Multicentre phase II study of oxaliplatin as a single-agent in cisplatin/carboplatin +/- taxane-pretreated ovarian cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: This multicentre phase II open-label study evaluated safety and antitumour activity of oxaliplatin in cisplatin or carboplatin (cis/carboplatin) +/- taxane-pretreated advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients received oxaliplatin 130 mg/M2 intravenously every 3 weeks, 94% having a performance status (PS) 0-1. All were pretreated with cis/carboplatin and 21 (44%) with paclitaxel. The median number of involved organs was two, 18 (38%) had liver metastasis, 23 (48%) were platinum-resistant and 14 (29%) were taxane-resistant. Forty-two patients were evaluable for a response, 18 (43%) were platinum-resistant and 11 (26%) were taxane-resistant. RESULTS: A total of 253 cycles was administered (median: 5.5/patient). Median cumulative oxaliplatin dose was 666 mg/m2. National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria toxicity analysis showed that seven patients (15%) had grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, two patients (4%) had grade 3 neutropenia, and one patient had grade 3 anaemia. Eleven patients (23%) experienced grade 3 neurosensory toxicity. Of the 29 patients with peripheral neuropathy at the end of treatment, 55% had recovered or improved 1 month later. Eleven objective responses (two complete) were obtained in the 42 evaluable patients [ORR 26%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 14% to 42%], with 10/24 (42%, 95% CI 22% to 63%) in platinum-sensitive, and 1 of 18 (5.6%, 95% CI 0% to 27%) in platinum-resistant patients. Median response duration was 9.2 months (95% CI 6.6% to 11.8%), and median progression-free and overall survival in all treated patients were 4.3 months (95% CI 3.0% to 5.7%) and 15.0 months (95% CI 11.1% to 18.8%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Oxaliplatin has a good safety profile and is active in cis/carboplatin +/- paclitaxel-pretreated AOC patients.

Factors predicting efficacy of oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) +/- folinic acid in a compassionate-use cohort of 481 5-FU-resistant advanced colorectal cancer patients.

A statistical analysis was performed on the patient data collected from two compassionate-use programmes using oxaliplatin (Eloxatin(R)) + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) +/- folinic acid (FA), to identify predictive factors for oxaliplatin-based salvage treatment in patients with 5-FU-resistant advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC). 481 5-FU-resistant ACRC patients, most with performance status < or = 2, > or = 3 involved sites, and > or = 2 prior lines of chemotherapy, received oxaliplatin + 5-FU +/- FA. Prognostic factors associated with overall response rate (ORR), time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic and/or Cox proportional hazards analyses. The ORR was 16% (95% CI: 13-20), the median TTP was 4.2 months (95% CI: 3.4-4.6), and the median OS was 9.6 months (95% CI: 8.6-10.6). The multivariate analysis indicated poor (> or = 2 WHO) performance status (PS), a large number of prior chemotherapy regimens (> or = 3), a low baseline haemoglobin level (< 10 g/dl), and a triweekly (vs biweekly) treatment administration schedule as significantly associated (P< 0.05) with a lower ORR. Sex (male), number of organs involved (> or =3) and alkaline phosphatase (AP) level (> or = 2 x the upper limit of normal) were associated (P< 0.05) with shorter TTP. Poor PS, a large number of organs involved, and elevated AP were independently and significantly correlated with shorter OS. Our analysis identified a relationship between efficacy results of oxaliplatin + 5-FU +/- FA treatment in 5-FU-resistant ACRC patients and baseline prognostic factors related to PS, extent of disease and number of prior regimens.

Antitumoral activity of oxaliplatin/cisplatin-based combination therapy in cisplatin-refractory germ cell cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Only 20-30% of patient with advanced germ cell tumors, relapsing after standard first-line therapy, are curable with current second-line cisplatin-based regimens. New salvage combinations incorporating new active agents are needed. We report the toxicity/tolerance of a new salvage regimen based on the oxaliplatin (Eloxatin)/cisplatin combination, evaluated in patients with recurrent, mostly cisplatin-refractory germ cell tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients were enrolled in this study. All except one had received cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Eight had progressive disease as the best response on their last platinum-based chemotherapy, and three had potentially sensitive tumors. The median interval since the last platinum-based chemotherapy was 6 months (range: 1-36 months). One untreated patient with poor prognosis was also enrolled. Twelve patients had pathological markers [median alpha-fetoprotein 14 800 ng/ml (58-10(6)), median human chorionic gonadotrophin beta subunit 7000 IU/ml (37-723 700)]. Patients received either oxaliplatin (130 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (100 mg/m(2)) every 3-4 weeks (Bi regimen, four patients), or the same regimen combined with one to four of the following cytotoxic agents: ifosfamide, epirubicin, vinorelbine, methotrexate, dactinomycin, etoposide and bleomycin (BiC regimen, 9 patients). Treatment was individualized according to each individual patient's pretreatment and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Seven objective responses were obtained (overall response rate = 54%), all with the BiC regimens (two complete and five partial responses). Two patients with recurrent disease achieved a long-term complete response lasting over 5 years. Four partial responders were seen in the eight cisplatin-refractory tumors, lasting 4-8 months. All objective responses had a corroborating major decrease in tumor marker blood levels (median decrease: 99.7%). The median survival for the whole group was 8 months. The commonest severe toxicity was hematological (grade 4 neutropenia in 78% and thrombopenia in 74% of the BiC cycles). CONCLUSION: Our combined salvage regimen induced significant antitumoral activity in recurrent, cisplatin-refractory germ cell tumors. Oxaliplatin merits further evaluation as a component of combination therapy for this disease.

