Exercise training and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin-I in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

AIMS: The aims of this sub-study of the SMARTEX trial were (1) to evaluate the effects of a 12-week exercise training programme on serum levels of high sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) in patients with moderate chronic heart failure (CHF), in New York Heart Association class II-III with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and (2) to explore the associations with left ventricular remodelling, functional capacity and filling pressures measured with N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). METHODS AND RESULTS: In this sub-study, 196 patients were randomly assigned to high intensity interval training (HIIT, n = 70), moderate continuous training (MCT, n = 59) or recommendation of regular exercise (RRE), (n = 67) for 12 weeks. To reveal potential difference between structured intervention and control, HIIT and MCT groups were merged and named supervised exercise training (SET) group. The RRE group constituted the control group (CG). To avoid contributing factors to myocardial injury, we also evaluated changes in patients without additional co-morbidities (atrial fibrillation, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). The relationship between hs-cTnI and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), VO2peak, and NT-proBNP was analysed by linear mixed models. At 12 weeks, Hs-cTnI levels were modestly but significantly reduced in the SET group from median 11.9 ng/L (interquartile ratio, IQR 7.1-21.8) to 11.5 ng/L (IQR 7.0-20.7), P = 0.030. There was no between-group difference (SET vs. CG, P = 0.116). There was a numerical but not significant reduction in hs-cTnI for the whole population (P = 0.067) after 12 weeks. For the sub-group of patients without additional co-morbidities, there was a significant between-group difference: SET group (delta -1.2 ng/L, IQR -2.7 to 0.1) versus CG (delta -0.1 ng/L, IQR -0.4 to 0.7), P = 0.007. In the SET group, hs-cTnI changed from 10.9 ng/L (IQR 6.0-22.7) to 9.2 ng/L (IQR 5.2-20.5) (P = 0.002), whereas there was no change in the CG (6.4 to 5.8 ng/L, P = 0.64). Changes in hs-cTnI (all patients) were significantly associated with changes in; LVEDD, VO2peak, and NT-proBNP, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stable HFrEF, 12 weeks of structured exercise intervention was associated with a modest, but significant reduction of hs-cTnI. There was no significant difference between intervention group and control group. In the sub-group of patients without additional co-morbidities, this difference was highly significant. The alterations in hs-cTnI were associated with reduction of LVEDD and natriuretic peptide concentrations as well as improved functional capacity.

Standardised Exercise Prescription for Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome and/or Heart Failure: A Consensus Statement from the EXPERT Working Group.

Whereas exercise training, as part of multidisciplinary rehabilitation, is a key component in the management of patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) and/or congestive heart failure (CHF), physicians and exercise professionals disagree among themselves on the type and characteristics of the exercise to be prescribed to these patients, and the exercise prescriptions are not consistent with the international guidelines. This impacts the efficacy and quality of the intervention of rehabilitation. To overcome these barriers, a digital training and decision support system [i.e. EXercise Prescription in Everyday practice & Rehabilitative Training (EXPERT) tool], i.e. a stepwise aid to exercise prescription in patients with CCS and/or CHF, affected by concomitant risk factors and comorbidities, in the setting of multidisciplinary rehabilitation, was developed. The EXPERT working group members reviewed the literature and formulated exercise recommendations (exercise training intensity, frequency, volume, type, session and programme duration) and safety precautions for CCS and/or CHF (including heart transplantation). Also, highly prevalent comorbidities (e.g. peripheral arterial disease) or cardiac devices (e.g. pacemaker, implanted cardioverter defibrillator, left-ventricular assist device) were considered, as well as indications for the in-hospital phase (e.g. after coronary revascularisation or hospitalisation for CHF). The contributions of physical fitness, medications and adverse events during exercise testing were also considered. The EXPERT tool was developed on the basis of this evidence. In this paper, the exercise prescriptions for patients with CCS and/or CHF formulated for the EXPERT tool are presented. Finally, to demonstrate how the EXPERT tool proposes exercise prescriptions in patients with CCS and/or CHF with different combinations of CVD risk factors, three patient cases with solutions are presented.

