Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Colorectal Dis ; 2024 May 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38706109

RESUMEN

AIM: Literature on nationwide long-term permanent stoma rates after rectal cancer resection in the minimally invasive era is scarce. The aim of this population-based study was to provide more insight into the permanent stoma rate with interhospital variability (IHV) depending on surgical technique, with pelvic sepsis, unplanned reinterventions and readmissions as secondary outcomes. METHOD: Patients who underwent open or minimally invasive resection of rectal cancer (lower border below the sigmoid take-off) in 67 Dutch centres in 2016 were included in this cross-sectional cohort study. RESULTS: Among 2530 patients, 1470 underwent a restorative resection (58%), 356 a Hartmann's procedure (14%, IHV 0%-42%) and 704 an abdominoperineal resection (28%, IHV 3%-60%). Median follow-up was 51 months. The overall permanent stoma rate at last follow-up was 50% (IHV 13%-79%) and the unintentional permanent stoma rate, permanent stoma after a restorative procedure or an unplanned Hartmann's procedure, was 11% (IHV 0%-29%). A total of 2165 patients (86%) underwent a minimally invasive resection: 1760 conventional (81%), 170 transanal (8%) and 235 robot-assisted (11%). An anastomosis was created in 59%, 80% and 66%, with corresponding unintentional permanent stoma rates of 12%, 24% and 14% (p = 0.001), respectively. When corrected for age, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, cTNM, distance to the anorectal junction and neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy, the minimally invasive technique was not associated with an unintended permanent stoma (p = 0.071) after a restorative procedure. CONCLUSION: A remarkable IHV in the permanent stoma rate after rectal cancer resection was found. No beneficial influence of transanal or robot-assisted laparoscopy on the unintentional permanent stoma rate was found, although this might be caused by the surgical learning curve. A reduction in IHV and improving preoperative counselling for decision-making for restorative procedures are required.

2.
J Surg Case Rep ; 2023(7): rjad419, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37485497

RESUMEN

Metachronous colorectal cancer is relatively rare, occurring in 0.7-3.6% of patients diagnosed with colorectal adenocarcinoma. Cutaneous metastases are similarly a rare presentation, occurring in <6% of metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Even more rare are the cutaneous recurrences at the peristomal site. Clinically, it is difficult to distinguish between metachronous cancer and cutaneous metastases. This paper reports a case of an elderly woman presenting with a slowly progressing peristomal cutaneous lesion 16 years after surgical resection for colorectal cancer. Core punch biopsy revealed a cutaneous localization of an intestinal type of adenocarcinoma. A surgical resection of the peristomal area was carried out whereby a new colostomy was created on the contralateral side. Definite histopathological examination showed a superficially located intestinal type adenocarcinoma with extensive pagetoid spread in the epidermal surface. In conclusion, it is important to remain alert and strive for early detection for cutaneous abnormalities following colorectal cancer.

3.
J Surg Case Rep ; 2023(5): rjad303, 2023 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37220594

RESUMEN

Metastatic disease in the vagina of other origins such as rectal cancer is rare and only very few cases have been reported. A female patient developed an isolated metachronic metastasis located at the lower part of the rectovaginal septum, 8 months after curative resection for proximal rectal cancer. An excision of the tumour was performed with primary closure of the vaginal wall. Histopathological examination confirmed the solid tumour to be metastatic disease from rectal origin with free margins. A year later, the patient received a lobectomy of the left lower lobe, due to distant metastasis of rectal origin 2 years after primary surgery. The patient is currently 4 years postoperatively, alive and shows no sign on recurrent disease. This case illustrates that awareness and early recognition of this rare presentation can lead to adequate treatment plans.

4.
Eur J Anaesthesiol ; 37(11): 1040-1049, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31789965

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether protective ventilation reduces ventilation-induced pulmonary inflammation and injury during one-lung ventilation. OBJECTIVE: To compare intra-operative protective ventilation with conventional during oesophagectomy with respect to pulmonary levels of biomarkers for inflammation and lung injury. DESIGN: Randomised clinical trial. SETTING: Tertiary centre for oesophageal diseases. PATIENTS: Twenty-nine patients scheduled for one-lung ventilation during oesophagectomy. INTERVENTIONS: Low tidal volume (VT) of 6 ml kg predicted body weight (pbw) during two-lung ventilation and 3 ml kgpbw during one-lung ventilation with 5 cmH2O positive end expired pressure versus intermediate VT of 10 ml kgpbw during two-lung ventilation and 5 ml kgpbw body weight during one-lung ventilation with no positive end-expiratory pressure. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the change in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) levels of preselected biomarkers for inflammation (TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-8) and lung injury (soluble Receptor for Advanced Glycation End-products, surfactant protein-D, Clara Cell protein 16 and Krebs von den Lungen 6), from start to end of ventilation. RESULTS: Median [IQR] VT in the protective ventilation group (n = 13) was 6.0 [5.7 to 7.8] and 3.1 [3.0 to 3.6] ml kgpbw during two and one-lung ventilation; VT in the conventional ventilation group (n = 16) was 9.8 [7.0 to 10.1] and 5.2 [5.0 to 5.5] ml kgpbw during two and one-lung ventilation. BAL levels of biomarkers for inflammation increased from start to end of ventilation in both groups; levels of soluble Receptor for Advanced Glycation End-products, Clara Cell protein 16 and Krebs von den Lungen 6 did not change, while levels of surfactant protein-D decreased. Changes in BAL biomarkers levels were not significantly different between the two ventilation strategies. CONCLUSION: Intra-operative protective ventilation compared with conventional ventilation does not affect changes in pulmonary levels of biomarkers for inflammation and lung injury in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation for oesophagectomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The 'Low versus Conventional tidal volumes during one-lung ventilation for minimally invasive oesophagectomy trial' (LoCo) was registered at the Netherlands Trial Register (study identifier NTR 4391).


