An online survey of women's views of respectful and disrespectful pregnancy and early labour care in the Czech Republic.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain and explore the views of women and their partners, giving birth in the Czech Republic, of the level of respectful or disrespectful care provided during pregnancy and early labour. DESIGN: Ethical approval was granted for a descriptive, online anonymous survey of 65 questions, with quantitative and qualitative responses. SETTING: The Czech Republic.The survey was completed by 8,767 women and 69 partners in 2018. MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS: Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used to present results. The majority of women were aged 26-35 years. Most had birthed in one of 93 hospitals, with 1.5% home births. Almost 40% never had an abdominal examination.in pregnancy. Quantitative data analysis revealed that less than half were given information on place of birth, or how to keep labour normal or non-interventionist. Almost 60% did not get information on positions for birth. Most (68%) commenced labour naturally, 25% had labour induced, 40% of them before term, and 7% had an elective caesarean section; 55% stated they had not been given any choice in the decision. Over half of those who had a membrane sweep said permission had not been sought. Half (54%) only had 'checking' visits from the midwife in labour. KEY CONCLUSIONS: Findings reveal a lack of information-giving, discussion and shared decision-making from healthcare professionals during pregnancy and early labour. Some practices were non-evidenced-based, and interventions were sometimes made without consent. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The examples of disrespectful care described in this study caused women distress during childbirth, which may result in an increased fear of childbirth or an increase in free-birthing.

Physical health and comorbid anxiety and depression across the first year postpartum in Ireland (MAMMI study): A longitudinal population-based study.

INTRODUCTION: Little is known of the associations between physical health issues and mental health issues such as anxiety, depression and comorbid anxiety and depression (CAD) occurring in the perinatal period. METHODS: A longitudinal cohort study with 3009 first-time mothers giving birth in Ireland collected physical and mental health data in pregnancy and at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months postpartum. Mental health was measured using the depression and anxiety subscales of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale. Experience of eight common physical health issues (e.g. severe headaches/migraines, back pain) were assessed in pregnancy, with an additional six assessed at each postpartum data collection point. RESULTS: 2.4 % of women reported depression alone in pregnancy and 4 % reported depression across the first postpartum year. Anxiety alone was reported by 3.0 % of women in pregnancy, and 2 % in the first year postpartum. Prevalence of comorbid anxiety/depression (CAD) was 1.5 % in pregnancy and almost 2 % postpartum. A higher proportion of women reporting, compared to women not reporting, postpartum CAD were younger, not partnered, not in paid employment in pregnancy, have fewer years of education, and had a caesarean birth. Extreme tiredness/exhaustion and back pain were the most common physical health issues in pregnancy and postpartum. Constipation, haemorrhoids, bowel issues, breast issues, infection and pain in the perineum or caesarean wound, pelvic pain and urinary tract infections were highest at three months postpartum and gradually decreased thereafter. Women reporting depression alone or anxiety alone were equivalent in terms of physical health issues. However, women without mental health symptoms reported significantly fewer physical health issues than women reporting depressive or anxiety symptoms alone or CAD at every time point. Women with CAD reported a significantly higher number of health issues than women reporting depression alone or anxiety alone at 9 and 12 months postpartum. CONCLUSION: Reports of mental health symptoms are associated with higher physical health burden demonstrating a need for integrated approaches in mental and physical health care pathways in perinatal services.