Multicenter phase II study of bimonthly high-dose leucovorin, fluorouracil infusion, and oxaliplatin for metastatic colorectal cancer resistant to the same leucovorin and fluorouracil regimen.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the objective tumor response rates and toxicities of leucovorin (LV) plus fluorouracil (5-FU) cancer regimen combined with oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2)) every 2 weeks on metastatic colorectal cancer patients with documented proof of progression while on bimonthly LV and 5-FU alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred patients were enrolled onto this study and 97 received the study drugs between October 1995 and December 1996. Eighty-nine patients were eligible for per-protocol efficacy analysis with documented proof of progression on one of the following two treatments: LV 500 mg/m(2) and continuous 5-FU infusion 1.5 to 2 g/m(2)/22 hours, days 1 through 2 every 2 weeks (FOLFUHD); or LV 200 mg/m(2), bolus 5-FU 400 mg/m(2), and continuous 5-FU infusion 600 mg/m(2)/22 hours, days 1 through 2 every 2 weeks (LV5FU2). In our study, 40 patients received FOLFUHD + 85 mg/m(2) of oxaliplatin day 1 (FOLFOX3) and 57 patients received LV5FU2 + 85 mg/m(2) of oxaliplatin day 1 (FOLFOX4). RESULTS: Of the 97 patients treated, 20 partial responses were observed (FOLFOX3/4: response rate, 20.6%; 95% confidence interval, 13% to 31.1%; FOLFOX3: response rate,18.4%; FOLFOX4: response rate, 23.5%). For patients treated with FOLFOX3/4, the median response duration for was 7.5 months, and the major toxicities were peripheral neuropathy and neutropenia. The incidence of grade 3 (National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria) peripheral neuropathy was 20.6%; whereas the overall incidence of grade 3 to 4 neutropenia was 27.8%, 15%, and 36.9% for FOLFOX3/4, FOLFOX3, and FOLFOX4, respectively (P =.02). From the start of treatment, median progression-free survival was 4. 7, 4.6, and 5.1 months for FOLFOX3/4, FOLFOX3, FOLFOX4, respectively, and median overall survival was 10.8, 10.6, and 11.1 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: This phase II study of oxaliplatin at 85 mg/m(2) in combination with bimonthly LV plus 5-FU in patients with colorectal cancer resistant to LV plus 5-FU alone confirms the enhanced antitumor activity of oxaliplatin in combination with 5-FU.

Oxaliplatin and paclitaxel combination in patients with platinum-pretreated ovarian carcinoma: an investigator-originated compassionate-use experience.

PURPOSE: Compassionate-use oxaliplatin paclitaxel was assessed for toxicity and efficacy according to clinical platinum resistance status in cisplatin-carboplatin-pretreated advanced ovarian cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients, retrospectively grouped into four oxaliplatin-paclitaxel dose levels (mg/m2): (DL1: 100/135; DL2: 130-135/135; DL3: 100/160-175; DL4: 130-135/160-175), received oxaliplatin and paclitaxel every three to four weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-one of thirty-seven treated patients were evaluable for activity, with 1 complete and 14 partial responses, (objective response rate: 48%, 95% CI: 31-66). Of 18 platinum-resistant patients 6 responded, and of 13 platinum-sensitive patients, 9 responded. One patient (3%) had two febrile neutropenia episodes, and eight (22%) and eleven patients (30%) had grades 3 and 4 neutropenia, respectively. Six patients (16%) experienced grade 3 peripheral neuropathy. The median response duration was 10.8 months, with a 23-month (range 8-54) median follow-up. Median progression-free and overall survivals were 9 months (95% CI: 7-12), and 25.2 months (95% CI: 12-39), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The antitumour activity of oxaliplatin-paclitaxel in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients accords with experimental data on the agents' lack of cross-resistance. Time-related progression parameters confirm it as a promising salvage treatment option.

Oxaliplatin added to 5-fluorouracil-based therapy (5-FU +/- FA) in the treatment of 5-FU-pretreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma (ACRC): results from the European compassionate-use program.

