Impact of pandemic mobility restrictions on kidney transplant patients' experience: lessons on quality of care.

BACKGROUND: Patient perspectives on their post-operative health are acknowledged as valuable healthcare outcomes and should be scrupulously considered when designing interventions for patient-centered healthcare. Yet, following the COVID-19 lockdown and in the absence of standardized guidelines on how to best provide virtual chronic care to kidney transplant recipients, little is known about how this unique population coped and managed to comply with public health indications during confinement. METHODS: This study addresses this shortcoming by examining the experiences of patients from a tertiary hospital in Spain during the initial weeks of the lockdown decreed by the national government. Specifically, we focus our attention on the perceptions and experiences of these patients by retrieving robust qualitative and quantitative data: the former based on a thematic analysis of focus group transcripts, the latter obtained from a large-scale survey. RESULTS: Our findings identify opportunities for improvement in the quality of care and point to the provisions that might be made when facing future pandemics or lockdown-requiring situations. CONCLUSIONS: As healthcare services navigate evolving landscapes, our findings on the experience of kidney transplant recipients should enable hospital services to improve the quality of care they are able to provide to such patients during periods of restricted mobility, especially those associated with future disease emergencies, and considering that home confinement is often part of the natural course of post-operative care of these patients.

Nueva herramienta de cribado nutricional para pacientes hospitalizados con enfermedad renal crónica: traducción, adaptación transcultural del iNUT Renal al castellano y comparación con cuestionarios clásicos / New nutritional screening tool for hospitalized patients with chronic kidney disease: translation, cross-cultural adaptation of Renal iNUT into Spanish and comparison with classic questionnaires

Introducción: la enfermedad renal crónica (ERC) se caracteriza por su alta prevalencia de malnutrición, de difícil detección al ser subestimada por las herramientas habitualmente usadas. No existe un cribado nutricional válido a nivel hospitalario en castellano para identificar pacientes con ERC en riesgo de malnutrición. Objetivo: traducir y realizar la adaptación transcultural al castellano del cuestionario de Jackson y cols. (Renal Inpatient Nutrition Screening Tool [iNUT Renal]), que detecta el riesgo de malnutrición en pacientes con ERC ingresados, y compararlo con herramientas nutricionales clásicas. Métodos: fase 1: traducción, retrotraducción y adaptación transcultural del cuestionario en versión inglesa a la versión castellana. Prueba piloto realizada por enfermería con posterior cuestionario de satisfacción. Fase 2: comparación de iNUT Renal con Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) y Valoración Global Subjetiva (VGS). Resultados: fase 1: la valoración de enfermería fue altamente favorable. Lo consideraron fácil o muy fácil de utilizar y el 90 % lo realizó en un máximo de diez minutos. Fase 2: de los 48 pacientes incluidos, iNUT Renal detectó un 44 % en riesgo bajo de malnutrición, 28 % en riesgo intermedio y 28 % en riesgo alto. Se halló mayor sensibilidad del iNUT Renal (p < 0,007) vs. MUST (62,5 vs. 33,3 %), similar especificidad (87,1 vs. 90,6 %) y aceptable correlación en comparación con VGS (r = 0,75, IC 95 %: 0,67-0,83). Conclusiones: la versión castellana de iNUT Renal es una herramienta útil y de fácil comprensión para el personal sanitario. Asimismo, confirmamos su buena correlación con VGS, con mayor sensibilidad que MUST para la detección del riesgo de malnutrición en el paciente con ERC ingresado. (AU)

Introduction: chronic kidney disease (CKD) is characterized by its high prevalence of malnutrition, difficult to detect as it is underestimated by the usual tools. There is no valid or hospital-level nutritional screening tool in Spanish to identify patients with CKD at risk of malnutrition. Objective: to translate and accomplish the transcultural adaptation of Jackson‘s questionnaire (Renal Inpatient Nutrition Screening Tool [Renal iNUT]) to Spanish, which detects the risk of malnutrition in CKD inpatients and compares it with other nutritional tools. Methods: phase 1: translation, back-translation and transcultural adaptation of the questionnaire from the English to the Spanish version. A pilot test was carried out by nursing staff together with a satisfaction questionnaire. Phase 2: comparison of Renal iNUT with Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and Subjective Global Assessment (SGA). Results: phase 1: the nursing staff’s perception was highly favorable. They found it easy or very easy to use and 90 % of them did it in a maximum of ten minutes. Phase 2: from 48 patients included, Renal iNUT detected 44 % at low risk of malnutrition, 28 % at intermediate risk and 28 % at high risk. Increased sensitivity of Renal iNUT (p < 0.007) vs MUST (62.5 vs 33.3 %) and similar specificity (87.1 vs 90.6 %) were found, together with an acceptable correlation compared to SGA (r = 0.75, 95 % CI: 0.67 to 0.83). Conclusions: the Spanish version of Renal iNUT is a useful and easy-to-understand tool for health professionals. We also confirm its good correlation with SGA, with greater sensitivity than MUST for the risk of malnutrition detection in CKD inpatients. (AU)

