Extremely high peritoneal cancer index in colorectal peritoneal metastases demonstrates safety and overall survival benefit in selected patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal peritoneal metastases are a devastating consequence of colorectal cancer (CRC) with extremely poor prognosis. Patients that can undergo complete cytoreduction by cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) have a markedly improved overall survival. Traditionally, patients with extremely high peritoneal cancer index (PCI), PCI >20, are not offered CRS/HIPEC. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of our prospectively maintained CRS/HIPEC database and evaluated all patients with CRC peritoneal metastases between 2012 and 2022. We divided the cohorts between those with low operative PCI (PCI<20) and high operative PCI (PCI =>20). We examined demographic, clinicopathologic data, perioperative, and oncological outcomes between the cohorts. RESULTS: Of the 691 patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC, 289 were evaluable with CRC metastases, 234 with PCI <20 and 43 with PCI => 20. Median radiologic preoperative and operative PCI was 4 and 10 versus 7 and 24.5 in the low and high PCI cohorts, respectively. Operative time was longer (6 vs. 4 h) and blood loss higher (500 vs. 400 mL) in the high PCI cohort. All other demographic, clinicopathological, and operative characteristics were similar. Median disease free survival (DFS) was longer in the low PCI cohort (11.5 vs. 7 months) but overall survival (OS) showed benefit (41.3 vs. 31.8 months), (p = 0.001 and p = 0.189, respectively), comparatively with an only chemotherapy strategy. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriately selected patients with CRC metastases and extremely high PCI demonstrate similar perioperative safety outcomes in experienced tertiary referral centers. Despite a shorter median DFS, these carefully selected patients demonstrated similar median OS.

Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Metastasis of Rectal Origin.

BACKGROUND: The peritoneum is a common metastatic site of colorectal cancer (CRC) and associated with worse oncological outcomes. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) has been shown to improve outcomes in selected patients. Studies have demonstrated significant difference in survival of patients with primary colon and rectal tumors both in local and in metastatic setting; but only few assessed outcomes of CRS/HIPEC for rectal and colon tumors. We studied the perioperative and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for rectal cancer. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database between 2009 and 2021 was performed. RESULTS: 199 patients underwent CRS/HIPEC for CRC. 172 patients had primary colon tumors and 27 had primary rectal tumors. Primary rectal location was associated with longer surgery (mean 4.32, hours vs 5.26 h, p = 0.0013), increased blood loss (mean 441cc vs 602cc, p = 0.021), more blood transfusions (mean 0.77 vs 1.37units, p = 0.026) and longer hospitalizations (mean 10 days vs 13 days, p = 0.02). Median disease-free survival (DFS) was shorter in rectal primary group; 7.03 months vs 10.9 months for colon primaries (p = 0.036). Overall survival was not statistically significant; 53.2 months for rectal and 60.8 months for colon primary tumors. Multivariate analysis indicated origin (colon vs rectum) and Peritoneal Cancer Index to be independently associated with DFS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with rectal carcinoma undergoing CRS/HIPEC for peritoneal metastasis had worse peri-operative and oncological outcomes. Overall survival was excellent in both groups. This data may be used for risk stratification when considering CRS/HIPEC for patients with rectal primary.

Current practice in assessment and management of malnutrition in surgical oncology practice - An ESSO-EYSAC snapshot analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Malnutrition is common in patients suffering from malignant diseases and has a major impact on patient outcomes. Prevention and early detection are crucial for effective treatment. This study aimed to investigate current international practice in the assessment and management of malnutrition in surgical oncology departments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The survey was designed by European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO) and ESSO Young Surgeons and Alumni Club (EYSAC) Research Academy as an online questionnaire with 41 questions addressing three main areas: participant demographics, malnutrition assessment, and perioperative nutritional standards. The survey was distributed from October to November 2021 via emails, social media and the ESSO website to surgical networks focussing on surgical oncologists. Results were collected and analysed by an independent team. RESULTS: A total of 156 participants from 39 different countries answered the survey, reflecting a response rate of 1.4%. Surgeons reported treating a mean of 22.4 patients per month. 38% of all patients treated in surgical oncology departments were routinely screened for malnutrition. 52% of patients were perceived as being at risk for malnutrition. The most used screening tool was the "Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool" (MUST). 68% of participants agreed that the surgeon is responsible for assessing preoperative nutritional status. 49% of patients were routinely seen by dieticians. In cases of severe malnutrition, 56% considered postponing the operation. CONCLUSIONS: The reported rate of malnutrition screening by surgical oncologists is lower than expected (38%). This indicates a need for improved awareness of malnutrition in surgical oncology, and nutritional screening.