Impact of Birthing Room Design on Maternal Childbirth Experience: Results From the Room4Birth Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of the birthing room design on nulliparous women's childbirth experience up to 1 year after birth. BACKGROUND: Although it is known that the birth environment can support or hinder birth processes, the impact of the birthing room design on maternal childbirth experience over time is insufficiently studied. METHODS: The Room4Birth randomized controlled trial was conducted at a labor ward in Sweden. Nulliparous women in active stage of spontaneous labor were randomized (n = 406) to either a regular birthing room (n = 202) or a new birthing room designed with more person-centered considerations (n = 204). Childbirth experiences were measured 2 hr, 3 months, and 12 months after birth by using a Visual Analogue Scale of Overall Childbirth Experience (VAS-OCE), the Fear of Birth Scale (FOBS), and the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ2). RESULTS: Women randomized to the new room had a more positive childbirth experience reported on the VAS-OCE 3 months (p = .002) and 12 months (p = .021) after birth compared to women randomized to a regular room. Women in the new room also scored higher in the total CEQ2 score (p = .039) and within the CEQ2 subdomain own capacity after 3 months (p = .028). The remaining CEQ2 domains and the FOBS scores did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that a birthing room offering more possibilities to change features and functions in the room according to personal needs and requirements, positively affects the childbirth experience of nulliparous women 3 and 12 months after they have given birth.

Clinicians' views of factors influencing decision-making for CS for first-time mothers-A qualitative descriptive study.

Clinicians' perspectives of the reasons for performing caesarean section (CS) are fundamental to deepening knowledge and understanding of factors influencing decision-making for CS. The aim of this study was to explore midwives' and obstetricians' views of factors influencing decision-making for CS for first-time mothers. A qualitative descriptive study with semi-structured one-to-one audio-recorded interviews was used to gather data from clinicians (15 midwives and 20 senior obstetricians). Following research ethics committee approval, clinicians, who were directly involved in the decision-making process for CS during the period of data collection, were purposively selected from three maternity units in the Republic of Ireland between June 2016 to July 2017. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. Three interrelated themes with several subthemes reflective of clinicians' views and experiences emerged following data analysis. These were: 'A fear factor' describing clinicians' fear of adverse outcomes and subsequent litigation, 'Personal preferences versus a threshold-clinician driven factors emphasising the influence of clinicians' personal beliefs, and 'Standardised versus individualised care-a system perspective' explaining the effects of, or lack of, organisational policy and its direct and indirect impact on the decision-making process. Findings show that decisions to perform a CS are, on occasion, based on clinicians' personal beliefs and interpretation, similar to findings from other published literature. Consideration of broader issues related to organisational, socio-cultural and political context is essential when seeking solutions to the rising CS rates. The findings will enable clinicians to reflect on their day-to-day practice, in order to look for modifiable factors that influence their decision-making, and help women understand the multitude of factors that can lead to a decision to perform a CS. Findings will also contribute to the development of the 'next step action' and assist in devising future intervention studies to reduce any unnecessary CSs.

Prevention and treatment of peripartum urinary incontinence-a survey of hospital-based maternity services in Ireland.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Considerable proportions of pregnant and postpartum women experience urinary incontinence, but to our knowledge, there are no national data on the preventative and treatment services available in Ireland's 19 maternity hospitals. METHODS: Ethical approval was granted. A national benchmarking survey on the range and type of services on prevention and treatment of urinary incontinence during pregnancy and postpartum was developed. Directors of Midwifery and Nursing in each hospital identified midwives and women's health physiotherapists to complete the survey. Data were analysed descriptively, and results presented as proportions. RESULTS: Responses were received from 17 hospitals. Women were asked about urinary incontinence during their first booking visit in 6 hospitals, during all antenatal visits in 2 and the onus was on women self-reporting symptoms in 9. Pelvic floor muscle exercises were taught in antenatal classes in 14 hospitals and management of urinary incontinence in 9. In hospital postpartum, midwives in 13 hospitals asked women about urinary incontinence. All women were seen by a physiotherapist in 7 hospitals and only those who were referred in 6. Women could access the hospital's physiotherapy services up to 6 weeks postpartum in 3 hospitals, up to 6 months or 1 year in 5 and beyond 1 year in 6. CONCLUSIONS: Geographical inequity exists in the services offered to pregnant and postpartum women nationally. This indicates that many pregnant and postpartum women, both continent and incontinent, cannot avail themselves of preventative and treatment services within the maternity hospital system and points to the need to review, reconfigure and resource services.