Frailty in hemodialysis patients: results of a screening program and multidisciplinary interventions.

Background: The number of frail patients of advanced age with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) undergoing hemodialysis is increasing globally. Here we evaluated a frailty screening program of ESKD patients starting hemodialysis, and subsequent multidisciplinary interventions. Methods: This was a prospective observational study of ESKD patients in a hemodialysis program. Patients were evaluated for frailty (Fried frail phenotype) before and after a 12-month period. Patients followed standard clinical practice at our hospital, which included assessment and multidisciplinary interventions for nutritional (malnutrition-inflammation score, protein-energy wasting), physical [short physical performance battery (SPPB)] and psychological status. Results: A total of 167 patients (mean ± standard deviation age 67.8 ± 15.4 years) were screened for frailty, and 108 completed the program. At screening, 27.9% of the patients were frail, 40.0% pre-frail and 32.1% non-frail. Nutritional interventions (enrichment, oral nutritional supplements, intradialytic parenteral nutrition) resulted in stable nutritional status for most frail and pre-frail patients after 12 months. Patients following recommendations for intradialytic, home-based or combined physical exercise presented improved or stable in SPPB scores after 12 months, compared with those that did not follow recommendations, especially in the frail and pre-frail population (P = .025). A rate of 0.05 falls/patient/year was observed. More than 60% of frail patients presented high scores of sadness and anxiety. Conclusions: Frailty screening, together with coordinated interventions by nutritionists, physiotherapists, psychologists and nurses, preserved the health status of ESKD patients starting hemodialysis. Frailty assessment helped in advising patients on individual nutritional, physical or psychological needs.

Challenges in perioperative blood transfusions in kidney transplantation and the need for Patient Blood Management.

BACKGROUND: Anemia is highly prevalent in end-stage chronic kidney disease patients, increasing their risk of receiving blood transfusions during and on the days after a kidney transplant (KTx) surgery. However, there is currently a lack of data that thoroughly describes this phenomenon in this population, the associated risk factors, and how they could benefit from the application of Patient Blood Management (PBM) guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Observational study. All adult patients who received a KTx between January 1st, 2020, and December 31st, 2021, were included and followed up to six months after transplantation. Those who received a multiorgan transplant, whose data was missing in the electronic health records, and who had primary non-function were excluded. We recorded donor and recipient characteristics, cold ischemia time, preoperative hemoglobin concentration, iron status deficiency biomarkers, incidence of delayed graft function and biopsy-proven graft rejections, and graft function at discharge and 6 months after transplantation. RESULTS: We found that a high amount (39%) of KTx recipients required at least one blood transfusion during the perioperative period. And that 1) most of these patients had anemia at the time of transplantation (85.4%), 2) iron status upon admission was associated with the transfusion of more blood units (3.9 vs 2.7, p=0.019), 3) surgical reintervention (OR 7.28, 2.35-22.54) and deceased donor donation (OR 1.99, 1.24-3.21) were associated with an increased risk of transfusion, and finally, 4) there was an association between a higher number of blood units transfused and impaired kidney graft function six months after hospital discharge (1.6 vs 1.9, p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, PBM guidelines should be applied to patients on the KTx deceased donor waiting list and especially those scheduled to receive a transplant from a living donor. This could potentially increase the utilization efficiency of blood products and avoid transfusion-related severe adverse effects.

Early kinetics of donor-derived cell-free DNA after transplantation predicts renal graft recovery and long-term function.

