RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Germline BRCA1-2 pathogenic variants (gBRCA1-2pv)-related pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) showed increased sensitivity to DNA cross-linking agents. This study aimed at exploring safety profile, dose intensity, and activity of different chemotherapy regimens in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: gBRCA1-2pv PDAC patients of any age and clinical tumor stage who completed a first course of chemotherapy were eligible. A descriptive analysis of chemotherapy toxicity, dose intensity, response, and survival outcomes was performed. RESULTS: A total of 85 gBRCA1-2pv PDAC patients treated in 21 Italian centers between December 2008 and March 2021were enrolled. Seventy-four patients were assessable for toxicity and dose intensity, 83 for outcome. Dose intensity was as follows: nab-paclitaxel 72%, gemcitabine 76% (AG); cisplatin 75%, nab-paclitaxel 73%, capecitabine 73%, and gemcitabine 65% (PAXG); fluorouracil 35%, irinotecan 58%, and oxaliplatin 64% (FOLFIRINOX). When compared with the literature, grade 3-4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and diarrhea were increased with PAXG, and unmodified with AG and FOLFIRINOX. RECIST responses were numerically higher with the three- (81%) or four-drug (73%) platinum-containing regimens that outperformed AG (41%) and oxaliplatin-based doublets (56%). Carbohydrate antigen 19.9 (CA19.9) reduction >89% at nadir was reported in two-third of metastatic patients treated with triplets and quadruplets, as opposed to 33% and 45% of patients receiving oxaliplatin-based doublets or AG, respectively. All patients receiving AG experienced disease progression, with a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 6.4 months, while patients treated with platinum-containing triplets or quadruplets had an mPFS >10.8 months. Albeit still immature, data on overall survival seemed to parallel those on PFS. CONCLUSIONS: Our data, as opposed to figures expected from the literature, highlighted that platinum-based regimens provoked an increased toxicity on proliferating cells, when dose intensity was maintained, or an as-expected toxicity, when dose intensity was reduced, while no change in toxicity and dose intensity was evident with AG. Furthermore, an apparently improved outcome of platinum-based triplets or quadruplets over other regimens was observed.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Proteína BRCA1/genética , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/genética , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Células Germinativas , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genéticaRESUMEN
The tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) family of receptor tyrosine kinases are encoded by NTRK genes and have a role in the development and normal functioning of the nervous system. Since the discovery of an oncogenic NTRK gene fusion in colorectal cancer in 1986, over 80 different fusion partner genes have been identified in a wide array of adult and paediatric tumours, providing actionable targets for targeted therapy. This review describes the normal function and physiology of TRK receptors and the biology behind NTRK gene fusions and how they act as oncogenic drivers in cancer. Finally, an overview of the incidence and prevalence of NTRK gene fusions in various types of cancers is discussed.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/genética , Proteínas de Fusión Oncogénica/genética , Proteínas Tirosina Quinasas Receptoras/genética , Receptor trkA/genética , Animales , Fusión Génica , Humanos , Neoplasias/enzimología , Proteínas de Fusión Oncogénica/metabolismo , Proteínas Quinasas/genética , Proteínas Quinasas/metabolismo , Proteínas Tirosina Quinasas Receptoras/metabolismo , Receptor trkA/metabolismo , Transducción de SeñalAsunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Oxaliplatino , Fluorouracilo , Humanos , Compuestos OrganoplatinosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Objective response to dacarbazine, the intravenous form of temozolomide (TMZ), in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is confined to tumors harboring O(6)-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter hypermethylation. We conducted a phase II study of TMZ enriched by MGMT hypermethylation in archival tumor (AT), exploring dynamic of this biomarker in baseline tumor (BT) biopsy and plasma (liquid biopsy). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We screened 150 mCRC patients for MGMT hypermethylation with methylation-specific PCR on AT from FFPE specimens. Eligible patients (n = 29) underwent BT biopsy and then received TMZ 200 mg/m(2) days 1-5 q28 until progression. A Fleming single-stage design was used to determine whether progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 12 weeks would be ≥35% [H0 ≤ 15%, type I error = 0.059 (one-sided), power = 0.849]. Exploratory analyses included comparison between MGMT hypermethylation in AT and BT, and MGMT methylation testing by MethylBEAMing in solid (AT, BT) and LB with regard to tumor response. RESULTS: The PFS rate at 12 weeks was 10.3% [90% confidence interval (CI) 2.9-24.6]. Objective response rate was 3.4% (90% CI 0.2-15.3), disease control rate 48.3% (90% CI 32.0-64.8), median OS 6.2 months (95% CI 3.8-7.6), and median PFS 2.6 months (95% CI 1.4-2.7). We observed the absence of MGMT hypermethylation in BT in 62.7% of tumors. CONCLUSION: Treatment of mCRC with TMZ driven by MGMT promoter hypermethylation in AT samples did not provide meaningful PFS rate at 12 weeks. This biomarker changed from AT to BT, indicating that testing BT biopsy or plasma is needed for refined target selection.