PURPOSE: To provide evidence for the therapeutic efficacy of oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) when given as a 2-6-hour i.v. infusion, alone or in combination with 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (5-FU +/- FA) in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma (ACRC) who have failed 5-FU-based therapy. To confirm the safety of the drug and its combination in an extended-access context. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prescribing physicians were supplied oxaliplatin on a nominative compassionate-use basis, after obtaining informed consent. Europe-wide, 206 ACRC patients in 44 centers received 1168 cycles of chemotherapy with oxaliplatin (80-100 mg/m2 q 2 weeks or 100-135 mg/m2 q 3 weeks) delivered as a short (2-6 hours) i.v. infusion, 177 of them (1026 cycles) receiving oxaliplatin + 5-FU +/- FA. RESULTS: Oxaliplatin added to the 5-FU +/- FA regimens of 111 verified 5-FU-refractory patients (imaging and/or clinical proof of progression under prior 5-FU-based regimen), elicited objective responses in 25 of 98 evaluable patients, (ORR: 25.5%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI: 17-35). The median time to progression was 4.1 months (95% CI: 3.3-5.0) and the median overall survival was 9.6 months (95% CI: 8.2-10.9). Differences in the toxicity profile of the oxaliplatin + 5-FU +/- FA combination appear related to administration modality, dose and schedule of the 5-FU-based regimen. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of oxaliplatin (2-6-hour i.v. infusion) to 5-FU +/- FA regimens is active in ACRC patients with clinical resistance to fluoropyrimidines. The therapeutic index of oxaliplatin + 5-FU +/- FA combinations administered as salvage therapy compares favorably with those reported in recent phase II-III trials involving other new agents or combinations active in 5-FU-refractory ACRC patients.

Single agent activity of oxaliplatin in heavily pretreated advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: Platinum-containing chemotherapy combinations achieve high response rates in women with advanced ovarian cancer. Unfortunately, most patients need further therapeutic options. Oxaliplatin (L-OHP) is a diaminocyclohexane (DACH) platinum analog active against human and murine cells in vitro and in vivo, including ovarian cells lines, with non-cross resistance characteristics with first (CDDP) and second (CBDCA) generation platinum compounds. The single agent activity of oxaliplatin in 34 consecutive platinum-pretreated ovarian cancer patients, not eligible for other phase II trials, was explored in a compassionate use program framework in a single institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients (34 of them eligible) were treated by L-OHP at the median initial dose of 100 mg/sqm q 3 weeks (5 patients: 58-89 mg/m2; 24 patients: 90-100 mg/m2; 6 patients: 120-130 mg/m2) by short (30'-2 hours) i.v. infusion; the treatment was repeated every three weeks until treatment limiting toxicity or disease progression. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients (median previous chemotherapy lines: 3) were evaluable for antitumoral activity, with a 29% objective response rate. According to Markman's criteria, objective partial responses were seen in six out of 13 evaluable potentially platinum-sensitive patients (46%) and three responses in the 18 evaluable platinum-resistant patients (17%). The tolerance was excellent, with no grade 3-4 (WHO) leukoneutropenia despite previous ABMT and abdominopelvic radiotherapy in six and eight cases, respectively. There was no renal or ototoxicity, and nausea/vomiting were moderate. The only grade 3 (WHO) peripheral neuropathy recorded concerned a patient with a neurotoxicity status grade 2 at baseline. CONCLUSION: The 29% ORR single agent activity of oxaliplatin at hematological subtoxic doses in heavily pretreated ovarian cancer patients, with objective responses in platinum refractory patients, supports experimental data on non cross-resistance and a differential clinical toxicity profile to other available platinum compounds. The 12 month median overall survival of this poor prognosis patients cohort (62% platinum-refractory patients, median number of three previous chemotherapy lines) gives a strong empirical basis for the further exploration of oxaliplatin's role in confirmatory phase II and combination chemotherapy studies.

Intensive concomitant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a phase II study of radiotherapy with cisplatin and 7-week continuous infusional fluorouracil.

PURPOSE: To evaluate an intensive concomitant chemoradiotherapy protocol of conventional radiotherapy with intermittent cisplatin (CDDP) and continuous-infusion fluorouracil (5-FU) in unresectable, locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with unresectable stage IV MO disease (International Union Against Cancer [UICC]/American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC], 1987) received radiotherapy 70 Gy followed by CDDP 80 mg/m2 and 5-FU 300 mg/m2/d. Response was assessed 2 months after treatment completion. RESULTS: Thirty patients (52%) received the full treatment schedule; 53 (93%) received full-dose radiotherapy, while 48 (84%) were given at least 75% of the planned chemotherapy doses. Severe mucositis (World Health Organization [WHO]) grade 3 to 4 was the limiting toxicity and was seen in 79% of patients. The median time for mucositis resolution was 8 weeks. Other toxicities were generally manageable, but there were four treatment related deaths (7%). Fifty patients were assessable for activity, with an overall response rate of 70% (95% confidence interval [CI], 58% to 82%). Complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) rates were 42% and 28%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This simultaneous combined-modality regimen was feasible at the cost of severe mucosal toxicity, which required hospitalization with nutritional, parenteral, and hydroelectrolytic support. The high response rate achieved (70%) did not translate into improved survival, probably due to patient eligibility. The likelihood of cure of this high-tumoral-volume patient population remains low (approximately 10%), despite the association of two therapeutic modalities at full standard therapeutic intensity.