RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Stent migration and subsequent adverse events are frequently observed in the use of fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMSs) for distal biliary stenosis. In this study, we identified predictors for stent migration based on biomechanical stent characteristics and associated these findings with clinical outcomes. METHODS: The migration resistance of FCSEMSs was quantified by measuring the pull-out force. We analyzed a single-center retrospective cohort of 178 FCSEMSs for treatment success and adverse events occurring during 180 days of follow-up. RESULTS: Biomechanical measurements revealed a 4-fold higher migration resistance of FCSEMSs with anchoring fins (AF-FCSEMSs; Fmax = 14.2 ± .1 N) compared with FCSEMSs with flared ends (FE-FCSEMSs; Fmax = 3.8 ± 1.0 N; P < .0001). Clinically, AF-FCSEMSs showed lower rates of migration compared with FE-FCSEMSs (5% vs 34%, P < .0001). Unscheduled ERCP procedures because of stent dysfunction were less frequent in the AF group compared with the FE group (15% vs 29%, P = .046). Cholangitis because of stent dysfunction was observed in 5% of the AF group compared with 19% in the FE group (P = .02). Stent patency rates at 1, 3, and 6 months were higher in the AF group (96%, 90%, and 80%, respectively) compared with the FE group (90%, 74%, and 66%; log-rank test: P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: The pull-out force as a biomechanical stent property predicts the migration resistance of FCSEMSs in distal biliary stenosis and may thus be used to classify stents for this application. AF-FCSEMSs showed a significantly lower rate of migration and adverse events compared with FE-FCSEMSs.
Asunto(s)
Colestasis , Stents Metálicos Autoexpandibles , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Constricción Patológica/etiología , Stents/efectos adversos , Stents Metálicos Autoexpandibles/efectos adversos , Colestasis/etiología , Colestasis/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Acute graft-versus-host-disease (aGVHD) is the main cause of morbidity and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). Nausea, vomiting, and anorexia after alloHCT can be early signs of aGVHD of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) but may also reflect lasting mucosal damage or side effects of drugs. If upper GIT aGVHD is suspected, upper endoscopic evaluation and histological examination are crucial. Still, the interpretation of clinical symptoms, macroscopical alterations, and histological findings can be challenging. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective analysis on single-center data from 174 patients with suspected aGVHD of the upper GIT who underwent upper endoscopy within the first 6 weeks after alloHCT, to study the distribution of aGVHD-related histological findings in relation to clinical symptoms and macroscopic findings and to correlate the severity of changes with data on relapse and NRM. Our data suggest that biopsies of the duodenum reveal the severity of upper GIT aGVHD most accurately. While the histological grading correlated weakly with the severity of macroscopic changes, we found a tight correlation between histological and clinical grades of upper GIT aGVHD (p < 0.001). Although correlation of histological grading of upper GIT aGVHD with the risk for NRM missed statistical significance (HR 1.53, Lerner ≥1° versus <1º, p = 0.13), overall clinical aGVHD severity correlated with NRM (HR 4.3, IIIº-IVº versus 0-Iº, p < 0.01). In conclusion, biopsies from the duodenum are most sensitive in excluding aGVHD in patients with normal macroscopic findings at esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Clinical grading of aGVHD predicts NRM better than histological grading.