The BYPASS-CTCA Study: the value of Computed Tomography Cardiac Angiography (CTCA) in improving patient-related outcomes in patients with previous bypass operation undergoing invasive coronary angiography: Study Protocol of a Randomised Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with ischaemic heart disease and previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) often need coronary evaluation by means of invasive coronary angiography (ICA). ICA in such patients is technically more challenging and carries a higher risk of complications including kidney damage, myocardial infarction, stroke and death. Improvements in Computed Tomography Cardiac Angiography (CTCA) technology have ensured its emergence as a useful clinical tool in CABG assessment, allowing for its potential use in planning interventional procedures in this patient group. METHODS: The BYPASS-CTCA study is a prospective, single centre, randomised controlled trial assessing the value of upfront CTCA in patients with previous surgical revascularisation undergoing ICA procedures. A total of 688 patients with previous CABG, requiring ICA for standard indications, will be recruited and randomised to receive ICA alone, or CTCA prior to angiography. Subjects will be followed up over a 12-month period post procedure. The primary endpoints are ICA procedural duration, incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) and patient satisfaction scores post ICA. Secondary endpoints include contrast dose (mL) and radiation dose (mSv) during ICA, number of catheters used, angiography-related complications and cost-effectiveness of CTCA (QALY) over 12 months. DISCUSSION: The study will investigate the hypothesis that CTCA prior to ICA in patients with previous CABG can reduce procedural duration, post-procedural kidney damage and improve patient satisfaction, therefore strengthening its role in this group of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov which is a resource maintained by the U.S. National Library of Medicine. Registration number NCT03736018.

NITRATE-CIN Study: Protocol of a Randomized (1:1) Single-Center, UK, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial Testing the Effect of Inorganic Nitrate on Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography for Acute Coronary Syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), an acute kidney injury resulting from the administration of intravascular iodinated contrast media, is a significant cause of morbidity/mortality following coronary angiographic procedures in high-risk patients. Despite preventative measures intended to mitigate the risk of CIN, there remains a need for novel effective treatments. Evidence suggests that delivery of nitric oxide (NO) through chemical reduction of inorganic nitrate to NO may offer a novel therapeutic strategy to reduce CIN and thus preserve long term renal function. DESIGN: The NITRATE-CIN trial is a single-center, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial, which plans to recruit 640 patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) who are at risk of CIN. Patients will be randomized to either inorganic nitrate therapy (capsules containing 12 mmol KNO3) or placebo capsules containing potassium chloride (KCl) daily for 5 days. The primary endpoint is development of CIN using the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria. A key secondary endpoint is renal function over a 3-month follow-up period. Additional secondary endpoints include serum renal biomarkers (e.g. neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin) at 6 h, 48 h and 3 months following administration of contrast. Cost-effectiveness of inorganic nitrate therapy will also be evaluated. SUMMARY: This study is designed to investigate the hypothesis that inorganic nitrate treatment decreases the rate of CIN as part of semi-emergent coronary angiography for ACS. Inorganic nitrate is a simple and easy to administer intervention that may prove useful in prevention of CIN in at-risk patients undergoing coronary angiographic procedures.

First-degree atrioventricular block on basal electrocardiogram predicts future arrhythmic events in patients with Brugada syndrome: a long-term follow-up study from the Veneto region of Northeastern Italy.

AIMS: This study was designed to assess the prognostic value of clinical and electrocardiographic parameters in Brugada syndrome (BrS). METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population included 272 consecutive patients (82% males; mean age 43 ± 12 years), with either a spontaneous (n = 137, 50%) or drug-induced (n = 135, 50%) Type 1 Brugada electrocardiogram (ECG) pattern. The study combined endpoint included sudden cardiac death (SCD), cardiac arrest, and appropriate intervention of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). A first-degree atrioventricular (AV) block (PR = 219 ± 17 ms) was documented at basal ECG in 45 patients (16.5%); 27 of these underwent an electrophysiological study with recording in 21 (78%) of an HV interval ≥55 ms (mean 61 ± 3 ms). Patients with first-degree AV block had a wider QRS complex (median 110 ms vs. 95 ms; P = 0.04) and more often showed a left anterior hemiblock pattern (n = 13, 29% vs. n = 35, 16%; P = 0.056). During a mean follow-up of 85 ± 55 months, 17 patients (6.3%) experienced ≥1 major arrhythmic events (appropriate ICD intervention, n = 13 and SCD, n = 4). At univariate analysis, the occurrence of major arrhythmic events was significantly associated with a history of syncope or cardiac arrest (P < 0.001), Type 1 ECG pattern (P = 0.04), and first-degree AV block (P < 0.001). Univariate and multivariable predictors of events included a history of syncope or cardiac arrest [hazard ratio (HR) 5.8, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.04-16.5; P < 0.001; and HR 6.68, 95% CI 2.34-19.1; P < 0.001; respectively], a spontaneous Type 1 ECG pattern (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.03-4.24; P = 0.033; and HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.01-4.29; P = 0.044; respectively) and a first-degree AV block at baseline ECG (HR 3.84, 95% CI 1.47-9.99; P = 0.006; and HR 4.65, 95% CI 2.34-19.1; P = 0.002; respectively). CONCLUSION: Besides a history of cardiac arrest or syncope, first-degree AV block on basal ECG is an independent predictor of malignant arrhythmic events and a stronger marker of arrhythmic risk than a spontaneous 'coved-type' ECG pattern in patients with BrS.