Toileting Behaviors and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Among Female Physicians and Medical Students.

IMPORTANCE: A greater understanding of the relationship between toileting behaviors and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) has the potential to generate awareness and improvement of overall bladder health in specific populations. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate the prevalence and correlation between maladaptive toileting behaviors and LUTS among female medical trainees and attending physicians. STUDY DESIGN: We surveyed female medical students, residents, fellows, and attending physicians at an academic hospital, capturing demographics, voiding behaviors, LUTS, and fluid intake using the Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Short Form, the Toileting Behavior-Women's Elimination Behaviors, and the Beverage Intake Questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 146 medical students and physicians participated in the study. Eighty-three percent reported at least 1 LUTS, most commonly storage symptoms, particularly incontinence (30%, stress urinary incontinence > urgency urinary incontinence). Altered toileting behaviors included "worrying about public toilet cleanliness" (82%), "emptying the bladder before leaving home" (81%), "delaying emptying their bladder when busy" (87%), and "waiting until they could not hold urine any longer" (57%). Total Toileting Behavior-Women's Elimination Behaviors scores were significantly associated with total Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms scores (ß = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.12-0.42; P<0.01). This remained true after adjusting for total fluid intake in medical students (ß = 0.41, P<0.01) and resident physicians (ß = 0.28, P = 0.03) but was not correlated among attending physicians (ß = -0.07, P = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: Female physicians and medical students experience a high prevalence of LUTS. Many engage in maladaptive toileting behaviors, which highly correlate with LUTS (especially among medical students and residents) and may lead to impaired bladder health.

Health literacy in women with chronic pelvic pain.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Limited health literacy (HL) is a risk factor for poor patient outcomes, including pain. Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a prevalent disorder affecting up to 25% of women and coexists with multiple overlapping conditions. This study aimed to describe health literacy in women with CPP, primarily correlate HL to pain intensity and pain duration, and secondarily correlate HL to mood symptoms and pain catastrophizing. We hypothesized that women with CPP with higher HL would report lower levels of pain intensity and duration. METHODS: This was a prospective, cross-sectional study. Forty-five women with CPP were recruited from outpatient Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation and Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery clinics. Validated questionnaires were administered to evaluate pain intensity and duration, pain disability, psychological symptoms, pain catastrophizing, and health literacy. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics of patient characteristics and summary scores, as well as Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (rho) to assess the strength of associations between summary scores and health literacy. RESULTS: Forty-five women with CPP were enrolled with mean age of 49 years, majority non-Hispanic White, and median chronic pelvic pain duration of 7 years. Possible or high likelihood of limited health literacy was identified in 20% women with CPP (11.1% and 8.9%, respectively). Limited health literacy was moderately correlated with pain intensity, depressive symptoms, and pain catastrophizing. Pain duration was not significantly correlated with health literacy. The remaining 80% of women with CPP were likely to have adequate health literacy. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of women with CPP in this single center study were likely to have adequate health literacy. Limited health literacy was seen in a minority of women with CPP but was moderately correlated with greater pain intensity, more depressive symptoms, and higher pain catastrophizing. This study identified that women with CPP were likely to have adequate HL, but underscores the importance of considering HL screening and interventions in those with higher pain intensity, depression, and pain catastrophizing.

Physical medicine & rehabilitation residents' perspectives on women's musculoskeletal health.

INTRODUCTION: Women are either disproportionately or uniquely affected by certain musculoskeletal conditions but have limited access to providers of sex-specific musculoskeletal care. Few physical medicine & rehabilitation (PM&R) residencies offer women's musculoskeletal health training, and it is unknown whether PM&R residents feel prepared to care for women's musculoskeletal health concerns. OBJECTIVE: To examine PM&R residents' perspectives and experiences in women's musculoskeletal health. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey developed through clinical expertise and consistent with sports medicine guidelines. SETTING: Electronic survey sent to all accredited PM&R residency programs within the United States, distributed through program coordinators and resident representatives. PARTICIPANTS: PM&R residents. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was residents' perspective of comfort with women's musculoskeletal health. Secondary outcomes were exposure to formal education on women's musculoskeletal health topics, exposure to various learning formats for these topics; and residents' perspectives on desire for further education, access to field-specific mentors, and interest in incorporating women's musculoskeletal health into future practice. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-eight responses were included for analysis (20% response rate, 55% female sex residents). Only 19% of residents self-reported feeling comfortable providing care for women's musculoskeletal health conditions. Comfort did not significantly differ by postgraduate year, program region, or sex. However, with regression modeling, the number of topics learned formally in their curriculum had an increased odds of residents self-reporting comfort (odds ratio [OR] 1.18, confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.30, adjusted p value .01). The majority of residents viewed learning women's musculoskeletal health as important (94%) and requested more exposure to the field (89%). CONCLUSIONS: Many PM&R residents do not feel comfortable in caring for women's musculoskeletal health conditions despite their interest in the field. To improve health care access for patients seeking care for these sex-predominant or sex-specific conditions, residency programs may want to consider increasing exposure to women's musculoskeletal health for residents.

