Switching from inotersen to eplontersen in patients with hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis with polyneuropathy: analysis from NEURO-TTRansform.

BACKGROUND: The phase 3 NEURO-TTRansform trial showed eplontersen treatment for 65 weeks reduced transthyretin (TTR), halted progression of neuropathy impairment, and improved quality of life (QoL) in adult patients with hereditary TTR-mediated amyloidosis with polyneuropathy (ATTRv-PN), vs. historical placebo. METHODS: NEURO-TTRansform enrolled patients with ATTRv-PN. A subset of patients were randomized to receive subcutaneous inotersen 300 mg weekly (Weeks 1-34) and subsequently switched to subcutaneous eplontersen 45 mg every 4 weeks (Weeks 37-81). Change in serum TTR and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were evaluated through Week 85. Effects on neuropathy impairment, QoL, and nutritional status were also evaluated. RESULTS: Of 24 patients randomized to inotersen, 20 (83%) switched to eplontersen at Week 37 and four discontinued due to AEs/investigator decision. Absolute change in serum TTR was greater after switching from inotersen (-74.3%; Week 35) to eplontersen (-80.6%; Week 85). From the end of inotersen treatment, neuropathy impairment and QoL were stable (i.e., did not progress) while on eplontersen, and there was no deterioration in nutritional status. TEAEs were fewer with eplontersen (Weeks 37-85; 19/20 [95%] patients) compared with inotersen (up to Week 35; 24/24 [100%] patients). Mean platelet counts decreased during inotersen treatment (mean nadir reduction ‒40.7%) and returned to baseline during eplontersen treatment (mean nadir reduction, ‒3.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Switching from inotersen to eplontersen further reduced serum TTR, halted disease progression, stabilized QoL, restored platelet count, and improved tolerability, without deterioration in nutritional status. This supports a positive benefit-risk profile for patients with ATTRv-PN who switch from inotersen to eplontersen.

Impact of Baseline Neuropathy Severity on Vutrisiran Treatment Response in the Phase 3 HELIOS-A Study.

INTRODUCTION: Hereditary transthyretin (ATTRv, v for variant) amyloidosis is a rare, progressive, fatal disease with multisystem manifestations, caused by pathogenic variants in the transthyretin (TTR) gene. Vutrisiran, an RNA interference therapeutic that results in rapid TTR knockdown, improved neuropathy and quality of life (QOL) versus external placebo in patients with ATTRv amyloidosis with polyneuropathy in the phase 3 HELIOS-A study (NCT03759379). This post hoc analysis evaluates the impact of baseline neuropathy severity on response to vutrisiran treatment. METHODS: Patients were randomized (3:1) to vutrisiran (n = 122; 25 mg subcutaneous injection once every 3 months) or patisiran (n = 42; 0.3 mg/kg intravenous infusion once every 3 weeks), which served as a reference group. In this post hoc analysis, patients were grouped into quartiles of increasing baseline Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS): Quartile (Q)1 ≥ 5.0 to ≤ 20.5; Q2 > 20.5 to ≤ 44.1; Q3 > 44.1 to ≤ 73.1; Q4 > 73.1 to ≤ 127.0. Mean change from baseline to Month 18 was summarized by quartile for a range of efficacy endpoints. RESULTS: Across all baseline NIS quartiles, vutrisiran demonstrated benefit versus external placebo in measures of neuropathy severity (modified NIS + 7), QOL (Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy), disability (Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale), gait speed (10-m walk test), and nutritional status (modified body mass index). Overall, patients in lower versus higher NIS quartiles (less severe neuropathy) at baseline maintained better scores at Month 18. The external placebo group progressively worsened in all measures at Month 18. CONCLUSIONS: Vutrisiran demonstrated benefit in neurologic function and other key efficacy measures versus external placebo across all four baseline neuropathy severity quartiles. Patients initiating vutrisiran earlier in their disease course retained the highest neurologic function level after 18 months, highlighting the importance of early diagnosis and treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03759379.

Impact of vutrisiran on exploratory cardiac parameters in hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis with polyneuropathy.

