Conservative treatment of upper urinary tract carcinoma in patients with imperative indications.

BACKGROUND: To report our experience for endoscopic treatment of upper urinary tract carcinoma (UTUC) in patients with imperative indications for management. METHODS: Retrospective data were collected for all patients who underwent endoscopic management of UTUC for imperative situations, from September 2013 to January 2019. Comorbidity was determined by using the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). The primary endpoint of the study was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates, complication rates and global renal function. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients were enrolled in the study. The median age was 69.0 (IQR 63.0-79.0) years and the median CCI was 6 (IQR 4-8). Overall, 137 endoscopic procedures were performed; 117 (85.4%) had no complication. Clavien-Dindo grade III and IV complications were 3 (2.2%) and 1 (0.7%) respectively. The median follow-up of 23 months (IQR 14-35). During the follow-up, 2 (6.9%) patients died for cause not related to cancer. Recurrence of UTUC occurred in 18 patients (61.1%). The 24-month OS was 96.4±3.5% and the 24-month RFS was 31.7±9.4%. Lower RFS rates were found in high grade tumor patients (22.2±13.9%) compared to low grade tumor patients (35.6±12.3%) (P=0.237). There was statistical difference in creatinine and eGFR values when comparing baseline to last follow-up (P=0.018 and P=0.005, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic management of UTUC in patients with imperative indications appears to be a reasonable alternative to nephroureterectomy. However, stringent endoscopic follow-up is necessary due to the high risk of disease recurrence.

Holmium laser for RIRS. Watts are we doing? / Laser holmium para ureteroscopia flexible retrograda. ¿Qué estamos haciendo?

OBJECTIVE: To review recent and relevant information regarding the use of high-power (HPL) and low-power (LPL) Holmium:YAG lasers (Ho:YAG) in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for lithotripsy. METHODS: A PubMed/Embase search was conducted and recent and relevant papers on Ho:YAG for RIRS were reviewed. RESULTS: Settings for Ho:YAG are pulse energy (PE), pulse frequency (PF), and pulse width. Currently, the majority of LPL can also adjust pulse-width but cannot reach PF as high as HPL, however, the higher energy outputs reached by HPL are rarely useful in lithotripsy. Higher PE might enhance ablation but generates larger fragments and higher retropulsion. Pulse width does not affect energy output but delivers energy for a longer time-length. Dusting and basketing are complementary techniques. Dusting seeks to pulverize stones into particles ≤250 µm avoiding the use of instruments for stone retrieval, whereas in fragmenting, the stones are break into smaller pieces which are then retrieved. Dusting can prevent the use of supplies such as access sheaths and baskets and also prevent the complications related to their use. However, is not always feasible in clinical practice to fully ablate a stone into dust, then the use of this supplies and popcorn technique are helpful for rendering a patient stonefree. The energy gap between HPL and LPL is wide and leaves room for a mid-power laser classification, which can overcome the main drawback of LPL, the expenses of HPL, and still holding its versatility for other procedures beyond stones. CONCLUSIONS: HPL and LPL have similar effectiveness, but long-term cost-effectiveness comparisons are underexplored. Newer HPL would need to be compared to emerging technologies as the thulium fiber, and prove superiority to mid-power laser to determine how powerful is enough for Ho:YAG in the years to come.

OBJETIVO: El láser Holmio:YAG (Ho:YAG) es el de elección para litotricia en cirugía retrógrada intrarenal (RIRS). Los equipos láser de alto poder (HPL) y bajo poder (LPL) tienen diferentes características, por lo tanto, pueden tener diferente desempeño. En el presente trabajo tuvimos el objetivo de revisar evidencia sobre el uso de HPL y LPL en RIRS. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda en PubMed/Embase y la información reciente y relevante sobre HPL y/o LPL en RIRS fue evaluada para una revisión monográfica. RESULTADOS: Los HPL y algunos LPL más recientes permiten al cirujano ajustar la duración del pulso, por lo tanto, al configurar un pulso largo, alta frecuencia y baja energía, se puede lograr una verdadera pulverización. Los LPL no pueden alcanzar la misma emisión de energía que los HPL. La retropulsión aumenta si la energía de pulso es mayor, entonces, se previene la retropulsión al incrementar la emisión total de energía mediante el incremento de la frecuencia. El costo de adquisión de los HPL es considerablemente mayor que el de los LPL, sin embargo, el costo a largo plazo pudiera ser similar pues los procedimientos pueden abaratarse al disminuir el uso de insumos para recuperar los litos, preservar la punta de las fibras reutilizables y disminuir el tiempo quirúrgico. CONCLUSIONES: La evidencia no favorece la efectividad de los HPL o LPL de modo abrumador. Ambos dispositivos son efectivos y seguros. No cabe duda de que los HPL alcanzan mayor emisión de energía que los LPL, pero los dispositivos de 50-80 Watts, tienen emisiones de energía que rara vez se alcanzan para litotricia y por lo tanto pudiera considerarse demasiada energía. A medida que nuevas tecnologías han surgido, la brecha entre LPL y HPL se amplía, dejando espacio para una clasificación de poder intermedio (36-55 Watts) y la comparación entre estos dispositivos sería más justa. Asimismo, los HPL aún necesitan ser contrastados en el escenario clínico, con las nuevas tecnologías disponibles, tal como la fibra de laser tulio.