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Metilación de ADN/genética , Metilasas de Modificación del ADN/genética , Enzimas Reparadoras del ADN/genética , Dacarbazina/análogos & derivados , Proteínas Supresoras de Tumor/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Biopsia , Neoplasias Colorrectales/sangre , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Metilasas de Modificación del ADN/sangre , Enzimas Reparadoras del ADN/sangre , Dacarbazina/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Regiones Promotoras Genéticas , Temozolomida , Proteínas Supresoras de Tumor/sangreRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The management of biliary tract cancers (BTCs) is complex due to limited data on the optimal therapeutic approach. This phase II multicenter study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of vandetanib monotherapy compared with vandetanib plus gemcitabine or gemcitabine plus placebo in patients with advanced BTC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized in a 1 : 1 : 1 ratio to three treatment groups: vandetanib 300 mg monotherapy (V), vandetanib 100 mg plus gemcitabine (V/G), gemcitabine plus placebo (G/P). Vandetanib (300 mg or 100 mg) or placebo was given in single oral daily doses. Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) was i.v. infused on day 1 and day 8 of each 21-day cycle. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points were: objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate, overall survival, duration of response, performance status and safety outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 173 patients (mean age 63.6 years) were recruited at 19 centers across Italy. Median (95% confidence intervals) PFS (days) were 105 (72-155), 114 (91-193) and 148 (71-225), respectively, for the V, V/G and G/P treatment groups, with no statistical difference among them (P = 0.18). No statistical difference between treatments was observed for secondary end points, except ORR, which slightly favored the V/G combination over other treatments. The proportion of patients reporting adverse events (AEs) was similar for the three groups (96.6% in V arm, 91.4% in the V/G arm and 89.3% in the G/P arm). CONCLUSIONS: Vandetanib treatment did not improve PFS in patients with advanced BTC. The safety profile of vandetanib did not show any additional AEs or worsening of already known AEs. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT00753675.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/tratamiento farmacológico , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Quinazolinas/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , GemcitabinaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hepatic pedicle clamping (HPC) during Liver Resection (LR) is a vascular procedure designed to prevent bleeding from the liver during hepatectomy. Outgrowth of pre-existing colorectal micrometastases may occur 5-6 times faster in occluded liver lobes than in non-occluded lobes. We conducted a case-matched analysis at our Institution to assess the effects of HPC on overall and recurrence-free survival in highly selected patients, who underwent LR due to Colorectal liver metastases (CLM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2002 to December 2010, 120 patients operated for CLM were included into this case-matched study. Patients were allocated to two groups: Group-A patients who underwent HPC during LR; Group-B patients who underwent LR without HPC. RESULTS: HPC during liver resection was associated with better overall patient 5-year survival (47.2% in Group-A and 32.1% in Group-B) (P-value = 0.06), and significantly better 5-year recurrence-free survival (49.9% in Group-A vs 18.3% in Group-B) (P-value = 0.010) The Cox regression model identified the following risk factors for worse prognosis in terms of shorter recurrence-free survival and higher incidence of tumor recurrence: no HPC (Group-B) (P-value = 0.032) and positive lymph nodes at the time of LR (P-value = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Lack of HPC in selected patients who underwent LR for CLM results to be a strong independent risk factor for higher patient exposure to tumor recurrence. We suggest that hepatic hilum clamping should be seriously taken into consideration in this patient setting. MINI-ABSTRACT: A case-matched study was performed in 120 patients undergoing liver resection due to colorectal liver metastases, comparing patients who received intermittent hepatic pedicle clamping (HPC) with those who did not. The 5-year overall survival rate was similar, but the 5-year recurrence-free rate was significantly higher with no HPC (p = 0.012).
