Analysis of Minimally Invasive Left Thoracotomy HVAD Implantation - A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation may reduce peri-/postoperative complications and risks associated with resternotomies. In this study, we describe our first results using a minimally invasive LVAD implantation technique (lateral thoracotomy [LT] group). These results were compared with LVAD implantations done via full median sternotomy (STX group). METHODS: HVAD (HeartWare, Framingham, Massachusetts, United States) implantations in 70 patients (LT group n = 22, 52 ± 15 years old; STX group n = 48, 59 ± 11 years old) were retrospectively analyzed. Minimally invasive access via left thoracotomy was feasible in 22 patients. Peri- and postoperative analyses of survival and adverse events were performed. RESULTS: No survival differences were observed between the LT and STX group (p = 0.43). LT patients without temporary right ventricular assist device (tRVAD) showed a significantly better survival rate compared to LT patients with concomitant tRVAD implantation (p = 0.02), which could not be demonstrated in the STX group (p = 0.11). Two LT and four STX patients were successfully bridged to heart transplantation and three STX patients were successfully weaned with subsequent LVAD explantations. LVAD-related infections (n = 4 LT group vs n = 20 STX group, p = 0.04) were less likely in the LT group. No wound dehiscence occurred in the LT group, whereas five were observed in the STX group (p = 0.17). The amount of perioperative blood transfusions (within the first 7 postoperative days) did not differ in both study groups (p = 0.48). CONCLUSION: The minimally invasive approach is a viable alternative with the possibility to reduce complications and should be particularly considered for bridge-to-transplant patients.

I-SWOT as instrument to individually optimize therapy of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms: Effective, norm-compliant and meeting the needs.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines summarize medical evidence, they identify the most efficient therapy under study conditions and recommend this therapy for use. The physician now has the challenge to translate a therapy that is efficient under laboratory conditions to a patient who is an individual person. To accomplish this task the physician has to make sure that (I) the ideal typical therapy is applicable and effective in this individual patient taking the special features into consideration, that (II) therapy is compliant with the norm including guidelines, laws and ethical requirements (conformity) and that (III) the therapy meets the patient's needs. OBJECTIVE: How can physicians together with the patients translate the medical evidence into an individually optimized therapy? MATERIAL AND METHODS: At the German Aortic Center in Hamburg we use I­SWOT as an instrument to identify such individually optimized therapy. With I­SWOT, we present an instrument with which we have developed an (I) efficient, (II) conform and (III) needs-oriented therapeutic strategy for individual patients. RESULTS: I-SWOT cross-tabulates strengths (S) and weaknesses (W) related to therapy with opportunities (O) and threats (T) related to individual patients. This I­SWOT matrix identifies four fundamental types of strategy, which comprise "SO" maximizing strengths and opportunities, "WT" minimizing weaknesses and threats, "WO" minimizing weaknesses and maximizing opportunities and "ST" maximizing strengths and minimizing threats. We discuss the case of a patient with asymptomatic thoracoabdominal aneurysm to show how I­SWOT is used to identify an individually optimized therapy strategy.

A simple clinical model to estimate the probability of Marfan syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Marfan syndrome is a heritable connective tissue disease. Definitive diagnosis is complex, and requires sequencing of a large gene, FBN1. AIM: We aimed to develop a simple model to estimate the pre-test probability of Marfan syndrome. DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional study. METHODS: We applied diagnostic standards for definitive diagnosis or exclusion of Marfan syndrome in 329 consecutive persons. In 208 persons with random assignment to our derivation group, we performed multivariate logistic regression to assess 14 clinical variables for inclusion in a prediction model with derivation of score points from the estimated coefficients. We created cut-offs to classify low, moderate and high probability of Marfan syndrome. For validation, we applied the model to the remaining 121 persons. RESULTS: We identified seven variables for inclusion in the final model, where we assigned four score points to ectopia lentis, two points to a family history of Marfan syndrome, and one point to previous thoracic aortic surgery, to pectus excavatum, to a wrist and thumb sign, to previous pneumothorax, and to skin striae. In the derivation group 12, 42 and 92% of persons with low (≤1 point), moderate (>1-3.5 points) or high pre-test probability (>3.5 points) had Marfan syndrome, compared to 12, 57 and 91%, respectively, in the validation group. Positive likelihood ratios were 13.96 and 8.54 in the high probability group of the derivation and validation group, respectively. CONCLUSION: A simple prediction model provides evidence for Marfan syndrome. This model can be used to identify patients who require definitive diagnostic work-up.

Analysis of phenotype and genotype information for the diagnosis of Marfan syndrome.

Marfan syndrome is considered a clinical diagnosis. Three diagnostic classifications comprising first, Marfan genotype with a causative FBN1 gene mutation; second, Marfan phenotype with clinical criteria of the original Ghent nosology (Ghent-1); and third, phenotype with clinical criteria of its current revision (Ghent-2) in 300 consecutive persons referred for confirmation or exclusion of Marfan syndrome (150 men, 150 women aged 35 ± 13 years) were used. Sequencing of TGBR1/2 genes was performed in 128 persons without FBN1 mutation. Marfan genotype was present in 140, Ghent-1 phenotype in 139, and Ghent-2 phenotype in 124 of 300 study patients. Marfan syndrome was confirmed in 94 and excluded in 129 persons consistently by all classifications, but classifications were discordant in 77 persons. With combined genotype and phenotype information confirmation of Marfan syndrome was finally achieved in 126 persons by Ghent-1 and in 125 persons by Ghent-2 among 140 persons with Marfan genotype, and exclusion was accomplished in 139 persons by Ghent-1 and in 141 persons by Ghent-2 among 160 persons without Marfan genotype. In total, genotype information changed final diagnoses in 22 persons with Ghent-1, and in 32 persons with Ghent-2. It is concluded that genotype information is essential for diagnosis or exclusion of Marfan syndrome.