Trajectories of Postpartum Recovery: What is Known and Not Known.

Women's postpartum health is a public health issue that has lifelong consequences. Timely recognition and treatment of physical and mental health issues can have positive health consequences while lack of access to effective treatments or health care services can lead to long-term health problems. To advance knowledge of priority health symptoms and trajectories of postpartum recovery from women's health perspectives, we share findings from the Maternal health And Maternal Morbidity in Ireland (MAMMI) study. Data from 3047 first-time mothers recruited to a longitudinal maternal health study in Ireland from 2012 to 2017 reveal the trajectories of maternal health and health problems experienced up to 12 months postpartum. Morbidities explored include urinary incontinence, pelvic girdle pain, and sexual and mental health issues. Viewed together, and over time, the scale and persistent nature of many physical and mental health problems become apparent, yet considerable proportions of women were not asked directly about health problems by health care professionals. When women do not know what is and is not normal postpartum, they may suffer in silence and the consequence is that health problems/issues that are preventable, and treatable, are likely to become chronic. To make positive contributions to women's health, maternity care systems must be truly woman-centered and structured in ways that place emphasis on women's own health needs. In systems where women's voices and concerns are acknowledged and central, women are likely to thrive and flourish in motherhood.

Factors associated with cesarean birth in nulliparous women: A multicenter prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: There is widespread concern around the rising rates of cesarean births (CBs), especially among first-time mothers, despite evidence suggesting increased morbidities after birth by cesarean. There are uncertainties around factors associated with rising rates of CBs among first-time mothers in Ireland, and insight into these is essential for understanding the rising trend in CBs. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the factors associated with CBs in nulliparous women. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted in three maternity hospitals in the Republic of Ireland between 2012 and 2017. Data were collected from 3047 nulliparous women using self-administered surveys antenatally and at 3 months postpartum and from consenting women's hospital records (n = 2755) and analyzed using the Poisson regression to assess associations between demographic and clinical factors and the main outcome measures, planned and unplanned CBs. RESULTS: Common risk factors for planned and unplanned CBs were being aged ≥40 years, being in private care, multiple pregnancy, and fetus in breech or other malpresentations. An unplanned CB occurred for 22.43% (n = 377/1681) of women who did not have induction of labor (IOL) or who had IOL with no epidural, but the risk was about twice as high for women who had IOL and epidural. CONCLUSIONS: Findings confirm multifactorial reasons for CB and the challenge of reversing the increasing CB rate if maternal age, overweight/obesity, infertility treatment, multiple pregnancy, and preexisting hypertension in Ireland continue to increase. There is a need to address prelabor interventions, especially IOL combined with epidural analgesia with respect to unplanned CB.

Room4Birth - The effect of giving birth in a hospital birthing room designed with person-centred considerations: A Swedish randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if a birthing room designed with person-centred considerations improves labour and birth outcomes for nulliparous women when compared to regular birthing rooms. METHODS: A randomised controlled trial was conducted at a Swedish labour ward between January 2019 and October 2020. Nulliparous women in spontaneous labour were randomised either to a birthing room designed with person-centred considerations (New room) or a Regular room. The primary outcome was a composite of four variables: vaginal non-instrumental birth; no oxytocin augmentation; postpartum blood loss < 1000 ml; and a positive childbirth experience. To detect a difference of 8% between the groups, 1274 study participants were needed, but the trial was terminated early due to consequences of the Covid-19 pandemic. RESULTS: A total of 406 women were randomised; 204 to the New room and 202 to the Regular room. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome between the groups (42.2% versus 35.1%; odds ratio: 1.35, 95% Confidence Interval 0.90-2.01; p = 0.18). Participants in the New room used epidural analgesia to a lower extent (54.4% versus 65.3%, relative risk: 0.83, 95% Confidence Interval 0.71-0.98; p = 0.03) and reported to a higher degree that the room contributed to a sense of safety, control, and integrity (p=<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesis that the New room would improve the primary outcome could not be verified. Considering the early discontinuation of the study, results should be interpreted with caution. Nevertheless, analyses of our secondary outcomes emphasise the experiential value of the built birth environment in improving care for labouring women.

