Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib in Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Meta-Analysis.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory skin disorder. Topical corticosteroids are the cornerstone of therapy in mild AD, whereas the JAK inhibitor upadacitinib is approved in the United States, Europe, and other countries for treating moderate-severe AD in adults and children over 12 years old whose disease is not adequately controlled with other systemic drugs, including biologics. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the overall efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in moderate to severe AD. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in moderate to severe AD were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled analysis revealed a significant proportion of patients achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index-75 (EASI 75) (R.R. = 3.86; 95% CI = 3.12 to 4.78, p < 0.00001), EASI 100 (R.R. = 13.09; 95% CI = 7.40 to 23.17, p < 0.00001), Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Score (WP-NRS) response (R.R. = 4.44; 95% CI = 3.72 to 5.29, p< 0.00001), and validated Investigator's Global Assessment (v-IGA) (RR = 5.96; 95% CI = 4.79 to 7.41, p < 0. 00001) in the upadacitinib arm compared to the placebo arm. Moreover, the pooled analysis also suggested that treatment-emergent adverse events (TAEs) were relatively higher with upadacitinib than with placebo, but were mild and easily manageable (R.R. = 1.15; 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.23, p<0.00001). This meta-analysis showed that upadacitinib had a significant beneficial effect and tolerable adverse effect profile in patients with moderate and severe AD. Dose regimens of 15 mg and 30 mg seemed to have similar benefits. However, further trials are needed to assess long-term efficacy and safety profile.

Molecular profiling of an Indian EB cohort - a single centre experience.

INTRODUCTION: Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) encompasses rare hereditary skin conditions marked by skin fragility, nail dystrophy, and minor trauma-induced skin blisters. This study aims to identify genetic variants in Indian EB patients and examine the relationship between genotypic and phenotypic manifestations. MATERIAL AND METHOD: EB patients seen consecutively over a period of 5 years at Outpatient Department of Dermatology. Baseline demographic data, birth history, family history, skin manifestation at birth, past medical history, current cutaneous manifestations, and the evolution of the disease were assessed and recorded. Genetic variants were identified using targeted gene panel sequencing of 23 EB-related genes, and a genetic-phenotype analysis was performed. RESULTS: Our study included 65 patients with EB. Among 65 EB patients, 38 dystrophic EB cases (58.46%), 12 junctional EB (18.46%), 12 epidermolysis bullosa simplex (18.46%), and 3 Kindler EB (4.62%) were reported. Dominant and recessive forms of dystrophic EB accounted for 16.92% and 41.4%, respectively. We identified 75 unique genetic variants, 58.67% newly discovered and 41.33% previously reported. Compound heterozygous variations were more frequent (55.55%) than homozygous ones (44.44%) in recessive dystrophic EB patients. Junctional EB patients harboured LAMB3 gene mutations more frequently, while epidermolysis bullosa simplex patients showed KRT5 and KRT14 gene missense heterozygous mutations. Kindler EB patients had homozygous mutations in the FERTM1 gene. CONCLUSION: Our study unveiled several novel genetic variants; severe phenotypes associated with nonsense genetic variants. These findings offer valuable insights for future clinical assessments and tailored management strategies.

Tofacitinib in Pediatric Alopecia Areata Totalis and Alopecia Universalis: A Retrospective Analysis From India.

Alopecia areata totalis and universalis are disabling conditions and therapeutically challenging as they are refractory to conventional options. Tofacitinib is a Janus-kinase (JAK) inhibitor utilized to treat alopecia areata (AA) as an off-label drug. In India, FDA-approved JAK inhibitors such as baricitinib and ritlecitinib are not available. There are only a few case reports on tofacitinib in AA in the Indian population. We present the data of 9 pediatric cases of clinically and histologically proven alopecia areata totalis (AT) and alopecia universalis (AU), for whom oral tofacitinib was given after baseline investigations. The following parameters were analysed: Photographic image and severity of alopecia tool (SALT) score at baseline, 3 months and 6 months, and Children Dermatology Life Quality Index (cDLQI) at baseline and 6 months. The mean ± standard deviation (M ± SD) of the SALT score and cDLQI(M ± SD) at baseline were 95 ± 5 and 17 ± 2. At weeks 4 and weeks 12, the SALT (M ± SD) score was 92.7 ± 6.1 and 34.35 ± 11.16, respectively. At weeks 24, the SALT (M ± SD) score and cDLQI (M ± SD) were 3.33 ± 5 and 6 ± 2. The final reduction in SALT score from the baseline was 100% in 6/9 cases (66.67%), 75% to 99% in 3/9 (22.23%), and 50 to 75% in 1/9 (11.12%). We also observed minimal adverse effects (one child developed herpes zoster) with tofacitinib. Our study demonstrates that oral tofacitinib represents a viable modality in managing difficult-to-treat pediatric AA, such as AT and AU, with a good safety profile.