Sporadic deficient mismatch repair in colorectal cancer increases the risk for non-colorectal malignancy: A European multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Disparities between tumors arising via different sporadic carcinogenetic pathways have not been studied systematically. This retrospective multicenter cohort study evaluated the differences in the risk for non-colorectal malignancy between sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients from different DNA mismatch repair status. METHODS: A retrospective European multicenter cohort study including in total of 1706 CRC patients treated between 1996 and 2019 in three different countries. The proficiency (pMMR) or deficiency (dMMR) of mismatch repair was determined by immunohistochemistry. Cases were analyzed for tumor BRAFV600E mutation, and BRAF mutated tumors were further analyzed for hypermethylation status in the promoter region of MLH1 to distinguish between sporadic and hereditary cases. Swedish and Finish patients were matched with their respective National Cancer Registries. For the Czech cohort, thorough scrutiny of medical files was performed to identify any non-colorectal malignancy within 20 years before or after the diagnosis of CRC. Poisson regression analysis was performed to identify the incidence rates of non-colorectal malignancies. For validation purposes, standardized incidence ratios were calculated for the Swedish cases adjusted for age, year, and sex. RESULTS: Of the 1706 CRC patients included in the analysis, 819 were female [48%], median age at surgery was 67 years [interquartile range: 60-75], and sporadic dMMR was found in 188 patients (11%). Patients with sporadic dMMR CRC had a higher incidence rate ratio (IRR) for non-colorectal malignancy before and after diagnosis compared to patients with a pMMR tumor, in both uni- (IRR = 2.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.89-3.31, p = 0.003) and multivariable analysis (IRR = 2.24, 95% CI = 1.67-3.01, p = 0.004). This association applied whether or not the non-colorectal tumor developed before or after the diagnosis of CRC in both uni- (IRR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.28-2.98, p = 0.004), (IRR = 2.45, 95% CI = 1.72-3.49, p = 0.004) and multivariable analysis (IRR = 1.67,95% CI = 1.05-2.65, p = 0.029), (IRR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.63-3.42, p = 0.005), respectively. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective European multicenter cohort study, patients with sporadic dMMR CRC had a higher risk for non-colorectal malignancy than those with pMMR CRC. These findings indicate the need for further studies to establish the need for and design of surveillance strategies for patients with dMMR CRC.

Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses of the Procedure-specific Risks of Thrombosis and Bleeding in General Abdominal, Colorectal, Upper Gastrointestinal, and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To provide procedure-specific estimates of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding after abdominal surgery. BACKGROUND: The use of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis represents a trade-off that depends on VTE and bleeding risks that vary between procedures; their magnitude remains uncertain. METHODS: We identified observational studies reporting procedure-specific risks of symptomatic VTE or major bleeding after abdominal surgery, adjusted the reported estimates for thromboprophylaxis and length of follow-up, and estimated cumulative incidence at 4 weeks postsurgery, stratified by VTE risk groups, and rated evidence certainty. RESULTS: After eligibility screening, 285 studies (8,048,635 patients) reporting on 40 general abdominal, 36 colorectal, 15 upper gastrointestinal, and 24 hepatopancreatobiliary surgery procedures proved eligible. Evidence certainty proved generally moderate or low for VTE and low or very low for bleeding requiring reintervention. The risk of VTE varied substantially among procedures: in general abdominal surgery from a median of <0.1% in laparoscopic cholecystectomy to a median of 3.7% in open small bowel resection, in colorectal from 0.3% in minimally invasive sigmoid colectomy to 10.0% in emergency open total proctocolectomy, and in upper gastrointestinal/hepatopancreatobiliary from 0.2% in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy to 6.8% in open distal pancreatectomy for cancer. CONCLUSIONS: VTE thromboprophylaxis provides net benefit through VTE reduction with a small increase in bleeding in some procedures (eg, open colectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy), whereas the opposite is true in others (eg, laparoscopic cholecystectomy and elective groin hernia repairs). In many procedures, thromboembolism and bleeding risks are similar, and decisions depend on individual risk prediction and values and preferences regarding VTE and bleeding.

