RESUMEN
This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the effect of visual feedback, age and movement repetition on the upper limb (UL) accuracy and kinematics during a reaching task in immersive virtual reality (VR). Fifty-one healthy participants were asked to perform 25 trials of a reaching task in immersive VR with and without visual feedback of their hand. They were instructed to place, as accurately and as fast as possible, a controller held in their non-dominant hand in the centre of a virtual red cube of 3â cm side length. For each trial, the end-point error (distance between the tip of the controller and the centre of the cube), a coefficient of linearity (CL), the movement time (MT), and the spectral arc length of the velocity signal (SPARC), which is a movement smoothness index, were calculated. Multivariate analyses of variance were conducted to assess the influence of visual feedback, age and trial repetition on the average end-point error, SPARC, CL and MT, and their time course throughout the 25 trials. Providing visual feedback of the hand reduced average end-point error ( P â <â 0.001) and MT ( P â =â 0.044), improved SPARC ( P â <â 0.001) but did not affect CL ( P â =â 0.07). Younger participants obtained a lower mean end-point error ( P â =â 0.037), a higher SPARC ( P â =â 0.021) and CL ( P â =â 0.013). MT was not affected by age ( P â =â 0.671). Trial repetition increased SPARC ( P â <â 0.001) and CL ( P â <â 0.001), and reduced MT ( P â =â 0.001) but did not affect end-point error ( P â =â 0.608). In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrated that providing visual feedback of the hand and being younger improves UL accuracy and movement smoothness in immersive VR. UL kinematics but not accuracy can be improved with more trial repetitions. These findings could guide the future development of protocols in clinical rehabilitation and research.
Asunto(s)
Retroalimentación Sensorial , Realidad Virtual , Humanos , Adulto , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Estudios Transversales , Extremidad SuperiorRESUMEN
Background: Individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) in less-resourced settings reported barriers to community integration, including inaccessible rehabilitation services, restricted environments and limited social integration. Peer training and entrepreneurial skills training are provided by Motivation, a nonprofit organisation, and Moshi Cooperative University to enhance occupational engagement of individuals with SCI in less-resourced settings. Objective: This study aimed to explore the impact of peer training and entrepreneurial skills training on the social participation of individuals with SCI living in Tanzania. Method: Using a qualitative photovoice approach, 10 participants captured meaningful photos and provided captions according to five standardised questions (PHOTO technique) to convey their messages. Participants selected up to 34 photos that best illustrated their experiences in the community. A mixed inductive-deductive thematic analysis was guided by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Results: Two interrelated themes emerged: (1) 'influencing factors', which revealed how participants' inclusion in the community was influenced by their activities and personal and environmental factors and (2) 'empowerment', which highlighted participants' desire to advocate and promote awareness of needs and hopes. Conclusion: Participants emphasised the importance of accessibility and equal opportunities. Whilst some were able to overcome obstacles, others experienced continued inaccessibility that inhibited meaningful occupations. Daily participation challenges of individuals with SCI in rural Tanzania were highlighted. Although the Motivation programmes were perceived to have powerful impacts on social participation, continued efforts and advocacy are needed to overcome accessibility issues and to meet the physical, psychological and social needs of Tanzanians living with SCI. Contribution: This article highlights the importance of accessibility and equal opportunities for individuals with disability living in rural Tanzania. Peer-training and entrepreneurial programs offer community-based rehabilitation services that were perceived by people with disabilities to have a powerful impact on social participation and vocation. However, continued efforts and advocacy are needed to meet the needs of Tanzanians living with spinal cord injury.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Voice Handicap Index (VHI) is a widely recognized, self-administered questionnaire, designed to evaluate patients' perception of voice-related disability. It takes into consideration the physical, functional and emotional impacts of dysphonia. The VHI has been translated and validated in many languages, including European French. The purpose of our study is to translate, adapt and validate a new version of the VHI in Quebec French. METHODS: The original VHI was translated into Quebec French (QF) by forward and backward translations by four professional translators, including a speech-language pathologist. The content validity of the resulting VHI-QF was examined in focus groups with six patients and seven speech-language pathologists. Another sample of 154 patients with voice disorders and 150 healthy controls allowed evaluation of the new questionnaire's convergent and discriminant validity, and internal consistency. Satisfaction toward the questionnaire was also evaluated for all patients, as well Test-retest reliability and responsiveness for a sub-sample. RESULTS: The VHI-QF showed a moderate correlation with dysphonia severity level, indicating adequate convergent validity. Both total and subscale scores also exhibited adequate ability to discriminate between patients and controls (discriminant validity), high internal consistency, and good test-retest reliability. The analysis of pre- and post-treatment VHI-QF scores revealed adequate responsiveness to voice treatment. Patients were overall satisfied with the questionnaire. CONCLUSION: The VHI-QF is a valid, reliable and clinically useful self-reported tool to evaluate the severity and change of voice disorders in Quebec French population. Therefore this questionnaire can be used in clinical and research contexts.
