The rs2018736 fibulin-5 polymorphism as a determinant for pelvic organ prolapse: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: Fibulin-5 is a connective tissue component and may play a role in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) pathogenesis. This study aimed to verify the association of the rs2018736 polymorphism of the fibulin-5 gene with POP in postmenopausal Brazilian women, and to determine the risk factors for POP. METHOD: This observational, cross-sectional, case-control study assessed postmenopausal women with advanced POP (stages III and IV) and control women (stages 0 and I) by examination and peripheral blood sample collection. DNA sequences were analyzed by real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. A logistic regression model was used with p < 0.05 for significance. RESULTS: A total of 565 participants were evaluated (325 POP and 240 control). The homozygous C allele of rs2018736 (CC) was protective against POP (odds ratio [OR] 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-0.91). Age (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.05-1.13), number of pregnancies (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01-1.28), vaginal delivery (OR 5.32, 95% CI 2.58-11.01), forceps delivery (OR 3.34, 95% CI 1.72-6.47), weight of newborn (OR 1.0007, 95% CI 1.0002-1.0011), family history of POP (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.24-4.44), hypertension (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.01-3.00) and diabetes (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.07-4.48)] were independent predictors for POP; cesarean (OR 0.02, 95% CI 0.005-0.09) was protective. CONCLUSION: The rs2018736-CC genotype of the fibulin-5 gene has a protective role against POP.

Association between the rs1036819 polymorphism of the ZFAT gene and pelvic organ prolapse: a case-control study.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The identification of risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) would contribute to planning prevention strategies. This study tests the hypothesis that the rs1036819 polymorphism in the ZFAT gene is associated with POP and investigates other risk factors for prolapse development. METHODS: A case-control study was carried out including 826 postmenopausal women divided into POP cases (stages III and IV) and controls (stages 0 and I), assessed by anamnesis, examination, and peripheral blood samples. DNA was extracted from blood and genotyped by real-time RT-PCR. We used logistic regression models for the association analyses of variables, with p < 0.05 for significance. RESULTS: Five hundred and sixty-eight women were evaluated (315 POP and 253 controls). The minor allele C was found in 19.3% of our sample and the genotype frequencies of AA, AC, and CC were similar in both groups. Age (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.06-1.13), number of pregnancies (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.08-1.41), history of one vaginal delivery (OR 3.39, 95% CI 1.38-8.33) or two or more (OR 2.51, 95% CI 1.04-6.07), weight of the largest newborn (OR 1.0001, 95% CI 1-1.001), and family history of POP (OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.24-4.13) were independent risk factors for POP, whereas one cesarean section (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.27-0.88) or two or more (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.05-0.38) were protective. CONCLUSIONS: No association was detected between the rs1036819 polymorphism of the ZFAT gene and advanced POP. Age, number of pregnancies, at least one vaginal delivery, weight of the newborn, and POP family history were independent risk factors for POP.

Collagen I and collagen III polymorphisms in women with pelvic organ prolapse.

AIMS: Verify the presence of the single nucleotide polymorphisms rs1800012 of the collagen I (COL1A1) and rs1800255 of the collagen III (COL3A1) genes and their association with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in Brazilian women and to determine risk factors for POP. METHODS: We assessed 826 postmenopausal women divided into POP (stages III and IV) and control groups (stages 0 and I) by examination and peripheral blood sample collection. DNA sequences of interest were analyzed by real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. We used logistic regression analyses, recessive and codominance models of inheritance, and P < .05 for significance. RESULTS: Six-hundred and thirty-four postmenopausal women were included: 348 (54.8%) POP cases and 286 (45.1%) controls. The frequencies of GG, GA, and AA genotypes for COL1A1 were 69.12%, 20.24%, and 10.59% in POP group and 71.79%, 20%, and 8.21% in controls; GG, GT, and TT for COL3A1 were 37.54%, 59.53%, and 2.93% in POP group and 36.24%, 60.14%, and 3.62% in controls. There were no genotypic or allelic association with POP phenotype that link both SNPs rs1800012 and rs1800255 to increased risk of POP. Vaginal delivery (odds ratio [OR] = 13; 95% confidence interval [CI] [4.00-47.08]), POP family history (OR = 3.1; 95% CI [1.49-6.50]), diabetes mellitus (OR = 2.3; 95% CI [1.08-5.21]), number of pregnancies (OR = 1.2; 95% CI [1.05-1.36]), and age (OR = 1.1; 95% CI [1.09-1.19]), were variables of increased risk for POP (P < .05 for all). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests lack of association between DNA polymorphisms rs1800012 of COL1A1 and rs1800255 of COL3A1 with advanced POP. Vaginal delivery, POP family history, diabetes mellitus, number of pregnancies, and age are risk factors for POP.

Collagen XVIII and LOXL-4 polymorphisms in women with and without advanced pelvic organ prolapse.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We verified the presence of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) rs2236479 of the collagen 18 (COL18A1) and rs2862296 of the lysyl oxidase-like 4 (LOXL-4) genes and the association with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in Brazilian women and determined risk factors for POP development. METHODS: We assessed 532 postmenopausal women divided into POP (stages III and IV) and control (stages 0 and I) groups by examination and peripheral blood sample collection. DNA sequences of interest were analyzed by real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). We used logistic regression models for the analyses, with p < 0.005 for significance. RESULTS: The frequency of homozygous polymorphic alleles (AA) in COL18A1 and (GG) in LOXL-4 were similar in both groups (17.5% and 15.4% for COL18A1 and 18.9% and 20.6% for LOXL-4, respectively). There were no associations between those polymorphisms or other genotypes and POP. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified age [odds ratio (OR) = 1.10, confidence interval (CI) 95% = 1.07; 1.14), number of vaginal births (OR = 1.66, CI 95% = 1.36; 2.03), and family history (OR = 2.55 CI 95% = 1.43; 4.55) as independent risk factors for POP. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests lack of association between DNA polymorphisms rs2236479 of COL18A1 and rs2862296 of LOXL-4 with advanced POP in this population.