Comparison of contemporary transcatheter heart valve prostheses: data from the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY).

BACKGROUND: Various second-generation transcatheter heart valve (THV) prostheses with high clinical efficacy and safety are available, but there is limited large-scale data available comparing their hemodynamic performance and clinical implications. OBJECTIVE: To compare the hemodynamic performance and short-term clinical outcome of four second-generation THV prostheses. METHODS: 24,124 patients out of the German Aortic Valve Registry who underwent transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) (Evolut™ R n = 7028, Acurate neo™ n = 2922, Portico n = 878 and Sapien 3 n = 13,296) were included in this analysis. Propensity-score weighted analysis was performed to control for differences in age, left ventricular function, STS score and sex. Primary endpoint was survival at one-year, secondary endpoints were 30 days survival, pre-discharge transvalvular gradients, paravalvular leakage and peri-procedural complications. RESULTS: Thirty-day and one-year survival were not significantly different between the four patient groups. Transvalvular gradients in Evolut™ R and Acurate neo™ were significantly lower as compared to Portico and Sapien 3 at hospital discharge. This difference exists across all annulus sizes. Paravalvular leakage ≥ II occurred significantly less often in the Sapien 3 group (1.2%, p < 0.0001). Rate of severe procedural complications was low and comparable in all groups. Permanent pacemaker implantation rate at one year was lowest in the ACUARATE neo group (13.0%) and highest in the Evolut™ R group (21.9%). CONCLUSION: Albeit comparable short-term clinical outcomes there are certain differences regarding hemodynamic performance and permanent pacemaker implantation rate between currently available THV prostheses which should be considered for individual prosthesis selection.

Aortic Valve Repair Results in Better 1-Year Survival Than Replacement: Results From German Aortic Valve Registry.

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve (AV) repair is an evolving surgical strategy in the treatment of nonelderly adults with aortic regurgitation. We aimed to determine the 1-year outcome after AV repair vs surgical AV replacement (sAVR) using real-world data from the German Aortic Valve Registry. METHODS: A total of 8076 aortic regurgitation patients (mean age, 59.1 ± 15.0 years; 76% men; mean The Society of Thoracic Surgeons score, 1.3 ± 1.1), who underwent AV surgical procedures between 2011 and 2015, were identified from German Aortic Valve Registry. The AV was repaired in 2327 patients (29%), and the remaining 5749 patients (71%) underwent sAVR. A weighted propensity score model, including the variables of age, sex, and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons score, was used to correct for baseline differences between AV repair and sAVR cohorts. The primary end point was 1-year survival after AV repair vs sAVR. Secondary end points were freedom from cardiac events and AV reinterventions. RESULTS: Survival at 1 year was 97.7% (95% CI, 97.0%-98.5%) in the AV repair cohort vs 96.4% (95% CI, 95.9%-96.9%) in the propensity score-weighted sAVR cohort (log-rank P < .001). Cox regression revealed a significant advantage of AV repair vs sAVR (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51-0.90; P < .0001) on 1-year survival, which was independent of age. Cardiac event-free survival at 1 year was 85.7% (95% CI, 483.8%-87.7%) in the AV repair group vs 81.7% (95% CI, 80.7%-82.9%) in the sAVR group (log-rank P < .001). AV reintervention was required in 38 AV repair patients (1.6%) compared with 1.6% in the sAVR cohort (P = .59). CONCLUSIONS: AV repair surgery, whenever intraoperatively feasible, is associated with a significantly better 1-year survival and 1-year cardiac event-free survival compared with sAVR.

Development and validation of explainable machine learning models for risk of mortality in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: TAVI risk machine scores.