Appropriate exercise prescription in primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: why this skill remains to be improved among clinicians and healthcare professionals. A call for action from the EXPERT Network†.

In Europe alone, on a yearly basis, millions of people need an appropriate exercise prescription to prevent the occurrence or progression of cardiovascular disease (CVD). A general exercise recommendation can be provided to these individuals (at least 150 min of moderate-intensity endurance exercise, spread over 3-5 days/week, complemented by dynamic moderate-intensity resistance exercise 2 days/week). However, recent evidence shows that this one size does not fit all and that individual adjustments should be made according to the patient's underlying disease(s), risk profile, and individual needs, to maximize the clinical benefits of exercise. In this paper, we (i) argue that this general exercise prescription simply provided to all patients with CVD, or elevated risk for CVD, is insufficient for optimal CVD prevention, and (ii) show that clinicians and healthcare professionals perform heterogeneously when asked to adjust exercise characteristics (e.g. intensity, volume, and type) according to the patient's condition, thereby leading to suboptimal CVD risk factor control. Since exercise training is a class 1A intervention in the primary and secondary prevention of CVD, the awareness of the need to improve exercise prescription has to be raised among clinicians and healthcare professionals if optimized prevention of CVD is ambitioned.

Effect of Training on Vascular Function and Repair in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: Exercise training improves peak oxygen uptake (V.O2peak) in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Multiple adaptations have been addressed, but the role of circulating endothelium-repairing cells and vascular function have not been well defined. OBJECTIVES: The authors investigated effects of moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on vascular function and repair in HFpEF. METHODS: This study is a subanalysis of the OptimEx-Clin (Optimizing Exercise Training in Prevention and Treatment of Diastolic Heart Failure) study randomizing patients with HFpEF (n = 180) to HIIT, MICT, or guideline control. At baseline, 3, and 12 months, the authors measured peripheral arterial tonometry (valid baseline measurement in n = 109), flow-mediated dilation (n = 59), augmentation index (n = 94), and flow cytometry (n = 136) for endothelial progenitor cells and angiogenic T cells. Abnormal values were defined as outside 90% of published sex-specific reference values. RESULTS: At baseline, abnormal values (%) were observed for augmentation index in 66%, peripheral arterial tonometry in 17%, flow-mediated dilation in 25%, endothelial progenitor cells in 42%, and angiogenic T cells in 18%. These parameters did not change significantly after 3 or 12 months of HIIT or MICT. Results remained unchanged when confining analysis to patients with high adherence to training. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HFpEF, high augmentation index was common, but endothelial function and levels of endothelium-repairing cells were normal in most patients. Aerobic exercise training did not change vascular function or cellular endothelial repair. Improved vascular function did not significantly contribute to the V.O2peak improvement after different training intensities in HFpEF, contrary to previous studies in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and coronary artery disease. (Optimizing Exercise Training in Prevention and Treatment of Diastolic Heart Failure [OptimEx-Clin]; NCT02078947).

Peak O2 -pulse predicts exercise training-induced changes in peak V̇O2 in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