BACKGROUND: Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) upon transplantation is one of the most impactful events that the kidney graft suffers during its life. Its clinical manifestation in the recipient, delayed graft function (DGF), has serious prognostic consequences. However, the different definitions of DGF are subject to physicians' choices and centers' policies, and a more objective tool to quantify IRI is needed. Here, we propose the use of donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA) for this scope. METHODS: ddcfDNA was assessed in 61 kidney transplant recipients of either living or deceased donors at 24 h, and 7, 14 and 30 days after transplantation using the AlloSeq cfDNA Kit (CareDx, San Francisco, CA, USA). Patients were followed-up for 6 months and 7-year graft survival was estimated through the complete and functional iBox tool. RESULTS: Twenty-four-hour ddcfDNA was associated with functional DGF [7.20% (2.35%-15.50%) in patients with functional DGF versus 2.70% (1.55%-4.05%) in patients without it, P = .023] and 6-month estimated glomerular filtration rate (r = -0.311, P = .023). At Day 7 after transplantation, ddcfDNA was associated with dialysis duration in DGF patients (r = 0.612, P = .005) and worse 7-year iBox-estimated graft survival probability (ß -0.42, P = .001) at multivariable analysis. Patients with early normalization of ddcfDNA (<0.5% at 1 week) had improved functional iBox-estimated probability of graft survival (79.5 ± 16.8%) in comparison with patients with 7-day ddcfDNA ≥0.5% (67.7 ± 24.1%) (P = .047). CONCLUSIONS: ddcfDNA early kinetics after transplantation reflect recovery from IRI and are associated with short-, medium- and long-term graft outcome. This may provide a more objective estimate of IRI severity in comparison with the clinical-based definitions of DGF.

Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses After a 3-dose Course of mRNA-1273 COVID-19 Vaccine in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Prospective Cohort Study.

In kidney transplant recipients, there is discordance between the development of cellular and humoral response after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. We sought to determine the interplay between the 2 arms of adaptive immunity in a 3-dose course of mRNA-1273 100 µg vaccine. Methods: Humoral (IgG/IgM) and cellular (N- and S-ELISpot) responses were studied in 117 kidney and 12 kidney-pancreas transplant recipients at the following time points: before the first dose, 14 d after the second dose' and before and after the third dose, with a median of 203 and 232 d after the start of the vaccination cycle, respectively. Results: After the second dose, 26.7% of naive cases experienced seroconversion. Before the third dose and in the absence of COVID-19, this percentage increased to 61.9%. After the third dose, seroconversion occurred in 80.0% of patients. Naive patients who had at any time point a detectable positivity for S-ELISpot were 75.2% of the population, whereas patients who maintained S-ELISpot positivity throughout the study were 34.3%. S-ELISpot positivity at 42 d was associated with final seroconversion (odds ratio' 3.14; 95% confidence interval' 1.10-8.96; P = 0.032). Final IgG titer was significantly higher in patients with constant S-ELISpot positivity (P < 0.001). Conclusions: A substantial proportion of kidney transplant recipients developed late seroconversion after 2 doses. Cellular immunity was associated with the development of a stronger humoral response.

Preemptive simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation has survival benefit to patients.

Several organ allocation protocols give priority to wait-listed simultaneous kidney-pancreas (SPK) transplant recipients to mitigate the higher cardiovascular risk of patients with diabetes mellitus on dialysis. The available information regarding the impact of preemptive simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation on recipient and graft outcomes is nonetheless controversial. To help resolve this, we explored the influence of preemptive simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplants on patient and graft survival through a retrospective analysis of the OPTN/UNOS database, encompassing 9690 simultaneous transplant recipients between 2000 and 2017. Statistical analysis was performed applying a propensity score analysis to minimize bias. Of these patients, 1796 (19%) were transplanted preemptively. At ten years, recipient survival was significantly superior in the preemptive group when compared to the non-preemptive group (78.9% vs 71.8%). Dialysis at simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation was an independent significant risk for patient survival (hazard ratio 1.66 [95% confidence interval 1.32-2.09]), especially if the dialysis duration was 12 months or longer. Preemptive transplantation was also associated with significant superior kidney graft survival compared to those on dialysis (death-censored: 84.3% vs 75.4%, respectively; estimated half-life of 38.57 [38.33 -38.81] vs 22.35 [22.17 - 22.53] years, respectively). No differences were observed between both groups neither for pancreas graft survival nor for post-transplant surgical complications. Thus, our results sustain the relevance of early referral for pancreas transplantation and the importance of pancreas allocation priority in reducing patient mortality after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation.

Incidence of severe breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections in vaccinated kidney transplant and haemodialysis patients.