Aims: Identification of high-risk patients and individualized decision support based on objective criteria for rapid discharge after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are key requirements in the context of contemporary TAVI treatment. This study aimed to predict 30-day mortality following TAVI based on machine learning (ML) using data from the German Aortic Valve Registry. Methods and results: Mortality risk was determined using a random forest ML model that was condensed in the newly developed TAVI Risk Machine (TRIM) scores, designed to represent clinically meaningful risk modelling before (TRIMpre) and in particular after (TRIMpost) TAVI. Algorithm was trained and cross-validated on data of 22 283 patients (729 died within 30 days post-TAVI) and generalisation was examined on data of 5864 patients (146 died). TRIMpost demonstrated significantly better performance than traditional scores [C-statistics value, 0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI)] [0.74; 0.83] compared to Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) with C-statistics value 0.69; 95%-CI [0.65; 0.74]). An abridged (aTRIMpost) score comprising 25 features (calculated using a web interface) exhibited significantly higher performance than traditional scores (C-statistics value, 0.74; 95%-CI [0.70; 0.78]). Validation on external data of 6693 patients (205 died within 30 days post-TAVI) of the Swiss TAVI Registry confirmed significantly better performance for the TRIMpost (C-statistics value 0.75, 95%-CI [0.72; 0.79]) compared to STS (C-statistics value 0.67, CI [0.63; 0.70]). Conclusion: TRIM scores demonstrate good performance for risk estimation before and after TAVI. Together with clinical judgement, they may support standardised and objective decision-making before and after TAVI.

TAVI With or Without Predilation: Trends From a Large, Propensity-Score Weighted German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY) Population.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Currently, it is unclear whether transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) without predilation (direct TAVI; d-TAVI) or with preimplantation balloon valvuloplasty (b-TAVI) provides similar clinical safety and efficacy. Therefore, we analyzed patients undergoing d-TAVI or b-TAVI for severe aortic stenosis (AS) with either self-expanding or balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves (THVs) from the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY). METHODS: Between 2011 and 2017, a total of 44,783 TAVI patients were collected, with 25,717 (57.4%) receiving a balloon-expandable THV and 19,066 (42.6%) receiving a self-expanding THV. A propensity-score weighted model was used to compare d-TAVI vs b-TAVI regarding differences in outcome. RESULTS: B-TAVI was performed in 71% and d-TAVI was performed in 29% of patients. In the investigated time interval, frequency of b-TAVI declined from 88.4% to 58.2%, accompanied by a constant rate of postdilation. After propensity weighting of patients receiving balloon-expandable THV, d-TAVI vs b-TAVI was associated with more frequent postoperative transvalvular mean pressure gradients (mPG) >15 mm Hg (20.7% vs 18.4%; P<.001), similar rates of paravalvular leakage (PVL) ≥ moderate (18.0% vs 16.9%; P=.08), fewer postdilations (13.4% vs 15.5%; P<.001), and fewer complications (permanent pacemaker implantation, 10.2% vs 11.9% [P=.01]; vascular complications, 1.9% vs 2.6% [P<.01]; pericardial tamponade, 0.5% vs 0.9% [P<.01]; and stroke, 0.9% vs 1.3% [P=.02]). In patients receiving self-expanding THVs, d-TAVI vs b-TAVI was associated with more frequent postimplantation mean PG ≥ 15 mm Hg (12.7% vs 10.4%; P<.01), higher rates of PVL ≥ moderate (24.8% vs 16.5%; P<.001), and similar complication rates including permanent pacemaker implantation. CONCLUSIONS: The safety and efficacy of d-TAVI vs b-TAVI depends on the type of THV implanted. For balloon-expandable valves, d-TAVI provides an advantage, while self-expanding valves offer a similar safety profile for d-TAVI compared with b-TAVI. However, increased mPG post intervention with both valve types and more significant PVL in self-expanding THVs emphasize the importance of proper patient selection and evaluation of valve anatomy to identify suitable cases for d-TAVI.