Increased risk for incisional hernia following cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of incisional hernias (IH) after midline laparotomy varies from 11% to 20%. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is potentially prone to hernias because a Xiphoid to pubis laparotomy incision performed on patients who have undergone previous abdominal surgeries with the addition of chemotherapy and its related adverse effects. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis on a prospectively maintained single institution database from March 2015 to July 2020. The inclusion criteria were patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC and had at least 6 months postoperative follow-up with post-operative cross-sectional imaging study. RESULTS: Two hundred and one patients were included in the study. All patients underwent CRS-HIPEC with resection of previous scar and umbilectomy. Fifty-four patients were diagnosed with IH (26.9%). The major risk factors for IH in multivariate analysis were higher American society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA) (OR 3.9, P = 0.012), increasing age (OR 1.06, P = 0.004) and increasing BMI (OR 1.1, P = 0.006). Most of the hernia sites were median (n = 43, 79.6%). Eleven (20.4%) patients had lateral hernias due to stoma incisions or drain sites. Most of the median hernias were at the level of the resected umbilicus 58.9% (n = 23). Five (9.3%) of the patients with IH necessitated an urgent surgical repair. CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that more than a quarter of the patients after CRS-HIPEC suffer from IH and up to 10% of them may require surgical intervention. More research is needed to find the appropriate intraoperative interventions to minimize this sequela.

PET-CT underestimates the true pathological extent of disease at lymphadenectomy for melanoma patients after systemic therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Modern systemic therapy has revolutionized the treatment of melanoma. Currently, patients with clinically involved lymph nodes require lymphadenectomy with associated morbidities. Positron Emission Tomography - Computed Tomography (PET-CT) has demonstrated accuracy in melanoma detection and response to therapy. We aimed to identify whether a PET-CT directed lymphatic resection after systemic therapy is oncologically sound. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of patients who underwent lymphadenectomy after systemic therapy for melanoma with a preoperative PET-CT. Examined demographic, clinical, and perioperative parameters including extent of disease, systemic therapy and response, and PET-CT findings compared to pathological outcomes. We compared patients with "as or less than expected" outcomes on pathology against those with "more than expected" pathological outcomes. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients met inclusion criteria. In 28 (71.8%), pathological outcomes were "as or less than expected" by PET-CT, and in 11 (28.2%) pathological outcome were "more than expected". "More than expected" occurred more frequently with advanced disease at presentation with 75% presenting with regional/metastatic disease versus only 42.9% in the "as or less than expected" group (p = 0.015). Poor response to therapy also trended towards the "more than expected" group with only 27.3% favorable response versus 53.6% favorable response in the "as or less than expected" group, not statistically significant. Extent of disease on imaging failed to predict pathological concordance. CONCLUSION: PET-CT underestimates pathological extent of disease in the lymphatic basin in 30% of patients after systemic therapy. We failed to identify predictors of more extensive disease and warn against limited PET-CT directed lymphatic resections.