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Hepatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Análisis de Varianza , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Constricción , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Hepatectomía/mortalidad , Humanos , Incidencia , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/métodos , Italia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Invasividad Neoplásica/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Selección de Paciente , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients carrying KRAS mutated tumors do not benefit from epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted cetuximab- or panitumumab-based therapies. Indeed, the mutational status of KRAS is currently a validated predictive biomarker employed to select mCRC patients for EGFR targeted drugs. When patients fail standard 5-fluorouracil-, oxaliplatin-, irinotecan- and bevacizumab-based therapies, EGFR-targeted salvage therapy can be prescribed only for those individuals with KRAS wild-type cancer. Thus, clinicians are now facing the urgent issue of better understanding the biology of KRAS mutant disease, in order to devise novel effective therapies in such defined genetic setting. In addition to KRAS, recent data point out that BRAF and PIK3CA exon 20 mutations hamper response to EGFR-targeted treatment in mCRC, potentially excluding from treatment also patients with these molecular alterations in their tumor. This review will focus on current knowledge regarding the molecular landscape of mCRC including and beyond KRAS, and will summarize novel rationally-developed combinatorial regimens that are being evaluated in early clinical trials.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/genética , Receptores ErbB/efectos de los fármacos , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas/análisis , Proteínas ras/análisis , Animales , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinasa Clase I , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Humanos , Proteínas de la Membrana/metabolismo , Mutación , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/genética , Fosfohidrolasa PTEN/metabolismo , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinasas/metabolismo , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas p21(ras) , Receptores de Superficie Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Receptores de Superficie Celular/metabolismo , Terapia Recuperativa , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de XenoinjertoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite the consistent clinical results demonstrated by studies on anti-angiogenic drugs targeted against the vascular endothelial growth factor in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients, no specific direct/indirect biomarker of their efficacy has been validated. In this field, circulating endothelial cells (CECs) and endothelial progenitor cells (CEPs) have recently been proposed as noninvasive biomarkers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The absolute numbers of CEPs, total CECs (tCECs) and their resting (rCECs) and activated subsets were evaluated by multiparameter flow cytometry in 40 mCRC patients at baseline and before the administration of the third and sixth course of a bevacizumab-based first-line treatment. Fifty healthy subjects were utilized as control. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 80%, overall clinical benefit was 90% and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.8 months. In our patients, tCECs and rCECs were significantly increased compared with healthy subjects. The patients who achieved a radiological response showed, at baseline, a significant decrease of rCECs and a trend in decrease of tCECs in comparison with patients not achieving response. Finally, a baseline absolute number of tCEC and rCEC <40 cells/ml was evidenced in patients with a longer PFS. No correlation was found regarding CEP. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests significant correlations between both tCEC and rCEC baseline levels and the antitumor efficacy of a bevacizumab-based combination therapy in mCRC patients, thus confirming that these biomarkers could be used in the clinical setting as an early predictor of tumor response.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Carcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Células Endoteliales/patología , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Bevacizumab , Biomarcadores Farmacológicos/sangre , Carcinoma/sangre , Carcinoma/diagnóstico , Carcinoma/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/sangre , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Células Endoteliales/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes/efectos de los fármacos , Pronóstico , Células Madre/patología , Células Madre/fisiologíaRESUMEN
Circulating endothelial cells (CEC) and endothelial progenitor cells (CEP) play an important role in tissue neovascularization. In human tumours, these cells may have clinical implications as prognostic/predictive factors during antiangiogenic therapy. The lack of a standardized assay for the quantification of these rare events has lead to a wide variation in the reported ranges of CEC and CEP. This study aimed to develop a flow cytometric (FCM) method for the immunophenotipic detection and enumeration of these cells in a healthy population. Peripheral blood samples from 32 subjects were analysed. Multiparameter FCM analysis was used to quantify resting and activated CEC and CEP. The mean values of the percentage and of the absolute number were: 0.005 +/- 0.004% and 306 +/- 243 cells/ml for CEC; 0.002 +/- 0.001% and 130 +/- 110 cells/ml for rCEC; 0.003 +/- 0.002% and 176 +/- 150 cells/ml for aCEC; 0.0001 +/- 0.00005% and 6 +/- 2 for CEP. We confirmed that FCM is an accurate and sensitive method for the quantitative analysis of CEC and CEP. The determination of normal ranges of CEC and CEP is helpful in defining their role as surrogate biomarkers of antiangiogenic treatment efficacy during clinical trials in oncology.