A Novel Model to Predict 1-Year Mortality in Elective Transfemoral Aortic Valve Replacement: The TAVR-Risk Score.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to develop and validate an effective prediction model for 1-year mortality risk in elective transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), ie, the TAVR-Risk (TARI) model. BACKGROUND: TAVR is the primary treatment for patients with symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis; however, risk assessment tools for longer-term outcomes after TAVR remain scarce. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used logistic regression to test univariate and multivariate associations. The German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY) was the derivation (n = 20,704) and the Swedish SWEDEHEART TAVR Registry (SWENTRY) was the validation cohort (n = 3982). The main outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) in the prediction of 1-year mortality. The final model included 12 parameters that were associated with 1-year mortality in a multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The TARI model (AUC, 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.67) performed better as compared with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score (AUC, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.62-0.64; P<.001) and logistic EuroSCORE I (AUC, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.59-0.61; P<.001) in the GARY derivation cohort, and discriminated the risk for 1-year mortality better than logistic EuroSCORE I in the SWENTRY validation cohort (AUC, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.60-0.64 vs AUC, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.57-0.61; P=.04). CONCLUSIONS: This novel TARI score provides a relatively easy-to-use risk model and offers a superior prediction for 1-year mortality in European TAVR patients.

Propensity matched comparison of TAVI and SAVR in intermediate-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis and moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease: a subgroup analysis from the German Aortic Valve Registry.

OBJECTIVE: We compared TAVI vs. SAVR in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease (eGFR 15-60 ml/min/1.73 m2) for whom both procedures could possibly be considered (age ≤ 80 years, STS-score 4-8). BACKGROUND: According to both ACC/AHA and ESC/EACTS recent guidelines, aortic stenosis may be treated with either transcatheter (TAVI) or surgical (SAVR) aortic valve replacement in a subgroup of patients. A shared therapeutic decision is made by a heart team based on individual factors, including chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: Data from the large nationwide German Aortic Valve Registry were used. A propensity score method was used to select 704 TAVI and 374 SAVR matched patients. Primary endpoint was 1-year survival. Secondary endpoints were clinical complications, including pacemaker implantation, vascular complications, myocardial infarction, bleeding, and the need for new-onset dialysis. RESULTS: One-year survival was similar (HR [95% CI] for TAVI 1.271 [0.795, 2.031], p = 0.316), with no divergence in Kaplan-Meier curves. In spite of post-procedural short-term survival being numerically higher for TAVI patients and 1-year survival being numerically higher for SAVR patients, such differences did not reach statistical significance (96.4% vs. 94.2%, p = 0.199, and 86.2% vs. 81.2%, p = 0.316, respectively). In weighted analyses, pacemaker implantation, vascular complications, and were significantly more common with TAVI; whereas myocardial infarction, bleeding requiring transfusion, and longer ICU-stay and overall hospitalization were higher with SAVR. Temporary dialysis was more common with SAVR (p < 0.0001); however, a probable need for chronic dialysis was rare and similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Both TAVI and SAVR led to comparable and excellent results in patients with moderate-to-severe CKD in an intermediate-risk population of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis for whom both therapies could possibly be considered.

Concomitant mitral regurgitation in patients with low-gradient aortic stenosis: an analysis from the German Aortic Valve Registry.

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) frequently presented mitral regurgitation (MR), which may interfere with the standard echocardiographic measurements of mean pressure gradient (MPG), flow velocity, and aortic valve area (AVA). AIMS: Herein we investigated the prevalence and severity of MR in patients with severe AS and its role on the accuracy of the standard echocardiographic parameters of AS quantification. METHODS: Of all patients with severe AS undergoing transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement enrolled in the German Aortic Registry from 2011 to 2017, 119,641 were included in this study. The population was divided based on the values of left ventricular ejection fraction ([LVEF] > 50%, LVEF 31-50%, and LVEF ≤ 30%] and AVA (0.80 to ≤ 1.00 cm2, 0.60 to < 0.80 cm2, 0.40 to < 0.60 cm2, and 0.20 to < 0.40 cm2). RESULTS: Overall, 77,890 (65%) patients with mild to-moderate and 4262 (4%) with severe MR were compared with 37,489 (31%) patients without MR. Patients with mild-to-moderate and severe MR presented significantly lower mPG (ΔmPG [95%CI] - 1.694 mmHg [- 2.123 to - 1.265], p < 0.0001 and - 6.954 mmHg [- 7.725 to - 6.183], p < 0.0001, respectively), that increased with LVEF impairment. Conversely, AVA did not differ (severe versus no MR: ΔAVA [95%CI]: - 0.007cm2 [- 0.023 to 0.009], p = 0.973). Increasing MR severity was associated with significant mPG reduction throughout all AVA strata, causing a low-gradient pattern, that manifested since the early stages of severe AS (LVEF > 50%: AVA 0.80 to 1.00 cm2; LVEF 31-50%: AVA 0.60 to 0.80 cm2). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe AS, concomitant MR is common, contributes to the onset of a low-gradient AS pattern, and affects the diagnostic accuracy of flow-dependent AVA measurements. In this setting, a multimodality, AVA-centric approach should be implemented. In patients with severe aortic stenosis, concomitant mitral regurgitation contributes to the onset of a low-gradient pattern, warranting a multimodality, and AVA-centric diagnostic approach.

