Massage therapy for paediatric procedural pain: A rapid review.

BACKGROUND: Pain is a common paediatric problem, and procedural pain, in particular, can be difficult to manage. Complementary therapies are often sought for pain management, including massage therapy (MT). We assessed the evidence for use of MT for acute procedural pain management in children. METHODS: We searched five main databases for (i) primary studies in English, (ii) included children 0 to 18 years of age, (iii) compared MT for procedural pain management to standard care alone or placebo, and (iv) measured pain as the primary or secondary outcome. The data were extracted by one author and verified by a second author. Randomized controlled trials were evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. RESULTS: Eleven paediatric trials of procedural pain in neonatal, burn, and oncology populations, a total of 771 participants, were identified. Eight reported statistically significant reductions in pain after MT compared to standard care. Pain was measured using validated pain scales, or physiologic indicators. The studies were heterogeneous in population, techniques, and outcome measures used. No adverse events associated with MT were identified. CONCLUSION: MT may be an effective nonpharmacologic adjunct for management of procedural pain in children.

The Manitoba Inflammatory Bowel Disease Cohort Study: a prospective longitudinal evaluation of the use of complementary and alternative medicine services and products.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use over time in a population-based cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: The Manitoba IBD Cohort Study is a longitudinal, population-based study of multiple determinants of health outcomes in an IBD cohort. Participants completed semi-annual surveys, and annual in-person interviews. Enquiries about the use of 12 types of CAM service providers and 13 CAM products, based on items from a national survey, were included at months 0, 12, 30 and 54. RESULTS: Overall, 74% of respondents used a CAM service or product in the 4.5-year period, with approximately 40% using some type of CAM at each time point, and 14% using CAM consistently at every time point. There was a trend for women to use CAM more than men; there was no difference in CAM use between patients with Crohn's disease and those with ulcerative colitis. The most often used CAM services (on average) were massage therapy (30%) and chiropractic (14%), physiotherapy (4%), acupuncture (3.5%) and naturopathy/homeopathy (3.5%). A wide range of CAM products were used, with Lactobacillus acidophilus (8%), fish and other oils (5.5%), glucosamine (4%) and chamomile (3.5%) as the most common. On average, only 18% of consumers used CAM for their IBD, so the majority chose it for other problems. There were no differences in psychological variables between CAM users and non-users. CONCLUSIONS: Those with IBD commonly try CAM, although very few use these approaches regularly over the years. CAM is not usually used by patients with IBD for disease management, but clinicians should be aware that many will test the services and products.

Information needs and preferences of recently diagnosed patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the information needs and experiences of patients who were recently diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: Seventy-four patients, diagnosed with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis, 3-24 months previously were recruited from gastroenterology practices and completed the information needs survey. RESULTS: The most frequent sources of information in the first 2 months after diagnosis were the gastroenterologist and the Internet. In all, 24% of patients reported feeling dissatisfied with the information they were given at the time of their diagnosis, 31% were moderately satisfied, and 45% were very satisfied. There were many areas of information about the disease, its treatment, and self management that patients considered to be important and received little or no information about. When patients described how they would prefer to receive information if they were considering a new treatment in the future, 68% indicated that they preferred information from a medical specialist. CONCLUSIONS: Given the large number of topics judged by patients to be important and the complexity of the information required, it would be very difficult to communicate this information in oral discussion during typical consultation visits. Supplementing physician-patient consultations with well-designed written information or a Website recommendation may produce more effective communication and education. Patients rated these sources of information as having a high level of acceptability.