AIMS: Exercise training (ET) has been consistently shown to increase peak oxygen consumption (V̇O2 ) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF); however, inter-individual responses vary significantly. Because it is unlikely that ET-induced improvements in peak V̇O2 are significantly mediated by an increase in peak heart rate (HR), we aimed to investigate whether baseline peak O2 -pulse (V̇O2  × HR-1 , reflecting the product of stroke volume and arteriovenous oxygen difference), not baseline peak V̇O2 , is inversely associated with the change in peak V̇O2 (adjusted by body weight) following ET versus guideline control (CON) in patients with HFpEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a secondary analysis of the OptimEx-Clin (Optimizing Exercise Training in Prevention and Treatment of Diastolic Heart Failure, NCT02078947) trial, including all 158 patients with complete baseline and 3 month cardiopulmonary exercise testing measurements (106 ET, 52 CON). Change in peak V̇O2 (%) was analysed as a function of baseline peak V̇O2 and its determinants (absolute peak V̇O2 , peak O2 -pulse, peak HR, weight, haemoglobin) using robust linear regression analyses. Mediating effects on change in peak V̇O2 through changes in peak O2 -pulse, peak HR and weight were analysed by a causal mediation analysis with multiple correlated mediators. Change in submaximal exercise tolerance (V̇O2 at the ventilatory threshold, VT1) was analysed as a secondary endpoint. Among 158 patients with HFpEF (66% female; mean age, 70 ± 8 years), changes in peak O2 -pulse explained approximately 72% of the difference in changes in peak V̇O2 between ET and CON [10.0% (95% CI, 4.1 to 15.9), P = 0.001]. There was a significant interaction between the groups for the influence of baseline peak O2 -pulse on change in peak V̇O2 (interaction P = 0.04). In the ET group, every 1 mL/beat higher baseline peak O2 -pulse was associated with a decreased mean change in peak V̇O2 of -1.45% (95% CI, -2.30 to -0.60, P = 0.001) compared with a mean change of -0.08% (95% CI, -1.11 to 0.96, P = 0.88) following CON. None of the other factors showed significant interactions with study groups for the change in peak V̇O2 (P > 0.05). Change in V̇O2 at VT1 was not associated with any of the investigated factors (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HFpEF, the easily measurable peak O2 -pulse seems to be a good indicator of the potential for improving peak V̇O2 through exercise training. While changes in submaximal exercise tolerance were independent of baseline peak O2 -pulse, patients with high O2 -pulse may need to use additional therapies to significantly increase peak V̇O2 .

Moderate continuous or high intensity interval exercise in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: Differences between ischemic and non-ischemic etiology.

Background: Exercise for heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is recommended by guidelines, but exercise mode and intensities are not differentiated between HF etiologies. We, therefore, investigated the effect of moderate or high intensity exercise on left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and maximal exercise capacity (peak VO2) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). Methods: The Study of Myocardial Recovery after Exercise Training in Heart Failure (SMARTEX-HF) consecutively enrolled 231 patients with HFrEF (LVEF ≤ 35 %, NYHA II-III) in a 12-weeks supervised exercise program. Patients were stratified for HFrEF etiology (ICM versus NICM) and randomly assigned (1:1:1) to supervised exercise thrice weekly: a) moderate continuous training (MCT) at 60-70 % of peak heart rate (HR), b) high intensity interval training (HIIIT) at 90-95 % peak HR, or c) recommendation of regular exercise (RRE) according to guidelines. LVEDD, LVEF and peak VO2 were assessed at baseline, after 12 and 52 weeks. Results: 215 patients completed the intervention. ICM (59 %; n = 126) compared to NICM patients (41 %; n = 89) had significantly lower peak VO2 values at baseline and after 12 weeks (difference in peak VO2 2.2 mL/(kg*min); p < 0.0005) without differences between time points (p = 0.11) or training groups (p = 0.15). Etiology did not influence changes of LVEDD or LVEF (p = 0.30; p = 0.12), even when adjusting for sex, age and smoking status (p = 0.54; p = 0.12). Similar findings were observed after 52 weeks. Conclusions: Etiology of HFrEF did not influence the effects of moderate or high intensity exercise on cardiac dimensions, systolic function or exercise capacity. Clinical Trial Registration­URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00917046.

Plasma-Derived microRNAs Are Influenced by Acute and Chronic Exercise in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Background: Exercise training improves VO2peak in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but the effect is highly variable as it is dependent on peripheral adaptations. We evaluated changes in plasma-derived miRNAs by acute and chronic exercise to investigate whether these can mechanistically be involved in the variability of exercise-induced adaptations. Methods: Twenty-five male HFrEF patients (left ventricular ejection fraction < 40%, New York Heart Association class ≥ II) participated in a 15-week combined strength and aerobic training program. The effect of training on plasma miRNA levels was compared to 21 male age-matched sedentary HFrEF controls. Additionally, the effect of a single acute exercise bout on plasma miRNA levels was assessed. Levels of 5 miRNAs involved in pathways relevant for exercise adaptation (miR-23a, miR-140, miR-146a, miR-191, and miR-210) were quantified using RT-qPCR and correlated with cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), echocardiographic, vascular function, and muscle strength variables. Results: Expression levels of miR-146a decreased with training compared to controls. Acute exercise resulted in a decrease in miR-191 before, but not after training. Baseline miR-23a predicted change in VO2peak independent of age and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Baseline miR-140 was independently correlated with change in load at the respiratory compensation point and change in body mass index, and baseline miR-146a with change in left ventricular mass index. Conclusion: Plasma-derived miRNAs may reflect the underlying mechanisms of exercise-induced adaptation. In HFrEF patients, baseline miR-23a predicted VO2peak response to training. Several miRNAs were influenced by acute or repeated exercise. These findings warrant exploration in larger patient populations and further mechanistic in vitro studies on their molecular involvement.