What would reduce caesarean section rates?-Views from pregnant women and clinicians in Ireland.

BACKGROUND: Caesarean section rates continue to rise in most parts of the world. While CS is a lifesaving procedure there is evidence that, beyond a certain threshold, CS rates may contribute to increased maternal and perinatal morbidity. This study aimed to elicit the views of pregnant women's and clinicians' on how CS rates might be reduced. METHODS: Pregnant women and their partners, and clinicians working with pregnant women in a maternity hospital in the Republic of Ireland of Ireland, were invited to participate in focus groups. Eligibility criteria included all women attending antenatal classes and clinicians working with pregnant women. A convenience sample was used and interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Four focus group interviews were conducted with 30 clinicians and 15 pregnant women and two partners participated in three focus groups. A further two women were interviewed individually. Participants expressed a view that rising CS rates were impacted by a societal perception that CS had become a 'normal mode of birth'. Suggestions for reducing CS rates were offered by clinicians and pregnant women and their partners. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians and pregnant women consider that CS rates can be reduced if a shared philosophy supporting normal birth is prioritised alongside adequate resourcing. Women and their partners also believe that enhanced communication with clinicians is central to reducing CS rates.

Maternal mental health in the first year postpartum in a large Irish population cohort: the MAMMI study.

PURPOSE: The international perinatal literature focuses on depression in the postpartum period. Prevalence and pathways of depression, anxiety and stress from pregnancy through the first postpartum year are seldom investigated. METHODS: MAMMI is a prospective cohort study of 3009 first-time mothers recruited in pregnancy. Depressive, anxiety and stress symptoms measured using the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS 21) in pregnancy and at 3-, 6-, 9- and/or 12-months postpartum. RESULTS: Prevalence of depressive and stress symptoms was lowest in pregnancy, increasing to 12-months postpartum. Anxiety symptoms remained relatively stable over time. In the first year after having their first baby, one in ten women reported moderate/severe anxiety symptoms (9.5%), 14.2% reported depression symptoms, and one in five stress symptoms (19.2%). Sociodemographic factors associated with increased odds of postpartum depression, anxiety and stress symptoms were younger age and being born in a non-EU country; socioeconomic factors were not living with a partner, not having postgraduate education and being unemployed during pregnancy. Retrospective reporting of poor mental health in the year prior to pregnancy and symptoms during pregnancy were strongly associated with poor postpartum mental health. CONCLUSIONS: The current findings suggest that the current model of 6-week postpartum care in Ireland is insufficient to detect and provide adequate support for women's mental health needs, with long-term implications for women and children.

Midwives' views of an evidence-based intervention to reduce caesarean section rates in Ireland.

PROBLEM: A worldwide increase of caesarean section (CS) rates has been estimated at a rate of 4% per year and numerous interventions to reduce the rates have not been successful, perhaps because they are not acceptable to clinicians. BACKGROUND: A caesarean section (CS) can be a life-saving operation, but has been associated with short- and long-term risk factors and shown to affect subsequent pregnancies. AIM: To explore midwives' views on CS rates and evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of an evidence-based intervention programme (REDUCE) designed to decrease overall CS rates in Ireland by 7%. METHODS: Following ethical approval, a qualitative exploratory design was used to seek midwives' views of the evidence-based intervention. A total of 28 midwives from one large tertiary maternity hospital took part in four focus group interviews. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. FINDINGS: Five themes emerged, illustrating the midwives' views of what could be improved in the present system and how CS rates could be reduced in future. The themes included: (i) Induction of labour; (ii) Education; (iii) Auditing of practice; (iv) Clinical practice; (v) Midwife-Obstetrician collaboration. DISCUSSION: This study noted a rising CS rate year on year, with a rate of 37% at the time of the study, and the midwives voiced their very real concerns over the increased high rates. CONCLUSION: The study provided support for the evidence based 'REDUCE' intervention, which now needs to be tested empirically within this Irish population.

