Is testis sparing surgery safe in patients with incidental small testicular lesions referring to a fertility center? A retrospective analysis reporting factors correlated to malignancy and long-term oncological outcomes.

PURPOSE: To define predictors of malignancy after Testis sparing surgery (TSS) in patients referring to a fertility center with incidental small testicular lesions. Sub analyses were performed to assess predictors of Leydig cell hyperplasia and Leydig cell tumor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of a single institutional database including patients treated with TSS between 2002 and 2020. All patients who underwent TSS as a first line surgical approach for incidentally detected lesions found during fertility evaluation were included. RESULTS: Data of 64 patients were collected. The median follow up was 58 months and no recurrences were observed. At univariable logistic regression multifocal lesions, hypervascularization, microlithiasis, age and lesion size were significantly associated with malignancy. At multivariable logistic regression lesion dimension, hypervascularization and multifocal lesions were predictors of malignancy. Lesions smaller than 5 mm proved to be benign in 96.6% of the cases (32/33). Intraoperative color of the lesion and US pattern of vascularization were predictors at multivariable logistic regression for Leydig cell hyperplasia and Leydig cell tumor. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonographic characteristics and intraoperative appearance of the lesion can predict the malignant nature of small testicular lesions, guiding their surgical management in patients referring to a fertility center. Based on our experience, clinicians may safely perform TSS in carefully selected patients.

Effect of superoxide dismutase supplementation on sperm DNA fragmentation.

BACKGROUND: antioxidants supplementation improves sperm quality, but few trials have analyzed the effects on sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF). This study compares the effectiveness of SOD-based antioxidant supplementation plus hydroxytyrosol and carnosol in reducing SDF with other antioxidants without SOD, hydroxytyrosol, and carnosol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: men with high SDF at baseline were selected in our clinical database. The patients taken into account had a 2-month control. SDF was measured by Sperm Chromatin Dispersion test (SCD). Untreated men were used as a control group. The remaining subjects received some oral antioxidant supplements (12 different combinations of both hydrophilic and lipophilic antioxidants), with some of them receiving nutritional support with a SOD-based antioxidant supplementation plus hydroxytyrosol and carnosol. RESULTS: 118 men were selected for a retrospective study. Mean age 39.3 ± 5.4 years. Fifteen had no treatment, 55 were treated with a SOD-based antioxidant supplementation plus hydroxytyrosol and carnosol, and 48 took some antioxidant supplements for 2 months. Clinically, variations of at least 10% in baseline values of classic semen parameters and sperm DNA fragmentation were taken into consideration. Classic seminal parameters did not vary significantly in the three groups, with the exception of viability (p = 0.001). We assessed which of the active substances (no. 19) in different formulations were associated with variations in SDF. In the multivariable analysis of the 7 active substances that passed the univariable analysis, only the SOD molecule appeared to be linked to an improvement in SDF (< 0.0001). In detail, only one patient in the control group showed a spontaneous improvement in SDF (6%), compared to 16/48 (33%) of those taking various oral antioxidant supplements, and 31/55 (56%) of those taking a SOD-based antioxidant supplementation plus hydroxytyrosol and carnosol. CONCLUSIONS: SOD-based antioxidant supplementation plus hydroxytyrosol and carnosol seems to provide a better chance of improving sperm DNA integrity than other classical antioxidant molecules.

Treatment with human, recombinant FSH improves sperm DNA fragmentation in idiopathic infertile men depending on the FSH receptor polymorphism p.N680S: a pharmacogenetic study.