miR-181c level predicts response to exercise training in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: an analysis of the OptimEx-Clin trial.

AIMS: In patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), exercise training improves the quality of life and aerobic capacity (peakV·O2). Up to 55% of HF patients, however, show no increase in peakV·O2 despite adequate training. We hypothesized that circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) can distinguish exercise low responders (LR) from exercise high responders (HR) among HFpEF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We selected HFpEF patients from the Optimizing Exercise Training in Prevention and Treatment of Diastolic HF (OptimEx) study which attended ≥70% of training sessions during 3 months (n = 51). Patients were defined as HR with a change in peakV·O2 above median (6.4%), and LR as below median (n = 30 and n = 21, respectively). Clinical, ergospirometric, and echocardiographic characteristics were similar between LR and HR. We performed an miRNA array (n = 377 miRNAs) in 14 age- and sex-matched patients. A total of 10 miRNAs were upregulated in LR, of which 4 correlated with peakV·O2. Validation in the remaining 37 patients indicated that high miR-181c predicted reduced peakV·O2 response (multiple linear regression, ß = -2.60, P = 0.011), and LR status (multiple logistic regression, odds ratio = 0.48, P = 0.010), independent of age, sex, body mass index, and resting heart rate. Furthermore, miR-181c decreased in LR after exercise training (P-group = 0.030, P-time = 0.048, P-interaction = 0.037). An in silico pathway analysis identified several downstream targets involved in exercise adaptation. CONCLUSIONS: Circulating miR-181c is a marker of the response to exercise training in HFpEF patients. High miR-181c levels can aid in identifying LR prior to training, providing the possibility for individualized management.

Pulmonary metastasectomy in colorectal carcinoma.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. It is estimated that 50% of all patients with CRC develop metastases, most commonly in the liver and the lung. Lung metastases are seen in approximately 10-15% of all patients with CRC. A large number of these patients with metastatic CRC can only receive palliative treatment due to invasion of other organs and disseminated disease. However, a subset of these patients present with potentially resectable metastases. Pulmonary metastasectomy is considered to be a potentially curative treatment for selected patients with resectable metastatic CRC. Current data suggest that patients that undergo pulmonary metastasectomy have 5-year survival rates of approximately 40%. However, the majority of data published regarding lung metastasectomy is based on small, retrospective case series. Due to this lack of prospective data, it is still unclear which subset of patients will benefit most from curative-intent surgery. Furthermore, there is also controversy regarding which prognostic and genetic factors are related to survival outcomes and whether there is a difference between open and thoracoscopic approaches in terms of overall and disease-free survival. In this review, we aim to summarize the latest data on prognostic factors and survival outcomes after pulmonary metastasectomy in patients with metastatic CRC.

Genome wide association study of response to interval and continuous exercise training: the Predict-HIIT study.

