Activity of quinupristin/dalfopristin against extracellular and intracellular Staphylococcus aureus with various resistance phenotypes.

OBJECTIVES: Treatment of chronic or recurrent Staphylococcus aureus infections may require using antibiotics with activity against intracellular multiresistant organisms. Quinupristin/dalfopristin (3:7) has been examined in this context. METHODS: Quinupristin and dalfopristin were used separately or mixed. Strains used were: (i) methicillin-susceptible and -resistant S. aureus (MSSA and MRSA); (ii) one vat(B) MSSA and msr(A/B) MRSA; (iii) erm(A)+ [MSSA, MRSA, vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA) and vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA)]; and (iv) one erm(A/B)+ cfr+ MRSA resistant to quinupristin, dalfopristin and their combination. Assessment of activity was determined by: (i) MICs (CLSI method); and (ii) concentration-response curves in broth and after phagocytosis by THP-1 macrophages, with descriptors of the model (Emin) and the pharmacodynamic response [maximal relative efficacy (Emax), relative potency (EC50) and apparent static concentration (Cstatic)]. RESULTS: erm(A)-positive strains were all susceptible to quinupristin/dalfopristin (except strain CM05), with MICs not adversely influenced by acid pH or by the MRSA, VISA or VRSA character of the strain. In concentration-response experiments, quinupristin/dalfopristin showed similar patterns for all strains (except strain CM05), with a >3 log10 cfu decrease in broth and a 1.3 [erm(A) strain] to 2.6 [fully susceptible, vat(B) and msr(A/B) strains] log10 cfu decrease for intracellular bacteria at the maximal extracellular concentration tested (25 mg/L). Maximal extracellular and intracellular activity was obtained for a quinupristin/dalfopristin ratio of 3:7. For strain CM05, quinupristin/dalfopristin was static in all conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Based on historical comparisons with rifampicin, fluoroquinolones, lipoglycopeptides and other antistaphylococcal drugs with a large accumulation in eukaryotic cells, quinupristin/dalfopristin appears to be one of the most active antibiotics against intracellular S. aureus studied in this model so far, largely irrespective of its resistance phenotype.

Intra- and extracellular activity of linezolid against Staphylococcus aureus in vivo and in vitro.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infections remains problematic (slow responses and frequent recurrences). Intracellular persistence of the S. aureus could explain those difficulties because of impaired intracellular efficacy of antibiotics. Our aim was to study linezolid for its intracellular activity. METHODS: (i) Pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis of intracellular activity using in vitro (THP-1 macrophages) and in vivo (mouse peritonitis) models with determination of key dose-response parameters [maximal relative efficacy (E(max)), relative potency (EC(50)) and static concentration (C(static))] towards methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (ATCC 25923; clinical isolate) with linezolid MICs of 4 mg/L; (ii) pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis in uninfected mice for determination of C(max), AUC and half-life for total and free drug; and (iii) determination of the predictive PK/PD parameter (fT > MIC, fAUC(24)/MIC or fC(max)/MIC) for therapeutic outcome. RESULTS: In vitro, linezolid showed an E(max) of approximately 1 log(10) cfu reduction compared with initial inoculum both intra- and extracellularly and an approximately 3-fold increased relative potency (lower EC(50) and C(static)) intracellularly. In vivo, the efficacy of linezolid was impaired (<0.5 log(10) reduction extracellularly; failure to reduce the cfu to less than the initial load intracellularly) with, however, an increased intracellular potency (lower EC(50)). Infection outcome correlated better with the fAUC(24)/MIC (R(2) = 55%) than with the fT > MIC parameter (R(2) = 51%) for the extracellular compartment, but no parameter emerged as significant for the intracellular compartment. CONCLUSIONS: Linezolid exerts only a weak intracellular activity against the strains of S. aureus tested, even though, in contrast to most other antibiotics, its potency does not appear impaired in comparison with the extracellular activity.

Intra- and extracellular activities of dicloxacillin against Staphylococcus aureus in vivo and in vitro.