The maternal health-related issues that matter most to women in Ireland as they transition to motherhood - A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Many studies on women's maternity care experiences reveal recurring issues that are poor or less than optimal. Women's opinions on the maternal health-related issues that matter most to them are essential if care and services are to be improved. AIMS: To identify the maternal health-related issues that matter most to women in Ireland, based on their own experiences of maternity care, services and motherhood. METHODS: A qualitative exploratory study with 24 women. Following university ethical approval, audio-recorded one-to-one telephone interviews were conducted and thematically analysed. FINDINGS: We identified two themes, each with four subthemes, connected to a central concept of the invisible woman. Pendulum of care, and subthemes Inconsistent services, All about the baby, Induced anxiety and Information seesaw, illustrated the extremes of care and services that women experienced. Magnitude of motherhood, and subthemes Weight of responsibility, Real-time reassurance, Change of identity and Growth into advocacy, depicted the intensity of their new role while transitioning to motherhood. DISCUSSION: Findings articulate the issues that mattered most to women in Ireland as they transitioned to motherhood. Some women identified specific research topics/areas, but all of the issues identified can be translated into researchable topics that seek to improve local care and service provision. CONCLUSION: Given the recurring nature of women's less than satisfactory experiences of aspects of maternity care in many countries, it is likely that conducting research on issues that matters most to women will have the greatest impact on their health, wellbeing and lives as they transition to motherhood.

Is there an association between parity and urinary incontinence in women during pregnancy and the first year postpartum?: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: To systematically review the literature on possible associations between parity and urinary incontinence (UI) during pregnancy and in the first year postpartum. METHODS: We searched the databases Pubmed, CINAHL, Embase, the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, MIDIRS, ClinicalTrials.gov (inception-18 April 2020). One reviewer screened all titles. Two reviewers independently selected studies by abstract and full text. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality In Prognosis Studies tool. Findings were synthesised in meta-analysis or narratively. We assessed the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group approach adopted for prognostic studies. RESULTS: We identified 16 643 records and 39 were included. Thirty studies examined UI during pregnancy and 12 examined UI postpartum. Multiparity was associated with UI at any point in the last pregnancy (odds ratio [OR]: 1.59 [1.26-2.00], 5 studies, 1565 participants) and in the third trimester when measured by ICIQ-SF (OR: 2.67 [1.53-4.67], 4 studies, 1150 participants), but not when studies measured the UI point prevalence (OR: 2.48 [0.91-6.79], 4 studies, 52 976 participants), or if they measured the prevalence at one point in any trimester (OR: 1.09 (0.60-1.95), 3 studies, 872 participants). At 3 months postpartum, UI was associated with multiparity (OR: 2.03 [1.35-3.06], 4 studies, 6781 participants). CONCLUSIONS: Increased parity was associated with UI in the first year postpartum, but studies on UI during pregnancy had conflicting results. The evidence was (very) uncertain. Future studies should use comparable definitions and further explore UI sub-types.

Clinician's attitudes towards caesarean section: A cross-sectional survey in two tertiary level maternity units in Ireland.

BACKGROUND: Although caesarean section (CS) is a life-saving intervention when medically indicated, the growth in CS rates is causing concern. In reducing unnecessary CS, it is important to understand clinicians' attitudes towards CS so that these might be understood contextually. OBJECTIVE: To explore clinicians' attitudes towards CS in Ireland. METHODS: A cross sectional survey involving maternity care professionals in two urban maternity hospitals in Ireland. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data. Ethical approval was granted by the Research Ethics Committees of the University and the two study sites. FINDINGS: One hundred and fifty-two maternity care professionals responded to the survey. Most (97%) indicated that the CS rate in their unit was 'high', although 81% believed there was a shift in culture towards a lower threshold for performing CS. Most participants (85%) considered birth a natural process that should not be interfered with unless necessary and that elective CS is not the safest option for the mother (74%) or baby (71%), yet 45% believed that a woman should be able to have a CS if she wants a CS. Just over half the participants considered a previous 3rd or 4th degree tear an indication for an elective CS. Offering vaginal birth after a previous CS for fetal distress and failure to progress increased with clinical experience. CONCLUSION: The findings of this survey can be considered contextually in addressing high CS rates and will be of wider relevance in understanding maternity care providers' beliefs about CS in general.