Dural ectasia in individuals with Marfan-like features but exclusion of mutations in the genes FBN1, TGFBR1 and TGFBR2.

Mutations in the genes FBN1, TGFBR1, and TGFBR2 can result in heritable connective tissue disorders comprising the Marfan syndrome and the Loeys-Dietz syndrome. Dural ectasia is a characteristic manifestation of both syndromes. However, dural ectasia has not yet been investigated in connective tissue disorders that are unrelated to mutations in the FBN1, TGFBR1 or TGFBR2 genes. Here, we assessed dural ectasia in 33 individuals both with typical manifestations of heritable connective tissue disease and in whom mutations in all three genes had been excluded. We identified 19 individuals with dural ectasia (58%), who exhibited major skeletal manifestations of the Marfan syndrome more frequently than the remaining 14 persons without dural ectasia (p = 0.06). Moreover, only persons with dural ectasia fulfilled clinical criteria of the Marfan syndrome (p = 0.01). Conversely, aortic aneurysm (12 patients; p = 0.8), aortic dissection (five patients; p = 0.1), spontaneous dissection of the carotid arteries (five patients; p = 1), and mitral valve prolapse (13 patients; p = 0.4) were similarly frequent irrespective of dural ectasia. We conclude that dural ectasia is a marker for connective tissue disease which coincides with skeletal rather than with cardiovascular manifestations, and which may involve currently uncharacterized pathogenetic mechanisms and syndromes.

Aortic aneurysms after correction of aortic coarctation: a systematic review.

Despite advanced techniques for surgical or percutaneous therapy coarctation of the aorta continues to carry a high risk of aneurysmal formation. Mortality of these aneurysms ranges between <1 and >90%, reflecting remarkable differences in surgical strategies and the follow-up management of coarctation. We review the frequency, anatomical types, risk factors and mechanisms of aortic aneurysm forming late after surgical or percutaneous therapy of aortic coarctation. We emphasize that aneurysms do not form exclusively at the site of previous intervention, but also at remote locations such as the ascending aorta. Moreover, aneurysm formation may only in part be attributed to a specific technique of coarctation therapy, and we emphasize the role of a bicuspid aortic valve and inherent weakness of the aortic wall as significant risk factors for aneurysm after aortic coarctation. We report the presenting symptoms, follow-up protocols, and imaging criteria for local and proximal aneurysms. Finally, we discuss criteria for prophylactic intervention at the site of such aneurysms, and present therapeutic options for different types of aneurysms. With this systematic review, we wish to provide data for establishing more uniform strategies for preventing, diagnosing and treating aneurysms associated with aortic coarctation.

E-mail communication between medical students and schoolchildren: A model for medical education.

OBJECTIVE: To examine e-mail communication between student physicians and schoolchildren, in the context of a school-based tobacco prevention program, as a way to teach communication skills and model physician-patient interactions. DESIGN: Twenty medical students and pediatric residents were partnered with groups of children as part of HealthQuest, a tobacco prevention program implemented in 2 kindergarten through grade 12 Vermont schools. Medical students and residents acted as mentors for their group and provided support to the schoolchildren through e-mail and occasional site visits. E-mail messages were transmitted and stored in a Web server and monitored by preceptors. Content analysis of the messages was performed to identify emerging themes. RESULTS: During the 2-year intervention period, 1187 messages were exchanged between children, teachers, and the student physicians. Thirty-two percent (n = 383) of the messages involved tobacco, of which 54% addressed health effects; 23% were related to social influences of tobacco use, 15% to cessation by parents and others, and 7% to cessation by students. Other categories included nontobacco health issues (n = 135), personal questions (n = 294), and classroom information (n = 735). Many inquiries required medical students and residents to research their answers, and several required collaboration with preceptors, because the questions raised serious medical or psychosocial issues. With feedback, medical students and residents adjusted their responses so that they were appropriate for the developmental level of the children. CONCLUSIONS: The e-mail component of this program provided important learning opportunities for student physicians in tobacco control, child development, communication skills, and developing a physician-patient relationship. This model also offers potential benefits for medically underserved pediatric populations. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154:1258-1262.

Positive and negative outcome expectations of smoking: implications for prevention.

BACKGROUND: To inform the development of messages for tobacco prevention programs, we examined seven positive and five negative outcome expectations of smoking as risk factors for smoking uptake. METHODS: A cross-sectional, self-administered survey of 471 students in grades 6-12 who were never or experimental smokers was performed. Logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between outcome expectations and susceptibility to becoming a smoker in the future, a measure of intent and resistance to peer smoking. RESULTS: A total of 36.1% of the sample was susceptible to smoking. All positive outcome expectations showed a strong and significant association with susceptibility. Students were most likely to be susceptible if they believed they would enjoy smoking (OR = 29.4). Three of the five negative outcome expectations were significantly associated with susceptibility, but the strength of these associations was much lower than that observed for the positive expectations (OR = 0.5 to 0.6). A strong belief in the negative outcomes of smoking did not alter the association between susceptibility and positive outcome expectations. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that teaching adolescents and teens about the negative consequences of smoking is unlikely to change their intent to smoke. Preventive efforts should identify ways to address the positive expectations adolescents have about smoking, possibly by offering alternative means for achieving these outcomes.