The first 10 years of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation in Finland.

INTRODUCTION: Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) is an option for patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and kidney failure but can be associated with a high complication rate. Here we describe our 10-year experience since the launch of the SPK program. METHODS: This retrospective study included consecutive patients with T1D receiving SPK from March 14, 2010 to March 14, 2020 at Helsinki University Hospital. Portocaval anastomosis (i.e., systemic venous drainage) and enteric exocrine drainage were used. A specific team was trained for both pancreas retrieval and transplantation, postoperative care was standardized to include somatostatin analogues, antimicrobial treatment, and preoperatively initiated chemothrombopropylaxis. During program maturation donor criteria were expanded and logistical processes improved to minimize cold ischemia time. Clinical data were collected from a nationwide transplantation registry and patient records. RESULTS: A total of 166 SPKs were performed (median 2 per year in the first 3 years, 17.5 per year for the following 4 years, and 23 per year for the past 3 years). Seven patients (4.1%) died with a functioning graft with a median 43 months follow-up. One-year pancreas graft survival was 97.0%, 3-year pancreas graft survival was 96.1% and 5-year was 96.1%. Mean HbA1c was 36 mmol/mol (SD 5.57) and creatinine was 107 µmol/L (SD 34.69) at 1-year after transplantation. All kidney grafts were functioning at the end of follow-up. Complications required re-laparotomy in 39 (23%) patients, mostly due to a pancreas graft related problem (N = 28). No pancreas or kidney graft failure from thrombosis occurred. CONCLUSION: A planned, step-wise development of an SPK program offers a safe and effective treatment for patients with T1D and kidney failure.

Phenotypic subtypes predict outcomes in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. The Colorectal Cancer Subtyping Consortium used the transcriptome-based method to classify CRC according to four molecular subtypes, each showing different genomic alterations and prognoses: CMS1 (microsatellite instable [MSI] immune), CMS2 (canonical), CMS3 (metabolic), and CMS4 (mesenchymal). To expedite the clinical implementation of such methods, easier and preferably tumor phenotype-based methods are needed. In this study, we describe a method to divide patients into four phenotypic subgroups using immunohistochemistry. Moreover, we analyze disease-specific survival (DSS) among different phenotypic subtypes and the associations between the phenotypic subtypes and clinicopathological variables. METHODS: We categorized 480 surgically treated CRC patients into four phenotypic subtypes (immune, canonical, metabolic, and mesenchymal) using the immunohistochemically determined CD3-CD8 tumor-stroma index, proliferation index, and tumor-stroma percentage. We analyzed survival rates for the phenotypic subtypes in different clinical patient subgroups using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis. Associations between phenotypic subtypes and clinicopathological variables were examined using the chi-square test. RESULTS: Patients with immune subtype tumors exhibited the best 5-year DSS, while mesenchymal subtype tumors accompanied the worst prognosis. The prognostic value of the canonical subtype showed wide variation among different clinical subgroups. Immune subtype tumors were associated with being female, stage I disease, and a right-side colon location. Metabolic tumors, however, were associated with pT3 and pT4 tumors, and being male. Finally, a mesenchymal subtype associated with stage IV disease, a mucinous histology, and a rectal tumor location. CONCLUSIONS: Phenotypic subtype predicts patient outcome in CRC. Associations and prognostic values for subtypes resemble the transcriptome-based consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) classification. In our study, the immune subtype stood out with its exceptionally good prognosis. Moreover, the canonical subtype showed wide variability among clinical subgroups. Further studies are needed to investigate the concordance between transcriptome-based classification systems and the phenotypic subtypes.

