Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 19(3): 2281733, 2023 Dec 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38012018

RESUMEN

Nucleic acid vaccines are designed based on genetic sequences (DNA or mRNA) of a target antigen to be expressed in vivo to drive a host immune response. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, mRNA and DNA vaccines based on the SARS-CoV-2 Spike antigen were developed. Surprisingly, head-to-head characterizations of the immune responses elicited by each vaccine type has not been performed to date. Here, we have employed a range of preclinical animal models including the hamster, guinea pig, rabbit, and mouse to compare and delineate the immune response raised by DNA, administered intradermally (ID) with electroporation (EP) and mRNA vaccines (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273), administered intramuscularly (IM), expressing the SARS-CoV-2 WT spike antigen. The results revealed clear differences in the quality and magnitude of the immune response between the two vaccine platforms. The DNA vaccine immune response was characterized by strong T cell responses, while the mRNA vaccine elicited robust humoral responses. The results may assist in guiding the disease target each vaccine type may be best matched against and suggest mechanisms to further enhance the breadth of each platform's immune response.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas de ADN , Cricetinae , Animales , Cobayas , Humanos , Ratones , Conejos , Vacuna BNT162 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Pandemias , COVID-19/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , ADN , Modelos Animales , ARN Mensajero , Inmunidad , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/genética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA