Stability testing of iomeprol and iopamidol formulations subjected to X-ray radiation.

INTRODUCTION: Exposure of iodinated contrast media (ICM) to X-rays is not uncommon, as contrast media are often stored in close proximity to radiological equipment. However, the interaction between X-rays and ICM is not widely investigated in literature. The present study aims to investigate the chemical stability of iomeprol and iopamidol, two commercial iodinated ICM commonly used in diagnostic imaging, under X-rays exposure. METHODS: Different formulations of iopamidol and iomeprol (iodine concentration 9 to 400 mgI/mL, volume 50-500 mL) were exposed to three different conditions of X-ray irradiation: i) 1 month storage in CT room (≈5-15 mGy); (ii) low-dose protocol (≈10 mGy); (ii) stressed protocol (≈100 mGy). Unexposed and exposed solutions were characterized by high-performance liquid chromatography in terms of concentration of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), iodine species and by products. In addition, appearance and colour of the solutions were inspected and pH measured. RESULTS: API concentrations, appearance, colour and pH of the exposed formulations remained unaffected by X-rays. Measured concentrations of iodine species and by products were observed well within the acceptability criteria, i.e. values turned out to be lower than specifications limits established by the manufacturer, considering both release and shelf-life values. CONCLUSIONS: Up to 100 mGy X-ray exposure did not induce any alteration of iomeprol and iopamidol formulation, nor a detectable increase in the concentration of iodine species or by-products. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Our study strengthens the hypothesis that ICM are stable under X-rays exposure up to 100 mGy.

Awareness of medical radiation exposure among patients: A patient survey as a first step for effective communication of ionizing radiation risks.

INTRODUCTION: The European Directive 2013/59/EURATOM requires patient radiation dose information to be included in the medical report of radiological procedures. To provide effective communication to the patient, it is necessary to first assess the patient's level of knowledge regarding medical exposure. The goal of this work is to survey patients' current knowledge level of both medical exposure to ionizing radiation and professional disciplines and communication means used by patients to garner information. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A questionnaire was designed comprised of thirteen questions: 737 patients participated in the survey. The data were analysed based on population age, education, and number of radiological procedures received in the three years prior to survey. RESULTS: A majority of respondents (56.4%) did not know which modality uses ionizing radiation. 74.7% had never discussed with healthcare professionals the risk concerning their medical radiological procedures. 70.1% were not aware of the professionals that have expertise to discuss the use of ionizing radiation for medical purposes, and 84.7% believe it is important to have the radiation dose information stated in the medical report. CONCLUSION: Patients agree with new regulations that it is important to know the radiation level related to the medical exposure, but there is little awareness in terms of which modalities use X-Rays and the professionals and channels that can help them to better understand the exposure information. To plan effective communication, it is essential to devise methods and adequate resources for key professionals (medical physicists, radiologists, referring physicians) to convey correct and effective information.

Idiopathic recurrent acute pericarditis: familial Mediterranean fever mutations and disease evolution in a large cohort of Caucasian patients.

Idiopathic recurrent acute pericarditis (IRAP) is suspected to be an autoimmune phenomenon. We studied 46 consecutive patients. We looked for: 1) the occurrence of new diagnoses of autoimmune diseases during our follow up; 2) HLA typing; and 3) the presence of the most frequent mutations linked to familial Mediterranean fever (FMF gene or MEFV). HLA typing was done in 21 patients at loci B, DRB1, DQA1 and DQB1. MEFV gene was looked in 23 patients using specific primers. During the follow-up we made a new diagnosis of primary Sjögren's syndrome in four patients (8.7%) and of rheumatoid arthritis in one patient (2.2%). HLA B14, DRB1*01 and DQB1*0202 were significantly more prevalent, but we did not find a typical HLA typing. MEFV gene was searched: exon 10 was checked by sequence and the E148Q mutation by restriction site analysis. No mutations were found. In conclusion, the prevalence of definite immunorheumatological diseases and the absence of the mutations linked to FMF reinforce the notion that idiopathic acute recurrent pericarditis is an autoimmune condition.