High tissue expression of TLRs combined with high density of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes predicts a better prognosis in colorectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer causes 935,000 cancer deaths yearly. High local immune cell infiltration serves as a positive prognostic factor in CRC. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) induce innate immune responses and lead to adaptive immune system activation. TLRs play protumorigenic and antitumorigenic roles. We aimed to explore the relationship between TLR immunoexpressions and the infiltration densities of T-lymphocytes in CRC. METHODS: Immunohistochemical TLR2, TLR4, TLR5, and TLR7 positivity and the density of CD3- and CD8-positive cells in tumoral and stromal tissue were evaluated from the tissue microarray slides of 549 consecutive CRC surgical patients treated at Helsinki University Hospital, Finland, between 1998 and 2005. We calculated the associations and correlations using Pearson's chi-square and Spearman's correlation tests, generating survival curves using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Positive intratumoral CD3 and CD8 densities associated with a high TLR2 expression (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively) and a high TLR4 expression (p = 0.013 and p = 0.025). A low TLR5 immunoexpression associated with negative intratumoral CD3 (p = 0.001) and CD8 (p = 0.011) and a low stromal CD3 (p = 0.001). No association or correlation emerged between TLR7 immunoexpression and CD3 or CD8 cell density. A low CD3-CD8 tumor-stroma index indicated a worse prognosis among all TLR subgroups, except the TLR7-negative subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: We detected significant associations and correlations between high tissue TLR2, TLR4, and TLR5 immunoexpressions and high densities of CD3- and CD8-positive cells. Combining these markers may improve the prognostic evaluation of CRC patients.

Tumor-associated CD3- and CD8-positive immune cells in colorectal cancer: The additional prognostic value of CD8+-to-CD3+ ratio remains debatable.

BACKGROUND: A large number of infiltrating CD3- and CD8-positive inflammatory cells indicates an improved survival in colorectal cancer (CRC), similar to many other cancers. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the prognostic value of different combinations of CD3- and CD8-positive immune cells in CRC patients. METHODS: The densities of CD3- and CD8-positive cells in intratumoral and stromal tissues were evaluated from 539 patients, for which we calculated a CD3 tumor-stroma index, a CD8 tumor-stroma index, and a CD3-CD8 tumor-stroma index. RESULTS: High CD3 and CD8 tumor-stroma indices associated with stage I to II disease (p <  0.001 for both). The CD3 tumor-stroma index associated with a colonic tumor location (p = 0.006), while the CD8 tumor-stroma index associated with right-sided tumors (p <  0.001) and histological grade 3 tumors (p = 0.032). High intratumoral and stromal densities for CD3- and CD8-positive immune cells, the CD3 tumor-stroma index, the CD8 tumor-stroma index, and the CD3-CD8 tumor-stroma index all indicated a better DSS. CONCLUSIONS: The CD3 tumor-stroma index carries a strong prognostic value in CRC, and none of the CD3 and CD8 combinations we analyzed proved superior.

TATI, TAT-2, and CRP as Prognostic Factors in Colorectal Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide, with an obvious need for more accurate prognostics. Previous studies identified C-reactive protein (CRP) as a prognostic serum biomarker for colorectal cancer, whereas the biomarkers tumor-associated trypsin inhibitor (TATI) and tumor-associated trypsin-2 (TAT-2) are less well-known prognostic factors. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to compare the prognostic role of these biomarkers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our cohort consisted of 219 women and 274 men who underwent colorectal cancer surgery at Helsinki University Central Hospital from 1998 through 2005. Serum and plasma samples were collected before surgery, aliquoted, stored at -80°C, and then analyzed using high-sensitivity methods with commercially available time-resolved immunofluorometric assay kits. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, CRP (HR 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25-2.23; p = 0.001), TATI (HR 1.87; 95% CI: 1.13-3.08; p = 0.014), and TAT-2 (HR 1.52; 95% CI: 1.13-2.06; p = 0.006) were significant prognostic biomarkers across the entire cohort. In subgroup analyses, TATI and TAT-2 represented significant negative prognostic factors among patients older than 66, while patients with left-sided disease, a high serum TAT-2, or a high plasma CRP experienced worse prognosis. None of the biomarkers emerged as important in the disease stage subgroup analysis nor did they serve as independent factors in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: TATI and TAT-2 as well as CRP significantly, but not independently, served as prognostic factors in our cohort of colorectal cancer patients. Further research is needed to fully understand their clinical role in colorectal cancer.

