Consumer Information and Treatment Resources for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Within Reach but Not Grasp.

In the context of multiple treatment options for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and a large, growing need for consumer information regarding accessible and effective treatments, this article identifies and reviews available information and treatment resources. Multiple search strategies identified a suite of information sources, including meta-analyses and systematic reviews of PTSD treatments, the program evaluation and implementation literature, the economics literature, Internet sites, and other resources for veteran and civilian consumers. Resources were evaluated with regard to their target audiences, depth and breadth of treatment options covered, nature of the information provided, and accessibility to consumers. A large body of research covers the various treatments and sets of treatment guidelines for PTSD. Despite the extensive scientific information targeted at providers and researchers, the quality, accessibility, and usability of the published research varies widely. The Veterans Health Administration provides the most extensive information on various treatment options and where to obtain treatment within that system. Publicly available websites provide information on multiple treatment options, but information to help nonveterans navigate treatment choices is limited. Published reports of PTSD program-evaluation and implementation studies are sparse. Information on PTSD treatment options available to consumers can be overwhelming and confusing, which places an unnecessary burden on an already vulnerable group of patients and their families. Exacerbating the situation is the shortage of program-evaluation and implementation research. The dearth of centralized and accessible information related to nonveteran PTSD patient groups needs to be addressed.

Gender differences in symptoms and care delivery for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Morbidity and mortality for women with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are increasing, and little is known about gender differences in perception of COPD care. METHODS: Surveys were administered to a convenience sample of COPD patients to evaluate perceptions about symptoms, barriers to care, and sources of information about COPD. RESULTS: Data on 295 female and 273 male participants were analyzed. With similar frequencies, women and men reported dyspnea and rated their health as poor/very poor. Although more women than men reported annual household income <$30,000, no significant gender differences in frequency of health insurance, physician visits, or ever having had spirometry were detected. In adjusted models (1) women were more likely to report COPD diagnostic delay (odds ratio [OR] 1.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-2.45, p=0.01), although anxiety (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.10-3.06, p=0.02) and history of exacerbations (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.08-2.37, p=0.01) were also significant predictors, (2) female gender was associated with difficulty reaching one's physician (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.33-4.86, p=0.004), as was prior history of exacerbations (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.21-4.20, p=0.01), and (3) female gender (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.10-4.21, p=0.02) was the only significant predictor for finding time spent with their physician as insufficient. CONCLUSIONS: Significant gender-related differences in the perception of COPD healthcare delivery exist, revealing an opportunity to better understand what influences these attitudes and to improve care for both men and women.

Economic analysis of a randomized trial of biventricular pacing in Canada.

BACKGROUND: Congestive heart failure (CHF) has been shown to affect 5% of the Canadian adult population, and leads to 9.5 deaths per 100 cardiac-related hospitalizations in Canada. The economic outcomes from biventricular pacing for heart failure are not well understood. This study analyzes resource utilization and related costs associated with CHF for patients who receive standard implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) versus those who receive ICD plus biventricular pacing or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODS: The Canadian analysis of resynchronization therapy in heart failure (CART-HF) study included 72 patients with New York Heart Association class II-IV CHF requiring an ICD. Patients were randomized to receive either ICD + CRT treatment or ICD treatment alone. Medical resource utilization data were collected for 6 months following treatment and were applied to representative costs for the provinces of Quebec and Ontario. Resource utilization was subcategorized into pharmacological therapy, physician visits, hospitalizations, adverse events, and productivity losses. RESULTS: Post-treatment, per patient costs for the CRT + ICD treatment group were less than the follow-up costs for patients receiving ICD treatment only in each province. Mean savings for patients receiving biventricular therapy were CAD 2,420 dollars in Quebec and CAD 2,085 dollars in Ontario during the 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses indicate that savings in post-implant health-care utilization (hospitalizations and pharmacological therapy) can offset some of the device and procedural costs associated with CRT devices.

Costs of urinary incontinence and overactive bladder in the United States: a comparative study.

OBJECTIVES: To update the cost of urinary incontinence (UI) for year 2000 and compare it with the cost of overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: Using the cost-of-illness framework, disease epidemiologic data were combined with treatment rates, consequence probabilities, and average cost estimates. All costs reflect the costs during 2000. RESULTS: The total cost of UI and OAB was 19.5 billion dollars and 12.6 billion dollars, respectively (year 2000 dollars). With UI, 14.2 billion dollars was borne by community residents and 5.3 billion dollars by institutional residents. With OAB, 9.1 and 3.5 billion dollars, respectively, was incurred by community and institutional residents. CONCLUSIONS: OAB affected 34 million individuals compared with 17 million with UI. Despite the differences in epidemiology, the total and per-person costs of UI were higher than the OAB costs because OAB individuals without incontinent episodes incurred fewer costs, on average.