IOeRT in retroperitoneal sarcoma: Towards more organ preservation with comparable oncological outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) present a surgical challenge with high rates of local recurrence (LR). We investigated the role of intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOeRT) in reducing LR after surgical resection of RPS. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent surgical resection for RPS between 2014 and 2021 at a tertiary academic referral center (n = 172). Patients included underwent surgical resection of their RPS and received IOeRT (n = 36) and were compared by case control matching to patients with similar tumor characteristics (recurrence status and tumor grade) that did not receive IOeRT (n = 36). RESULTS: The median length of hospitalization was 8 days (range, 4-34) in the IOeRT group and 10 days (range, 2-42) in the non-IOeRT group (p = 0.25). The mean operating room (OR) time was 4h (±1.3) and 4h (±1.9) in the IOeRT and non-IOeRT groups respectively, (p = 0.37). Complete resection with R0 margins was achieved in 30 patients (83.3%) and 24 patients (66.6%) in the IOeRT and non-IOeRT groups, respectively (p = 0.1). R1 resection was achieved in 6 patients (16.6%) and 12 patients (33.3%) respectively, (p = 0.1). The resected organ weighted score was significantly different between the groups; score 0 observed in 19 (52.7%) patients in the IOeRT group and 3 (8.3%) in the non-IOeRT group (p < 0.001), score 1 observed in 7 (19.4%) in the IOeRT group and 17 (47.2%) in the non-IOeRT group (p = 0.012). The rate of severe complications (CD score>3) did not differ between the groups, 5 (13.8%) patients in the IOeRT group and 9 (25%) patients in the non-IOeRT group (p = 0.23). No radiation associated complications were noted. The 2-year local recurrence free survival (LRFS) was 75.9% in the IOeRT group and 60.3% in the non-IOeRT group (p = 0.4). The 2-year IOeRT field recurrent free survival (IRFS) was 88.4% in the IOeRT group and 60.3% in the non-IOeRT group (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The use of IOeRT did not increase the rate of surgical complications and was associated with superior local control in the radiation field, improved organ preservation without an impact on overall survival.

Resection of Recurrent Pelvic Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Is the Risk Worth the Reward?

INTRODUCTION: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the pelvis present a surgical and oncological challenge. We investigated the outcomes of patients undergoing resection of pelvic sarcomas. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent surgical resection for STS between 2014 and 2021 at a tertiary academic referral center (n = 172). Included all patients with primary or recurrent STS which originated or extended to the pelvic cavity (n = 29). RESULTS: The cohort was divided into primary pelvic sarcomas (n = 18) and recurrent pelvic sarcomas (rPS, n = 11). Complete R0/R1 resection was achieved in 26 patients (89.6%). The postoperative complication rate was 48.3%. The rate of major complications was 27.5%. The median time of follow-up from surgery was 12.3 months (range, 0.6-60.3 months). Disease-free survival was superior in the primary pelvic sarcomas group compared to the rPS group (P = 0.002). However, there was no significant difference in overall survival, (P = 0.52). Univariant and multivariant analyses identified rPS group (Hazard Ratio 8.68, P = 0.006) and resection margins (Hazard Ratio 6.29, P = 0.004) to be independently associated with disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that achieving R0/R1 resection is feasible. Oncological outcomes are favorable for primary tumors, whereas recurrent tumors exhibit early recurrences. Consideration of resection of recurrent pelvic STS should involve a careful multidisciplinary evaluation.