Systematic reviews of observational studies of Risk of Thrombosis and Bleeding in General and Gynecologic Surgery (ROTBIGGS): introduction and methodology.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding are serious and potentially fatal complications of surgical procedures. Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis decreases the risk of VTE but increases the risk of major post-operative bleeding. The decision to use pharmacologic prophylaxis therefore represents a trade-off that critically depends on the incidence of VTE and bleeding in the absence of prophylaxis. These baseline risks vary widely between procedures, but their magnitude is uncertain. Systematic reviews addressing baseline risks are scarce, needed, and require innovations in methodology. Indeed, systematic summaries of these baseline risk estimates exist neither in general nor gynecologic surgery. We will fill this knowledge gap by performing a series of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the procedure-specific and patient risk factor stratified risk estimates in general and gynecologic surgeries. METHODS: We will perform comprehensive literature searches for observational studies in general and gynecologic surgery reporting symptomatic VTE or bleeding estimates. Pairs of methodologically trained reviewers will independently assess the studies for eligibility, evaluate the risk of bias by using an instrument developed for this review, and extract data. We will perform meta-analyses and modeling studies to adjust the reported risk estimates for the use of thromboprophylaxis and length of follow up. We will derive the estimates of risk from the median estimates of studies rated at the lowest risk of bias. The primary outcomes are the risk estimates of symptomatic VTE and major bleeding at 4 weeks post-operatively for each procedure stratified by patient risk factors. We will apply the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to rate evidence certainty. DISCUSSION: This series of systematic reviews, modeling studies, and meta-analyses will inform clinicians and patients regarding the trade-off between VTE prevention and bleeding in general and gynecologic surgeries. Our work advances the standards in systematic reviews of surgical complications, including assessment of risk of bias, criteria for arriving at the best estimates of risk (including modeling of the timing of events and dealing with suboptimal data reporting), dealing with subgroups at higher and lower risk of bias, and use of the GRADE approach. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021234119.

The Relationship between the Tissue Expression of TLR2, TLR4, TLR5, and TLR7 and Systemic Inflammatory Responses in Colorectal Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed malignancy globally. CRC patients with elevated plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) levels exhibit compromised prognoses. Toll-like receptors (TLRs), activating the innate and adaptive immune systems, may contribute to pro- and antitumorigenic inflammatory responses. We aimed to identify a possible link between local and systemic inflammatory responses in CRC patients by investigating the association between tissue TLRs and plasma CRP. METHODS: Tissue expressions of TLR2, TLR4, TLR5, and TLR7 were assessed using immunohistochemistry of tissue microarray slides from 549 CRC patients surgically treated between 1998 and 2005. Blood samples were drawn preoperatively, centrifuged, aliquoted, and stored at -80°C until analysis. Plasma CRP was determined through high-sensitivity time-resolved immunofluorometric assay. We investigated the association of TLRs to clinicopathologic variables, plasma CRP, and survival. RESULTS: High TLR2 expression (hazard ratio [HR] 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.85; p = 0.005), high TLR5 expression (HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.45-0.83; p = 0.002), positive TLR7 expression (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.33-0.72; p < 0.001), and low CRP (HR 1.48; 95% CI 1.08-2.11; p = 0.017) were associated with a better prognosis. A high TLR2 immunoexpression was associated with a better prognosis among low-CRP patients (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.35-0.80; p = 0.002), high TLR4 expression among high-CRP patients (HR 2.04; 95% CI 1.04-4.00; p = 0.038), high TLR5 expression among low-CRP patients (HR 0.059; 95% CI 0.37-0.92; p = 0.021), and positive TLR7 expression among low-CRP patients (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.28-1.00; p = 0.049). In multivariate analyses, no biomarkers emerged as significant independent variables. CONCLUSIONS: High tissue TLR2, TLR5, and TLR7 levels were associated with a better prognosis. Among low-CRP patients, those with high TLR2, TLR5, and TLR7 immunoexpressions exhibited a better prognosis. Among high CRP patients, a high TLR4 immunoexpression was associated with a better prognosis.