Holmium laser for RIRS. Watts are we doing? / Laser holmium para ureteroscopia flexible retrograda. ¿Qué estamos haciendo?

OBJECTIVE: To review recent and relevant information regarding the use of high-power (HPL) and low-power (LPL) Holmium:YAG lasers (Ho:YAG) in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for lithotripsy. METHODS: A PubMed/Embase search was conducted and recent and relevant papers on Ho:YAG for RIRS were reviewed. RESULTS: Settings for Ho:YAG are pulse energy (PE), pulse frequency (PF), and pulse width. Currently, the majority of LPL can also adjust pulse-width but cannot reach PF as high as HPL, however, the higher energy outputs reached by HPL are rarely useful in lithotripsy. Higher PE might enhance ablation but generates larger fragments and higher retropulsion. Pulse width does not affect energy output but delivers energy for a longer time-length. Dusting and basketing are complementary techniques. Dusting seeks to pulverize stones into particles ≤250 μm avoiding the use of instruments for stone retrieval, whereas in fragmenting, the stones are break into smaller pieces which are then retrieved. Dusting can prevent the use of supplies such as access sheaths and baskets and also prevent the complications related to their use. However, is not always feasible in clinical practice to fully ablate a stone into dust, then the use of this supplies and popcorn technique are helpful for rendering a patient stonefree. The energy gap between HPL and LPL is wide and leaves room for a mid-power laser classification, which can overcome the main drawback of LPL, the expenses of HPL, and still holding its versatility for other procedures beyond stones. CONCLUSIONS: HPL and LPL have similar effectiveness, but long-term cost-effectiveness comparisons are underexplored. Newer HPL would need to be compared to emerging technologies as the thulium fiber, and prove superiority to mid-power laser to determine how powerful is enough for Ho:YAG in the years to come

OBJETIVO: El láser Holmio:YAG (Ho:YAG) es el de elección para litotricia en cirugía retrógrada intrarenal (RIRS). Los equipos láser de alto poder (HPL) y bajo poder (LPL) tienen diferentes características, por lo tanto, pueden tener diferente desempeño. En el presente trabajo tuvimos el objetivo de revisar evidencia sobre el uso de HPL y LPL en RIRS. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda en PubMed/Embase y la información reciente y relevante sobre HPL y/o LPL en RIRS fue evaluada para una revisión monográfica. RESULTADOS: Los HPL y algunos LPL más recientes permiten al cirujano ajustar la duración del pulso, por lo tanto, al configurar un pulso largo, alta frecuencia y baja energía, se puede lograr una verdadera pulverización. Los LPL no pueden alcanzar la misma emisión de energía que los HPL. La retropulsión aumenta si la energía de pulso es mayor, entonces, se previene la retropulsión al incrementar la emisión total de energía mediante el incremento de la frecuencia. El costo de adquisión de los HPL es considerablemente mayor que el de los LPL, sin embargo, el costo a largo plazo pudiera ser similar pues los procedimientos pueden abaratarse al disminuir el uso de insumos para recuperar los litos, preservar la punta de las fibras reutilizables y disminuir el tiempo quirúrgico. CONCLUSIONES: La evidencia no favorece la efectividad de los HPL o LPL de modo abrumador. Ambos dispositivos son efectivos y seguros. No cabe duda de que los HPL alcanzan mayor emisión de energía que los LPL, pero los dispositivos de 50-80 Watts, tienen emisiones de energía que rara vez se alcanzan para litotricia y por lo tanto pudiera considerarse demasiada energía. A medida que nuevas tecnologías han surgido, la brecha entre LPL y HPL se amplía, dejando espacio para una clasificación de poder intermedio (36-55 Watts) y la comparación entre estos dispositivos sería más justa. Asimismo, los HPL aún necesitan ser contrastados en el escenario clínico, con las nuevas tecnologías disponibles, tal como la fibra de laser tulio

Hospital care in Departments defined as COVID-free: A proposal for a safe hospitalization protecting healthcare professionals and patients not affected by COVID-19.