Outcomes of aortic valve repair: early results from the German Aortic Valve Registry.

OBJECTIVES: Aortic valve (AV) repair is an evolving surgical strategy in the treatment of young patients with aortic regurgitation (AR) and/or aortic root aneurysm. We aimed to determine the clinical outcome following AV repair/AV-sparing root surgery using real-world data from the German Aortic Valve Registry. METHODS: A total of 2327 patients with AR (mean age 55.2 ± 15.0 years, 76% men), who underwent AV repair/AV-sparing root surgery between 2011 and 2015 (i.e. 5% of 42 868 AV surgery patients enrolled in the German Aortic Valve Registry during the same period) were included. Study cohort was subdivided according to the technique of AV repair: isolated AV repair without root surgery (group I) (n = 914), AV-sparing root surgery (i.e. reimplantation or remodelling) without cusp repair (group II) (n = 1077) and AV-sparing root surgery (i.e. reimplantation or remodelling) with simultaneous cusp repair (group III) (n = 336). Primary end point was 1-year survival after AV repair/AV-sparing root surgery. Secondary end points were freedom from cardiac adverse events and freedom from AV reinterventions at 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality was 19 (0.8%) in the whole study cohort without significant differences in the 3 subgroups [4 (0.4%) patients in group I vs 14 (1.3%) patients in group II vs 1 (0.3%) patient in group III (P = 0.054)]. Postoperatively, 1445 (74%) patients had no residual AR, 474 (24%) patients had mild AR and 40 (2%) patients had moderate/severe AR at the time of hospital discharge. One-year survival (95% confidence interval) was 97.7% (97.1-98.3) in the whole study cohort and without significant difference among the 3 subgroups. One-year cardiac adverse event-free survival (95% confidence interval) was 85.7% (84.2-87.1) and was similar in all 3 study groups in propensity score-weighted analysis. A total of 38 (1.6%) patients required AV reintervention during a 1-year follow-up, without significant difference among subgroups (P = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: AV repair/AV-sparing root surgery is performed in 5% of patients requiring AV surgery in Germany. Our data demonstrate very satisfactory periprocedural and 1-year survival and cardiac event-free survival after AV repair surgery. Implementation of specific surgical techniques during the index procedure seems to result in comparable outcomes.

Surgical aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50-69 years-insights from the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY).

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyse the outcome of patients between 50 and 69 years of age undergoing biological or mechanical aortic valve replacement. METHODS: Data were collected from the German Aortic Valve Registry. Data were analysed regarding baseline characteristics and outcome parameters such as 5-year survival, stroke and reintervention. RESULTS: In total.3046 patients undergoing isolated surgical aortic valve replacement between 2011 and 2012 were investigated and a propensity score matching was performed. Within this period, 2239 patients received a biological prostheses, while 807 patients received a mechanical prosthesis. Mean age in the biological group was 63.07 (±5.11) and 57.34 (±4.67) in the mechanical group (standardized mean difference 1.172). In the overall cohort, there were more female patients in the biological group (32.7% vs 28.4%) and log EuroSCORE I was higher (5.41% vs 4.26%). After propensity matching (610 pairs), there was no difference in the mortality at 5-year follow-up (12.1% biological vs 9.2% mechanical P = 0.05) nor for reoperation/reintervention (2.5% biological vs 2.0% mechanical, P = 0.546). Patients undergoing mechanical aortic valve replacement suffered from a higher stroke rate 3.3% vs 1.5% (P = 0.04) at 5-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic valve replacement with biological or mechanical prostheses showed similar 5-year outcomes for survival and reoperation in a propensity-matched cohort, but significantly increased stroke rate after mechanical aortic valve replacement. This could influence the choice of a mechanical valve in younger patients.