Elevated tumor expression of Astroprincin (FAM171A1) is an independent marker of poor prognosis in colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: Colon cancer (CC) is one of the most commonly diagnosed malignancies worldwide. Several biomarkers have been suggested for improved prognostic evaluation, but few have been implemented in clinical practice. There is a need for biomarkers that predict the tumor behavior in CC and allow stratification of patients that would benefit from adjuvant therapy. We recently identified and functionally characterized a previously unknown protein that we called ASTROPRINCIN (APCN) due to its abundance in astrocytes. APCN, also annotated as FAM171A1, is found in trophoblasts of early placenta. We demonstrated that high expression levels of APCN in cancer cells induced motility and ability of invasive growth in semisolid medium. METHODS: We screened by immunohistochemistry a tissue microarray material from the tumors of 429 CC patients with clinical follow-up in a test series and 255 CC patients in a validation series. RESULTS: We showed that low or absent APCN expression correlates with a favorable prognosis while high APCN expression was a sign of an adverse outcome. Cox uni- and multivariable analysis revealed that elevated tumor expression of APCN constitutes a robust marker of poor prognosis independent of stage, grade, patient's age, or gender. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that APCN is a novel independent prognostic marker in CC and could potentially select patients for more intense postoperative adjuvant treatment and follow-up.

Colon cancer patients with mismatch repair deficiency are more likely to present as acute surgical cases.

BACKGROUND: The effect of the genetic imprint on the emergency presentation of colon cancer remains unclear. The disparity between tumours evolving along different carcinogenetic pathways has not been studied systematically. This retrospective multicenter cohort study evaluates the association between mismatch repair status and the risk for acute surgery of colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective multicenter cohort study including in total 870 patients from three different countries. Scandinavian cohort (Finland and Sweden), including a total of 412 patients operated between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2010, was validated against a cohort from the Czech Republic, including a total of 458 patients, operated between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2019. The proficiency or deficiency of mismatch repair was determined by immunohistochemistry. Primary outcome was the risk for acute colon cancer surgery given as the Odds Ratio (OR) in the univariable and multivariable analyses. Acute colon cancer surgery was defined as surgery performed during the same hospital admission as when the diagnosis of colon cancer was made. RESULTS: Of the 870 patients (399 females [46%]) included in the analyses, median age at surgery was 69 [interquartile range, 61-76] years, deficient Mismatch Repair (dMMR) status was found in 190 patients (22%), and 179 patients (21%) underwent acute surgery during the same hospital admission as when the diagnosis of colon cancer was made. In the Scandinavian cohort, a significant association between dMMR status and acute surgery was seen in both the univariable (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.11-3.02, P = 0.017) and the multivariable (OR = 2.21, 95% CI 1.28-3.95, P = 0.005) analyses. This was confirmed in the Czech validation cohort in both the univariable (OR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.09-3.26, P = 0.022) and the multivariable (OR = 1.77, 95% CI 1.15-3.18, P = 0.021) analyses. CONCLUSION: This multicenter study reveals a strong association between acute colon cancer surgery and dMMR tumour status.

High Tissue TLR5 Expression Predicts Better Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC), the third most common cancer globally, caused 881,000 cancer deaths in 2018. Toll-like receptors (TLRs), the primary sensors of pathogen-associated molecular patterns and damage-associated molecular patterns, activate innate and adaptive immune systems and participate in the development of an inflammatory tumor microenvironment. We aimed to explore the prognostic value of TLR3, TLR5, TLR7, and TLR9 tissue expressions in CRC patients. METHODS: Using immunohistochemistry, we analyzed tissue microarray samples from 825 CRC patients who underwent surgery between 1982 and 2002 at the Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Finland. After analyzing a pilot series of 205 tissue samples, we included only TLR5 and TLR7 in the remainder of the patient series. We evaluated the associations between TLR5 and TLR7 tissue expressions, clinicopathologic variables, and survival. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, we generated survival curves, determining significance using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses relied on the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The 5-year disease-specific survival was 55.9% among TLR5-negative (95% confidence interval [CI] 50.6-61.2%) and 61.9% (95% CI 56.6-67.2%; p = 0.011, log-rank test) among TLR5-positive patients. In the Cox multivariate survival analysis adjusted for age, sex, stage, location, and grade, positive TLR5 immunoexpression (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74; 95% CI 0.59-0.92; p = 0.007) served as an independent positive prognostic factor. TLR7 immunoexpression exhibited no prognostic value in the survival analysis across the entire cohort (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.78-1.20; p = 0.754) nor in subgroup analyses. CONCLUSIONS: We show for the first time that a high TLR5 tumor tissue expression associates with a better prognosis in CRC patients.

