Appendiceal Inversion Presenting as a Cecal Polypoid Mass on Screening Colonoscopy: A Case Report and Review of Available Diagnostic Adjuncts to Differentiate Benign From Malignant Colorectal Pathology.

Appendiceal inversion is uncommon. It may be a benign finding or seen in association with malignant pathology. When detected, it masquerades as a cecal polyp which poses a diagnostic dilemma with malignancy in the differential. In this report, we highlight a case of a 51-year-old patient with an extensive surgical history as a newborn in the setting of omphalocele and intestinal malrotation, who was found to have a 4 cm cecal polypoid growth on screening colonoscopy. He underwent a cecectomy for tissue diagnosis. Ultimately, the polyp was found to be an inverted appendix without evidence of malignancy. Currently, suspicious colorectal lesions which cannot be removed by polypectomy are primarily addressed with surgical excision. We reviewed the literature for available diagnostic adjuncts to better differentiate benign from malignant colorectal pathology. The application of advanced imaging and molecular technology will allow for improved diagnostic accuracy and subsequent operative planning.

Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma of the Transverse Colon.

While liposarcoma is one of the most common soft tissue sarcomas, it is rarely seen within the gastrointestinal tract, and even less frequently seen within the colon. Dedifferentiated liposarcoma is a subtype of liposarcoma, which along with the pleomorphic subtype is considered a high-grade, aggressive tumor; both possess the ability to metastasize and are associated with decreased survival. Despite complete resection, recurrence is common. While surgical excision is the cornerstone of treatment for liposarcoma of the colon, there is no consensus on adjuvant therapies. We present the case of a 66-year-old woman who presented with abdominal pain with rectal bleeding and was found on colonoscopy to have a high-grade dedifferentiated liposarcoma of the transverse colon. She underwent robotic segmental colectomy. Due to absence of nodal involvement or distal metastasis, adjuvant therapy was not administered. On 1-year follow-up, the patient remains disease free.

Does CD10 Expression Predict Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer?

BACKGROUND: Accurate preoperative prediction of lymph node status would be a revolutionary adjunct in treating colorectal cancer. The immunohistochemical marker CD10 has been suggested recently to have a predictive capacity for lymph node involvement in colorectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to evaluate the relationship between the presence of the CD10 molecular marker and lymph node metastasis in a US patient population using previously banked colorectal cancer specimens. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a single academic institution. PATIENTS: Included were specimens from 191 patients, with cancer stages ranging from T1N0 to T3N2. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The relationship between CD10 and different clinicopathologic parameters was assessed, as well as the ability to predict lymph node metastasis by itself and in conjunction with lymphovascular invasion. RESULTS: CD10 was significantly correlated with left-sided colon cancers (p = 0.01) and the presence of mucinous histology and had a relatively high specificity (75.7%) for lymph node metastasis. CD10 did not correlate with lymph node status (p = 0.33) or enhance the ability of lymphovascular invasion to predict lymphatic metastasis in our patient population. Sensitivity and specificity of lymphovascular invasion alone for lymph node metastasis were 62.8% and 93.6%, whereas adding CD10 status resulted in a sensitivity of 70.6% and specificity of 69.3%. Multivariate analysis revealed only lymphovascular invasion as a predictor of lymph node metastasis in our patient population. LIMITATIONS: This study was primarily limited by its small sample size and retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS: In our patient population, CD10 status was not significantly associated with lymph node metastasis, and it was no better than lymphovascular invasion alone when predicting lymph node status.

Retained surgical items: a problem yet to be solved.

BACKGROUND: Retained surgical items (RSI) continue to occur. Large RSI studies are few due to low RSI frequency in single institutions and the medicolegal implications. Consequently, RSI risks are not fully defined, with discrepancies persisting among published studies. The goals of this study were to better define risk factors for RSI, to clarify previously discrepant risk factors, and to evaluate other potential contributors to RSI occurrence, such as trainee presence during an operation. STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter case-match study of RSI risk factors was conducted between January 2003 and December 2009. Cases complicated by RSI were identified at participating centers using clinical quality improvement and adverse event reporting data. Case match controls (non-RSI) were selected from same or similar-type cases performed at each respective institution. Retained surgical item risk factors were evaluated by univariate and multivariate conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Fifty-nine RSIs and 118 matched controls were analyzed (RSI incidence 1 in 6,975 or 59 in 411,526). Retained surgical items occurred despite use of confirmatory x-rays (13 of 27 instances) and/or radiofrequency tagging (2 of 32 instances). Among previously discrepant results, we confirmed that body mass index, unexpected intraoperative events, and procedure duration were associated with increased RSI risk. The occurrence of any safety variance, and specifically an incorrect count at any time during the procedure, was associated with elevated RSI risk. Trainee presence was associated with 70% lower RSI risk compared with trainee absence. CONCLUSIONS: Longer duration of surgery, safety variances, and incorrect counts during the procedure result in elevated RSI risk. The possible positive influence of trainee presence on RSI risk deserves additional study. Our findings highlight the need for zero tolerance for safety omissions, continued study and development of novel approaches to RSI reduction, and establishing anonymous RSI reporting systems to better track both the incidence and risks associated with this problem, which has yet to be solved.

Intravascular retained surgical items: a multicenter study of risk factors.

INTRODUCTION: Retained surgical items (RSIs) have been previously studied in patients undergoing major surgical procedures. This is the first study that specifically examines potential risk factors for intravascular RSI (ivRSI). METHODS: Multicenter retrospective review of 83 RSIs was performed. Among these, 13 cases involved ivRSI. Cases in the ivRSI group were compared with a group of similar control cases to determine potential risk factors for ivRSI, including procedural factors (urgency and complicating factors), patient factors (body mass index), equipment failure (structural or functional), and safety variances. Fisher's exact testing was performed. RESULTS: Thirteen ivRSI cases and 14 controls were examined. There were no differences between the two groups with regard to age, gender, or body mass index. ivRSI items included guide wires (8/13), catheter/catheter fragments (4/13), and a coil (1/13). The incidence of unexpected procedural factors was significantly higher among ivRSI cases (10/13) than among controls (3/14) (P < 0.007). Equipment failure occurred in five ivRSI cases, with none among controls (P < 0.016). There were no differences between the two groups with regard to number of urgent procedures, bleeding >500 mL, evening procedures, or trainee involvement. Both groups had a very high proportion of safety variances (8 in ivRSI and 11 in control group, P = not significant). In addition, seven of 13 ivRSIs were missed on initial confirmatory postprocedural imaging. DISCUSSION: Unexpected procedural factors and equipment failure are significantly associated with ivRSI. Of concern, over half of all ivRSIs were missed on confirmatory postprocedural imaging. Strict adherence to established protocols and stringent radiographic review for intravascular procedures is required to prevent ivRSI.