RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The main objective of our study was to compare a new model of self-ligating ceramic bracket (Clarity™ Ultra by 3M™), to its competitors by evaluating their resistance to sliding during an in vitro simulation of canine retraction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The sample consisted of 120 brackets (30 brackets in each group: Victory Twin Series LP™, Clarity Ultra™ by 3M™, Damon Clear 2™ by Ormco™ and Empower™ 2 Clear by American Orthodontics™). Canine retraction was simulated using a universal testing machine connected to a software that measured the average sliding resistance (ASR) for each group. Five brackets from each group were randomly selected and observed under a digital optical microscope at ×50 magnification. ANOVA test and Tukey's analysis were carried to detect statistically significant differences between the groups' sliding resistance values, at the risk of α=0.05. RESULTS: Measured ASR values of control group (metallic Victory Twin) were the highest ones (70.55g), followed by 3M™ (33.22g) then Damon™ (6.72g) and AO™ (5.49g) (P-value<0.0001). Through microscopic observations, we found that the 3M™ bracket has the lowest percentage of slot chamfering (8%) compared to the other brackets (12%). The 3M™ bracket also has the widest slot followed by AO, and then Damon™. All three bracket types have oversized slots compared to the manufacturer's description, the least oversized being the 3M™ bracket, followed by AO™ and then Damon™. 3M™ and Damon™ brackets have covers that concealed the entire wire in the vertical dimension whereas the AO™ bracket has a curvilinear cover that only shields the gingival part of its slot. Wire-play is zero for the 3M™ group, and 0.1mm for the other two groups. CONCLUSION: Clarity Ultra™ ceramic bracket produced by 3M™ does not perform well against friction forces compared to its competitors and that is due to its micro-morphological characteristics.