Pelvic Peritonectomy Poorly Affects Outcomes in Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Constraints of pelvic anatomy render complete cytoreduction (CRS) challenging. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of pelvic peritonectomy during CRS/HIPEC on colorectal peritoneal metastasis (CRPM) patients' outcomes. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained CRS/hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) database. The analysis included 217 patients with CRPM who had a CRS/HIPEC between 2014 and 2021. We compared perioperative and oncological outcomes of patients with pelvic peritonectomy (PP) (n = 63) to no pelvic peritonectomy (non-PP) (n = 154). RESULTS: No differences in demographics were identified. The peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was higher in the PP group with a median PCI of 12 vs. 6 in the non-PP group (p < 0.001). Operative time was 4.9 vs. 4.3 h in the PP and non-PP groups, respectively (p = 0.63). Median hospitalization was longer in the PP group at 12 vs. 10 days (p = 0.007), and the rate of complications were higher in the PP group at 57.1% vs. 39.6% (p = 0.018). Pelvic peritonectomy was associated with worse disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) with 3-year DFS and OS of 7.3 and 46.3% in the PP group vs. 28.2 and 87.8% in the non-PP group (p = 0.028, p .> 0.001). The univariate OS analysis identified higher PCI (p = 0.05), longer surgery duration (p = 0.02), and pelvic peritonectomy (p < 0.001) with worse OS. Pelvic peritonectomy remained an independent prognostic variable, irrespective of PCI, on the multivariate analysis (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic peritonectomy at the time of CRS/HIPEC is associated with higher morbidity and worse oncological outcomes. These findings should be taken into consideration in the management of patients with pelvic involvement.

Predisposing factors for high output stoma in patients with a diverting loop ileostomy after colorectal surgeries.

PURPOSE: One of the most common ileostomy-related complications is high output stoma (HOS) which causes significant fluids and electrolytes disturbances. We aimed to analyze the incidence, severity, and risk factors for readmission for HOS. METHODS: We reviewed all patients who underwent loop ileostomy closure in a single institution between 2010 and 2020. Patients that were readmitted for dehydration due to HOS during the time interval between the creation and the closure of the stoma were identified and divided into a study (HOS) group. The remaining patients constructed the control group. RESULTS: A total of 307 patients were included in this study, out of which, 41 patients were readmitted 73 times (23.7% readmission rate) for the HOS group, and the remaining 266 patients constructed the control group. Multivariate analysis identified; advanced American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status (PS) classification, elevated baseline creatinine, and open surgery as risk factors for HOS. Renal function worsened among the entire cohort between the construction of the stoma to its closure (mean creatinine of 0.82 vs. 0.96, P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Loop ileostomy formation is associated with a substantial readmission rate for dehydration as a result of HOS, and increasing the risk for renal impairment during the duration of the diversion. We identified advanced ASA PS classification, open surgery, and elevated baseline creatinine as predictors for HOS.

Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Elderly is Safe and Effective.

INTRODUCTION: An increasing proportion of elderly patients (EP) are undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC). They have increased comorbidities and perioperative risk. Current literature is deficient in describing the outcomes of EP undergoing CRS/HIPEC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of our prospectively maintained CRS/HIPEC database analyzed perioperative and oncological outcomes of EP (>70 y) compared to younger patients (YP) (<60 y). RESULTS: Of 500 CRS/HIPEC patients, 62 EP and 210 YP were included. Median age was 73 y in EP and 46 y in YP. Demographic, clinical, operative, and perioperative outcomes were similar between groups. American Society of Anesthesiologists > 3 was more prevalent in the EP with 88.2% versus 54.8% in the YP (P < 0.001). Comorbidities were higher in the EP with 87.1% versus 39.0% in the YP (P < 0.001). Peritoneal Cancer Index score was similar with a median of 9. All postoperative and severe complications were similar with 55.2% and 17.1% in the YP and 64.5% and 21.0% in the EP (P = 0.242; P = 0.448). Postoperative mortality was similar with 1.5% in the YP and 5.0% in the EP (P = 0.134). In colorectal primary patients, median overall and disease-free survival was 61.8 and 12.9 mo in the YP and 64.6 and 11.3 mo in the EP (P = 0.363; P = 0.845). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a significant age difference, increased comorbidities, worse American Society of Anesthesiologists, and similar Peritoneal Cancer Index burden, we found no significant differences in perioperative complications or oncological benefit in elderly CRS/HIPEC patients. EP appear to have similar perioperative and oncological outcomes as YP.