INTRODUCTION: Given the increased COVID-19 observed in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and haemodialysis patients, several studies have tried to establish the efficacy of mRNA vaccines in these populations by evaluating their humoral and cellular responses. However, there is currently no information on clinical protection (deaths and hospitalizations), a gap that this study aims to fill. METHODS: Observational prospective study involving 1,336 KTRs and haemodialysis patients from three dialysis units affiliated to Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Spain, vaccinated with two doses of mRNA-1273 (Moderna) or BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines. The outcomes measured were SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosed by a positive RT-PCR fourteen days after the second vaccine dose, hospital admissions derived from infection, and a severe COVID-19 composite outcome, defined as either ICU admission, invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation, or death. RESULTS: Six per cent (18/302) of patients on haemodialysis were infected, of whom four required hospital admission (1.3%), only one (0.3%) had severe COVID-19, and none of them died. In contrast, 4.3% (44/1034) of KTRs were infected, and presented more hospital admissions (26 patients, 2.5%), severe COVID-19 (11 patients, 1.1%) or death (4 patients, 0.4%). KTRs had a significantly higher risk of hospital admission than HD patients, and this risk increased with age and male sex (HR 3.37 and 4.74, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the need for booster doses in KTRs. In contrast, the haemodialysis population appears to have an adequate clinical response to vaccination, at least up to four months from its administration.

Impact of insulin therapy before donation on graft outcomes in pancreas transplantation: An analysis of the OPTN/UNOS database.

AIMS: Information on the impact of insulin therapy before pancreas donation on pancreas outcomes is scarce. We aim to explore the influence of insulin therapy before donation on recipient and pancreas graft survival. METHODS: Registry study including 12,841 pancreas recipients from the OPTN/UNOS registry performed between 2000 and 2017. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to account for covariate imbalance between recipients from a donor with and without insulin requirements. RESULTS: A total of 7765 (60%) patients received a pancreas from a donor with insulin before donation (IBD). Pancreas graft survival (death-censored) was similar between recipients from IBD and non-IBD donors at 1, 5 and 10 years (89% vs 89%, 78% vs 79 and 69% vs 70%, respectively, P = 0.35). Recipients from IBD donors presented a similar 90-days pancreas graft survival. After IPTW weighting, IBD donors were neither associated with any post-transplant surgical complication (HR 1.11 [95% CI 0.98-1.24], P = 0.06), nor with risk for recipient death (HR 0.94 [95% CI 0.85-1.04], P = 0.26), nor pancreas graft failure (HR 1.06 [95% CI 0.98-1.16], P = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Insulin therapy before donation in accepted pancreas donors was not associated, per se, with an impaired pancreas graft and patient survival.

Humoral and Cellular Responses to mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines Administered to Hemodialysis Patients.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Patients with kidney failure who are receiving maintenance dialysis have a higher risk of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and worse clinical outcomes after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) than the general population. Therefore, immunization against SARS-CoV-2 with effective vaccines is an important component of health-maintenance strategies for these patients. This study evaluated the humoral and cellular responses to messenger RNA (mRNA) SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in this population. STUDY DESIGN: Observational prospective multicenter cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 205 patients treated at 3 dialysis units at the Hospital Clínic of Barcelona (Spain) were vaccinated from February 3 to April 4, 2021, and followed until April 23, 2021. EXPOSURE: Immunization with either the mRNA-1273 (Moderna) or BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. OUTCOME: Seroconversion, defined as the detection of IgG antibodies to the receptor-binding domain of the S1 spike antigen of SARS-CoV-2 (anti-S1-RBD IgG), and the identification of activated CD4+T cells 3 weeks after completing vaccination. Anti-S1-RBD IgG levels were also analyzed as a secondary outcome. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Univariate and multivariable logistic and multiple linear regression models were used to evaluate the associations between vaccination and study outcomes. RESULTS: We found that 97.7% of 175 vaccinated patients who were seronegative at baseline developed a response (humoral, cellular, or both); 95.4% of these patients seroconverted, while 62% of those tested for cellular immunity had a positive response. Greater age and immunosuppressive treatment were associated with lower antibody levels. LIMITATIONS: Mandatory vaccine administration by health authorities. Anti-S1-RBD IgG levels were reported up to 150U/mL and cellular immune responses were characterized qualitatively. Antibody assay and cellular response assessment may not be comparable with previously published laboratory approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Immunization with mRNA vaccines generated a humoral and cellular immune response in a high proportion of patients with kidney failure receiving maintenance dialysis. These findings as well as the high risk of infection and poor clinical outcomes among these patients make their vaccination a health priority.