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Tracto Gastrointestinal Superior , Enfermedad Aguda , Biopsia , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Neuralgic amyotrophy (NA) has been described as a possible extrahepatic manifestation of hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection. Usually, HEV-associated NA occurs bilaterally. The clinical characteristics determining the course of HEV-associated NA have still not been defined. METHODS: In this retrospective multicentric case series, 16 patients with HEV-associated NA were studied and compared to 176 HEV patients without NA in terms of their age, sex, and ALT levels. RESULTS: Neither gender distribution (75% vs. 67% male) nor age (47 vs. 48 years median) differed significantly between the NA patients and controls. Eight NA patients (50%) presented with bilateral involvement-seven of these had right-side dominance and one had left-side dominance. Thirteen cases (81%) were hospitalized. Eight of these patients stayed in hospital for five to seven days, and five patients stayed for up to two weeks. The time from the onset of NA to the HEV diagnosis, as well as the diagnostic and therapeutic proceedings, showed a large variability. In total, 13 (81%) patients received treatment: 1/13 (8%) received intravenous immunoglobulins, 8/13 (62%) received glucocorticoids, 3/13 (23%) received ribavirin, and 6/13 (46%) received pregabalin/gabapentin. Patients with ages above the median (47 years) were more likely to be treated (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: HEV-associated NA causes a relevant morbidity. In our case series neither the type of treatment nor the time of initiation of therapy had a significant effect on the duration of hospitalization or the course of the disease. The clinical presentation, the common diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, and the patients' characteristics showed large variability, demonstrating the necessity of standardized protocols for this rare but relevant disease.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis E infection affects over 20 million people worldwide. Reports of neurological manifestations are largely limited to the peripheral nervous system. We report a middle-aged genotype 3c male patient with acute hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection and severe neurological deficits with evidence of multiple disseminated inflammatory lesions of the central nervous system. CASE PRESENTATION: A 42-year-old male patient presented to our emergency department with musculoskeletal weakness, bladder and bowel retention, blurred vision and ascending hypoesthesia up to the level of T8. Serology showed elevated liver enzymes and positive IgM-titers of hepatitis E. Analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) showed mild pleocytosis and normal levels of glucose, lactate and protein. HEV-RNA-copies were detected in the CSF and stool. Within 3 days after admission the patient became paraplegic, had complete visual loss and absent pupillary reflexes. MRI showed inflammatory demyelination of the optic nerve sheaths, multiple subcortical brain regions and the spinal cord. Electrophysiology revealed axonal damage of the peroneal nerve on both sides with absent F-waves. Treatment was performed with methylprednisolone, two cycles of plasma exchange (PLEX), one cycle of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) and ribavirin which was used off-label. Liver enzymes normalized after 1 week and serology was negative for HEV-RNA after 3 weeks. Follow-up MRI showed progressive demyelination and new leptomeningeal enhancement at the thoracic spine and cauda equina 4 weeks after admission. Four months later, after rehabilitation was completed, repeated MRI showed gliotic transformation of the spinal cord without signs of an active inflammation. Treatment with rituximab was initiated. The patient remained paraplegic and hypoesthesia had ascended up to T5. Nevertheless, he regained full vision. CONCLUSIONS: Our case indicates a possible association of acute HEV infection with widespread disseminated central nervous system inflammation. Up to now, no specific drugs have been approved for the treatment of acute HEV infection. We treated our patient off-label with ribavirin and escalated immunomodulatory therapy considering clinical progression and the possibility of an autoimmune response targeting nerve cell structures. While response to treatment was rather limited in our case, detection of HEV in patients with acute neurological deficits might help optimize individual treatment strategies.