Asunto(s)
Disfonía , Trastornos de la Voz , Comparación Transcultural , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Disfonía/diagnóstico , Humanos , Quebec , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Trastornos de la Voz/diagnósticoRESUMEN
Objective: To explore the validity of energy expenditure estimates using the SenseWear Armband during a sequence of four daily living activities in patients post-stroke. Method: Patients with stroke who were able to walk during 6 min without human assistance were asked to wear the SenseWear Armband on the non-paretic arm while performing transfers, a manual task, walking, and walking up and down stairs. The energy expenditure estimated using the SenseWear Armband was compared to the energy expenditure calculated from oxygen consumption, measured by a portable indirect calorimeter (Metamax 3B). The mean of energy expenditure was pooled for each task. Accuracy was explored by mean bias (MB) of Bland-Altman analysis and root mean square error (RMSE), agreement by 95% of limits of agreement (95%LoA) and coefficient of correlation (r). Results: Thirty-eight participants (65.7 ± 13.5 years) were included. The SenseWear Armband globally underestimated energy expenditure, MB = 9.77 kcal for the whole sequence. RMSE were large, accounting for 15% to 41% of the measured energy expenditure. Agreement was low with r < 0.70 and 95%LoA from 42% to 93% of the measured energy expenditure. Conclusions: This study reported a global underestimation and a low level of agreement of the energy expenditure estimated by SenseWear Armband in four daily living activities in patients after stroke. Abbreviations: EE: Energy Expenditure; NIHSS: National Institute of Health Stroke Score.
Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Metabolismo Energético , Accidente Cerebrovascular/fisiopatología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paresia/fisiopatología , Paresia/rehabilitación , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Rehabilitación de Accidente Cerebrovascular , Caminata , Dispositivos Electrónicos VestiblesRESUMEN
With the growing interest in daily activity monitoring, several insole designs have been developed to identify postures, detect activities, and count steps. However, the validity of these devices is not clearly established. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize the available information on the criterion validity of instrumented insoles in detecting postures activities and steps. The literature search through six databases led to 33 articles that met inclusion criteria. These studies evaluated 17 different insole models and involved 290 participants from 16 to 75 years old. Criterion validity was assessed using six statistical indicators. For posture and activity recognition, accuracy varied from 75.0% to 100%, precision from 65.8% to 100%, specificity from 98.1% to 100%, sensitivity from 73.0% to 100%, and identification rate from 66.2% to 100%. For step counting, accuracies were very high (94.8% to 100%). Across studies, different postures and activities were assessed using different criterion validity indicators, leading to heterogeneous results. Instrumented insoles appeared to be highly accurate for steps counting. However, measurement properties were variable for posture and activity recognition. These findings call for a standardized methodology to investigate the measurement properties of such devices.