Cellular and humoral response after MRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in kidney transplant recipients.

According to preliminary data, seroconversion after mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination might be unsatisfactory in Kidney Transplant Recipients (KTRs). However, it is unknown if seronegative patients develop at least a cellular response that could offer a certain grade of protection against SARS-CoV-2. To answer this question, we prospectively studied 148 recipients of either kidney (133) or kidney-pancreas (15) grafts with assessment of IgM/IgG spike (S) antibodies and ELISpot against the nucleocapside (N) and the S protein at baseline and 2 weeks after receiving the second dose of the mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccine. At baseline, 31 patients (20.9%) had either IgM/IgG or ELISpot positivity and were considered to be SARS-CoV-2-pre-immunized, while 117 (79.1%) patients had no signs of either cellular or humoral response and were considered SARS-CoV-2-naïve. After vaccination, naïve patients who developed either humoral or cellular response were finally 65.0%, of which 29.9% developed either IgG or IgM and 35.0% S-ELISpot positivity. Factors associated with vaccine unresponsiveness were diabetes and treatment with antithymocytes globulins during the last year. Side effects were consistent with that of the pivotal trial and no DSAs developed after vaccination. In conclusion, mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine elicits either cellular or humoral response in almost two thirds of KTRs.

A hybrid data envelopment analysis-artificial neural network prediction model for COVID-19 severity in transplant recipients.

In an overwhelming demand scenario, such as the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, pressure over health systems may outburst their predicted capacity to deal with such extreme situations. Therefore, in order to successfully face a health emergency, scientific evidence and validated models are needed to provide real-time information that could be applied by any health center, especially for high-risk populations, such as transplant recipients. We have developed a hybrid prediction model whose accuracy relative to several alternative configurations has been validated through a battery of clustering techniques. Using hospital admission data from a cohort of hospitalized transplant patients, our hybrid Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)-Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model extrapolates the progression towards severe COVID-19 disease with an accuracy of 96.3%, outperforming any competing model, such as logistic regression (65.5%) and random forest (44.8%). In this regard, DEA-ANN allows us to categorize the evolution of patients through the values of the analyses performed at hospital admission. Our prediction model may help guiding COVID-19 management through the identification of key predictors that permit a sustainable management of resources in a patient-centered model. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10462-021-10008-0.

Prevalence, evolution, and related risk factors of kidney disease among Spanish HIV-infected individuals.

Prevalence of kidney disease (KD) is increasing among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected population. Different factors have been related, varying on different published series.The objectives were to study prevalence of KD in those patients, its evolution, and associated risk factors.An observational cohort study of 1596 HIV-positive patients with cross-sectional data collection in 2008 and 2010 was conducted. We obtained clinical and laboratory markers, and registered previous or current treatment with tenofovir (TDF) and indinavir (IDV). The sample was divided according to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation. Group 1: eGFR ≤60 mL/min/1.73 m; group 2: eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m.Among the patients, 76.4% were men, mean age (SD) 45 ±â€Š9 years, time since diagnose of HIV 14 ±â€Š7 years, and 47.2% of the patients received previous treatment with TDF and 39.1% with IDV. In 2008, eGFR ≤60: 4.9% (91.4% of them in chronic kidney disease [CKD] stage 3, eGFR 59-30 mL/min); this group was older, presented higher fibrinogen levels, and more patients were treated previously with TDF and IDV. In 2010, eGFR ≤60: 3.9% (87.1% stage 3 CKD). The 2.4% of cohort showed renal improvement and 1.3% decline of renal function over time. The absence of hypertension and treatment with TDF were associated with improvement in eGFR. Increased age, elevated fibrinogen, decreased albumin, diabetes mellitus, hyperTG, and worse virological control were risk factors for renal impairment.The HIV-positive patients in our area have a CKD prevalence of 4% to 5% (90% stage 3 CKD) associated with ageing, inflammation, worse immune control of HIV, TDF treatment, and metabolic syndrome.

Magnetic bead-based proteomic technology to study paricalcitol effect in kidney transplant recipients.

