Osteomyelitis and antibiotic treatment in patients with grade IV pressure injury and spinal cord lesion-a retrospective cohort study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To analyze characteristics and treatment of osteomyelitis (OM) in the treatment of grade IV pressure injury (PI) in patients with spinal cord injury/disorder (SCI/D) following the Basel Decubitus Concept. SETTING: Acute care and rehabilitation clinic specialized in SCI/D. METHODS: Patients with SCI/D were admitted for grade IV PI treatment between 1st January 2010 and 28th February 2015. Patients, SCI/D, and PI characteristics were collected from chart reviews. Descriptive statistics and differences between groups with and without OM were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 117 patients (87 male, 30 female) with 130 PI grade IV were included. In 95 patients (81%), OM was diagnosed histologically. In 87 cases, more than one bacterial species was involved. Out of 49 different bacterial species, Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococus aureus were most frequently observed. Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and ciprofloxacin were the most frequently used out of 24 different antibiotics. Length of antibiotic treatment varied between <8 days and >91 days with 31 patients receiving antibiotics for about 8 weeks. Complications occurred in all groups of antibiotic duration. Having a paraplegia, no OM and sacral PI was associated with increased complication rates, but the number of patients did not allow comprehensive risk factor analysis. CONCLUSION: Because the variety of patients concerning SCI/D, PI, and OM characteristics did not show a conclusive relation between length of antibiotic treatment and complication rates, the development of a subgroup specific treatment concept for PI in patients with SCI/D would be favorable to further optimize antibiotic treatment.

The association between in-stent neoatherosclerosis and native coronary artery disease progression: a long-term angiographic and optical coherence tomography cohort study.

AIMS: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the relationship between in-stent neoatherosclerosis (NA) and native atherosclerosis progression of untreated coronary segments. METHODS AND RESULTS: In-stent NA was assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) among patients included in the SIRTAX-LATE OCT study 5 years after drug-eluting stent (DES) (sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents) implantation. Neoatherosclerosis was defined as the presence of fibroatheroma or fibrocalcific plaque within the neointima of stented segments with a longitudinal extension >1.0 mm. Atherosclerosis progression in untreated native coronary segments was evaluated by serial quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). The change in minimal lumen diameter (MLD) was serially assessed within matched segments at baseline and 5-year angiographic follow-up. The key clinical endpoint was non-target lesion (non-TL) revascularization throughout 5 years. A total of 88 patients with 88 lesions were available for OCT analysis 5 years after DES implantation. In-stent NA was observed in 16% of lesions with the majority of plaques being fibroatheromas (11.4%) followed by fibrocalcific plaques (5.7%). A total of 704 non-TL segments were serially evaluated by QCA. Between baseline and 5-year follow-up, the reduction in MLD was significantly more pronounced in patients with NA (-0.25 mm, 95% CI -0.36 to -0.17 mm) when compared with patients without NA (-0.13 mm, 95% CI -0.17 to -0.10 mm, P = 0.002). Similarly, non-TL revascularization was more frequent in patients with NA (78.6%) when compared with patients without NA (44.6%, P = 0.028) throughout 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: In-stent NA is more common among patients with angiographic and clinical evidence of native atherosclerosis progression suggesting similar pathophysiological mechanisms.SIRTAX trial is registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00617084.

Differential healing response attributed to culprit lesions of patients with acute coronary syndromes and stable coronary artery after implantation of drug-eluting stents: an optical coherence tomography study.

BACKGROUND: Pathology studies have shown delayed arterial healing in culprit lesions of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) compared with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) after placement of drug-eluting stents (DES). It is unknown whether similar differences exist in-vivo during long-term follow-up. Using optical coherence tomography (OCT), we assessed differences in arterial healing between patients with ACS and stable CAD five years after DES implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 88 patients comprised of 53 ACS lesions with 7864 struts and 35 stable lesions with 5298 struts were suitable for final OCT analysis five years after DES implantation. The analytical approach was based on a hierarchical Bayesian random-effects model. OCT endpoints were strut coverage, malapposition, protrusion, evaginations and cluster formation. Uncovered (1.7% vs. 0.7%, adjusted p=0.041) or protruding struts (0.50% vs. 0.13%, adjusted p=0.038) were more frequent among ACS compared with stable CAD lesions. A similar trend was observed for malapposed struts (1.33% vs. 0.45%, adj. p=0.072). Clusters of uncovered or malapposed/protruding struts were present in 34.0% of ACS and 14.1% of stable patients (adj. p=0.041). Coronary evaginations were more frequent in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction compared with stable CAD patients (0.16 vs. 0.13 per cross section, p=0.027). CONCLUSION: Uncovered, malapposed, and protruding stent struts as well as clusters of delayed healing may be more frequent in culprit lesions of ACS compared with stable CAD patients late after DES implantation. Our observational findings suggest a differential healing response attributable to lesion characteristics of patients with ACS compared with stable CAD in-vivo.