RESUMEN
Despite the accessibility of several step count measurement systems, count accuracy in real environments remains a major challenge. Microelectromechanical systems and pressure sensors seem to present a potential solution for step count accuracy. The purpose of this study was to equip an insole with pressure sensors and to test a novel and potentially more accurate method of detecting steps. Methods: Five force-sensitive resistors (FSR) were integrated under the heel, the first, third, and fifth metatarsal heads and the great toe. This system was tested with twelve healthy participants at self-selected and maximal walking speeds in indoor and outdoor settings. Step counts were computed based on previously reported calculation methods, individual and averaged FSR-signals, and a new method: cumulative sum of all FSR-signals. These data were compared to a direct visual step count for accuracy analysis. Results: This system accurately detected steps with success rates ranging from 95.5 ± 3.5% to 98.5 ± 2.1% (indoor) and from 96.5 ± 3.9% to 98.0 ± 2.3% (outdoor) for self-selected walking speeds and from 98.1 ± 2.7% to 99.0 ± 0.7% (indoor) and 97.0 ± 6.2% to 99.4 ± 0.7% (outdoor) for maximal walking speeds. Cumulative sum of pressure signals during the stance phase showed high step detection accuracy (99.5 ± 0.7%â»99.6 ± 0.4%) and appeared to be a valid method of step counting. Conclusions: The accuracy of step counts varied according to the calculation methods, with cumulative sum-based method being highly accurate.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: ABILHAND is a self-reported questionnaire assessing manual ability. It was validated and calibrated using the Rasch analysis for European stroke patients. After a stroke, performing upper limb activities of daily living is influenced by personal and environmental contextual factors. It is thus important to conduct a contextual validation to use this questionnaire outside of Europe. AIM: The aim of this study was to perform a cross cultural validation of the ABILHAND-Stroke questionnaire for post-stroke patients living in Benin, a West-African country. DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study. SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation centres. POPULATION: 223 Beninese chronic stroke patients. METHODS: The experimental questionnaire was made of 59 items evaluating manual activities. Patients had to estimate their difficulty of performing each activity according to four response categories: impossible, very difficult, difficult and easy. For construct validity analysis, patients were also evaluated with other assessment tools: Box and Block Test, the motor subscale of the Functional Independence Measure, the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set, and ACTIVLIM-Stroke. Data were analysed with the Rasch partial credit model. RESULTS: The response categories very difficult and difficult were merged and the number of response categories was reduced from 4 to 3 (impossible, difficult and easy). The Rasch analyses selected 16 bimanual activities that fit the Rasch model (chi square=42.35; P=0.10). The item location ranged from -1.10 to 2.24 logits. The standard error ranged from 0.15 to 0.22 logits. There is no differential item functioning between subgroups (age, sex, dexterity, affected side, time since stroke). The person separation index is 0.82. The questionnaire can measure 3 levels of manual ability, similarly to the occidental version. CONCLUSIONS: The ABILHAND-stroke is a Rasch validated, unidimensional and invariant questionnaire to assess manual ability among Beninese patients. The ordinal score can be transformed into linear score using a conversion table. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: This assessment tool is clinically relevant in Benin, a developing country, since it requires no specific equipment or training. It should promote and standardize assessments for stroke patients in clinical practice and research in this African country.
Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Mano/fisiopatología , Destreza Motora/fisiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/fisiopatología , Adulto , Anciano , Benin , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
This study aimed to investigate (i) the validity of self-reported scores of locomotion ability in stroke survivors using the ABILOCO-Benin questionnaire, and (ii) the congruence between online Rasch analysis of the ABILOCO-Benin raw scores and a conversion table set along with the questionnaire development. Thirty-five adult poststroke patients [mean age: 52 (SD: 10) years, 60% men] recruited from the rehabilitation department of National University Hospital of Cotonou (Benin), self-reported their locomotion ability, filling out the ABILOCO-Benin questionnaire [self-reported scores (SRS)]. Afterwards, a physical therapist observed and rated the patients' locomotion ability, while they performed each of the 15 items of the questionnaire [performance-based scores (PBS)]. Both raw SRS and PBS were then converted to linear measures using (i) an online Rasch analysis method and (ii) an ordinal-to-interval transformation table. Analyses showed high correlation (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.74, P<0.001) and nonsignificant difference (P=0.778) between SRS and PBS. Linear measures from online Rasch and a conversion table also exhibited high correlation (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.92; P<0.001). However, the difference between online analysis and the conversion table was significant (P=0.022). In conclusion, self-report is a valid method to administer ABILOCO-Benin in stroke patients. The conversion table offers a valid opportunity for quick transfer of raw scores to linear measures. However, the accuracy of linear measures from the conversion table may be slightly affected by missing responses.