Asunto(s)
Células Endoteliales/patología , Citometría de Flujo/métodos , Células Madre/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Animales , Células Endoteliales/citología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Ratones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neovascularización Patológica/patología , Valores de Referencia , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Células Madre/citologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: KRAS codons 12 and 13 mutations predict resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (moAbs) in metastatic colorectal cancer. Also, BRAF V600E mutation has been associated with resistance. Additional KRAS mutations are described in CRC. METHODS: We investigated the role of KRAS codons 61 and 146 and BRAF V600E mutations in predicting resistance to cetuximab plus irinotecan in a cohort of KRAS codons 12 and 13 wild-type patients. RESULTS: Among 87 KRAS codons 12 and 13 wild-type patients, KRAS codons 61 and 146 were mutated in 7 and 1 case, respectively. None of mutated patients responded vs 22 of 68 wild type (P=0.096). Eleven patients were not evaluable. KRAS mutations were associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS, HR: 0.46, P=0.028). None of 13 BRAF-mutated patients responded vs 24 of 74 BRAF wild type (P=0.016). BRAF mutation was associated with a trend towards shorter PFS (HR: 0.59, P=0.073). In the subgroup of BRAF wild-type patients, KRAS codons 61/146 mutations determined a lower response rate (0 vs 37%, P=0.047) and worse PFS (HR: 0.45, P=0.023). Patients bearing KRAS or BRAF mutations had poorer response rate (0 vs 37%, P=0.0005) and PFS (HR: 0.51, P=0.006) compared with KRAS and BRAF wild-type patients. CONCLUSION: Assessing KRAS codons 61/146 and BRAF V600E mutations might help optimising the selection of the candidate patients to receive anti-EGFR moAbs.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas/genética , Proteínas ras/genética , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Camptotecina/administración & dosificación , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Cetuximab , Codón , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Análisis Mutacional de ADN , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Receptores ErbB/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Irinotecán , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas p21(ras)RESUMEN
Blood circulating endothelial cells (CECs), with their resting and activated subsets, (rCECs and aCECs) and circulating progenitors cells (CEPs) are two extremely rare cell populations that are important in tissue vascularization. Their number and function are modulated in diseases involving vascular injury, such as human tumours. Although a consensus on the phenotypic definition of endothelial cells, as well as on the optimal enumeration technique, is still lacking, the number of clinical studies based on assessment of these cells is rapidly expanding, as well as the analytical methods employed. The present study aimed to develop a rapid and sensitive flow cytometric method of quantifying and characterizing CECs (with both their subsets and the apoptotic fraction) and CEPs. We analysed peripheral blood samples from 21 subjects with a six-colour flow cytometric approach allowing detection of the cell phenotype of CECs and CEPs using a monoclonal antibodies panel and a dedicated gating strategy. Apoptotic CECs were detected with Annexin V and dead cells with 7-amino-actinomycin D staining. The described technique proved to be a new, reliable, tool increasing our knowledge of the biology of CECs and CEPs and can readily be applied in the study of many pathological conditions characterized by endothelial damage.
Asunto(s)
Apoptosis , Células Sanguíneas/citología , Células Endoteliales/citología , Citometría de Flujo/métodos , Fenotipo , Adulto , Anexina A5 , Color , Dactinomicina/análogos & derivados , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
Dendritic cells (DCs) are the key antigen-presenting cells controlling the initiation of the T cell- dependent immune response. Currently, two peripheral blood DC subsets have been identified on the basis of their CD11c expression. The CD11c-negative (CD11c-) DCs (expressing high levels of CD123) are designated as lymphoid-derived DCs (DC2), whereas the CD11c+/CD123- cells, do identify the myeloid-derived DCs (DC1). A growing number of studies have been conducted in recent years on both the quantitative and functional alterations of DCs and their subsets in different pathological conditions. In the present study we assessed, using two different flow cytometric (FCM) techniques, the normal profile of blood DCs in 50 italian adult healthy subjects (M/F: 25/25, median age 42.5 years, range 20-65). The percentage and the absolute number of DCs and their subsets, were obtained starting from whole blood samples in two ways: 1) by calculating the number of DCs when gated as lineage-negative/ HLA-DR+ and identifing the two subsets as CD11c+ (DC1) and CD123+ (DC2) and 2) by using three specific markers: BDCA.1 (CD11c+ high/CD123+ low, myeloid DCs); BDCA.2 (CD11c-/ CD123+high, lymphoid DCs); BDCA.3 (CD11c+low /CD123-, myeloid DCs). Six parameters, 4-color FCM analysis were perfomed with a BD FACSCanto equipment. The mean values of the percentage and of the absolute number were: 0.5+/-0.2% and 30+/-11 cells/microL for DCs; 0.2+/-0.1% and 15+/-6 cells/microL for DC1; 0.2+/-0.1% and 15+/-7 cells/microL for DC2. The same values were: 0.2+/-0.1% and 16+/-7 cells/microL for BDCA.1; 0.2+/-0.1% and 12+/-7 cells/microL for BDCA.2; 0.02+/-0.01% and 2+/-1 cells/microL for BDCA.3, respectively. Our study confirmes that the two types of FCM analysis are able to identify the DC population. We also provides the first reference values on normal rates and counts of blood DCs in italian adult healthy subjects.