Asunto(s)
Virus de la Hepatitis E/genética , Hepatitis E/diagnóstico , Inflamación/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Encéfalo/patología , Genotipo , Hepatitis E/inmunología , Hepatitis E/virología , Virus de la Hepatitis E/inmunología , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , MasculinoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the most common and potentially life-threatening surgical complication in pancreatic surgery. One possible pharmacological treatment could be the endoscopic injection of botulinum toxin (BTX) into the sphincter of Oddi to prevent POPF. Promising data reported a significantly reduced rate of clinically relevant POPF. We analyzed the effect of BTX injection in our patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy (DP). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing DP was performed. Patients with preoperative endoscopic injection of BTX into the sphincter of Oddi were included. The end points were postoperative outcomes including POPF. BTX patients were compared with a historical cohort and matched in a 1:1 ratio using a propensity score analysis. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients were treated with endoscopic injection of BTX before open (n=8) or laparoscopic (n=11) DP. The median age of the patients was 67 years and the mean body mass index was 25.9 kg/m2. In median, the intervention was performed 1 day (range, 0-14 days) before the operation. There were no intervention-related complications. The incidence of POPF was not statistically different between the two groups: a clinically relevant POPF grade (B/C) occurred in 32% (BTX) and 42% (control; p=0.737). Likewise, there were no significant differences in postoperative drain fluid amylase levels, morbidity, and mortality. CONCLUSION: The present study could not reproduce the published results of a significant lowering of grade B/C POPF. The explanations could be the timing of BTX injection before surgery and the endoscopic technique of BTX injection. However, the conflicting results after BTX injection in two high-volume centers prompt a randomized controlled multicenter trial with trained endoscopists.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Triple therapy with a proton pump inhibitor, moxifloxacin, and amoxicillin has been proven effective in first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. AIM: To explore 1, the value of triple therapy with esomeprazole, moxifloxacin, and amoxicillin in second-line or rescue treatment of Caucasian patients and 2, the impact of treatment duration on eradication success. METHODS: H. pylori-infected patients with at least one previous treatment failure were randomized to oral esomeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., moxifloxacin 400 mg o.d., and amoxicillin 1000 mg b.i.d. for either 7 (EMA-7) or 14 days (EMA-14). Eradication was confirmed by 13C urea breath test. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed in all patients at baseline and in patients who failed treatment. RESULTS: Eighty patients were randomized, and 60% had ≥ 2 previous treatment failures. Pretreatment resistance against clarithromycin and metronidazole was found in 70.5 and 61.5% of cases, respectively. The intention-to-treat eradication rate was significantly higher after EMA-14 compared with EMA-7 (95.0 vs 78.9%, p = .036). No independent risk factor for treatment failure could be identified. There were no serious adverse events. Five of the EMA-14 patients (12.5%) compared with none of the EMA-7 patients discontinued prematurely because of adverse events (p = .031). Post-treatment resistance against moxifloxacin was found in one of seven patients with isolated organisms (14.3%). CONCLUSION: Second-line/rescue H. pylori eradication therapy with esomeprazole, moxifloxacin, and amoxicillin is very effective and well tolerated. Fourteen days of treatment significantly increase the eradication rate but also the rate of adverse events.
Asunto(s)
Amoxicilina/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antiulcerosos/administración & dosificación , Compuestos Aza/administración & dosificación , Esomeprazol/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Terapia Recuperativa/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Amoxicilina/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antiulcerosos/efectos adversos , Compuestos Aza/efectos adversos , Pruebas Respiratorias , Quimioterapia Combinada/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Esomeprazol/efectos adversos , Femenino , Fluoroquinolonas , Infecciones por Helicobacter/microbiología , Helicobacter pylori/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Moxifloxacino , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Terapia Recuperativa/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Urea/análisis , Población BlancaRESUMEN
New generations of fluoroquinolones, like levofloxacin and moxifloxacin, exhibit a broad-spectrum activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, and have been successfully introduced into the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. Based on a large body of evidence, current guidelines recommend the use of levofloxacin- or moxifloxacin-containing proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) triple therapies in second-line or rescue treatment of H. pylori infection. The efficacy of standard PPI triple therapies has substantially declined during the last decade, mainly due to increasing resistance against the key antibiotics clarithromycin and metronidazole. Therefore, alternative strategies for first-line therapy of H. pylori infection have been evaluated in a considerable number of clinical trials including sequential regimens, nonbismuth quadruple regimens, and quinolone-containing PPI triple therapy regimens. The aim of this paper is to summarize the current body of evidence of levofloxacin- and moxifloxacin-containing regimens in first-line treatment of H. pylori infection, and to discuss the risks and benefits of these strategies in the light of increasing resistance of H. pylori to quinolones.