The COVID-19 pandemic influenced the normal course of clinical practice leading to significant delays in the delivery of healthcare services for patients non affected by COVID-19. In the near future, it will be crucial to identify facilities capable of providing health care in compliance with the safety of healthcare professionals, administrative staff and patients. All the staff involved in the project of a Covid-free hospital should be subjected to a diagnostic swab for COVID-19 before the beginning of healthcare activity and then periodically in order to avoid the risk of contamination of patients during the process of care. The modifications of various activities involved in the process of care are described: outpatient care, reception of inpatients, inpatient ward and operating room. For outpatient care, modality of appointment procedure, characteristics of waiting room and personal protective equipment (PPE) for healthcare professionals and administrative staff are presented. Reception of inpatients shall be conditional on a negative swab for COVID-19 obtained with a drive-in procedure. The management of the operating room represents the most crucial step of the patient's care process. The surgical team should be restricted and monitored with periodic swabs; surgical procedures should be performed by experienced surgeons according to standard procedures; surgical training experimental treatments and research protocols should be suspended. Adequate personal protective equipment and measures to reduce aerosolization in the operating room (closed circuits, continuous cycle insufflators, fume extraction) should be adopted. Prevention of possible transmission of the virus during procedures in open, laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery is to use a multi-tactic approach, which includes correct filtration and ventilation of the operating room, the use of appropriate PPE (FFP3 plus surgical mask and protective visor for all the staff working in the operating room) and smoke evacuation devices with a suction and filter system.   on behalf of the UrOP Executive Committee Giuseppe Ludovico, Angelo Cafarelli, Ottavio De Cobelli, Ferdinando De Marco, Giovanni Ferrari, Stefano Pecoraro, Angelo Porreca, Domenico Tuzzolo.

Semirigid Ureteroscopy: Step by Step.

This article aims to demonstrate a step-by-step technique of semirigid ureteroscopy (URS) for the treatment of ureteral stones, urothelial tumors, and ureteral stenosis. Operating room setup, camera settings, access to the bladder, and negotiation of the ureteral orifice, lasertripsy, basketing of the stone fragments, endoscopic treatment of ureteral tumors and ureteral stenosis, flexible URS at the end of semirigid URS, and Double-J stent placement are described step by step.

Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: tips and tricks.

This paper aims to give an exhaustive overview of supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) illustrating some tips and tricks in order to optimize its execution in full safety. Critical review of Pros and cons of supine PCNL is accomplished to allow the urologist to experience the beauty of this position while being ready to overcome its minimal shortcomings.

Italian endourological panorama: results from a national survey.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this survey was to explore the dissemination of flexible ureteroscopy (fURS), shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the Italian urological community and to know the real availability of the complex endourological armamentarium all over the country. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online questionnaire characterizing the case volume/year of upper urinary tract stone treatment and the availability of flexible ureteroscopes (FUs) armamentarium was sent to all urological Italian centers. RESULTS: The survey was sent to 294 urological centers and 146 responded (49.7%). The case volume/year of fURS was the following: <20 cases in 20 centers (13.7%); 20-50 cases in 40 centers (27.4%), >50- <100 cases in 55 centers (37.8%) and >100 cases in 28 centers (19.2%). The case volume/year of SWL was the following: <50 cases in 18 centers (12.3%); >50- <200 cases in 56 centers (36.4%) and >200 cases in 35 centers (24%). In 37 centers (25.3%) SWL was not utilized at all. The case volume/year of PCNL was the following: <10 cases in 20 centers (14%); >10 - <30 cases in 55 centers (30%), >30- < 50 cases in 33 centers(23%), >50- <100 cases in 13 centers (9%) and >100 procedures in 2 centers (1%). However, 24 centers (16%) did not perform any PCNL procedure.Four centers (3%) did not have any FU at the moment of the survey. The availability of FUs was as follows: 1 FU in 21 (14%) centers, 2 FUs in 61 (42%) centers, 3 FUs in 29 (20%) centers, 4 FUs in 13 (9%) centers and ≥5 FUs in 16 (9%) centers. Only 82 (56%) centers had all of their FUs in working condition. CONCLUSIONS: This survey succeeded in providing a complete overview on the Italian endourological panorama.