BACKGROUND: Low cardiorespiratory fitness (V̇O2peak) is highly associated with chronic disease and mortality from all causes. Whilst exercise training is recommended in health guidelines to improve V̇O2peak, there is considerable inter-individual variability in the V̇O2peak response to the same dose of exercise. Understanding how genetic factors contribute to V̇O2peak training response may improve personalisation of exercise programs. The aim of this study was to identify genetic variants that are associated with the magnitude of V̇O2peak response following exercise training. METHODS: Participant change in objectively measured V̇O2peak from 18 different interventions was obtained from a multi-centre study (Predict-HIIT). A genome-wide association study was completed (n = 507), and a polygenic predictor score (PPS) was developed using alleles from single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) significantly associated (P < 1 × 10-5) with the magnitude of V̇O2peak response. Findings were tested in an independent validation study (n = 39) and compared to previous research. RESULTS: No variants at the genome-wide significance level were found after adjusting for key covariates (baseline V̇O2peak, individual study, principal components which were significantly associated with the trait). A Quantile-Quantile plot indicates there was minor inflation in the study. Twelve novel loci showed a trend of association with V̇O2peak response that reached suggestive significance (P < 1 × 10-5). The strongest association was found near the membrane associated guanylate kinase, WW and PDZ domain containing 2 (MAGI2) gene (rs6959961, P = 2.61 × 10-7). A PPS created from the 12 lead SNPs was unable to predict V̇O2peak response in a tenfold cross validation, or in an independent (n = 39) validation study (P > 0.1). Significant correlations were found for beta coefficients of variants in the Predict-HIIT (P < 1 × 10-4) and the validation study (P < × 10-6), indicating that general effects of the loci exist, and that with a higher statistical power, more significant genetic associations may become apparent. CONCLUSIONS: Ongoing research and validation of current and previous findings is needed to determine if genetics does play a large role in V̇O2peak response variance, and whether genomic predictors for V̇O2peak response trainability can inform evidence-based clinical practice. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), Trial Id: ACTRN12618000501246, Date Registered: 06/04/2018, http://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=374601&isReview=true .

Exercise training and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

AIMS: Whether an exercise training intervention is associated with reduction in long-term high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) concentration (a biomarker of subclinical myocardial injury) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is unknown. The aims were to determine (i) the effect of a 12 week endurance exercise training intervention with different training intensities on hs-cTnT in stable patients with HFrEF (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35%) and (ii) associations between hs-cTnT and peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak ). METHODS AND RESULTS: In this sub-study of the SMARTEX-HF trial originally including 261 patients from nine European centres, 213 eligible patients were included after withdrawals and appropriate exclusions [19% women, mean age 61.2 years (standard deviation: 11.9)], randomized to high-intensity interval training (HIIT; n = 77), moderate continuous training (MCT; n = 63), or a recommendation of regular exercise (RRE; n = 73). Hs-cTnT measurements and clinical data acquired before (BL) and after a 12 week exercise training intervention (12 weeks) and at 1 year follow-up (1 year) were analysed using multivariable mixed models. Baseline hs-cTnT was above the 99th percentile upper reference limit of 14 ng/L in 35 (48%), 35 (56%), and 49 (64%) patients in the RRE, MCT, and HIIT groups, respectively. Median hs-cTnT was 16 ng/L at BL, 14 ng/L at 12 weeks, and 14 ng/L at 1 year. Hs-cTnT was statistically significantly reduced at 12 weeks in a model adjusted for randomization group, centre and VO2peak , and after further adjustment in the final model that also included age, sex, creatinine concentrations, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, smoking, and heart failure treatment. The mean reduction from BL to 12 weeks in the final model was 1.1 ng/L (95% confidence interval: 1.0-1.2 ng/L, P < 0.001), and the reduction was maintained at 1 year with a mean reduction from BL to 1 year of 1.1 ng/L (95% confidence interval: 1.0-1.1 ng/L, P = 0.025). Randomization group was not associated with hs-cTnT at any time point (overall test: P = 0.20, MCT vs. RRE: P = 0.81, HIIT vs. RRE: P = 0.095, interaction time × randomization group: P = 0.88). Independent of time point, higher VO2peak correlated with lower hs-cTnT (mean reduction over all time points: 0.2 ng/L per increasing mL·kg-1 ·min-1 , P = 0.002), without between-group differences (P = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stable HFrEF, a 12 week exercise intervention was associated with reduced hs-cTnT in all groups when adjusted for clinical variables. Higher VO2peak correlated with lower hs-cTnT, suggesting a positive long-term effect of increasing VO2peak on subclinical myocardial injury in HFrEF, independent of training programme.

