Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
PLoS One ; 18(3): e0283132, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36952477

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Concerns regarding potential risk of dermal irritation have led to the exclusion of NICU patients from the recommendation regarding the use of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) wash for daily skin cleansing to reduce bloodstream infections. Our aim was to assess the safety of 2% CHG bathing in NICU patients. METHODS: The regulator required a stepwise study enrollment to three successive groups: term infants, followed by near-term and pre-term infants. For comparison, we used a cohort of matched controls. A propensity score-adjusted regression model was used to compare the groups. INTERVENTION: Infants were bathed thrice-weekly with 2% CHG-impregnated washcloths. Participant's skin was examined daily. RESULTS: Over a total of 661 days of treatment: 384,129, and 148 days for the term, near-term and pre-term groups, respectively, no skin reactions were observed. The intervention group was generally sicker, however, bloodstream infections were similar between the groups. CONCLUSION: For infants >30 weeks and >3 days old, 2% CHG bathing was safe. Large multicenter studies are urgently needed to establish the effectiveness of this practice in the NICU.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales , Infección Hospitalaria , Sepsis , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Humanos , Clorhexidina/efectos adversos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Proyectos Piloto , Atención Terciaria de Salud , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Baños , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA