RESUMEN
Study objective: We sought to evaluate the sex-based disparities and comparative in-hospital outcomes of principal AF hospitalizations in patients with and without dementia, which have not been well-studied. Design: This is a non-interventional retrospective cohort study. Setting and participants: We identified principal hospitalizations of AF in the National Inpatient Sample in adults (≥18 years old) between January 2016 and December 2019. Main outcome measure: In-hospital mortality. Results: Of 378,230 hospitalized patients with AF, 49.2 % (n = 186,039) were females and 6.1 % (n = 22,904) had dementia. The mean age (SD) was 71 (13) years. Patients with dementia had higher odds of in-hospital mortality {adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.48, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.34, 1.64, p < 0.001} and nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (aOR: 1.60, 95 % CI: 1.04, 2.47, p = 0.032), but they had lower odds of catheter ablation (0.39, 95 % CI: 0.35, 0.43, p < 0.001) and electrical cardioversion (aOR: 0.33, 95 % CI: 0.31, 0.35, p < 0.001). In patients with AF and dementia, compared to males, females had similar in-hospital mortality (aOR: 1.00, 95 % CI: 0.93, 1.07, p = 0.960), fewer gastrointestinal bleeds (aOR: 0.92, 95 % CI: 0.85, 0.99, p = 0.033), lower odds of getting catheter ablation (aOR: 0.79, 95 % CI: 0.76, 0.81, p < 0.001), and less likelihood of getting electrical cardioversion (aOR: 0.78, 95 % CI: 0.76, 0.79, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with AF and dementia have higher mortality and a lower likelihood of getting catheter ablation and electrical cardioversion.
RESUMEN
Patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) may have concomitant positive coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to compare the risk of in-hospital mortality in patients primarily hospitalized for AMI with or without concomitant COVID-19 positive status. Using the random-effects model, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published articles from December 1, 2019, to April 1, 2022. There were eight studies with 10,128 patients, including 612 patients with COVID and 9516 patients without COVID. A total of 261 patients (42.64%) with COVID-19 positive and 612 patients (6.43%) with negative COVID-19 status died in the hospital. Pooled data showed that patients with a primary diagnosis of AMI with COVID-19 infection had more than five times increased risk of in-hospital mortality compared to patients without COVID-19 (OR: 5.06, 95% CI: 3.61, 7.09; I2 = 35%, P < 0.001). However, pooled data from five studies with adjustment of baseline differences in patient demographics and characteristics, comorbidities, and in-hospital pharmacology revealed more than three times increased risk of in-hospital mortality compared to patients who had primary AMI without COVID-19 infection (aOR: 3.47, 95% CI: 2.21, 5.45; I2 = 0%, P < 0.001). In subgroup analysis, ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) had lower in-hospital mortality (OR 4.23, 95% CI: 3.31, 5.40; I2 = 0%, P < 0.001) compared to non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) (OR 9.97, 95% CI: 5.71, 17.41; I2 = 0%, P < 0.001) (p-value = 0.006). Our study shows that COVID-19 infection is associated with increased in-hospital mortality in patients with index hospitalization for AMI.
RESUMEN
Background: With the results of the largest randomized controlled trial (RECOVERY) and the most extensive retrospective cohort study on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) recently published, we performed a meta-analysis on the association of aspirin with mortality of COVID-19. We aimed to investigate the role of aspirin in COVID-19 hospitalizations. Materials and Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases for studies from 1 January 2020 until 20 July 2022, that compared aspirin versus non-aspirin use in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. We excluded case reports, review articles and studies on non-hospitalized COVID-19 infections. We used the inverse variance method and random effects model to pool the individual studies. Results: Ten observational studies and one randomized controlled trial met the criteria for inclusion. There were 136 695 total patients, of which 27 168 were in the aspirin group and 109 527 were in the non-aspirin group. Aspirin use was associated with a 14% decrease in all-cause mortality compared with non-aspirin use in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 [relative risk (RR) 0.86, confidence interval (95% CI) 0.76-0.97; P = 0.002; I 2 =64%]. Among subgroups of studies reporting in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 hospitalizations, aspirin use was associated with a 16% decrease in in-hospital mortality compared with non-aspirin use (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71-0.99; P = 0.007; I 2 =64%). Conclusion: Our study shows that aspirin decreases in-hospital mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Further studies are needed to assess which COVID-19 patient populations benefit most, such as patients on aspirin for primary versus secondary prevention of atherosclerotic disease. In addition, significant bleeding also needs to be considered when assessing the risk-benefit of aspirin use.