Circulating microRNA as predictors for exercise response in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

AIMS: Exercise training is a powerful adjunctive therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but ca. 55% of patients fail to improve VO2peak. We hypothesize that circulating microRNAs (miRNAs), as epigenetic determinants of VO2peak, can distinguish exercise responders (ER) from exercise non-responders (ENR). METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed 377 miRNAs in 18 male HFrEF patients (9 ER and 9 ENR) prior to 15 weeks of exercise training using a miRNA array. ER and ENR were defined as change in VO2peak of >20% or <6%, respectively. First, unsupervised clustering analysis of the miRNA pattern was performed. Second, differential expression of miRNA in ER and ENR was analysed and related to percent change in VO2peak. Third, a gene set enrichment analysis was conducted to detect targeted genes and pathways. Baseline characteristics and training volume were similar between ER and ENR. Unsupervised clustering analysis of miRNAs distinguished ER from ENR with 83% accuracy. A total of 57 miRNAs were differentially expressed in ENR vs. ER. A panel of seven miRNAs up-regulated in ENR (Let-7b, miR-23a, miR-140, miR-146a, miR-191, miR-210, and miR-339-5p) correlated with %changeVO2peak (all P < 0.05) and predicted ENR with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves ≥0.77. Multiple pathways involved in exercise adaptation processes were identified. CONCLUSION: A fingerprint of seven miRNAs involved in exercise adaptation processes is highly correlated with VO2peak trainability in HFrEF, which holds promise for the prediction of training response and patient-targeted exercise prescription.

Delphi consensus recommendations on how to provide cardiovascular rehabilitation in the COVID-19 era.

This Delphi consensus by 28 experts from the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC) provides initial recommendations on how cardiovascular rehabilitation (CR) facilities should modulate their activities in view of the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A total number of 150 statements were selected and graded by Likert scale [from -5 (strongly disagree) to +5 (strongly agree)], starting from six open-ended questions on (i) referral criteria, (ii) optimal timing and setting, (iii) core components, (iv) structure-based metrics, (v) process-based metrics, and (vi) quality indicators. Consensus was reached on 58 (39%) statements, 48 'for' and 10 'against' respectively, mainly in the field of referral, core components, and structure of CR activities, in a comprehensive way suitable for managing cardiac COVID-19 patients. Panelists oriented consensus towards maintaining usual activities on traditional patient groups referred to CR, without significant downgrading of intervention in case of COVID-19 as a comorbidity. Moreover, it has been suggested to consider COVID-19 patients as a referral group to CR per se when the viral disease is complicated by acute cardiovascular (CV) events; in these patients, the potential development of COVID-related CV sequelae, as well as of pulmonary arterial hypertension, needs to be focused. This framework might be used to orient organization and operational of CR programmes during the COVID-19 crisis.

Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training, Moderate Continuous Training, or Guideline-Based Physical Activity Advice on Peak Oxygen Consumption in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Endurance exercise is effective in improving peak oxygen consumption (peak V̇o2) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, it remains unknown whether differing modes of exercise have different effects. Objective: To determine whether high-intensity interval training, moderate continuous training, and guideline-based advice on physical activity have different effects on change in peak V̇o2 in patients with HFpEF. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized clinical trial at 5 sites (Berlin, Leipzig, and Munich, Germany; Antwerp, Belgium; and Trondheim, Norway) from July 2014 to September 2018. From 532 screened patients, 180 sedentary patients with chronic, stable HFpEF were enrolled. Outcomes were analyzed by core laboratories blinded to treatment groups; however, the patients and staff conducting the evaluations were not blinded. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1; n = 60 per group) to high-intensity interval training (3 × 38 minutes/week), moderate continuous training (5 × 40 minutes/week), or guideline control (1-time advice on physical activity according to guidelines) for 12 months (3 months in clinic followed by 9 months telemedically supervised home-based exercise). Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary end point was change in peak V̇o2 after 3 months, with the minimal clinically important difference set at 2.5 mL/kg/min. Secondary end points included changes in metrics of cardiorespiratory fitness, diastolic function, and natriuretic peptides after 3 and 12 months. Results: Among 180 patients who were randomized (mean age, 70 years; 120 women [67%]), 166 (92%) and 154 (86%) completed evaluation at 3 and 12 months, respectively. Change in peak V̇o2 over 3 months for high-intensity interval training vs guideline control was 1.1 vs -0.6 mL/kg/min (difference, 1.5 [95% CI, 0.4 to 2.7]); for moderate continuous training vs guideline control, 1.6 vs -0.6 mL/kg/min (difference, 2.0 [95% CI, 0.9 to 3.1]); and for high-intensity interval training vs moderate continuous training, 1.1 vs 1.6 mL/kg/min (difference, -0.4 [95% CI, -1.4 to 0.6]). No comparisons were statistically significant after 12 months. There were no significant changes in diastolic function or natriuretic peptides. Acute coronary syndrome was recorded in 4 high-intensity interval training patients (7%), 3 moderate continuous training patients (5%), and 5 guideline control patients (8%). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with HFpEF, there was no statistically significant difference in change in peak V̇o2 at 3 months between those assigned to high-intensity interval vs moderate continuous training, and neither group met the prespecified minimal clinically important difference compared with the guideline control. These findings do not support either high-intensity interval training or moderate continuous training compared with guideline-based physical activity for patients with HFpEF. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02078947.