Assessment of bilateral supine and prone tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

INTRODUCTION: To assess the outcome of same-session bilateral tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (BPCNL) in supine and prone positions and to compare them to unilateral tubeless PCNL (UPCNL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive PCNL patients treated at two institutions between 2006-2016 were analyzed. Tubeless BPCNL was performed when indicated. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients underwent BPCNLs [30 supine (SBPCNL) and 28 prone (PBPCNL)], while 1395 patients underwent UPCNLs. Demographics and baseline data were similar for all groups (p > 0.05). SBPCNL had a longer operating time (124 +/- 38 minutes versus 105 +/- 36 minutes; p = 0.49) and a significantly longer hospital stay (3.6 +/- 1.9 versus 2.4 +/- 1.3 days, respectively; p = 0.019) in comparison to PBPCNL. Seven planned BPCNLs were converted to UPCNL, resulting in a BPCNL success rate of 58/65 (89%). When compared to UPCNL, BPCNL patients had a significantly increased postoperative creatinine level (0.74 +/- 0.3 versus -0.04 +/- 0.8 g/dL; p = 0.07E-7), a decreased postoperative hemoglobin level (2 +/- 1.1 versus 1.4 +/- 1.7 mg/dL; p = 0.026), a higher blood transfusion rate (9% versus 2%; p = 0.023), and a longer hospital stay (3 +/- 1.7 versus 1.6 +/- 1.7 days; p = 0.001E-4). Stone-free and overall complication rates were similar for both groups. CONCLUSION: BPCNL can be routinely offered to patients with a bilateral indication. BPCNL is associated with higher blood transfusion rates and longer hospital stays, but it may spare patients from repeat anesthesia and hospitalization. SBPCNL takes longer to perform than PBCNL, but without clinical ramifications.

Decreased transcriptional activity of calcium-sensing receptor gene promoter 1 is associated with calcium nephrolithiasis.

BACKGROUND: CaSR gene is a candidate for calcium nephrolithiasis. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) encompassing its regulatory region were associated with calcium nephrolithiasis. AIMS: We tested SNPs in the CaSR gene regulatory region associated with calcium nephrolithiasis and their effects in kidney. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred sixty-seven idiopathic calcium stone formers and 214 healthy controls were genotyped for four CaSR gene SNPs identified by bioinformatics analysis as modifying transcription factor binding sites. Strontium excretion after an oral load was tested in 55 stone formers. Transcriptional activity induced by variant alleles at CaSR gene promoters was compared by luciferase reporter gene assay in HEK-293 and HKC-8 cells. CaSR and claudin-14 mRNA levels were measured by real-time PCR in 107 normal kidney medulla samples and compared in patients with different CaSR genotype. RESULTS: Only rs6776158 (A>G), located in the promoter 1, was associated with nephrolithiasis. Its minor G allele was more frequent in stone formers than controls (37.8% vs 26.4%, P = .001). A reduced strontium excretion was observed in GG homozygous stone formers. Luciferase fluorescent activity was lower in cells transfected with the promoter 1 including G allele at rs6776158 than cells transfected with the A allele. CaSR mRNA levels were lower in kidney medulla samples from homozygous carriers for the G allele at rs6776158 than carriers for the A allele. Claudin-14 mRNA levels were also lower in GG homozygous subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Minor allele at rs6776158 may predispose to calcium stones by decreasing transcriptional activity of the CaSR gene promoter 1 and CaSR expression in kidney tubules.

Robot-assisted uretero-ureterostomy for iatrogenic lumbar and iliac ureteral stricture: technical details and preliminary clinical results.

