Changes in sleep-disordered breathing from the acute to the stable phase of pulmonary embolism: The ESAET study.

BACKGROUND: /Objective: Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) may change from the acute to stable phase of some cardiovascular disorders, but little is known whether these dynamic changes also exist in pulmonary embolism (PE). This study aimed to analyze the changes in the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) from the acute to stable phase of PE as well as the factors associated. PATIENTS/METHODS: We conducted a prospective, longitudinal and multicenter study of consecutive adults requiring hospitalization for non-hypotensive acute PE, with a protocol including clinical, imaging (transthoracic echocardiography [TTE] and computed tomography), blood tests and a sleep study within 48 h of diagnosis of PE. After 3 months of follow-up, the sleep study was repeated. Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction was defined according to TTE criteria. RESULTS: One hundred and eleven patients (mean age [SD]: 63 [15] years; body mass index: 28.4 [4.7] kg/m2) were included. The initial AHI was 24.4 (21.8) events/h (AHI≥5: 82.8 %; AHI≥30: 33.3 %). Seventy-seven patients (69.4 %) had RV dysfunction. In the overall cohort, the AHI decreased by 8.7 events/h from the acute to stable phase (24.4/h vs. 15.7/h; p=0.013). Patients with RV dysfunction showed a greater decrease in AHI (mean decrease 12.3/h vs. 0.43/h). In the multivariable analysis a drop of an AHI≥5 events/hour was independently associated with the presence of initial RV dysfunction (hazard ratio 3.9; 95%CI 1.3 to 12.1). CONCLUSIONS: In hemodynamically stable patients with acute PE, there is a transient but clinically significant decrease in the AHI from the acute to stable phase, particularly when initially presenting with RV dysfunction.

Bronchiectasis and COVID-19 infection: a two-way street.

ABSTRACT: Bronchiectasis (BE) has been linked to past viral infections such as influenza, measles, or adenovirus. Two years ago, a new pandemic viral infection severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) broke out and it still persists today, and a significant proportion of surviving patients have radiological and clinical sequelae, including BE. Our aim was to thoroughly review the information available in the literature on the bidirectional relationship between SARS-CoV-2 infection and the development of BE, as well as the impact of this infection on patients already suffering from BE. Available information indicates that only a small percentage of patients in the acute phase of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia develop BE, although the latter is recognized as one of the radiological sequelae of COVID-19 pneumonia, especially when it is caused by traction. The severity of the initial pneumonia is the main risk factor for the development of future BE, but during the COVID-19 pandemic, exacerbations in BE patients were reduced by approximately 50%. Finally, the impact of BE on the prognosis of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia is not yet known.

Clinical Features and Outcomes Associated with Bronchial Asthma Among COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients.

Background: The impact of diagnosis treatment and bronchial asthma on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) associated outcomes remains unclear. Objective: To identify the prevalence and outcomes associated with asthma among hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Methods: Electronic health records of 130 patients with asthma among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were reviewed. Two subgroups of asthmatic patients were compared according to clinical outcomes during hospitalization. Patients with death results, intubation, and/or need of intensive care unit (ICU) stay were grouped as asthmatic patients with severe COVID-19 outcomes, and the rest were grouped as asthmatic patients with non-severe COVID-19 outcomes. Multivariable analyses were conducted with logistic regression to identify independent risk factors for severe outcomes. Results: The prevalence of asthma in COVID-19 hospitalized patients was 5%. The mean age was 59.4 years and 54% were women. 17% received treatment in GINA step 4-5 asthma at the time of admission. An allergic asthma phenotype was determined in 38%. There was no significant difference in hospital length of stay or need for intubation between asthmatic patients and global COVID-19 admitted patients. 17% of asthmatic patients developed a severe outcome, and 5% had a death result. Elevated Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) level, low transcutaneous pulse oximetry (SpO2), the coexistence of atrial fibrillation (AF), and need for moderate or high ICS at admission were independent risk factors for a worse outcome in asthmatics COVID-19 hospitalized patients. Conclusion: The prevalence of asthma in COVID-19 hospitalized patients was 5%, consistent with the asthma prevalence in the general population. The asthmatic patients with the previous prescription of moderate or high doses of ICS and/or coexistence of atrial fibrillation at admission had a higher risk of the severe outcome.