Secondary hyperparathyroidism is a common complication in patients with chronic kidney disease and frequently persists after kidney transplantation. Paricalcitol, a selective vitamin D receptor activator, is indicated in the management of this disorder and recent evidences have suggested that this drug has other beneficial effects. Aiming to elucidate these effects, our study included 52 stable kidney transplant recipients randomized 2:1 to treatment with paricalcitol or to no treatment. Bone mineral parameters, kidney function and inflammatory status were assessed at baseline, at 3 and at 12 months. Moreover, a proteomic approach, based on magnetic beads technology coupled to MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry readout, was used to determine changes in patients' plasma peptidome. Patients treated with paricalcitol showed a significant decrease in parathyroid hormone and alkaline phosphatase levels, and an increase of bone mineral density and glomerular filtration rate. The proteomic analysis revealed a decrease in bradykinin after paricalcitol treatment, whereas 2 peptides identified as fragments of the complement factor C4 decreased only in those patients not treated with paricalcitol. These findings suggest that paricalcitol may offer additional benefits due to immunomodulatory effects via the kallikrein-kinin and complement systems.

Effect of drastic weight loss after bariatric surgery on renal parameters in extremely obese patients: long-term follow-up.

Obesity is a health problem that is reaching epidemic proportions. Extreme obesity (body mass index [BMI] > or =40 kg/m2) is a type of obesity that usually does not respond to medical treatment, with surgery being the current treatment of choice. Extreme obesity is associated with cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension. Recently, obesity has been related with high rate of renal lesions, but renal function and renal parameters in extreme obesity scarcely are documented. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of weight loss after bariatric surgery (BS) on BP, renal parameters, and renal function in 61 extremely obese (EO) patients after 24 mo of follow-up. A total of 61 EO adults (37 women) were studied prospectively before and 24 mo after surgery. Control subjects were 24 healthy, normal-weight adults (15 women). Anthropometric, BP, and renal parameters were determined. Presurgery weight, BMI, GFR, 24-h proteinuria, and 24-h albuminuria were higher in the EO patients than in control subjects (P < 0.001). All parameters improved at 12 mo after BS. However, during the second year of follow-up, only 24-h albuminuria (P = 0.006) and BMI (P = 0.014) continued to improve. At 24 mo after BS, obesity-related renal alterations considerably improved. This improvement was observed mainly in the first year after surgery, when the majority of weight loss occurred. However, 24-h albuminuria still improves during the second year of follow-up. It is possible that this decrease in 24-h albuminuria is not GFR related but rather is attributable to the persistence of the decrease in BMI and to the improvement of other weight-related metabolic factors.

Homocysteine, C-reactive protein, lipid peroxidation and mortality in haemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is common in haemodialysis patients with chronic renal insufficiency and is the leading cause of death. The accelerated state of atherosclerosis found in these patients is due to a combination of different mechanisms. Recent studies confirm that inflammation plays an important role in the development of atherosclerosis. However, the role of hyperhomocysteinaemia and the immune response to oxidation of low-density lipoproteins (LDL) remains unclear and studies show contradictory results. The objective of this study was to determine whether there is a relationship between inflammation, hyperhomocysteinaemia and oxidative stress and whether these CVD risk factors are predictors of mortality in haemodialysis patients. METHODS: A prospective follow-up study was carried out in 94 stable, chronic haemodialysis patients for 24 months (July 1999-July 2001). All the patients were given folic acid and vitamin B complex supplements. Homocysteine was determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay. C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were determined by chemiluminescent enzyme-labelled immunometric assay. Plasma copper oxidized anti-LDL (oxLDL) antibodies were measured by ELISA using native LDL and oxLDL as antigens. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients died during the study and 59.3% of the deaths could be attributed to CVD (eight to acute myocardial infarction and 11 to non-coronary vascular disease). The patients had slight hyperhomocysteinaemia (25.8 +/- 7.82 micromol/l), evidence of inflammation (CRP 5.16 mg/l (0.35-88.7)) and oxidative stress (oxLDL antibodies = 162 +/- 77 optical density at 495 nm x 1000). Age (P < 0.01), CRP (P = 0.03) and the oxLDL antibody titre (P < 0.01) were predictive of mortality. The patients who died from heart disease showed higher oxLDL antibody titres (P = 0.03). No correlation was found between homocysteine, CRP and the oxLDL antibody titre, or between serum homocysteine levels and the different causes of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that lipid peroxidation and inflammation, but not hyperhomocysteinaemia, are the main risk factors for mortality in haemodialysis patients receiving vitamin supplements. As the study was carried out in a relatively limited number of patients, our findings need to be confirmed in a larger patient population.