Natural History and Management of Small-Bowel Obstruction in Patients After Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Small-bowel obstruction (SBO) after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is a common complication associated with re-admission that may alter patients' outcomes. Our aim was to characterize and investigate the impact of bowel obstruction on patients' prognosis. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of patients with SBO after CRS/HIPEC (n = 392). We analyzed patients' demographics, operative and perioperative details, SBO re-admission data, and long-term oncological outcomes. RESULTS: Out of 366 patients, 73 (19.9%) were re-admitted with SBO. The cause was adhesive in 42 (57.5%) and malignant (MBO) in 31 (42.5%). The median time to obstruction was 7.7 months (range, 0.5-60.9). Surgical intervention was required in 21/73 (28.7%) patients. Obstruction eventually resolved (spontaneous or by surgical intervention) in 56/73 (76.7%) patients. Univariant analysis identified intraperitoneal chemotherapy agents: mitomycin C (MMC) (HR 3.2, p = 0.003), cisplatin (HR 0.3, p = 0.03), and doxorubicin (HR 0.25, p = 0.018) to be associated with obstruction-free survival (OFS). Postoperative complications such as surgical site infection (SSI), (HR 2.2, p = 0.001) and collection (HR 2.07, p = 0.015) were associated with worse OFS. Multivariate analysis maintained MMC (HR 2.9, p = 0.006), SSI (HR 1.19, p = 0.001), and intra-abdominal collection (HR 2.19, p = 0.009) as independently associated with OFS. While disease-free survival was similar between the groups, overall survival (OS) was better in the non-obstruction group compared with the obstruction group (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: SBO after CRS/HIPEC is common and complex in management. Although conservative management was successful in most patients, surgery was required more frequently in patients with MBO. Patients with SBO demonstrate decreased survival.

Outcomes of Stable Lung Colorectal Metastases on Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have demonstrated benefit in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM). Traditionally, extraperitoneal disease is considered a contraindication to CRS/HIPEC. Stable lung metastases in patients with colorectal cancer often have an indolent course, while the presence of untreated peritoneal metastases poorly affects short-term survival. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for peritoneal disease with known stable lung metastases. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively maintained CRS/HIPEC database. In 2017, we adopted a policy of considering patients with stable lung metastases for CRS/HIPEC as part of multidisciplinary treatment. We compared the oncologic outcome and safety of CRS/HIPEC with peritoneal only (PM) against patients with peritoneal and lung metastases (PLM). RESULTS: Our database includes 570 patients with CRS/HIPEC of which 174 with CRPM that underwent CRS/HIPEC, 18 with preoperatively diagnosed peritoneal and lung metastases. The demographics of the PM and PLM group were similar with the exception of operative time that was longer in the PLM group. Median PCI of the cohort was 7, similar in both groups (p = 0.89). Three-year overall survival (OS) of PLM patients was 68%, compared to 71% in PM (p = 0.277). Three-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 20% in PLM and 23% in PM (p = 0.688). CONCLUSIONS: Presence of stable lung metastases from colorectal cancer in patients with CRPM does not appear to affect the outcomes of CRS/HIPEC. Patients with stable lung disease should be considered for CRS/HIPEC after multidisciplinary discussion.

Standards in surgical training in advanced pelvic malignancy across Europe and beyond - A Snapshot analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Multimodal treatment of patients with advanced pelvic malignancies (APM) is challenging and surgical expertise is usually concentrated in highly specialised centres. Given significant regional variation in APM surgery, surgical training represents a cornerstone in standardising and future-proofing of this complex therapy. The aim of this study was to describe the availability and current satisfaction levels with surgical training for APM. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An online questionnaire was developed and distributed through the Redcap© platform with 32 questions addressing participant and institution demographics, and training in APM surgeries. The survey was electronically disseminated in 2021 to surgical networks across Europe including all specialities treating APM via the European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO). All statistical analysis were performed using R. RESULTS: The survey received 280 responses from surgeons across 49 countries, representing general surgery (36%), surgical oncology (30%), gynaeoncology (15%), colorectal surgery (14%) and urology (5%). Fifty-three percent of participants report performing >25 APM procedures/year. Respondents were departmental chiefs (12%), consultants (34%), specialist surgeons (40%) and fellows (15%). 34% were happy/very happy with their training with 70% satisfaction about their exposure to surgical procedures. Respondents reported a lack of standardised training (72%), monitoring tools (41%) and mentorship (56%). 57% rated attended courses as useful for training, while 80% rated visiting expert centres as useful. CONCLUSION: This study has identified a learning need for improved structured training in APM, with low current satisfaction levels with exposure to APM training. Organisations such as ESSO provide an important platform for visiting expert centres, courses, and structured training.

