Renal cell carcinoma and risk of second primary cancer: A Danish nationwide cohort study.

AIM: To examine the risk of second primary cancer in patients with incident renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: We identified all patients diagnosed with incident RCC during 1995-2019, using population-based Danish medical registries. Patients were followed from the date of RCC diagnosis until any second primary cancer diagnosis, death, emigration, or December 31, 2019, whichever came first. We computed the absolute risk, standardized incidence ratio (SIR), and excess absolute risk of second primary cancer, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), among patients with RCC compared to the general population. RESULTS: The absolute 1- and 20-year risks of any second primary cancer were 2.8% and 17.8%, respectively. Within 1 year after RCC diagnosis, we detected 20 excess cancer cases per 1000 person-years (PY) (SIR, 2.3; 95% CI: 2.1-2.6). Moreover, we detected an additional four excess cancer cases per 1000 PY during 1 to <5 years of follow-up (SIR, 1.3; 95% CI: 1.2-1.4), and 6 per 1000 PY beyond 5 years of follow-up (SIR, 1.4; 95% CI: 1.3-1.5). The sustained elevated cancer risk beyond 1 year of follow-up was mainly attributed to excess risk of lung and bladder cancer. The risk of second primary cancer was higher in 2006-2019 than in 1995-2005, but only during the first year of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Patients with incident RCC have a sustained 40% elevated long-term risk of second primary cancer, compared with the general population. This increased risk is mainly attributed to lung and bladder cancer.

Long-term risk of benign prostatic hyperplasia-related surgery and acute urinary retention in men treated with 5-alpha reductase inhibitor versus alpha-blocker monotherapy in routine clinical care.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the risk of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-related surgery and acute urinary retention (AUR) in men treated with 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor (5-ARI) versus alpha-blocker monotherapy in routine clinical care over 15 years of follow-up. METHODS: Using population-based Danish Health registries, we identified all new-users of 5-ARI or alpha-blocker monotherapy in Denmark, 1997-2017. We defined an index date 180 days after the date of first prescription and included men who redeemed at least one additional prescription before the index date. We used multiple imputation to replace missing prostate-specific antigen values. We performed propensity score-weighted Cox regression to estimate weighted hazard ratios (wHRs) and cumulative incidence function to estimate weighted cumulative risks of BPH-related surgery and AUR in intention to treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analyses. RESULTS: We included 18,421 and 95,984 men treated with 5-ARI and alpha-blocker monotherapy, respectively. Overall, treatment with 5-ARI monotherapy was associated with a reduced risk of BPH-related surgery (ITT wHR = 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68-0.78), PP wHR = 0.77 (95% CI: 0.70-0.84) and AUR (ITT wHR = 0.73 (95% CI: 0.67-0.78), PP wHR = 0.75 (95% CI: 0.66-0.84). The 15-year risk of BPH-related surgery in men treated with 5-ARI versus alpha-blocker monotherapy was 14.8% (95% CI: 14.1%-15.5%) versus 19.1% (95% CI: 18.7%-19.5%) in the ITT analysis and 13.8% (95% CI: 12.6%-14.9%) versus 17.5% (95% CI: 16.9%-18.0%) in the PP analysis. The 15-year risk of AUR in men treated with 5-ARI versus alpha-blocker was 13.0% (95% CI: 12.3%-13.6%) versus 16.6% (95% CI: 16.3%-17.0%) in the ITT analysis and 12.6% (95%: 11.3%-14.0%) versus 16.9% (95% CI: 16.3%-17.6%) in the PP analysis. CONCLUSION: Treatment with 5-ARI versus alpha-blocker monotherapy in routine clinical care was associated with a reduced risk of BPH-related surgery and AUR for up to 15 years of follow-up. After 15 years of follow-up, the relative risk reduction was 21%-25% and the absolute risk reduction was 4%.

First-time postmenopausal bleeding as a clinical marker of long-term cancer risk: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Data on long-term risk of cancer after a postmenopausal bleeding diagnosis are sparse. METHODS: We used Danish medical registries to conduct a population-based cohort study of women with a first hospital-diagnosed postmenopausal bleeding during 1995-2013. We computed the absolute risk of cancer and the standardised incidence ratio (SIR) comparing the observed cancer incidence with that expected in the general population. RESULTS: Among 43,756 women with postmenopausal bleeding, the absolute 1- and 5-year risk of endometrial cancer were 4.66% and 5.18%, respectively. The SIR of endometrial cancer was elevated during 0-3 months (SIR = 330.36 (95% CI: 315.43-345.81)), 3-12 months (SIR = 11.39 (95% CI: 9.79-13.17)), 1-5 years (SIR = 2.55 (95% CI: 2.19-2.94)) and >5 years of follow-up (SIR = 1.63 (95% CI: 1.40-1.90)). All selected gynaecological and urological, gastrointestinal and haematological cancers had elevated 0-3 months SIRs. Beyond 1 year of follow-up the SIRs of ovarian and bladder cancer remained elevated with a 1-5-year SIR of 2.15 (95% CI: 1.71-2.65) and 1.45 (95% CI: 1.14-1.80), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the Danish population, women with a first hospital-diagnosed postmenopausal bleeding have an increased 0-3 months risk of gynaecological, urological, gastrointestinal and haematological cancers. The SIR of endometrial, ovarian and bladder cancer remained elevated for several years.