Estimated economic costs of overactive bladder in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the economic costs of overactive bladder (OAB), including community and nursing home residents, and to compare the costs in male versus female and older versus younger populations. METHODS: The National Overactive Bladder Evaluation Program included a representative telephone survey of 5204 community-dwelling adults 18 years and older in the United States and a follow-up postal survey of all individuals with OAB identified and age and sex-matched controls. The postal survey asked respondents about bladder symptoms, self-care use, treatment use, work loss, and OAB-related health consequences. Survey data estimates were combined with year 2000 average cost data to calculate the cost of OAB in the community. Institutional costs were estimated from the costs of urinary incontinence in nursing homes, limited to only those with urge incontinence or mixed incontinence (urge and stress). RESULTS: The estimated total economic cost of OAB was 12.02 billion dollars in 2000, with 9.17 and 2.85 billion dollars incurred in the community and institutions, respectively. Community female and male OAB costs totaled 7.37 and 1.79 billion dollars, respectively. The estimated total cost was sensitive to the estimated prevalence of OAB; therefore, we calculated the average cost per community-dwelling person with OAB, which was 267 dollars per year. CONCLUSIONS: By quantifying the total economic costs of OAB, this study-the first obtained from national survey data-provides an important perspective of this condition in society. The conservative estimates of the total cost of OAB were comparable to those of osteoporosis and gynecologic and breast cancer. Although this provides information on the direct and indirect costs of OAB, quality-of-life issues must be taken into account to gain a better understanding of this condition.

New technologies and potential cost savings related to morbidity and mortality reduction in Class III/IV heart failure patients in Canada.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure affects 1-2% of the Canadian population. The 1-year mortality rates in New York Heart Association Class III/IV heart failure patients range from 11 to 44%. This study evaluates costs associated with current management of Class III/IV heart failure and potential savings if morbidity and mortality are reduced. OBJECTIVES: To construct an economic model to evaluate the components of treating Class III/IV heart failure patients in Canada and the resulting direct medical costs. The model also estimates the potential savings that could result from the introduction of a new technology such as cardiac resynchronization therapy that reduces morbidity and mortality. METHODS: The model evaluates costs of pharmacological therapy, medical care, laboratory and diagnostic tests, and complications, most commonly hospitalization. Estimates are based on a literature review, expert opinion, and standard cost sources using widely accepted health economic methods. RESULTS: The model, under conservative assumptions, estimates that Class III/IV heart failure costs between CAD$1.4 billion and CAD$2.3 billion in Canada overall. Costs are substantial on the provincial level as well and are estimated to be approximately CAD$700 million, CAD$500 million, and CAD$300 million in Ontario, Québec, and British Columbia, respectively. New treatments could bring substantial savings depending on their effectiveness-measured as reduction in morbidity and mortality-and the number of patients who receive that treatment. Potential savings in Canada could reduce the total annual costs for this group of patients by approximately 10% or up to CAD$200 million annually. CONCLUSIONS: The high level of morbidity and mortality in Class III/IV heart failure patients and costs associated with their care are an impetus for the development of new therapies such as cardiac resynchronization therapy, that could deliver long-term benefits including increased exercise tolerance, reduced hospitalizations, and improved quality of life. Successful therapies could provide substantial savings and present a favorable economic profile in the treatment of heart failure. In order to ensure that appropriate technologies are commercialized and marketed, prospective evaluation of new therapies should include critical assessment of direct medical costs in addition to evaluating morbidity, quality of life and survival.

Newborn hearing screening: costs of establishing a program.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the costs and performance characteristics associated with the start-up phase of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs, one utilizing automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) and the other using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE). STUDY DESIGN: Economic and performance data were collected at the initiation of both screening programs. Data were collected until 1500 newborn infants were screened or until a referral rate for further audiologic evaluation at hospital discharge of less than or equal to 5% was achieved. Data collected included screening pass/fail rates, referral rates and personnel, equipment, and supply utilization. Actual costs of personnel, equipment, and supplies were used. Statistical comparisons of proportions using z-statistic with the one-tailed test and an alpha of 0.01 were made. RESULTS: Screening in the AABR program was performed by neonatal nurses, whereas screening in the TEOAE program was performed by master's level audiologists. The average age at initial screen was 29 hours for TEOAE, and 9.5 hours for AABR. Eighty-four percent of infants was screened within 24 hours in the AABR program, in contrast to 35% in the TEOAE program. Throughout the duration of the study, the referral rate at hospital discharge remained approximately 15% for the TEOAE program. The AABR referral rate began at 8% and was less than 4% at the completion of the study. Pre-discharge total costs for initiating and establishing the programs were US$49,316 for TEOAE and US$47,553 for AABR. Cost per infant screened was US$32.23 and US$33.68, respectively. When post-discharge screening and diagnostic evaluation costs were included, the total cost per infant screened was US$58.07 for TEOAE and US$45.85 for AABR. CONCLUSION: AABR appears to be the preferred method for universal newborn hearing screening. AABR was associated with the lowest costs, achieved the lowest referral rates at hospital discharge, and had the quickest learning curve to achieve those rates.