The birthing room and its influence on the promotion of a normal physiological childbirth - a qualitative interview study with midwives in Sweden.

The birthing room is a major workplace for midwives but how it influences them in practice is not enough investigated.Purpose: This study aimed to explore midwives´ experiences of how the birthing room affects them in their work to promote a normal physiological birth.Methods: A phenomenological reflective lifeworld research approach was used and included individual interviews with 15 midwives working at four different hospitals in western Sweden, and of which two also assisted at homebirths. The analysis focused on the meanings of the study phenomenon.Results: A birthing room can by its design either support a normal physiological birth or support a risk approach to childbirth. Four opposing constituents complete the essential meaning of the birthing rooms, and to which the midwives need to relate in their roles as guardians for normal birth: i) a private or a public room; ii) a home-like or hospital-like room; iii) a room promoting activity or passivity; iv) a room promoting the midwife´s presence or absence.Conclusions: The birthing room mirrors a pathogenic-oriented care approach. A presupposition for the work to keep the birth bubble intact is to protect the mother from disturbing elements both inside and outside the room.

Comparison of labour and birth outcomes between nulliparous women who used epidural analgesia in labour and those who did not: A prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare labour and birth outcomes between nulliparous women who used versus did not use intrapartum epidural analgesia. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Two maternity hospitals in Ireland. POPULATION: A total of 1221 nulliparous women who gave birth vaginally or by emergency caesarean section. METHODS: Multinomial logistic regression was used to analyse categorical outcomes, with results presented as ratios of relative risks (RRR). For dichotomous outcomes we used logistic regression, with results presented as odds ratios (OR). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mode of birth, IV syntocinon use, pyrexia (≥38°C), antibiotic treatment, first stage labour ≥10h, second stage labour ≥2h, blood loss (≥500mls, ≥1000mls), perineal trauma. Neonatal outcomes included Apgar score ≥7 at 1min and 5min, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, and infant feeding method. RESULTS: Women using EA were more likely to require a vacuum-assisted birth (RRR 3.35, p<0.01) or forceps-assisted birth (RRR 11.69, p<0.01). Exposure to EA was associated with significantly greater risk of ≥10h first (OR 6.72, p=0.01) and ≥2h second (OR 2.25, p<0.01) stage labour, increased likelihood of receiving IV syntocinon (OR 9.38, p<0.01), antibiotics (OR 2.97, p<0.01) and a greater probability of pyrexia (OR 10.26, p<0.01). Women who used EA were half as likely to be breastfeeding at three months postpartum (OR 0.53, p<0.01). No differences were observed between groups in neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our data shows significant associations between EA use and several intrapartum outcomes.

Shared decision-making and maternity care in the deep learning age: Acknowledging and overcoming inherited defeaters.