The impact of gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks on survival of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal (GI) leaks after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is a known life-threatening complication that may alter patients' outcomes. Our aim is to investigate risk factors associated with GI leaks and evaluate the impact of GI leaks on patient's oncological outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of perioperative and oncological outcomes of patients with and without GI leaks after CRS/HIPEC. RESULTS: Out of 191 patients included in this study, GI leaks were identified in 17.8% (34/191) of patients. Small bowel anastomoses were the most common site (44%). Most of the GI leaks were managed conservatively and re-operation was needed in 44.1% of cases. Univariate analysis identified higher PCI (p = 0.03), higher number of packed cells transfused (p = 0.036), pelvic peritonectomy (p = 0.013), high number of anastomoses (p = 0.003) and colonic resection (p = 0.042) as factors associated with GI leaks. Multivariate analysis identified stapled anastomoses (OR 2.59, p = 0.001) and pelvic peritonectomy (OR 2.33, p = 0.044) as independent factors associated with GI leaks. Disease-free survival tended to be worse in the leak group but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.235). The 3- and 5-year OS was 73.2% and 52.9% in the leak group compared to 75.8% and 73.2% in the non-leak group (p = 0.236). CONCLUSIONS: GI leak showed no impact on overall and disease free survival after CRS/HIPEC.Avoidance of stapled reconstruction in high risk patients with high tumor burden and large number of anastomoses may yield improved outcomes.

The pattern of peritoneal colorectal metastasis predicts survival after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal cancer index (PCI) has been used reliably to prognosticate patients with peritoneal metastasis, however, it fails to describe the patterns of peritoneal spread and to correlate these patterns to survival outcomes. We aim to define the scattered peritoneal spread (SPS) as a pattern associated with worse survival in colorectal peritoneal metastasis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of metastatic colorectal cancer patients from a prospectively maintained database of peritoneal surface malignances (n = 280) between 2015 and 2020. SPS was defined by the presence of at least two distant and non-contiguous PCI regions. We compared patients with SPS (n = 73) and clustered peritoneal spread (CPS) (n = 88) for demographics, perioperative and survival outcomes. RESULTS: No difference in demographics or post-operative course was noted between the groups. The median follow-up was 15.4 months (0.4-70.8 months). Worse disease-free survival (DFS) in the SPS group with an estimated median of 8.2 months compared to 22.5 months in the CPS spread group, (p = 0.001). The estimated median overall survival (OS) for SPS group was 35.7 months whereas in the CPS group the median was not reached (p = 0.025). The same effect of SPS was preserved even after stratification of PCI. CONCLUSIONS: We defined and described the association of the peritoneal spread pattern to survival outcomes. SPS patients exhibit worse DFS and OS independent of the PCI level. Integration of malignant spread pattern into prognostication models along with PCI may aid in predicting oncological outcomes.

Ratio of Pathological Response to Preoperative Chemotherapy in Patients Undergoing Complete Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Correlates with Survival.