RESUMEN
Recommendation for the diagnosis and treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection are defined in recent national and international guidelines. In Germany, proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy with clarithromycin and metronidazole or amoxicillin is still the standard in first line therapy. However, success rates have decreased substantially during the last years due to increasing antibiotic resistance, particularly in patients from Southern Europe. In addition, antimicrobial resistance rates against the standard antibiotics further increases dramatically after failure of first line therapy deeming the repeated use of these antibiotics basically impossible. Against this background, a critical appraisal and eventually adaption of therapeutic options both in first line and rescue treatment appears necessary. This paper gives an overview on the current status of therapeutic options and developments in the treatment of H. pylori infection in the light of increasing antibiotic resistance.
Asunto(s)
Amoxicilina/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antiulcerosos/uso terapéutico , Claritromicina/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Helicobacter pylori/efectos de los fármacos , Metronidazol/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Esquema de Medicación , Gastroscopía , Alemania , Infecciones por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/microbiología , Humanos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Insuficiencia del TratamientoRESUMEN
The effectiveness of recommended first-line therapies for Helicobacter pylori infections is decreasing due to the occurrence of resistance to metronidazole and/or clarithromycin. Quadruple therapies, which include tetracycline and a bismuth salt, are useful alternative regimens. However, resistance to tetracycline, mainly caused by mutations in the 16S rRNA genes (rrnA and rrnB) affecting nucleotides 926 to 928, are already emerging and can impair the efficacies of such second-line regimens. Here, we describe a novel real-time PCR for the detection of 16S rRNA gene mutations associated with tetracycline resistance. Our PCR method was able to distinguish between wild-type strains and resistant strains exhibiting single-, double, or triple-base-pair mutations. The method was applicable both to DNA extracted from pure cultures and to DNA extracted from fresh or frozen H. pylori-infected gastric biopsy samples. We therefore conclude that this real-time PCR is an excellent method for determination of H. pylori tetracycline resistance even when live bacteria are no longer available.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Helicobacter/microbiología , Helicobacter pylori/efectos de los fármacos , Mutación , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Resistencia a la Tetraciclina/genética , ADN Bacteriano/análisis , ADN Ribosómico/genética , Helicobacter pylori/genética , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Datos de Secuencia Molecular , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Tetraciclina/farmacologíaRESUMEN
Tetracycline is one of four antibiotics commonly used for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection, but its effectiveness is decreasing as the incidence of tetracycline resistance is increasing. In five Brazilian tetracycline-resistant (Tet(R)) H. pylori isolates, high-level tetracycline resistance is mediated by the triple-base-pair substitution AGA(926-928)-->TTC in both 16S rRNA genes, as was previously observed in two independent high-level Tet(R) H. pylori strains. A polymerase chain reaction-based restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) assay was developed for the detection of the AGA(926-928)-->TTC substitution, and confirmed the presence of the aforementioned triple-base-pair substitution in all five Brazilian Tet(R) isolates. This PCR-RFLP-based approach distinguishes the high-level Tet(R) isolates from low-level Tet(R) and Tet(S) H. pylori strains and thus allows the direct detection of Tet(R) H. pylori isolates.
Asunto(s)
Genes de ARNr , Helicobacter pylori/efectos de los fármacos , Helicobacter pylori/genética , Polimorfismo de Longitud del Fragmento de Restricción , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , Resistencia a la Tetraciclina/genética , Alelos , Sustitución de Aminoácidos/genética , Secuencia de Bases , Sitios de Unión , ADN Bacteriano/química , ADN Bacteriano/genética , ADN Ribosómico/química , ADN Ribosómico/genética , Infecciones por Helicobacter/microbiología , Humanos , Mutación , Proteínas Represoras , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa/métodos , Tetraciclina/metabolismo , Tetraciclina/farmacologíaRESUMEN
The triple-base-pair 16S rDNA mutation AGA(926-928)-->TTC mediates high-level tetracycline resistance in Helicobacter pylori. In contrast, single- and double-base-pair mutations mediated only low-level tetracycline resistance and decreased growth rates in the presence of tetracycline, explaining the preference for the TTC mutation in tetracycline-resistant H. pylori isolates.