In recent years there has been an explosion of interest in Artificial Intelligence (AI) both in health care and academic philosophy. This has been due mainly to the rise of effective machine learning and deep learning algorithms, together with increases in data collection and processing power, which have made rapid progress in many areas. However, use of this technology has brought with it philosophical issues and practical problems, in particular, epistemic and ethical. In this paper the authors, with backgrounds in philosophy, maternity care practice and clinical research, draw upon and extend a recent framework for shared decision-making (SDM) that identified a duty of care to the client's knowledge as a necessary condition for SDM. This duty entails the responsibility to acknowledge and overcome epistemic defeaters. This framework is applied to the use of AI in maternity care, in particular, the use of machine learning and deep learning technology to attempt to enhance electronic fetal monitoring (EFM). In doing so, various sub-kinds of epistemic defeater, namely, transparent, opaque, underdetermined, and inherited defeaters are taxonomized and discussed. The authors argue that, although effective current or future AI-enhanced EFM may impose an epistemic obligation on the part of clinicians to rely on such systems' predictions or diagnoses as input to SDM, such obligations may be overridden by inherited defeaters, caused by a form of algorithmic bias. The existence of inherited defeaters implies that the duty of care to the client's knowledge extends to any situation in which a clinician (or anyone else) is involved in producing training data for a system that will be used in SDM. Any future AI must be capable of assessing women individually, taking into account a wide range of factors including women's preferences, to provide a holistic range of evidence for clinical decision-making.

Risk factors for pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy-related Pelvic Girdle Pain (PPGP) is a common complaint. The aetiology remains unclear and reports on risk factors for PPGP provide conflicting accounts. The aim of this scoping review was to map the body of literature on risk factors for experiencing PPGP. METHODS: We searched the databases PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, MIDIRS, and ClinicalTrial.gov (3 August 2020). We selected studies with two reviewers independently. Observational studies assessing risk factors for PPGP were included. Studies examining specific diagnostic tests or interventions were excluded. RESULTS: We identified 5090 records from databases and 1077 from ClinicalTrial.gov. Twenty-four records met the inclusion criteria. A total of 148 factors were examined of which only 14 factors were examined in more than one study. Factors that were positively associated with PPGP included a history of low back or pelvic girdle pain, being overweight/obese, already having a child, younger age, lower educational level, no pre-pregnancy exercise, physically demanding work, previous back trauma/disease, progestin-intrauterine device use, stress, depression and anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: A large number of factors have been examined as potential risk factors for PPGP, but there is a lack of repetition to be able to draw stronger conclusions and pool studies in systematic reviews. Factors that have been examined in more than five studies include age, body mass index, parity and smoking. We suggest a systematic review be conducted to assess the role of these factors further in the development of PPGP.

Factors associated with maternal readmission to hospital, attendance at emergency rooms or visits to general practitioners within three months postpartum.

While most women remain healthy after giving birth to their baby, others experience complications that require medical attention or readmission to hospital. However, data on maternal attendance for medical care postpartum or readmission to hospital are not collected or reported routinely in many countries so the extent of health problems experienced remain unknown. Collecting data on the proportion of women who seek medical care in the early postpartum period may deepen understanding of risk factors, the consequences for women, their families and the maternity care system and, ultimately, help identify preventative strategies and processes. OBJECTIVE: To identify the factors associated with maternal rehospitalisation, attendance at emergency rooms or visits to general practitioners, the three main sources of medical services postpartum in Ireland, within the first three months postpartum. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study, embedded in a larger maternal health and morbidity study, with 1668 nulliparous women recruited from two maternity hospitals in Ireland. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to explore associations with postpartum rehospitalisation, emergency room attendance and general practitioner visits within the first three months postpartum, for maternal health-related reasons. RESULTS: Four percent (n = 66) of women were rehospitalised, 10% (n = 166) attended an emergency room, and 13.6% (n = 223) attended their general practitioner three or more times, regarding their own health. Women aged 24 years or less were more likely to attend their doctor (p = 0.02, AOR 2.13, 95% CI 1.08-4.21) compared to women aged 25-29 years, the reference category. Women who were obese or very obese were also more likely to attend their doctor three or more times (p = 0.01, AOR 1.79, 95% CI 1.15-2.79) and also more likely to attend an emergency room (p = 0.04, AOR 1.69, 95% CI 1.02-2.80) within three months postpartum, for their own health reasons. CONCLUSION: Findings indicate that considerable proportions of women seek medical care from various healthcare sources postpartum. These medical visits are not routinely reported and point to the need for interventions regarding the care, management and services available to first-time mothers birthing in Ireland, with specific attention on preventative postpartum health.