Ductal Carcinoma of the Prostate: An Uncommon Entity With Atypical Behaviour.

AIMS: Ductal adenocarcinoma is a rare variant of prostate cancer, and as such clinical outcomes and best management are not well defined. This series demonstrates the atypical presentation and unusual clinical behaviour of ductal adenocarcinoma and proposes management guidelines to assist clinicians. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of pure (nine patients) and mixed (18 patients) ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate referred to the Departments of Radiation Oncology of the Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, between 2000 and 2015. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were treated with definitive radiotherapy, nine patients (33%) with pure ductal and 18 (67%) with mixed ductal-acinar adenocarcinoma. The median follow-up was 38 months. Four patients (15%) failed locally, all of whom received less than 80 Gy, or no brachytherapy boost. Five patients (19%) failed distantly, four with biopsy-proven lung metastases. All distant failures occurred with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 3 ng/ml. CONCLUSION: This series shows the atypical clinical presentation of this entity, as well as its propensity to metastasise to unusual sites. Relapse may occur at low absolute PSA values and is often asymptomatic. Ductal cancer should not simply be regarded as a high Gleason grade cancer. We propose management guidelines, including regular computed tomography examinations (rather than relying solely on PSA levels) as part of the follow-up for patients with any component of ductal adenocarcinoma.

Retrospective cohort analysis of neoadjuvant treatment and survival in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in a high volume referral centre.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a deadly disease. Neoadjuvant therapy (NA) with chemotherapy (NAC) and radiotherapy (RT) prior to surgery provides promise. In the absence of prospective data, well annotated clinical data from high-volume units may provide pilot data for randomised trials. METHODS: Medical records from a tertiary hospital in Sydney, Australia, were analysed to identify all patients with resectable or borderline resectable PDAC. Data regarding treatment, toxicity and survival were collected. RESULTS: Between January 1 2010 and April 1 2016, 220 sequential patients were treated: 87 with NA and 133 with upfront operation (UO). Forty-three NA patients (52%) and 5 UO patients (4%) were borderline resectable at diagnosis. Twenty-four borderline patients received NA RT, 22 sequential to NAC. The median overall survival (OS) in the NA group was 25.9 months (mo); 95% CI (21.1-43.0 mo) compared to 26.9 mo (19.7, 32.7) in the UO; HR 0.89; log-ranked p-value = 0.58. Sixty-nine NA patients (79%) were resected, mOS was 29.2 mo (22.27, not reached (NR)). Twenty-two NA (31%) versus 22 UO (17%) were node negative at operation (N0). In those managed with NAC/RT the mOS was 29.0 mo (17.3, NR). There were no post-operative deaths with NA within 90-days and three in the UO arm. DISCUSSION: This is a hypothesis generating retrospective review of a selected real-world population in a high-throughput unit. Treatment with NA was well tolerated. The long observed survival in this group may be explained by lymph node sterilisation by NA, and the achievement of R0 resection in a greater proportion of patients.