AIMS: HELIOS-A was a Phase 3, open-label study of vutrisiran, an RNA interference therapeutic, in patients with hereditary transthyretin (ATTRv) amyloidosis with polyneuropathy. This analysis evaluated vutrisiran's impact on exploratory cardiac endpoints in HELIOS-A patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were randomized 3:1 to subcutaneous vutrisiran 25 mg every 3 months or intravenous patisiran 0.3 mg/kg every 3 weeks (reference group) for 18 months. Exploratory cardiac endpoints included change from baseline in N-terminal prohormone of brain-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and echocardiographic parameters versus external placebo (APOLLO study). The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population comprised randomized patients receiving any study drug (n = 122). A cardiac subpopulation with evidence of cardiac amyloid involvement (n = 40) was prespecified. 99mTc scintigraphy exploratory assessments in a planned vutrisiran-treated cohort at select sites were compared with baseline. At Month 18, vutrisiran demonstrated beneficial effects on NT-proBNP versus external placebo in the mITT and cardiac subpopulations (adjusted geometric mean fold change ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.480 [0.383-0.600], p = 9.606 × 10-10 and 0.491 [0.337-0.716], p = 0.0004, respectively). Benefits or trends towards benefit in echocardiographic parameters versus external placebo were observed for both populations. In 99mTc scintigraphy assessments, 32/47 (68.1%) and 31/48 (64.6%) patients exhibited reduced normalized left ventricular total uptake and heart-to-contralateral lung ratio, respectively. Perugini grade was reduced or unchanged versus baseline in 55/57 (96.5%) evaluable patients. No increase in cardiac adverse events was observed with vutrisiran versus external placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Vutrisiran demonstrated evidence of potential benefit on cardiac manifestations in patients with ATTRv amyloidosis with polyneuropathy, with an acceptable safety profile.

APOLLO-B, a study of patisiran in patients with transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: primary long-term results from the open-label extension period

INTRODUCTION: The Phase 3 APOLLO-B study evaluates patisiran in patients (pts) with transthyretin (ATTR) cardiac amyloidosis over a 12-month (M) double-blind (DB) period, followed by an open-label extension (OLE) period when all pts receive patisiran (NCT03997383). Hypothesis: Patisiran provides long-term benefit in pts with ATTR cardiac amyloidosis. Aims: Describe safety and efficacy of patisiran during the APOLLO-B OLE (18M+). METHODS: Pts (18-85 yrs) with ATTR cardiac amyloidosis and heart failure history were randomized 1:1 to patisiran or placebo (pbo). Pts completing DB period were eligible to receive patisiran in the OLE for ≤36M. Results summarized based on DB treatment arm. Exploratory assessments include change from study baseline (CFB) in 6-minute walk test (6MWT), KCCQ-OS, NT-proBNP, and troponin I. RESULTS: In the DB period, 359 pts (pbo n=178; patisiran n=181) received study drug (median [range] age, 76.0 [41, 85] yrs; male, 89%; wtATTR, 80%; tafamidis at baseline, 25%); 334 (93%) entered the OLE. In patisiran arm, M12 and M18 results, respectively, were similar for each endpoint: 6MWT and KCCQ-OS (mean [SEM] CFB) −8.09 [5.73] vs −9.21 [6.04] meters (m) and 0.60 [1.36] vs 0.22 [1.48]; NT-proBNP and troponin I (geometric mean fold-CFB [95%CI]) 1.10 [1.03, 1.17] vs 1.17 [1.07, 1.27] and 1.11 [1.05, 1.18] vs 1.09 [1.01, 1.17]). In pbo arm, patisiran initiation in OLE was associated with a slower rate of worsening or relative stability across endpoints; CFB at M12 vs M18, respectively: 6MWT, −25.43 [5.61] vs −31.08 [5.45] m; KCCQ-OS, −3.41 [1.33] vs −4.02 [1.49]; NT-proBNP, 1.39 [1.28, 1.51] vs 1.53 [1.38, 1.71]; and troponin I, 1.29 [1.21, 1.38] vs 1.21 [1.13, 1.30]. Patisiran had an acceptable safety profile; no new concerns. OLE analyses are ongoing; updated data to be presented. CONCLUSIONS: The M18 results provide evidence that beneficial effects observed in DB period on functional capacity, health status, and quality of life were maintained by continued treatment with patisiran during the OLE. Pbo-treated pts initiating patisiran at M12 showed slowed worsening or stabilization in most endpoints at M18. Early treatment initiation is important: pbo-treated pts did not recover functional capacity or health lost prior to initiating OLE patisiran.