The prognostic role of tissue TLR2 and TLR4 in colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC), the second most common cancer globally, resulted in 881,000 deaths in 2018. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are crucial to detecting pathogen invasion and inducing the host's immune response. This study aimed to explore the prognostic value of TLR2 and TLR4 tumor expressions in colorectal cancer patients. We studied the immunohistochemical expressions of TLR2 and TLR4 using tissue microarray specimens from 825 patients undergoing surgery in the Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, between 1982 and 2002. We assessed the relationships between TLR2 and TLR4 expressions and clinicopathological variables and patient survival. We generated survival curves using the Kaplan-Meier method, determining significance with the log-rank test. Among patients with lymph node-positive disease and no distant metastases (Dukes C), a strong TLR2 immunoactivity associated with a better prognosis (p < 0.001). Among patients with local Dukes B disease, a strong TLR4 immunoactivity associated with a worse disease-specific survival (DSS; p = 0.017). In the multivariate survival analysis, moderate TLR4 immunoactivity compared with strong TLR4 immunoactivity (hazard ratio (HR) 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49-0.89, p = 0.007) served as an independent prognostic factor. In the multivariate analysis for the Dukes subgroups, moderate TLR2 immunoactivity (HR 2.63, 95% CI 1.56-4.44, p < 0.001) compared with strong TLR2 immunoactivity served as an independent negative prognostic factor in the Dukes C subgroup. TLR2 and TLR4 might be new prognostic factors to indicate which CRC patients require adjuvant therapy and which could spare from an unnecessary follow-up, but further investigations are needed.

Serum MMP-8 and TIMP-1 predict prognosis in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Almost all of the extracellular matrix (ECM) components can be degraded by the endoproteinases matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Important regulators of MMPs, and thereby of the extracellular environment, are tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs), and especially TIMP-1. Early tumor development, as well as distant metastasis, may be results of an MMP/TIMP ratio imbalance altering the ECM. MMPs are elevated in several inflammatory conditions. Our aim is to investigate the prognostic role of MMP-8, - 9, and TIMP-1 in colorectal cancer (CRC) and their relationship to inflammation. METHODS: We included 337 colorectal cancer patients and 47 controls undergoing surgery at Helsinki University Hospital in Finland, 1998-2011. Serum levels of MMP-8 and plasma levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) were determined with a time-resolved immunofluorometric assay (IFMA), and MMP-9 and TIMP-1 with commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits. Association and correlation analyses were performed with the Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, and Spearman rank correlation tests. Survival curves were constructed according to the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. RESULTS: Among patients with advanced disease, serum levels of MMP-8 and TIMP-1 were elevated. CRC patients with high MMP-8 (HR (hazard ratio) 1.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17-2.52, P = 0.005) and those with high TIMP-1 (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.23-2.64, P = 0.002) had worse prognoses. MMP-9 level failed to serve as a prognostic factor. In multivariable survival analysis, Dukes stage, and low MMP-9/TIMP-1 molar ratio (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.33-0.98, P = 0.042) were independently predicted prognosis. A weak correlation between CRP and MMP-8 (rS = 0.229, P < 0.001), and TIMP-1 (rS = 0.280, P < 0.001) was noted. Among patients showing no systemic inflammatory response, MMP-8 (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.10-2.53, P = 0.017) and TIMP-1 (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.05-2.42, P = 0.029) were prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: MMP-8 and TIMP-1 in serum, but not MMP-9, identified CRC patients with bad prognosis. Among patients showing no systemic inflammatory response, MMP-8 and TIMP-1 may associate with poor prognosis.