BACKGROUND: Although the incidence of iatrogenic ureteral strictures is low, the treatment remains challenging. OBJECTIVE: To report our technique of robot-assisted uretero-ureterostomy (RAUU) for adults with iatrogenic lumbar and iliac stricture. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A descriptive study was performed by our department. Since April 2009, five patients underwent RAUU: Two patients had developed a lumbar or iliac ureteral stricture following a ureterorenoscopy, one had ureteral catheter positioning, one had colon surgery, and one had resection of retroperitoneal cystic lymphangioma. Preoperative evaluation includes history, computed tomography (CT) scan, and mercaptoacetyltriglycine-3 (MAG3) diuretic renal scan. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: A flank position was used for all patients with lumbar stenosis. A supine position with the bed turned 30° was required for iliac stricture. The optical port, two 8-mm robotic ports, and one 5-mm assistant port were used. A precise definition of the site and extension of the stricture was done using the flexible ureterorenoscope. After the stricture resection, the anastomosis was performed with two running sutures on a ureteral double-J stent. MEASUREMENTS: Success was defined as no postoperative symptoms and evidence of no obstruction at the CT/urography and at the MAG3 scan at 6-mo follow-up. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: RAUU was technically feasible in all five patients. Average operating time was 135min, and median hospital stay was 3 d. No significant complications occurred. Absence of stricture recurrence and no reduction of kidney function were confirmed by CT/urography and MAG3 scans. At a mean follow-up of 8 mo, all patients were asymptomatic. The main limitations were the short follow-up and the small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: RAUU is feasible and safe for repairing iatrogenic lumbar and iliac ureteral strictures. The flexible ureterorenoscopy is useful to localise the obstruction and to correctly define its site and extension to spare as much ureter as possible.

Photodynamic diagnosis for follow-up of carcinoma in situ of the bladder.

INTRODUCTION: A prospective study to evaluate the reliability of cystoscopy was performed with fluorescence (photodynamic diagnosis, PDD) compared with standard white light (WL) cystoscopy in patients with solitary carcinoma in situ (CIS), undergoing BCG treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February 2004 and March 2006, 49 patients suffering from CIS were enrolled in the study. Patients age was 68.5 ± 13.5 years (mean ± SD) and all presented CIS alone at inclusion. All suspicious areas were biopsied either under white light or blue light. Urine cytology was peformed on each patient before endoscopy. RESULTS: Out of 49 patients enrolled, 15 (30.6%) presented with positive urinary cytology. Out of 18 patients positive to CIS at biopsy, 14 (77.7%) could be diagnosed exclusively by means of PDD cystoscopy and transurethral bladder resection and 4 (22.3%) during both standard and PDD cystoscopy. No additional CIS could be diagnosed by standard WL cystoscopy alone. The overall false positive rate for PDD accounted for 33.3% compared with 7.1% for WL cytoscopy. A statistical correlation was documented between the number of CIS findings and PDD (r = 0.6976, p = 0.0002) while WL cystoscopy (r = 0.1870, p = 0.3816) and urinary cytology (r = 0.4965, p = 0.0136) correlated only weakly with CIS. The overall side effects related to the drugs were negligible overall. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that PDD cystoscopy is more reliable than WL cytoscopy for the follow-up of CIS patients during BCG treatment. Long-term data and multicenter, prospective data are needed to assess the true impact on tumor recurrence and progression.

Nerve-sparing laparoscopic cystectomy.

Laparoscopic radical cystectomy has been included among the viable options for the surgical treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Even with the minimally invasive approach, it must be considered a major surgical intervention and, even in experienced hands, it can be associated with a significant percentage of complications with a negative impact on overall quality of life, especially in terms of continence and sexual potency. According to our Medline search, only two papers are available from the literature on laparoscopic and robotic versions of nerve- and seminal-sparing cystectomy and nerve-sparing cystectomy, performed respectively on three and 17 patients, showing the feasibility and preliminary results of those surgical procedures. Therefore, data seem encouraging, but further prospective studies are mandatory to correctly assess oncologic and functional results in terms of potency and continence maintenance related to these innovative techniques.

[Comparison of surgical techniques: resection and termino-terminal anastomosis]. / Tecniche chirurgiche a confronto: resezione ed anastomosi termino-terminali.

There are different surgical options for the treatment of anterior stricture diseases such as anastomotic repair, substitution urethroplasty and two stage procedures. The choice of the adequate technique must be based on a correct urethral stricture selection (aetiology, length, previous treatments, local factors). The urethroplasty failures are generally secondary to incorrect selection or execution of the operations and sometimes to spongiofibrosis relapse or prolonged tessutal ischemia. End-to-end anastomosis is the treatment of choice for strictures, particularly post traumatic, of the bulbous urethra no longer than 2 cm. The dorsal roof-strip anastomosis is indicated for bulbar urethral strictures longer than 2 to 3 cm. It is a combined end-to-end and substitution urethroplasty technique.