Asunto(s)
Lesión Pulmonar , Ventilación Unipulmonar , Biomarcadores , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Inflamación/diagnóstico , Pulmón , Países Bajos , Ventilación Unipulmonar/efectos adversos , Receptor para Productos Finales de Glicación Avanzada , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Volumen de Ventilación Pulmonar
5.
Korean J Anesthesiol ; 72(2): 184-187, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30553237

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Double-lumen tubes (DLT) and endobronchial blockers (EB) are used for one-lung ventilation in thoracic surgery. More complications are seen when using DLT when compared to EB, while major complications are rarely seen. CASE: This case report describes a perforation of the right mainstem bronchus by an EZ-Blocker EB in a patient undergoing a minimally invasive esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. CONCLUSIONS: We advise to insert an EZ-BlockerTM EB with caution and only under direct bronchoscopic visualization, especially in previous irradiated patients.


Asunto(s)
Bronquios/lesiones , Quimioradioterapia/tendencias , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Esófago/cirugía , Terapia Neoadyuvante/tendencias , Ventilación Unipulmonar/efectos adversos , Anciano , Esofagectomía/instrumentación , Humanos , Intubación Intratraqueal/efectos adversos , Intubación Intratraqueal/instrumentación , Masculino , Ventilación Unipulmonar/instrumentación
6.
J Vasc Surg ; 46(1): 24-30, 2007 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17606119

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to compare the early and mid-term results of the medial and posterior approaches in the surgical treatment of popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs). METHODS: From 1992 to 2006 in three hospitals, 110 popliteal aneurysms needed surgical repair by a posterior or a medial approach. Of 36 aneurysms repaired by the posterior approach, 33 could be case-matched to a medially excluded PAA according to the criteria of (1) patient age, (2) cardiovascular comorbidity, (3) indication for PAA repair, (4) diameter of PAA at time of surgical repair, (5) number of distal outflow vessels at time of surgical repair, and (6) type of bypass or interposition graft (venous or polytetrafluoroethylene). RESULTS: During the 30-day postoperative period, seven complications (21%) occurred in each group, no patients died, and no amputations were necessary. Two patients in the posterior group vs none in the medial group (P < .05) needed thrombectomy because of occlusion of the reconstruction. The mean follow-up was 47 months (range, 2 to 176). In this period, 13 deaths occurred, but none were related to the previous interventions. The primary patency rates at 6 months and at 1, 3, and 4 years were 84%, 79%, 66%, and 66% in the posterior group and 96% (P < .05), 93% (P < .05), 76% (P = NS), and 69 % (P = NS) for the medial group, respectively. The secondary patency rates at 6 months, and at 1, 3, and 4 years were 100%, 100%, 100%, and 90% in the posterior group and 96%, 96%, 96%, and 90% in the medial group, respectively (P = NS). Limb salvage rates were 97% for the posterior group and 100% for the medial group (P = NS). No neurologic complications or venous damage was seen in either group. Irrespective of approach, venous reconstructions resulted in significantly higher patency rates compared with prosthetic reconstructions at the 3-year follow-up (84% vs 67%, P < .01). During follow-up, which included duplex scanning, two patients in the medial group needed renewed surgical intervention and posterior exclusion because of persistent flow and growth of the native aneurysm. CONCLUSION: Early (<1 year) primary patency rates of the medial approach were significantly better than the posterior approach, possibly because of the limited posterior exposure. However, in the absence of a significant difference in long-term primary and secondary patency rates between the posterior and medial approach, and considering the substantial risk of aneurysm growth after medial approach (up to 22%), the posterior approach might be the surgical method of preference for PAA repair in the long run.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Prótesis Vascular , Arteria Poplítea/cirugía , Vena Safena/trasplante , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma/mortalidad , Aneurisma/patología , Aneurisma/fisiopatología , Angiografía de Substracción Digital , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Angiografía por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Arteria Poplítea/patología , Arteria Poplítea/fisiopatología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Doppler Dúplex , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...