Anatomical suitability and off-label use of contemporary transcatheter heart valves.

BACKGROUND: Despite excellent procedural results in a broad clinical population, certain anatomical or clinical conditions are still challenging for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI). Whether the adherence to the instructions for use (IFU) or the use of a clinically suitable device is a prerequisite for procedural success has not been well characterized. AIMS: The anatomical and clinical suitability of new-generation transcatheter heart valves (THV) was evaluated in an all-comers population (n = 540) at a high-volume center. METHODS: Conformity with anatomical IFU criteria was evaluated in each implanted THV. In addition, the suitability of the implanted THV was verified in each case according to clinical and anatomical criteria, which had been previously defined according to the results of an international survey including 20 renowned TAVI operators. Furthermore, criteria of clinical suitability and adherence to IFU of each THV were applied to the overall cohort to analyze the proportion of patients in whom the use of the respective THV would have been judged to be unsuitable or off-label. RESULTS: An off-label use of THV based on anatomical considerations was found in 20% of all procedures, whereas the implantation of a THV deemed to be clinically unsuitable was noted in 16.3% of all procedures. Clinical suitability and conformity with IFU were present to a varying extent across the THV systems. Neither clinical suitability, nor conformity with IFU were associated with device failure or periprocedural mortality. On multivariable analysis, aortic tortuosity, mean transaortic gradient and ascending aorta diameter were identified as independent predictors of device failure (VARC-3). CONCLUSIONS: Off-label TAVI and the use of clinically unsuitable THVs were common, but did not affect procedural outcomes. The variety of clinical and anatomical coverage of the different THV systems emphasizes the importance of an individualized THV selection.

Procedural Results of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With Aortic Annuli Diameter ≥26 mm: insights from the German Aortic Valve Registry.

Patients presenting with severe aortic stenosis and large aortic annuli are challenging to treat because of the size limitations of available transcatheter heart valves. In this study, we aimed to determine clinical and hemodynamic outcomes in patients presenting with large aortic annuli who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Patients from the German Aortic Valve Registry who underwent TAVI either with the Edwards Sapien (ES) or Medtronic CoreValve (MCV) systems from 2011 to 2017 were included. They were further stratified into a large (aortic annulus diameter 26 to 29 mm for ES; 26 to 30 mm for MCV) and extra-large (aortic annulus diameter >29 mm for ES; >30 mm for MCV) group and analyzed using propensity score adjustment. Extra-large was set beyond the sizing limitations according to the manufacturer's instructions for use. Patients in the large (n = 5,628) and extra-large (n = 509) groups were predominantly male (large: 92.6% vs extra-large: 91.9%). The 30-day mortality was comparable (large: 3.9% vs extra-large: 5.0%, p = 0.458). Procedure duration (large: 78.9 minutes ± 0.82 vs extra-large: 86.4 minutes ± 1.9, p <0.001) was longer in the extra-large group. Likewise, vascular complications (large: 6.2% vs extra-large: 12%, p = 0.002) and the need for a permanent pacemaker implantation (large: 18.8% vs extra-large: 26.0%, p = 0.027) were more often present in the extra-large group. Aortic regurgitation ≥II after valve implantation was numerically higher (large: 3.0% vs extra-large: 5.3%, p = 0.082) in patients with extra-large anatomy. In conclusion, patients with large and extra-large aortic annulus diameters who underwent TAVI have comparable 30-day mortality. Beyond the recommended annulus range, there is a higher risk for vascular complications and permanent pacemaker implantation.