STUDY QUESTION: Does the sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) improve depending on the FSH receptor (FSHR) genotype as assessed by the nonsynonymous polymorphisms rs6166 (p.N680S) after 3 months of recombinant FSH treatment in men with idiopathic infertility? SUMMARY ANSWER: FSH treatment significantly improves sperm DFI only in idiopathic infertile men with the p.N680S homozygous N FSHR. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: FSH, fundamental for spermatogenesis, is empirically used to treat male idiopathic infertility and several studies suggest that DFI could be a candidate predictor of response to FSH treatment, in terms of probability to conceive. Furthermore, it is known that the FSHR single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs6166 (p.N680S) influences ovarian response in women and testicular volume in men. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE AND DURATION: A multicenter, longitudinal, prospective, open-label, two-arm clinical trial was performed. Subjects enrolled were idiopathic infertile men who received 150 IU recombinant human FSH s.c. every other day for 12 weeks and were followed-up for a further 12 weeks after FSH withdrawal. Patients were evaluated at baseline, at the end of treatment and at the end of follow-up. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Eighty-nine men with idiopathic infertility carrier of the FSHR p.N680S homozygous N or S genotype, FSH ≤ 8 IU/l and DFI >15%, were enrolled. A total of 66 patients had DFI analysis completed on at least two visits. DFI was evaluated in one laboratory by TUNEL/PI (propidium iodide) assay coupled to flow cytometry, resolving two different fractions of sperm, namely the 'brighter' and 'dimmer' sperm DFI fractions. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Thirty-eight men (57.6%) were carriers of the p.N680S homozygous N and 28 (42.4%) of the homozygous S FSHR. Sperm concentration/number was highly heterogeneous and both groups included men ranging from severe oligozoospermia to normozoospermia. Total DFI was significantly lower at the end of the study in homozygous carriers of the p.N680S N versus p.N680S S allele (P = 0.008). Total DFI decreased significantly from baseline to the end of the study (P = 0.021) only in carriers of the p.N680S homozygous N polymorphism, and this decrease involved the sperm population containing vital sperm (i.e. brighter sperm) (P = 0.008). The dimmer sperm DFI fraction, including only nonvital sperm, was significantly larger in p.N680S S homozygous patients than in homozygous N men (P = 0.018). Total DFI was inversely related to total sperm number (P = 0.020) and progressive sperm motility (P = 0.014). When patients were further stratified according to sperm concentration (normoozospermic versus oligozoospermic) or -211G>T polymorphism in the FSHB gene (rs10835638) (homozygous G versus others), the significant improvement of sperm DFI in FSHR p.N680S homozygous N men was independent of sperm concentration and associated with the homozygous FSHB -211G>T homozygous G genotype. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The statistical power of the study is 86.9% with alpha error 0.05. This is the first pharmacogenetic study suggesting that FSH treatment induces a significant improvement of total DFI in men carriers of the p.N680S homozygous N FSHR; however, the results need to be confirmed in larger studies using a personalized FSH dosage and treatment duration. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The evaluation of sperm DFI as a surrogate marker of sperm quality, and of the FSHR SNP rs6166 (p.N680S), might be useful to predict the response to FSH treatment in men with idiopathic infertility. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The study was supported by an unrestricted grant to M.S. and H.M.B. from Merck Serono that provided the drug used in the study. MS received additional grants from Merck Serono and IBSA as well as honoraria from Merck Serono. The remaining authors declare that no conflicts of interest are present. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT number 2010-020240-35.

ICSI outcome is significantly better with testicular spermatozoa in patients with necrozoospermia: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcome with testicular sperm is superior to that of ejaculated sperm in men with incomplete necrozoospermia, defined as sperm viability ≥5 to ≤45%. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study at a Reproductive Medicine Center of a tertiary referral hospital. A total of 231 couples with male infertility due to incomplete necrozoospermia underwent 342 ICSI cycles with freshly ejaculated sperm (ICSI-ejaculated) and 182 cycles with testicular sperm (ICSI-TESE). RESULTS: Overall 1624 MII oocytes were injected in the ICSI-ejaculated group with a fertilisation rate of 60.8%, while in ICSI- TESE cycles the fertilisation rate was 59.6% in 874 MII oocytes. The cleavage rate was higher in ICSI-ejaculated cycles than in ICSI-TESE cycles (96.3% versus 92.9%; p = 0.004). However, the pregnancy and implantation rates per cycle were significantly higher in the ICSI-TESE group (67/182, 36.8% versus 68/342, 19.9% (p = 0.0001); and 23.7% versus 12.7% (p = 0.0001), respectively). The miscarriage rate was similar (ICSI-ejaculated 26.5% versus ICSI-TESE 17.9%, p = 0.301). Live birth rate per cycle in the ICSI-ejaculated group was significantly lower than in the ICSI-TESE (13.7% versus 28.6%, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In cases of persistent necrozoospermia, testicular sperm should be favoured over ejaculated sperm. These data call for more research to understand the pathophysiology of refractory necrozoospermia.