Antibiotic treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infections is often problematic due to the slow response and recurrences. The intracellular persistence of the staphylococci offers a plausible explanation for the treatment difficulties because of the impaired intracellular efficacies of the antibiotics. The intra- and extracellular time- and concentration-kill relationships were examined in vitro with THP-1 cells and in vivo by use of a mouse peritonitis model. The in vivo model was further used to estimate the most predictive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices (the ratio of the maximum concentration of drug in plasma/MIC, the ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve/MIC, or the cumulative percentage of a 24-h period that the free [f] drug concentration exceeded the MIC under steady-state pharmacokinetic conditions [fT(MIC)]) for dicloxacillin (DCX) intra- and extracellularly. In general, DCX was found to have similar intracellular activities, regardless of the model used. Both models showed (i) the relative maximal efficacy (1-log-unit reduction in the numbers of CFU) of DCX intracellularly and (ii) the equal relative potency of DCX intra- and extracellularly, with the MIC being a good indicator of the overall response in both situations. Discordant results, based on data obtained different times after dosing, were obtained from the two models when the extracellular activity of DCX was measured, in which the in vitro model showed a considerable reduction in the number of CFU from that in the original inoculum (3-log-unit decrease in the number of CFU after 24 h), whereas the extracellular CFU reduction achieved in vivo after 4 h did not exceed 1 log unit. Multiple dosing of DCX in vivo revealed increased extra- and intracellular efficacies (2.5 log and 2 log units of reduction in the numbers of CFU after 24 h, respectively), confirming that DCX is a highly active antistaphylococcal antibiotic. PK/PD analysis revealed that fT(MIC) is the index that is the most predictive of the outcome of infection both intra- and extracellularly.

Plectasin shows intracellular activity against Staphylococcus aureus in human THP-1 monocytes and in a mouse peritonitis model.

Antimicrobial therapy of infections with Staphylococcus aureus can pose a challenge due to slow response to therapy and recurrence of infection. These treatment difficulties can partly be explained by intracellular survival of staphylococci, which is why the intracellular activity of antistaphylococcal compounds has received increased attention within recent years. The intracellular activity of plectasin, an antimicrobial peptide, against S. aureus was determined both in vitro and in vivo. In vitro studies using THP-1 monocytes showed that some intracellular antibacterial activity of plectasin was maintained (maximal relative efficacy [E(max)], 1.0- to 1.3-log reduction in CFU) even though efficacy was inferior to that of extracellular killing (E(max), >4.5-log CFU reduction). Animal studies included a novel use of the mouse peritonitis model, exploiting extra- and intracellular differentiation assays, and assessment of the correlations between activity and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. The intracellular activity of plectasin was in accordance with the in vitro studies, with an E(max) of a 1.1-log CFU reduction. The parameter most important for activity was fC(peak)/MIC, where fC(peak) is the free peak concentration. These findings stress the importance of performing studies of extra- and intracellular activity since these features cannot be predicted from traditional MIC and killing kinetic studies. Application of both the THP-1 and the mouse peritonitis models showed that the in vitro results were similar to findings in the in vivo model with respect to demonstration of intracellular activity. Therefore the in vitro model was a good screening model for intracellular activity. However, animal models should be applied if further information on activity, PK/pharmacodynamic parameters, and optimal dosing regimens is required.

Combined effect of pH and concentration on the activities of gentamicin and oxacillin against Staphylococcus aureus in pharmacodynamic models of extracellular and intracellular infections.

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus survives in acid media, including phagolysosomes. Conflicting in vitro/in vivo data exist on its susceptibility to antibiotics in such environments. METHODS: Oxacillin and gentamicin activities against methicillin-susceptible S. aureus ATCC 25923 were compared extracellularly (broth; different pH) and assessed intracellularly (THP-1 macrophages), using a pharmacological approach (antibiotic concentrations: 0.01-1000 x MIC). Antibiotic cellular contents were determined by microbiological assay. RESULTS: MICs and MBCs increased 72-fold for gentamicin, and decreased 8-fold for oxacillin between pH 7.4 and 5.0. Plots of log(10) colony-forming unit changes at 24 h versus log(10) of antibiotic concentration followed sigmoidal shapes, allowing calculation of EC(50) (relative potency) and apparent E(max) (relative efficacy) in all conditions. In broth, the EC(50) of gentamicin rose 316-fold and that of oxacillin decreased 15-fold with unchanged apparent E(max) [-5 log (limit of detection)] between pH 7.4 and 5. Intracellularly, EC(50)s were similar to those observed extracellularly at pH 7.4, but E(max) values were much lower (-1 log) for both antibiotics. Calculations based on the assumed pH in phagolysosomes (5.4) and on local accumulation of antibiotics (gentamicin, 23-fold; oxacillin, 0.05-fold) suggest that the contrasting effects of acid pH on relative potencies of gentamicin and oxacillin could be almost exactly compensated for by differences in accumulation. CONCLUSIONS: The weak activity of gentamicin and oxacillin towards intraphagocytic S. aureus compared with extracellular forms is not related to an overall decrease of their relative potencies but to impaired efficacy, suggesting the need for new approaches to improve the eradication of intracellular S. aureus.