Asunto(s)
Antígenos CD/análisis , Células Dendríticas/citología , Citometría de Flujo , Adulto , Anciano , Antígenos CD/inmunología , Células Dendríticas/inmunología , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunofenotipificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Standardized conditions to distinguish subpopulations of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients more and less sensitive to cetuximab therapy remain undefined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) copy number by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in paraffin-embedded tumor blocks from 85 chemorefractory CRC patients treated with cetuximab. Results were analyzed according to different score systems previously reported in colorectal and lung cancers. The primary end point of the study was identification of the EGFR FISH score that best associates with response rate (RR). RESULTS: Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the cut-off that best discriminated responders versus nonresponders to cetuximab was a mean of 2.92 EGFR gene copies per cell. This model showed sensitivity of 58.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 47.1-70.1) and specificity of 93.3% (95% CI = 80.6-100). EGFR FISH-positive patients (N = 43, 50.6%) had significantly higher RR (P = 0.0001) and significantly longer time to disease progression (P = 0.02) than EGFR FISH negative (N = 42, 49.4%). Other scoring systems resulted less accurate in discriminating patients with the highest likelihood of response to cetuximab therapy. CONCLUSIONS: CRC patients with high EGFR gene copy number have an increased likelihood to respond to cetuximab therapy. Prospective clinical trials with a careful standardization of assay conditions and pattern interpretation are urgently needed.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Neoplasias Colorrectales/química , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Receptores ErbB/análisis , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Cetuximab , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Intervalos de Confianza , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Receptores ErbB/genética , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Selección de Paciente , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Curva ROC , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Over the past several years the medical approach to cancer patients has made important steps forward both in the field of novel, selective, antiproliferative agents and more effective supportive therapies. A greater understanding of the molecular pathways regulating cell proliferation and metastasis has led to the identification of a range of targets specifically inhibited by these new drugs. The clinical development of these compounds (the so called "targeted therapies") has shown distinctive adverse effects with respect to standard chemotherapeutic agents but the potential increasing risk of venous thromboembolism remains unvaried. In fact, the incidence of this potentially life-threatening complication in patients receiving standard chemotherapy ranges from about 11% to 20% and even more depending on the type of drug administered and on the possible association with other anti-neoplastic and supportive therapies. In this paper we reviewed all the available evidences concerning the increasing risk of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients during treatment with new agents currently used in medical oncology together with data concerning the clinical value of a concomitant prophylactic anticoagulation. At present, additional information concerning safety in terms of thromboembolic risk of novel biological and molecular therapies should be collected from specifically designed original basic science studies and clinical trials in order to optimize their use in current oncology practice.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Tromboembolia/epidemiología , Trombosis de la Vena/epidemiología , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , RiesgoRESUMEN
The medical treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has progressively changed since the introduction of "targeted therapy". The development of one of these molecular drug categories, e. g., the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine-kinase (TK) selective inhibitors, such as the orally active gefitinib and erlotinib, offers an interesting new opportunity. The clinical response rates obtained with their employment in unselected patient populations only account for approximately 10%. Because of this, over the last two years numerous studies have been performed in order to identify the patient subsets that could better benefit from these agents. Not only patient characteristics and clinical-pathological features, such as never-smoking status, female gender, East Asian origin, adenocarcinoma histology, bronchioloalveolar subtype, but also molecular findings, such as somatic mutations in the EGFR gene, emerge as potentially useful prognostic and predictive factors in advanced NSCLC. Further, specifically designed clinical trials are still needed to completely clarify these and other open issues that are reviewed in this paper, in order to clarify all the interesting findings available in the clinical practice.