RESUMEN
Background: Visual acuity (VA) assessments are crucial in ophthalmology but traditionally rely on in-clinic evaluations. The emergence of telemedicine has spurred interest in creating dependable self-administered VA tests for use beyond standard clinical environments. This study evaluated the practicality and validity of a self-administered near VA card test against traditional Snellen and Rosenbaum Pocket Vision Screener (RPVS) methods for home monitoring and enhancing clinical workflow. Methods: In a cross-sectional study, a near VA card (Hadassah Self-Visual Acuity Screener (HSVA)) was developed with written and videotaped instructions for self-use. Patients with a minimal best-corrected VA (BCVA) of 1.0 LogMAR in at least one eye were recruited from ophthalmology and optometry clinics. Outcomes included the mean BCVA difference between the self-administered values and those obtained by the examiner, and correlations between BCVA values obtained by the Snellen, RPVS, HSVA, and previous distance BCVA methods according to the patients' electronic medical records. Results: A total of 275 participants (mean age: 42.5 ± 19.4 years; range: 18-89 years; 47% female) were included. Test-retest reliability analysis of the HSVA demonstrated a very good correlation and repeatability (n = 38 patients; Rs = 1.0; p < 0.001). Accuracy analysis revealed the mean LogMAR BCVA values of an additional 237 patients obtained by the Snellen, RPVS, and HSVA methods were similar (p = 0.10). The self-test BCVA results obtained by the HSVA agreed with the masked examiner-tested VA results (n = 67 patients; p = 0.17; Rs = 0.87; ICC = 0.96). Similar results were obtained when stratification by median age (42 years) was performed. Bland-Altman analysis of the HSVA and RPVS methods demonstrated a good agreement. To assess whether the HSVA could predict the VA results in the clinically used charts, multivariate analysis was used and revealed that the HSVA predicted the RPVS results (ß = 0.91; p = 0.001; R2 = 0.88), and the self-test HSVA predicted the Snellen VA results within two lines (ß = 0.93; p = 0.01; R2 = 0.36). Conclusions: The home-based HSVA assessment exhibited high test-retest reliability, accuracy, and alignment with clinical-standard VA tests. Its efficacy in self-testing mirrored examiner-conducted VA assessments and accurately predicted Snellen VA outcomes, indicating the HSVA's suitability for self-monitoring in chronic ocular conditions or when access to conventional examinations is limited. The utility of self-administered VA tests may extend beyond ophthalmology and optometry, potentially benefiting primary care, emergency medicine, and neurology. Further research is needed to explore and validate the practical applications of remote VA testing.
RESUMEN
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Preschool vision screening is essential for the early detection and treatment of eye and vision problems. BACKGROUND: The rate of parental adherence to referrals for comprehensive examination was assessed and factors and potential barriers associated with adherence were identified. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study design, parents were offered to bring their 3-6 year old aged children to free-of-charge vision screening tests at community-based Mother Child Health Centers. Children with abnormal findings were referred to an ophthalmologist examination. Parents were interviewed three to six months after the referral to evaluate adherence and barriers. Barriers were organised into a conceptual framework of parental predisposing and health system factors. Adherence and barriers were assessed by sex, age, ethnic group and socio-economic-status. RESULTS: Altogether 1283 children (mean age 4.5 ± 0.6 years, 47.8% girls) were screened in the Jerusalem district, Israel. The ethnic groups, Jewish (ultra-Orthodox 51.4%, secular/religious 33.2%) and Arab (15.4%), were similar by age and sex, but not by socio-economic status. The overall referral rate was 23.0% (N = 295). Referral rate was not associated with demographic factors. Overall, 54.3% (N = 160) of parents adhered to the referral to bring the child for a full eye examination. Adherence did not differ with sex, ethnicity or socio-economic-status. Parents of 5-6-year-old children were significantly more likely to adhere than parents of younger children. Of parents who did not adhere, 79.3% were attributed to predisposing factors, 16.3% to system factors and 4.4% to other reasons. CONCLUSIONS: Only half the parents proceeded with the recommended full eye examination. Parents of older children were more likely to adhere to referral. In contrast with vaccinations provided by Mother Child Health Centers, adherence to vision screening did not vary based on ethnicity or socio-economic factors. Since most barriers were associated with predisposing factors of parents, interventions to improve adherence should include parental education.
