Impact of admission to high-risk isolation room on patients' and healthcare workers' perceptions: A qualitative cross-assessment Approach.

INTRODUCTION: High-risk isolation units (HRIU) house patients at high risk of transmitting infectious agents, notably patients with suspected viral hemorrhagic fever or smear-positive tuberculosis. Admission to HRIU can alter the quality of care and impact patients' and healthcare workers' (HCWs) anxiety and dissatisfaction. METHODS: The Infectious Diseases Department of the Bichat Claude Bernard Hospital in Paris houses a 7-bed HRIU. We conducted a qualitative study based on individual semi-structured interviews to assess the perceptions of both patients and HCWs. RESULTS: We interviewed 14 patients and 16 HCWs routinely working in the HRIU. All 8 patients subject to isolation precautions and 1 of the 6 patients not subject to isolation precautions expressed a negative representation of the room with a feeling of confinement, stigma, and mistrust. They also reported a lack of information from healthcare staff and a need for entertainment, activities, and visits from relatives. HCWs did not like working in this unit because of the anteroom's technical constraints and a loss of frequent contact with patients. They also expressed a feeling of insecurity working in these units despite the use of interphones. CONCLUSION: Placing patients in an HRIU not only affects their emotions, but also impacts HCWs both emotionally and organizationally. Alert systems, intercoms, and videoconferencing systems can improve safety and security as well as exchanges with patients and their relatives. Psychological support is needed for patients who are subject to isolation precautions and for their attending HCWs.

Bathroom contamination by antibiotic-resistant Enterobacterales (ESBLPE and CPE): an experimental study.

BACKGROUND: Extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBLPE) and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) cause serious infections. Their presence in urine may lead to environmental contamination potentially responsible for cross-transmission. AIM: To evaluate the level of spraying and contamination after emptying urine in the toilet and rinsing in the sink, a common practice in the healthcare setting. METHODS: For each test, the procedure was similar: seat raised, emptying urinal bottle into the toilet at the height of the bowl, rinsing in the sink and flushing. To study splash-drops, water and fluorescein were mixed in the urinal bottle. In each area, the splash-drops frequency and level were assessed with UV. To study contamination, three ESBLPE and one CPE were diluted in saline, 106/mL. Contamination was assessed by sampling before, immediately after and 3 h after the test. The swabs were cultured and the colonies counted and identified. FINDINGS: The areas at the highest risk of spraying were the toilet bowl contour (N = 36/36), the underside of the toilet seat (N = 34) and the inside of the sink (N = 34). Except for gloves (N = 14), there was low clothing contamination. The most frequently contaminated areas were inside the sink (40/48), where the highest levels of contamination were found (14/48). CONCLUSION: Emptying the urinal bottles in the toilet followed by sink rinsing is associated with a significant risk of projection and contamination, depending on the area (highest risk at the sink), but the bacteria did not survive beyond 3 h. This practice, which carries a risk of cross-transmission, should be reviewed.

Prevalence of carriage of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing enterobacteria and associated factors in a French hospital.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to evaluate the prevalence and associated factors for carriage of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing enterobacteria (ESBL-PE) in a healthcare facility. METHODS: In 2016 a serial cross-sectional survey of ESBL-PE carriage in a French university hospital was conducted. All patients present on the day of the survey were screened for ESBL-PE carriage. Demographic characteristics and risk factors for ESBL-PE carriage were collected. RESULTS: In all, 146/844 patients (17%) were digestive carriers of ESBL-PE; of these, 96 (66%) had not previously been identified. Among patients carrying ESBL-PE, Escherichia coli (62%) and CTX-M type (94%) predominated. Greater age, recent travel abroad, receipt of antibiotic, and prolonged hospitalization were associated with ESBL-PE carriage. CONCLUSION: Given the high prevalence of ESBL-PE and the high proportion of unknown carriers, our results strongly suggest reinforcing standard precautions rather than contact precautions for controlling the spread of ESBL-PE.

Evaluation of excreta management in a large French multi-hospital institution.

BACKGROUND: Excreta are a major source of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae including strains that produce extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL). The increase of ESBL incidence in Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) hospitals prompted an evaluation of the equipment and practices used to dispose of excreta. AIM: To evaluate the use of equipment for the management of excreta and to review practices of healthcare workers in their disposal. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2012. FINDINGS: A total of 28 AP-HP hospitals including 536 units (342 acute care units and 194 rehabilitation and long-term care units) were evaluated. Among the patients on the day of the survey, 5697 (43%) wore diapers and 1767 (13%) were using a bedpan. Sixty-one percent of the beds were equipped with shared toilets and 43% of the toilets were equipped with hand sprayers, a device favouring the spread of faecal material in the environment. Sixty eight percent of the units were equipped with bedpan washer-disinfectors. Only 52% of the bedpan washer-disinfectors were located in rooms where alcohol-based hand rubs (ABHRs) were available. In 71% of the units the bedpan was rinsed before disinfection, mostly in the patient's bathroom (62%). Finally, only 9% of questioned healthcare workers said they followed an educational programme about excreta disposal. CONCLUSION: This survey shows that, in the field of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae control and the promotion of hand hygiene with ABHRs, excreta management is a concerning but neglected subject.