segundo para a realização da educação permanente. A análise dos dados foi realizada por meio de estatísticas descritivas e teste não paramétrico de Wilcoxon para comparar os dois momentos. Resultados: Participaram 15 agentes comunitários de saúde. De 18 questões, observou-se que no pré-teste, o número de acertos variou entre sete e 16, enquanto que no pós-teste variou entre 10 e 17. Nas comparações, houve um aumento de acertos tanto no questionário em geral quanto nas categorias: conceito, diagnóstico e complicações e prevenção. Conclusão: a intervenção proporcionou um aumento no nível de conhecimento sobre a temática aos agentes comunitários de saúde da unidade.
Objective: to identify and evaluate the level of knowledge of community health workers before and after carrying out a permanent health education on diabetes mellitus. Method: quantitative, analytical, and prospective research; carried out with community health agents from a Basic Health Unit in a city in the Triângulo Mineiro region. Two questionnaires were used; one containing sociodemographic and labor issues and the other about diabetes mellitus. Three meetings were held with each team, the first and third for data collection and the second for continuing education. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and the non-parametric Wilcoxon test to compare the two moments. Results: 15 community health agents participated. Of 18 questions, it was observed that in the pre-test, the number of correct answers varied between seven and 16, while in the post-test it varied between 10 and 17. In the comparisons, there was an increase in correct answers both in questionnaire in general and in the categories: concept, diagnosis and complications and prevention. Conclusion: the intervention provided an increase in the level of knowledge on the subject to the community health workers of the unit.
Objetivo: identificar y evaluar el nivel de conocimiento de los agentes comunitarios de salud antes y después de realizar una educación sanitaria permanente sobre la diabetes mellitus. Método: investigación cuantitativa, analítica y prospectiva; realizada con agentes comunitarios de salud de una Unidad Básica de Salud de una ciudad de la región del Triângulo Mineiro. Se utilizaron dos cuestionarios; uno con cuestiones sociodemográficas y laborales y otro sobre diabetes mellitus. Se realizaron tres reuniones con cada equipo, la primera y la tercera para la recogida de datos y la segunda para la formación continuada. El análisis de los datos se realizó mediante estadística descriptiva y la prueba no paramétrica de Wilcoxon para comparar los dos momentos. Resultados: Participaron 15 agentes comunitarios de salud. De 18 preguntas, se observó que en el pre- test, el número de respuestas correctas varió entre siete y 16, mientras que en el post-test varió entre 10 y 17. En las comparaciones, hubo un aumento de respuestas correctas tanto en el cuestionario en general como en las categorías: concepto, diagnóstico y complicaciones y prevención. Conclusión: la intervención proporcionó un aumento en el nivel de conocimiento sobre el tema a los agentes comunitarios de salud de la unidad.
RESUMEN
Background and Objectives: adverse events are a major public health problem. The purpose of the study was to characterize the main adverse events with harm reported in a teaching hospital in Minas Gerais. Methods: this is a retrospective cross-sectional descriptive study with quantitative approach, which assessed the reports on adverse events, carried out between January 2015 and December 2018. Pearson's chi-square test was applied in order to verify the association between categorical variables. Cramer's measure V was calculated to assess the degree of association between the respective variables. In the observation of statistically significant results, the Z test was applied to compare proportions with adjustments by the Bonferroni method. Results: a total of 445 adverse events were reported, being the highest number in 2018 (61.8%) involving "Abrasion and friction" process (44.7%), which correspond to grades 3 and 4 pressure injuries. Most adverse events were reported by the Emergency Unit (29.2%), and serious harm (7.6%) and deaths (1.3%) were more prevalent in this place. There was a statistically significant association between types of harm and types of incidents (p<0.001), types of harm (p<0.001) and years of occurrence, and also between the harm and the hospital sectors (p=0.003). Conclusion: adverse event reports back institutional risk management by strengthening the patient safety culture.(AU)
