Long-term maintenance of calcineurin inhibitor monotherapy reduces the risk for squamous cell carcinomas after kidney transplantation compared with bi- or tritherapy.

The incidence of skin cancer after organ transplantation is mainly related to type, level, and duration of immunosuppression. The immunosuppressive minimization strategy reduces skin malignancies, but no data are available concerning long-term calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) monotherapy compared with bi- or tritherapy. We studied the benefits of long-term CNI monotherapy (>6 years of exposure) with regard to the incidence of squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) and basal cell carcinomas (BCC) compared with bi- or tritherapy, among first renal allograft adult recipients who were more than 6 years posttransplantation. Among 294 renal transplantations performed between 1986 and 1999, 80 patients received CNI monotherapy (MT) and 86 patients bi- or tritherapy (BTT) with a follow-up of more than 6 years. MT patients were older, had longer follow-up, and fewer biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes. The incidence of SCC was 15.9 SCC/1000 patients/year for MT vs 26.2 for BTT (P = .07). The incidence was significantly lower for patients older than 40 years (22.4 vs 56, respectively; P < .01). The incidence of BCC was 28.3 BCC/1000 patients/year for MT and 10.1 for BTT (P = .05), which failed to show a significant difference in patients older than 40 years (39.7 vs 25, respectively; P = .09). The ratio of SCC/BCC in MT was maintained around 1/2 over time, while it exceeded 2/1 in BTT after 12 years posttransplantation. Patient survival was comparable between the 2 groups. A higher graft survival rate was observed in the MT group. CNI monotherapy should be considered to be a beneficial, safe immunosuppressive minimization strategy for SCC in selected recipients.

Preemptive renal transplantation in adults.

Recent studies have clearly demonstrated that preemptive renal transplantation is associated with better graft and patient survival. It improves the quality of life and is a cost-effective option compared to conventional transplantation. We report our experience with this concept and review the literature. We retrospectively analyzed all adult kidney transplantations performed in our center between March 1986 and May 2004: among 463 renal transplantations 44 were preemptive (9.5%). Mean follow-up was 45.7 +/- 6 months in preemptive versus 62.3 +/- 2.6 months in the other group. At the end of the study, graft survivals were 93.2% and 77.1%, respectively (P = .02). Patient survival rates were similar in both groups. In the preemptive group, grafts were more likely to come from living donors (P < .001) and cold ischemia time was shorter (P = .02). A subgroup case-control study showed that cost saving for dialysis in the preemptive group was about 119,000 Euros per patient. More preemptive patients had professional activity before (P = .0002) and after transplantation (P = .02). Our results and data from the literature support the place of preemptive transplantation as the optimal mode of renal replacement therapy for medical and socioeconomic reasons.