Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Radiat Environ Biophys ; 56(1): 111-120, 2017 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28035471

RESUMEN

Health effects of close residential proximity to nuclear facilities have been a concern for both the general public and health professionals. Here, a study is reported examining the association between maternal residential proximity to nuclear facilities and low birth weight (LBW) in offspring using data from 1996 through 2008 in Texas, USA. A case-control study design was used together with a proximity-based model for exposure assessment. First, the LBW case/control births were categorized into multiple proximity groups based on distances between their maternal residences and nuclear facilities. Then, a binary logistic regression model was used to examine the association between maternal residential proximity to nuclear facilities and low birth weight in offspring. The odds ratios were adjusted for birth year, public health region of maternal residence, child's sex, gestational weeks, maternal age, education, and race/ethnicity. In addition, sensitivity analyses were conducted for the model. Compared with the reference group (more than 50 km from a nuclear facility), the exposed groups did not show a statistically significant increase in LBW risk [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.91 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.81, 1.03) for group 40-50 km; aOR 0.98 (CI 0.84, 1.13) for group 30-40 km; aOR 0.95 (CI 0.79, 1.15) for group 20-30 km; aOR 0.86 (CI 0.70, 1.04) for group 10-20 km; and aOR 0.98 (CI 0.59, 1.61) for group 0-10 km]. These results were also confirmed by results of the sensitivity analyses. The results suggest that maternal residential proximity to nuclear facilities is not a significant factor for LBW in offspring.


Asunto(s)
Vivienda , Recién Nacido de Bajo Peso , Exposición Materna/efectos adversos , Plantas de Energía Nuclear , Exposición a la Radiación/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Embarazo , Texas , Factores de Tiempo
2.
Health Place ; 16(2): 209-18, 2010 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19879177

RESUMEN

Although breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths among women in the Unites States, to date there have been no nationwide studies systematically analyzing geographic variation and clustering. An assessment of spatial-temporal clusters of cancer mortality by age and race at the county level in the lower 48 United States indicated a primary cluster in the Northeast US for both younger (RR = 1.349; all RR are p < or = 0.001) and older (RR = 1.283) women in the all-race category. Similar cluster patterns in the North were detected for younger (RR = 1.390) and older (RR = 1.292) white women. The cluster for both younger (RR = 1.337) and older (RR = 1.251) black women was found in the Midwest. The clusters for all other racial groups combined were in the West for both younger (RR = 1.682) and older (RR = 1.542) groups. Regression model results suggest that lower socioeconomic status (SES) was more protective than higher status at every quartile step (Medium-high SES, OR = 0.374; Medium-low, OR = 0.137; Low, OR = 0.061). This study may provide insight to aid in identifying geographic areas and subpopulations at increased risk for breast cancer.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Mama/etnología , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clase Social , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...