The impact of a sacroiliac joint belt on function and pain using the active straight leg raise in pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain.

INTRODUCTION: Pelvic girdle pain (PGP) is the most common musculoskeletal concern in pregnancy. The Active Straight Leg Raise (ASLR) test is diagnostic. Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) belts are included in multimodal therapy, but there is no established predictive measure to determine which pregnant women will benefit. OBJECTIVE: To determine if the ASLR score is immediately reduced by SIJ belt application and whether PGP pain and function improves after 4 weeks of belt use. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant women at least 18 years of age in the second or third trimester of pregnancy with posterior PGP and ASLR score of 2 to 10. INTERVENTIONS: Four-week SIJ belt use. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: ASLR, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ), Perceived Global Impression of Improvement (PGII). RESULTS: Sixty-three women enrolled. On multivariable analysis, immediate belted ASLR score was -2.70 points lower than the non-belted ASLR score (P < .001). Four weeks later there was significant improvement in the ASLR score with a belt (Mdiff = -0.99; P = .001) and without a belt (Mdiff = -1.94; P < .001); the decline was more precipitous for the non-belted response (Mdiff = -0.96; P = .02). Current NRS pain scores declined from baseline by approximately -0.94 points (P < .001). This decline did not depend on ASLR scores (interaction P = .43) or wearing a belt at the time of testing (interaction P = .51). Similar conclusions held for participants' usual NRS score and average PGQ score. After 4 weeks, 82% reported improvement based on the PGII. CONCLUSIONS: SIJ belts are a safe, well-tolerated, and effective therapeutic option for pregnancy-related PGP. The ASLR score is immediately reduced following SIJ belt application but does not predict pain score 4 weeks later. SIJ belt leads to significant improvements in pain and function over time.

Musculoskeletal Women's Health Education in Physiatry: A Mismatch in Residency Education and Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal Women's Health (MSK WH) is a niche subspecialty within physical medicine & rehabilitation (PM&R). Women make up 50.7% of the population of the United States but are burdened with higher rates of musculoskeletal disease compared to men. MSK WH topics are not included in PM&R or Primary Care Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) program requirements. Given the comprehensive training provided in PM&R, physiatrists are ideal candidates to diagnose, treat, and provide education on MSK WH conditions. OBJECTIVE: To identify the prevalence of formalized MSK WH education and of WH physiatrists at ACGME-accredited PM&R residency programs. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey design. SETTING: Computer-based survey. PARTICIPANTS: ACGME-accredited residency programs (N = 86; as of February 2017). METHODS: A single, multiple choice, computer-generated Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) survey with branching logic was sent to all ACGME-accredited PM&R residency programs (N = 86). OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was to assess the prevalence of women's health curricula at ACGME-accredited PM&R residency programs in the United States. The secondary outcome was to assess the prevalence of WH physiatrists at these programs. RESULTS: Eighty-six ACGME-accredited PM&R residency programs were contacted with 55 completed responses (64% response rate). Only six programs (11%) reported the presence of a formal WH curriculum at their residency program. In contrast, 25 programs (45%) reported having WH physiatrists at their institutions, and 36 programs (65%) reported that general physiatrists were providing WH-related care. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings identify a mismatch between the prevalence of MSK WH residency education (11% of programs) and the prevalence of physiatrists providing MSK WH care (66% of programs). Physiatrists are ideally suited to manage MSK WH care. Based on the findings of this cross-sectional study, residency programs and governing bodies should evaluate these trends and consider the addition of topics pertinent to women's musculoskeletal health into PM&R graduate medical education. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Office Evaluation of Pelvic Pain.

The history and physical examination are important keys to diagnosis and treatment of patients with chronic pelvic pain. The comprehensive history should include questioning regarding patient's pain complaint and a thorough history and review of any body system that may be involved, including neuromusculoskeletal, obstetric, gynecologic, gastrointestinal, urologic, dermatologic, infectious, oncologic, and psychiatric. The physical examination should also follow a focused systems-based approach and includes examination of gastrointestinal, dermatologic, neurologic, and musculoskeletal (including lumbosacral spine, sacroiliac joints, pelvis, and hips) systems, and the pelvic floor (internal and external examination, including neuromuscular anatomy).