BACKGROUND: Pathological response of colorectal peritoneal metastasis (CRPM) may affect prognosis. We investigated the relationship between oncological outcomes and pathological response to chemotherapy of CRPM following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained Peritoneal Surface Malignancies database between 2015 and 2020. Analysis included patients with CRPM who underwent a CRS/HIPEC procedure (n = 178). The cohort was divided into three groups according to the response ratio (ratio of tumor-positive specimens to the total number of specimens resected): Group A, complete response; Group B, high response ratio, and Group C, low response ratio. RESULTS: The group demographics were similar, but the overall complication rate was higher in Group C (65.2%) compared with Groups A (55%) and B (42.8%) [p = 0.03]. Survival correlated to response ratio; the estimated median disease-free survival of Group C was 9.1 months (5.97-12.23), 14.9 months (4.72-25.08) for Group B, and was not reached in Group A (p = 0.001). The estimated median overall survival in Group C was 35 months (26.69-43.31), and was not reached in Groups A and B (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The pathological response ratio to systemic therapy correlates with survival in patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC. This study supports the utilization of preoperative therapy for better patient selection, with a potential impact on survival.

Totally Laparoscopic Ileocolic Resection for Complex Enterovisceral Fistulas in Crohn's Disease: A Comparative Study.

INTRODUCTION: In primary Crohn's disease (CD), laparoscopic ileocolic resection has been shown to be both feasible and safe, and is associated with improved outcomes in terms of postoperative morbidity and length of hospital stay. However, it is unclear whether the laparoscopic approach can be routinely proposed as a safe procedure for patients with complex enterovisceral fistulas.The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic surgery for complex enterovisceral fistulas, and compare it with CD patients who underwent primary laparoscopic ileocolic resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent laparoscopic primary ileocolic resection (LICR) for complex enterovisceral fistulas between July 2006 and July 2017 were included. They were compared with all consecutive patients who underwent LICR for nonfistulizing CD in the same period of time. Patients with previous bowel resections or recurrent disease were excluded. RESULTS: Nineteen patients with 20 enterovisceral fistulas (group I) were compared with 61 patients who underwent LICR for nonfistulizing disease (group II). There were no differences between the groups in age, sex, preoperative body mass index, nutritional status, and American Society of Anesthesiology score. There was no conversion to open surgery in both groups.There were no significant differences between groups in terms of operative time [120 (range: 65 to 232) vs. 117 (range: 62 to 217) min, P=0.7], hospital stay [6 (5 to 8) vs. 7 (5 to 65) days, P=0.56], overall morbidity 26.3% versus 16.4% (P=0.33), major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo >3) 15.7% versus 10% (P=0.66) and reoperation rates 5.3% versus 4.9% (P=0.9). There was no mortality in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that the laparoscopic approach for complex enterovisceral fistulas in selected CD patients is both feasible and safe in the hands of experienced inflammatory bowel disease surgeons with extensive expertise in laparoscopic surgery. Larger study cohorts are needed to confirm these findings.

Repeat Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Recurrences is Safe and Efficacious.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) for colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases (CRPM) is associated with improved survival in patients with historically dismal prognosis. Nonetheless, peritoneal recurrences remain common and represent a difficult challenge in these patients' management. Repeat CRS/HIPEC is associated with even greater morbidity and its survival benefit has not yet been clearly demonstrated. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively maintained database and aimed to assess the safety and oncological efficacy of repeat CRS/HIPEC. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-two patients underwent an initial CRS/HIPEC, whereas 30 subsequently had repeat CRS/HIPEC for CRPM. Groups were similar in demographics, comorbidities, and peritoneal cancer index (PCI). No significant difference in morbidity, hospital stay, or reoperation rate was noted between initial and repeat procedures. Patients who underwent repeat CRS/HIPEC had a median overall survival of 68 months versus 51 months in patients who did not undergo repeat procedure for their peritoneal recurrence (p = 0.03). Disease-free survival (DFS) in patients after repeat and after initial procedure were similar with median of 9.6 versus 12 months, respectively (p = 0.083). Univariate analysis demonstrated that PCI, DFS, and repeat procedure displayed significant factors on outcomes in patients with peritoneal recurrences, whereas PCI > 16 and DFS remained independent predictors on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis, which represents the largest series to date of repeat CRS/HIPEC for CRPM, indicates that this approach as a part of multimodal therapy is both safe and efficacious in appropriately selected patients.