Iron Deficiency Impacts Diastolic Function, Aerobic Exercise Capacity, and Patient Phenotyping in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Subanalysis of the OptimEx-Clin Study.

AIMS: Iron deficiency (ID) is linked to reduced aerobic exercise capacity and poor prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF); however, data for HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is scarce. We assessed the relationship between iron status and diastolic dysfunction as well as aerobic exercise capacity in HFpEF, and the contribution of iron status to patient phenotyping. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among 180 patients with HFpEF (66% women; median age, 71 years) recruited for the Optimizing Exercise Training in Prevention and Treatment of Diastolic HF (OptimEx-Clin) trial, baseline iron status, including iron, ferritin, and transferrin saturation, was analyzed (n = 169) in addition to exercise capacity (peak oxygen uptake [peak V̇O2]) and diastolic function (E/e'). ID was present in 60% of patients and was more common in women. In multivariable linear regression models, we found that diastolic function and peak V̇O2 were independently related to iron parameters; however, these relationships were present only in patients with HFpEF and ID [E/e' and iron: ß-0.19 (95% confidence interval -0.32, -0.07), p = 0.003; E/e' and transferrin saturation: ß-0.16 (-0.28, -0.04), p = 0.011; peak V̇O2 and iron: ß 3.76 (1.08, 6.44), p = 0.007; peak V̇O2 and transferrin saturation: ß 3.58 (0.99, 6.16), p = 0.007]. Applying machine learning, patients were classified into three phenogroups. One phenogroup was predominantly characterized by the female sex and few HFpEF risk factors but a high prevalence of ID (86%, p < 0.001 vs. other phenogroups). When excluding ID from the phenotyping analysis, results were negatively influenced. CONCLUSION: Iron parameters are independently associated with impaired diastolic function and low aerobic capacity in patients with HFpEF and ID. Patient phenotyping in HFpEF is influenced by including ID. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02078947.

Baseline and Exercise Predictors of V˙O2peak in Systolic Heart Failure Patients: Results from SMARTEX-HF.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate baseline, exercise testing, and exercise training-mediated predictors of change in peak oxygen uptake (V˙O2peak) from baseline to 12-wk follow-up (ΔV˙O2peak) in a post hoc analysis from the SMARTEX Heart Failure trial. METHODS: We studied 215 patients with heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes II-III who were randomized to either supervised high-intensity interval training with exercise target intensity of 90%-95% of peak heart rate (HRpeak) or supervised moderate continuous training (MCT) with target intensity of 60%-70% of HRpeak, or who received a recommendation of regular exercise on their own. Predictors of ΔV˙O2peak were assessed in two models: a logistic regression model comparing highest and lowest tertiles (baseline parameters) and a multivariate linear regression model (test/training/clinical parameters). RESULTS: The change in V˙O2peak in response to the interventions (ΔV˙O2peak) varied substantially, from -8.50 to +11.30 mL·kg·min. Baseline NYHA (class II gave higher odds vs III; odds ratio (OR), 7.1 (2.0-24.9); P = 0.002), LVEF (OR per percent, 1.1 (1.0-1.2); P = 0.005), and age (OR per 10 yr, 0.5 (0.3-0.8); P = 0.003) were associated with ΔV˙O2peak.In the multivariate linear regression, 34% of the variability in ΔV˙O2peak was explained by the increase in exercise training workload, ΔHRpeak between baseline and 12-wk posttesting, age, and ever having smoked. CONCLUSION: Exercise training response (ΔV˙O2peak) correlated negatively with age, LVEF, and NYHA class. The ability to increase workload during the training period and increased ΔHRpeak between baseline and the 12-wk test were associated with a positive outcome.

Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial of Isolated Lung Perfusion in Patients With Lung Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Up to 66% of patients show local pulmonary disease progression after pulmonary metastasectomy. Regional treatment with isolated lung perfusion (ILuP) may improve local control with minimal systemic adverse effects. The aims of this study were to evaluate local and distant control after ILuP, determine the effect on overall survival compared with historical controls, and confirm the safety and feasibility of ILuP. METHODS: A total of 107 patients with resectable pulmonary metastases of colorectal carcinoma, osteosarcoma, and soft-tissue sarcoma were included in a prospective phase II study of pulmonary metastasectomy combined with ILuP with 45 mg melphalan at 37°C. Local and distant control, overall survival, lung function, and 90-day mortality and morbidity were monitored. RESULTS: We report 0% mortality, low morbidity, and no long-term pulmonary toxicity. For colorectal carcinoma, median time to local pulmonary progression, median time to progression, and median survival time were 31, 14, and 78 months, respectively. Median time to local progression was not reached for sarcoma, whereas median time to progression and median survival time were 13 and 39 months, respectively. The 5-year disease-free rate and pulmonary progression-free rate were 26% and 44% for colorectal carcinoma and 29% and 63% for sarcoma, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ILuP with melphalan combined with metastasectomy is feasible and safe. Compared with historical controls, favorable results were obtained in this phase II study for local control. Further evaluation of locoregional lung perfusion techniques with other chemotherapeutic drugs is warranted.

A Multi-Center Comparison of O2peak Trainability Between Interval Training and Moderate Intensity Continuous Training.

There is heterogeneity in the observed O2peak response to similar exercise training, and different exercise approaches produce variable degrees of exercise response (trainability). The aim of this study was to combine data from different laboratories to compare O2peak trainability between various volumes of interval training and Moderate Intensity Continuous Training (MICT). For interval training, volumes were classified by the duration of total interval time. High-volume High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) included studies that had participants complete more than 15 min of high intensity efforts per session. Low-volume HIIT/Sprint Interval Training (SIT) included studies using less than 15 min of high intensity efforts per session. In total, 677 participants across 18 aerobic exercise training interventions from eight different universities in five countries were included in the analysis. Participants had completed 3 weeks or more of either high-volume HIIT (n = 299), low-volume HIIT/SIT (n = 116), or MICT (n = 262) and were predominately men (n = 495) with a mix of healthy, elderly and clinical populations. Each training intervention improved mean O2peak at the group level (P < 0.001). After adjusting for covariates, high-volume HIIT had a significantly greater (P < 0.05) absolute O2peak increase (0.29 L/min) compared to MICT (0.20 L/min) and low-volume HIIT/SIT (0.18 L/min). Adjusted relative O2peak increase was also significantly greater (P < 0.01) in high-volume HIIT (3.3 ml/kg/min) than MICT (2.4 ml/kg/min) and insignificantly greater (P = 0.09) than low-volume HIIT/SIT (2.5 mL/kg/min). Based on a high threshold for a likely response (technical error of measurement plus the minimal clinically important difference), high-volume HIIT had significantly more (P < 0.01) likely responders (31%) compared to low-volume HIIT/SIT (16%) and MICT (21%). Covariates such as age, sex, the individual study, population group, sessions per week, study duration and the average between pre and post O2peak explained only 17.3% of the variance in O2peak trainability. In conclusion, high-volume HIIT had more likely responders to improvements in O2peak compared to low-volume HIIT/SIT and MICT.