Reirradiation of gliomas under stereotactic conditions: Prognostic factors for survival without relapse or side effects, a retrospective study at Tours regional university hospital (France).

PURPOSE: To search for factors correlated with relapse-free survival following stereotactic reirradiation in patients with recurrent glioma following radiochemotherapy and evaluate tolerance to this treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Initial radiotherapy was given according to the protocol of Stupp and al. Reirradiation was performed using the CyberKnife® system. Patients could have had surgical resection initially and at the time of recurrence. We analysed 13 patients treated between July 2010 and September 2014. The median age was 55 years. The doses delivered ranged from 20 to 36Gy, in one to ten fractions. RESULTS: Median survival after stereotactic radiotherapy was 14 months. Survival without relapse was 3.7 months. Factors significantly influencing duration of relapse-free survival were: age (P=0.04), total dose (P=0.02), dose per fraction (P=0.04) and number of fractions (P=0.01). We found no correlation between gross tumour volume, clinical target volume, grade of tumour or prescription isodose and relapse-free survival following radiochemotherapy. Three patients developed radionecrosis. CONCLUSION: Reirradiation under stereotactic conditions is well tolerated. A dose of more than 30Gy delivered in 5 or more fractions seems to prolong relapse-free survival.

Stereotactic body re-irradiation therapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after external-beam radiation therapy: Initial report.

PURPOSE: Management of prostate cancer relapses after external-beam radiation therapy is still undefined. Re-irradiation schedules have been explored in different tumour sites. In this report, we present our preliminary experience of re-irradiation using stereotactic body radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer failure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between March 2011 and October 2014, robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy was administered to patients previously treated with external-beam radiation therapy to a median dose of 71.1Gy (range, 45-76.5Gy) and with biochemical failure corresponding to a local in-field recurrence of prostate cancer. Ten patients had recurrences after postoperative external-beam radiotherapy. Patients underwent a pelvic MRI to confirm the recurrence and a total body staging using a ((18)F)-fluorocholine PET/CT. The prescription dose consisted of five fractions of 7.25Gy to a total dose of 36.25Gy. Efficacy was evaluated based on biochemical response and toxicity was evaluated according to CTCAE v.4.0 questionnaires and International Prostate Symptom Score. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were treated and followed for a median time of 11.7 months (mean: 13.4 months; range: 2.5-46.5 months). Median time between the first external-beam radiation therapy of prostate cancer and the first day of CyberKnife(®) treatment was 111 months (range: 38-398 months). One-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rate was 83.3%, and only one in-field progression was reported. Two patients had a biochemical failure corresponding to metastatic progression without evidence of local recurrence. Treatment was well tolerated, with only one grade 2 acute genitourinary toxicity, no grade≥2 acute gastrointestinal or late toxicities were reported. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic body re-irradiation therapy using CyberKnife(®) after failed external-beam radiation therapy showed favourable results in terms of in-field local and biochemical control. Toxicity was low and acceptable. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these results to select patient and to evaluate the introduction of androgen-deprivation therapy.

Robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy for tumors of the liver: radiation-induced liver disease, incidence and predictive factors.

PURPOSE: Robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy is a new option to treated unresecable liver tumours. The objectives were to assess the tolerance of this technique, to identify predictive factors for toxicity and evaluate the efficiency of this treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June 2010 to November 2012, robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy was proposed for 56 patients with unresecable hepatocellular carcinomas (23 patients) or hepatic metastases (41 patients). Two or less hepatic lesions, lesion size under 75 mm and WHO score under 3 were selection criteria. The prescribed dose was 45 Gy/3 fractions or 60 Gy/3 fractions. The primary end-point was toxicity, using the radiation-induced liver disease definition and to identify predictive factors. Secondary end-points were in-field local control and overall survival. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 12.5 months. The one-year local control rate and the one-year overall survival rate were 64% [CI95%: 48.2 to 76.5%] and 89% [CI95%: 76 to 95%], respectively. For patient treated with a total dose of 60 Gy, no one experienced recurrence. According to the definition we took, radiation-induced liver disease rate was 0 or 9%. A lesion size at least 35 mm was a predictive factor to liver toxicity (P=0.01). CONCLUSION: Using robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy, the incidence of radiation-induced liver disease is weak and spontaneously reversible. Prospective studies are required to put in evidence other predictive factors of radiation-induced liver disease and confirm the optimal dose treatment.

[Induction chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer]. / Cancers des voies aérodigestives supérieures : le retour de la chimiothérapie néoadjuvante ?

Chemotherapy is a part of the combined multimodality treatment for locally advanced head and neck cancers. Concomitant administration with radiation therapy is the standard treatment for these patients. The efficacy of the docetaxel-cisplatinum-5-fluoro-uracil (TPF) regimen compared to the platinum-5-fluoro-uracil (PF) regimen raised the question of whether this treatment could improve the therapeutic results for locally advanced tumours. For larynx preservation, induction chemotherapy using TPF, followed by radiation therapy for good responders is a valid option. However, clinical studies have to be performed to compare this approach to the concomitant radiation therapy-chemotherapy approach using functional endpoints. For locally advanced tumors, despite the superiority of the TPF regimen over the PF, there is no evidence in the literature to support the use of induction chemotherapy prior to concomitant radiation therapy-chemotherapy. Two recent studies (DECIDE, PARADIGM) failed to demonstrate any benefit, but both trials were stopped early because of slow enrollment. Other studies are on going, or with recently finished accrual, will help to shed light on the role of this treatment.

[Endometrial cancer]. / Cancer de l'endomètre.

Endometrial cancers are frequent and affect mainly postmenopausal women. They are mostly diagnosed at an early stage with an excellent prognosis. Surgery is the reference for a precise FIGO staging who guide adjuvant treatment. Tumor extension, grade, myometrium invasion and involved lymph nodes will be discriminating in therapeutic strategy. The management of stages I and II has been recently amended by ESMO, who proposed surveillance, brachytherapy, and radiation therapy followed by brachytherapy for respectively low, intermediate and high risk groups. These recommendations are controversial and must be confirmed. Locally advanced stages represent a heterogeneous population in which surgery should be proposed if it is feasible then followed by radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. Based on an illustrated clinical case, indications, delineation, dosimetry and complications expected with radiotherapy are demonstrated.