Influence of 25-Hydroxy-Vitamin D Insufficiency on Maximal Aerobic Power in Elite Indoor Athletes: A Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: The impact of vitamin D on musculoskeletal health is well-established, although its influence on physical performance is unclear. Therefore, we conducted this study to evaluate the impact of 25-hydroxy-vitamin D (25-OH vitamin D) concentrations with maximal aerobic power of professional indoor athletes. RESULTS: A total of 112 male professional athletes were included in this cross-sectional study, consisting of 88 handball and 24 ice hockey players. The maximal aerobic power was assessed with a standardized cycling ergometer test. Athletes were assigned to two groups according to their 25-OH vitamin D status: insufficient (< 30 ng/mL) and sufficient (≥ 30 ng/mL). Thirty-four players (30.4%) displayed insufficient (21.9 ± 5.9 ng/mL) and 78 (69.6%) sufficient 25-OH vitamin D concentrations (41.6 ± 8.6 ng/mL). Athletes with sufficient levels achieved a higher maximal aerobic power (3.9 ± 0.9 vs. 3.5 ± 0.8 W/kg, p = 0.03) compared to those with insufficient levels. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high prevalence of 25-OH vitamin D insufficiency in professional indoor athletes, even in summer. Insufficient 25-OH vitamin D concentrations were associated with lower maximal aerobic power in male professional indoor athletes. Further, the 25-OH vitamin D concentration was identified as the only independent predictor of maximal aerobic power in these athletes, highlighting the impact of 25-OH vitamin D on physical performance. Therefore, 25-OH vitamin D concentrations of ≥ 30 ng/mL should be maintained to ensure optimal physical performance in these athletes.

Five-year outcome in 18 010 patients from the German Aortic Valve Registry.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the 5-year outcome in patients treated by isolated transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or surgical aortic valve replacement (sAVR)-a prospective observational cohort study. METHODS: A total of 18 010 patients were included (n = 8942 TAVI and n = 9068 sAVR) in the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY) who were treated in 2011 and 2012 at 92 sites in central Germany. Eligible patients with TAVI and sAVR were matched using propensity scores in a nearest-neighbour approach. Patients with repeat procedures or unequivocal indication for one treatment option (e.g. frailty) were excluded (n = 4785 for TAVI and n = 2 for sAVR). This led to 13 223 patients (4157 TAVI and 9066 sAVR) as an unmatched subcohort. The main outcome measure was the 5-year all-cause mortality. RESULTS: TAVI patients were significantly older (80.9 ± 6.1 vs 68.5 ± 11.1 years, P < 0.001), had a higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score (6.3 ± 4.9 vs 2.6 ± 3.0, P < 0.001) and a higher 5-year all-cause mortality (49.8% vs 16.5%, P < 0.0001). There was no major difference in in-hospital stroke, in-hospital myocardial infarction, or temporary and chronic dialysis. In the propensity score-matched group (n = 3640), there were 763 deaths (41.9%) among 1820 TAVI patients compared with 552 (30.3%) among 1820 treated with sAVR during the 5-year follow-up (hazard ratio 1.51, 95% confidence interval 1.35-1.68; P < 0.0001). New pacemaker implantation was performed in 448 patients (24.6%) after TAVI and in 201 (11.0%) after sAVR (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The 5-year follow-up data show that TAVI patients were significantly older and had a higher STS score than sAVR patients. After propensity score matching, TAVI with early-generation prosthesis was associated with significantly higher 5-year all-cause mortality than sAVR.

Prospective validation of an acoustic-based system for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease in a high-prevalence population.

