Design considerations for patient-specific bone fixation plates: a literature review.

In orthopedic surgery, patient-specific bone plates are used for fixation when conventional bone plates do not fit the specific anatomy of a patient. However, plate failure can occur due to a lack of properly established design parameters that support optimal biomechanical properties of the plate.This review provides an overview of design parameters and biomechanical properties of patient-specific bone plates, which can assist in the design of the optimal plate.A literature search was conducted through PubMed and Embase, resulting in the inclusion of 78 studies, comprising clinical studies using patient-specific bone plates for fracture fixation or experimental studies that evaluated biomechanical properties or design parameters of bone plates. Biomechanical properties of the plates, including elastic stiffness, yield strength, tensile strength, and Poisson's ratio are influenced by various factors, such as material properties, geometry, interface distance, fixation mechanism, screw pattern, working length and manufacturing techniques.Although variations within studies challenge direct translation of experimental results into clinical practice, this review serves as a useful reference guide to determine which parameters must be carefully considered during the design and manufacturing process to achieve the desired biomechanical properties of a plate for fixation of a specific type of fracture.

Psychiatric vulnerability and the risk for unintended pregnancies, a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Unintended pregnancies (UPs) are a global health problem as they contribute to adverse maternal and offspring outcomes, which underscores the need for prevention. As psychiatric vulnerability has previously been linked to sexual risk behavior, planning capacities and compliance with contraception methods, we aim to explore whether it is a risk factor for UPs. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched in November 2020. All articles in English language with data on women with age ≥ 18 with a psychiatric diagnosis at time of conception and reported pregnancy intention were included, irrespective of obstetric outcome (fetal loss, livebirth, or abortion). Studies on women with intellectual disabilities were excluded. We used the National Institutes of Health tool for assessment of bias in individual studies and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation method for assessment of quality of the primary outcome. FINDINGS: Eleven studies reporting on psychiatric vulnerability and UPs were included. The participants of these studies were diagnosed with mood, anxiety, psychotic, substance use, conduct and eating disorders. The studies that have been conducted show that women with a psychiatric vulnerability (n = 2650) have an overall higher risk of UPs compared to women without a psychiatric vulnerability (n = 16,031) (OR 1.34, CI 1.08-1.67) and an overall weighed prevalence of UPs of 65% (CI 0.43-0.82) (n = 3881). INTERPRETATION: Studies conducted on psychiatric vulnerability and UPs are sparse and many (common) psychiatric vulnerabilities have not yet been studied in relation to UPs. The quality of the included studies was rated fair to poor due to difficulties with measuring the outcome pregnancy intention (use of various methods of assessment and use of retrospective study designs with risk of bias) and absence of a control group in most of the studies. The findings suggest an increased risk of UPs in women with psychiatric vulnerability. As UPs have important consequences for mother and child, discussing family planning in women with psychiatric vulnerabilities is of utmost importance.