Working towards a reduction in cattle lameness: 2. Understanding dairy farmers' motivations.

Reducing lameness in dairy herds requires farmers to adapt or change existing practices or resources. Those who seek to improve animal welfare by influencing the actions of farmers need to understand farmers' motivations. To investigate why farmers see lameness as a problem and what motivates their efforts to reduce lameness, a questionnaire was carried out with 222 UK dairy farmers. Farmers considered pain and suffering for the cows to be an important outcome of lameness, but reduced performance by lame cows was also seen as a considerable problem. The motivator most commonly given high importance was pride in a healthy herd. Factors incorporating accreditation issues, public image and costs of treatment were generally seen to be of some, but lesser importance. Advisors need to take all these areas into consideration when working to encourage farmers to act to reduce lameness and thereby improve animal welfare.

Working towards a reduction in cattle lameness: 1. Understanding barriers to lameness control on dairy farms.

On 222 dairy farms, the farmer's perception of the scale of the herd lameness problem was compared with the prevalence detected by observation of the milking herd, and a questionnaire explored the barriers to lameness reduction. Ninety percent of farmers did not perceive lameness to be a major problem on their farm, although the average prevalence of lameness was 36%. For 62% of the sample, lameness was not the top priority for efforts made to improve herd health. Time and labour were important limiting factors for lameness control activities and financial constraints prevented farmers taking action on advice in 30% of cases. Farmers' understanding the implications of lameness for the farm business was limited. Lameness reduction is restricted by farmers' perception of lameness, but also by time, labour and finance; these issues need to be addressed at the industry level to support animal welfare improvement.

TSC-22D1 isoforms have opposing roles in mammary epithelial cell survival.

Transforming growth factor beta (TGFbeta)-stimulated clone-22 domain family member 1 (TSC-22D1) has previously been associated with enhanced apoptosis in several cell systems. In an attempt to identify novel factors that are involved in the control of cell death during mammary gland involution, we found that the mRNA for isoform 2 of TSC-22D1 was highly upregulated 24 h after forced weaning, when a dramatic increase in cell death occurred, closely following the expression of the known inducer of cell death during involution, TGFbeta3. This was paralleled by strongly increased TSC-22D1 isoform 2 protein levels in the luminal epithelium. In contrast, RNA and protein expression levels of the isoform 1 of TSC-22D1 did not change during development. Whereas isoform 2 induced cell death, isoform 1 suppressed TGFbeta-induced cell death and enhanced proliferation in mammary epithelial cell lines. Furthermore, four distinct forms of isoform 2 protein were detected in the mammary gland, of which only a 15-kDa form was associated with early involution. Our data describe novel opposing functions of the two mammalian TSC-22D1 isoforms in cell survival and proliferation, and establish the TSC-22D1 isoform 2 as a potential regulator of cell death during mammary gland involution.

Using a dynamic training environment to acquire laparoscopic surgery skill.

BACKGROUND: Current physical laparoscopic surgical simulators provide training only for static tasks, which do not develop the more advanced hand-eye coordination skills needed to navigate the dynamic surgical environment. A novel dynamic minimally invasive training environment (DynaMITE) was developed to address this need. This study aimed to evaluate further the utility of the system as a training and skill assessment tool. Two studies were performed with a second-generation design. The authors hypothesized that the dynamic task environment would be challenging to novices and would differentiate experienced surgeons from the inexperienced by emphasising the dynamic skills gained through surgical experience. METHODS: The participants in the first study were 42 novice and experienced surgeons attending the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) 2007 Learning Center, whereas the second controlled laboratory study had 16 participants (5 novices and 11 experienced surgeons). The participants performed two tasks: an aiming task and an object manipulation task. Both tasks were positioned on a dynamic platform that moved in five different trajectories. RESULTS: The subjective feedback from the surgeons at the SAGES Learning Center was positive. The results from the controlled study showed significant performance deterioration in the fast diagonal task compared with the task of aiming and manipulating in the static environment for both experience groups but no performance differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic tasks are challenging, and surgeons need to be trained specifically for these tasks. The DynaMITE system can provide training benefits for dynamic skill development, even for expert surgeons who may have had no opportunity to gain these skills through their surgical practice.

Stress responses in lambs docked and castrated surgically or by the application of rubber rings.

A comparative study has been made in lambs 3 to 6 weeks of age of the behavioural responses and changes in plasma immunoreactive beta-endorphin (ir beta-endorphin) and cortisol after docking or docking plus castration by the application of rubber rings or by surgery. The use of rubber rings on lambs at this age was characterised by very agitated behaviour indicative of considerable distress for a period of up to 1 h. In contrast, surgery was accompanied by some post-operative shock exhibited by reduced exploratory and social behaviour, at least in the lambs exposed to docking plus castration. In the latter group there were highly significant increases in both plasma ir beta-endorphin and cortisol concentrations that may be consistent with the induction of stress-induced analgesia. We conclude that surgery caused less distress than the rubber rings, and is therefore preferable for docking and castration of lambs 3 to 6 weeks of age.

Stress-induced changes in plasma concentrations of immunoreactive beta-endorphin and cortisol in response to routine surgical procedures in lambs.

Following four different surgical procedures in lambs 3-5 weeks old, plasma immunoreactive beta-endorphin (beta-EP) and cortisol were assayed at 15 min and 24 h as determinants of post-operative stress. A threefold increase in mean plasma beta-EP levels occurred 15 min after tail docking, and a maximal eight- to tenfold increase occurred in response to castration and/or mulesing with tail docking. Significant increments in mean plasma cortisol levels followed these surgical procedures with the maximal response 15 min after mulesing plus castration with tail docking. The physiologically active 'free' cortisol in plasma represents about 25% of the cortisol, as measured, and the two are highly correlated. At 24 h, beta-EP levels in all treated groups were similar to controls, although a small elevation in cortisol levels was still present in the lambs subjected to mulesing. Ultrafiltration of plasma extracts showed that peak beta-EP levels contained about 40% immunoreactivity from low molecular weight species (mol. wt less than 10,000). By specific radioimmunoassay and reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography this comprised about 75% beta-EP1-31, the most potent analgesic endorphin, 10% beta-EP1-27, and 15% alpha-N-acetyl-beta-EP. Increased beta-EP1-31 levels may modulate post-operative pain in lambs.