Recent guidelines recommend a risk-adjusted, non-invasive work-up in patients presenting with chest discomfort to exclude coronary artery disease (CAD). However, a risk-adjusted diagnostic approach remains challenging in clinical practice. An acoustic detection device for analyzing micro-bruits induced by stenosis-generated turbulence in the coronary circulation has shown potential for ruling out CAD in patients with low-to-intermediate likelihood. We examined the diagnostic value of this acoustic detection system in a high-prevalence cohort. In total, 226 patients scheduled for clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography (ICA) were prospectively enrolled at two centers and examined using a portable, acoustic detection system. The acoustic analysis was performed in double-blinded fashion prior to quantitative ICA and following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). An acoustic detection result (CAD score) was obtained in 94% of all patients. The mean baseline CAD score was 41.2 ± 11.9 in patients with obstructive CAD and 33.8 ± 13.4 in patients without obstructive CAD (p < 0.001). ROC analysis revealed an AUC of 0.661 (95% CI 0.584-0.737). Sensitivity was 97.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 91.5-99.7%), specificity was 14.5% (CI 9.0-21.7%), negative predictive value was 90.5% (CI 69.6-98.8%), and positive predictive value was 41.7% (CI 34.6-49.0%). Following PCI, the mean CAD score decreased from 40.5 ± 11.2 to 38.3 ± 13.7 (p = 0.039). Using an acoustic detection device identified individuals with CAD in a high-prevalence cohort with high sensitivity but relatively low specificity. The negative predictive value was within the predicted range and may be of value for a fast rule-out of obstructive CAD even in a high-prevalence population.

Impact of chronic kidney disease in 29 893 patients undergoing transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement from the German Aortic Valve Registry.

OBJECTIVES: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a key risk factor in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). We analysed the impact of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and CKD stages on their mid-term survival. METHODS: Data from 29 893 patients enrolled in the German Aortic Valve registry from January 2011 to December 2015 receiving TAVI (n = 12 834) or SAVR (n = 17 059) at 88 sites were included. The impact of renal impairment, as measured by eGFR and CKD stages, was investigated. The primary end-point was 1-year cumulative all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Higher CKD stages were significantly associated to lower in-hospital, 30-day- and 1-year survival rates. Both TAVI- and SAVR-treated patients in CKD 3a, 3b, 4 and 5 stages showed significant and gradually increasing HR values for 1-year all-cause mortality. The same trend persisted in multivariable analysis, although HR values for CKD 3a and 5 did not reach significance in TAVI patients, whereas CKD 4 + 5 did not reach statistical significance in SAVR. Likewise, eGFR as a continuous variable was a significant predictor for 1-year mortality, with the best cut-off points being 47.4 ml/min/1.73 m2 for TAVI and 59.8 ml/min/1.73 m2 for SAVR. Significant 8.6% and 9.0% increases in 1-year mortality were observed for every 5-ml reduction in eGFR for TAVI and SAVR, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CKD ≥3b and CKD ≥3a are the independent major risk factors for mortality in patients undergoing TAVI and SAVR, respectively. In the overall population of patients with severe aortic stenosis, an appropriate stratification based on CKD substage may contribute to a better selection of patients suitable for such therapies.

Five-year follow-up of patients who underwent everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold implantation.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate very long-term results after unrestricted everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) implantation. BACKGROUND: Previous randomized studies mainly included selected patients differing from those seen during daily routine and long-term data from all-comers registries are sparse. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing BRS implantation were included in this observational, single center study. Clinical follow-up was conducted up to 5 years. Endpoint of interest was the composite of target lesion failure (TLF), including target-vessel myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization and cardiac death. Furthermore, ARC-defined scaffold thrombosis (ScT) were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 176 patients with a median age of 64 (55 - 72) years were analyzed, of which 59.6% presented an acute coronary syndrome. A total of 183 mainly complex lesions (55.8%) were treated. At 5 years, the rate for TLF was 21.6%. Definite or probable ScT rate was 4.1%. The rate of ScT within the first year was 2.8% and afterwards 1.2%. Notably, no ScT was seen later than 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Although this real-world registry displays high rates of clinical events during long-term follow-up, no ScT was seen after 2 years.