Long-term vascular healing in response to sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents: an optical coherence tomography study.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess stent strut coverage, malapposition, protrusion, and coronary evaginations as markers of healing 5 years after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES), by optical coherence tomography (OCT). BACKGROUND: Early-generation drug-eluting stents have been shown to delay vascular healing. METHODS: A total of 88 event-free patients with 1 randomly selected lesion were suitable for final OCT analysis 5 years after drug-eluting stent implantation. The analytical approach was based on a hierarchical Bayesian random-effects model. RESULTS: OCT analysis was performed at 5 years in 41 SES lesions with 6,380 struts, and in 47 PES lesions with 6,782 struts. A total of 196 struts were uncovered in SES (1.5%) compared with 185 struts in PES lesions (1.0%, 95% credibility interval [CrI]: 0.5 to 1.6; p = 0.32). Malapposed struts were present in 1.2% of SES compared with 0.7% of PES struts (0.7%, 95% CrI: 0.03 to 1.6; p = 0.23). Protruding struts were more frequent among SES (n = 114; 0.8%) than PES lesions (n = 24; 0.1%, 95% CrI: 0.3 to 1.3; p < 0.01). Coronary evaginations were more common among SES- than PES-treated lesions (17 vs. 7 per 100 cross sections, p = 0.003). During extended clinical follow-up, 2 patients suffered from very late stent thrombosis showing a high degree of malapposition, protrusion, and coronary evaginations at the time of OCT investigation. CONCLUSIONS: Early-generation drug-eluting stents show a similar degree of strut coverage and malapposition at 5 years of follow-up. Despite an overall low degree of uncovered and malapposed struts in event-free patients, some lesions show a clustering of these characteristics, indicating a heterogeneous healing response, which may be the source for very late adverse events.

Long-term comparison of everolimus- and sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to compare the long-term clinical outcome between everolimus-eluting stent (EES) and sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). BACKGROUND: EES have not been directly compared with SES in ACS patients to date. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2009, 1,746 consecutive ACS patients (ST-segment elevation ACS [STE-ACS]: 33.5%; non-ST-segment elevation ACS [NSTE-ACS]: 66.5%) were treated with EES (n=903) or SES (n=843). Using propensity score matching, clinical outcome was compared among 705 matched pairs of ACS patients treated with EES and SES. RESULTS: Through 3 years, the primary endpoint-the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR)-occurred in 13.8% of EES- and 17.7% of SES-treated ACS patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54 to 0.95, p=0.02). The difference in favor of EES was driven by a lower risk of TVR (5.7% vs. 8.8%, HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.98, p=0.04) and a trend toward a lower risk of MI (2.1% vs. 3.3%, HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.29 to 1.12, p=0.10). The risk of death (7.2% vs. 8.8%, HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.50 to 1.10, p=0.14) showed no difference between EES and SES. The treatment effect in favor of EES for the primary endpoint was similar for patients with STE-ACS (16.4% vs. 18.5%, HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.50 to 1.27) and NSTE-ACS (12.4% vs. 17.3%; HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.96; pfor interaction=0.56) and across major subgroups. Definite (0.4% vs. 1.8%, p=0.03), and definite or probable stent thrombosis (3.4% vs. 6.1%, p=0.02) were less frequent among EES- than SES-treated ACS patients. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with ACS, the unrestricted use of EES is associated with improved clinical outcome compared with SES during long-term follow-up to 3 years. Notably, the risk of stent thrombosis was lower among EES-treated ACS patients.