Transcatheter or surgical aortic valve implantation in chronic dialysis patients: a German Aortic Valve Registry analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve implantation in chronic dialysis patients with aortic valve stenosis (AS). BACKGROUND: Chronic dialysis patients undergoing heart valve surgery are at higher risk for morbidity and mortality. Whether interventional techniques can reduce this risk is unclear because dialysis patients have thus far been excluded from randomized trials. METHODS: Chronic dialysis patients with AS enrolled in the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY) between 2012 and 2015 were analyzed to compare transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI n = 661) with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR n = 457). Propensity scores for inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to adjust the comparison of the two treatment groups for potential confounders. RESULTS: TAVI patients were older (78 ± 7.3 vs. 69 ± 10.2 years, p < 0.01, unadjusted) and had more comorbidities. Mortality at 1 year was the same (TAVI: 33.4% vs. SAVR 35.0%, p = 0.72, IPTW-adjusted) while it was lower with TAVI at 30 days (8.6% vs. 15.0%, p = 0.02, IPTW-adjusted). TAVI patients required more pacemaker implantation and showed more aortic regurgitation. SAVR patients required more blood transfusions and had longer hospital stay. Diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, previous PCI, urgent procedure and EuroSCORE were associated with elevated 30-day mortality. Atrial fibrillation and older age were independent risk factor of 1-year mortality in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic dialysis patients with AS undergoing TAVI or SAVR had the same 1-year mortality, although survival at 30 days was better with TAVI. These results suggest that TAVI may improve peri-procedural outcomes.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiovascular mortality and catherization activity during the lockdown in central Germany: an observational study.

AIMS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, hospital admissions for cardiac care have declined. However, effects on mortality are unclear. Thus, we sought to evaluate the impact of the lockdown period in central Germany on overall and cardiovascular deaths. Simultaneously we looked at catheterization activities in the same region. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from 22 of 24 public health-authorities in central Germany were aggregated during the pandemic related lockdown period and compared to the same time period in 2019. Information on the total number of deaths and causes of death, including cardiovascular mortality, were collected. Additionally, we compared rates of hospitalization (n = 5178) for chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in 26 hospitals in this area. Data on 5,984 deaths occurring between March 23, 2020 and April 26, 2020 were evaluated. In comparison to the reference non-pandemic period in 2019 (deaths: n = 5832), there was a non-significant increase in all-cause mortality of 2.6% [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99-1.06; p = 0.16]. Cardiovascular and cardiac mortality increased significantly by 7.6% (IRR 1.08, 95%-CI 1.01-1.14; p = 0.02) and by 11.8% (IRR 1.12, 95%-CI 1.05-1.19; p < 0.001), respectively. During the same period, our data revealed a drop in cardiac catherization procedures. CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19-related lockdown a significant increase in cardiovascular mortality was observed in central Germany, whereas catherization activities were reduced. The mechanisms underlying both of these observations should be investigated further in order to better understand the effects of a pandemic-related lockdown and social-distancing restrictions on cardiovascular care and mortality.

CILP1 as a biomarker for right ventricular maladaptation in pulmonary hypertension.

The aim of our study was to analyse the protein expression of cartilage intermediate layer protein (CILP)1 in a mouse model of right ventricular (RV) pressure overload and to evaluate CILP1 as a biomarker of cardiac remodelling and maladaptive RV function in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH).Pulmonary artery banding was performed in 14 mice; another nine mice underwent sham surgery. CILP1 protein expression was analysed in all hearts using Western blotting and immunostaining. CILP1 serum concentrations were measured in 161 patients (97 with adaptive and maladaptive RV pressure overload caused by PH; 25 with left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy; 20 with dilative cardiomyopathy (DCM); 19 controls without LV or RV abnormalities)In mice, the amount of RV CILP1 was markedly higher after banding than after sham. Control patients had lower CILP1 serum levels than all other groups (p<0.001). CILP1 concentrations were higher in PH patients with maladaptive RV function than those with adaptive RV function (p<0.001), LV pressure overload (p<0.001) and DCM (p=0.003). CILP1 showed good predictive power for maladaptive RV in receiver operating characteristic analysis (area under the curve (AUC) 0.79). There was no significant difference between the AUCs of CILP1 and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (AUC 0.82). High CILP1 (cut-off value for maladaptive RV of ≥4373 pg·mL-1) was associated with lower tricuspid annular plane excursion/pulmonary artery systolic pressure ratios (p<0.001) and higher NT-proBNP levels (p<0.001).CILP1 is a novel biomarker of RV and LV pathological remodelling that is associated with RV maladaptation and ventriculoarterial uncoupling in patients with PH.