Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 17 de 17
Filtrar
3.
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med ; 50(4): 419-26, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24691247

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) causes an impairment of respiratory function, well reflected by the progressive decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). The only interventions able to slow down the FEV1 decline are smoking cessation and drug treatment. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), is claimed to improve exercise tolerance, symptoms and quality of life, but its effects on lung function have been scantly investigated. AIM: The aim of this paper was to evaluate, by the study named "FEV1 as an Index of Rehabilitation Success over Time" (FIRST), the effects of PR on lung function in patients with COPD, under drug treatment with inhaled corticosteroids or long-acting ß2-agonists and/or tiotropium in various combinations, according to guidelines, during a 3-year period. DESIGN: Observational, prospective, with two parallel groups study. SETTING: PR setting in an urban hospital. POPULATION: Two hundred fifty-seven COPD patients, 190 (103 males, mean age 71.1 ± 7.1 years range 57-86 years) underwent PR and 67 (49 males, mean age 67.9 ± 7.9 years, range 58-79 years) were treated only with drugs. METHODS: Lung function was measured at baseline and at one-year intervals up to 3 years. The postbronchodilator FEV1 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: In the PR group, FEV1 increased from 1240 mL (57.3% of predicted value) to 1252.4 mL (60.8%) after 3 years, whereas in the controls the values were 1367 mL (55% of predicted) at baseline and 1150 mL (51%) after 3 years. This difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with COPD on standard pharmacotherapy, PR significantly affected the decline of FEV1 over time. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The ability to substantially stop the FEV1 decline seems exclusive of PR when added to drug treatment. This finding warrants confirmation from randomized trials.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Tolerancia al Ejercicio , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado/fisiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/rehabilitación , Calidad de Vida , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 20(2): 146-52, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20461969

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: No studies have directly compared the effects of immunotherapy and antileukotrienes due to the long time required to appreciate the clinical effects of immunotherapy. We compared the effect of montelukast (MK) and SLIT added to standard therapy in moderate asthma over 5 years. METHODS: Open randomized controlled trial. Patients with moderate asthma (and rhinitis) solely due to birch pollen were randomized to receive either MK (10 mg/d) or birch sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in the pollen seasons, in addition to formoterol/fluticasone. All the patients also received salbutamol and cetirizine as rescue medications. Asthma and rhinitis symptoms were recorded on diary cards from February to May at baseline and after 3 and 5 years of study. In-season nasal eosinophils and bronchial hyperresponsiveness were also evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-three adult patients were enrolled and 29 completed the study. The groups were homogeneous at baseline. Bronchial and nasal symptom scores were lower at 3 and 5 years compared to baseline in the SLIT group. Bronchial hyperresponsiveness and bronchodilator use decreased significantly in both groups at 5 years, but only in the SLIT group at 3 years. In the SLIT group there was a significant decrease in nasal eosinophils compared to baseline and to the MK group. CONCLUSION: In patients with birch pollen-induced moderate asthma and rhinitis, the addition of SLIT provides a greater clinical benefit than that of MK.


Asunto(s)
Acetatos/administración & dosificación , Asma/terapia , Desensibilización Inmunológica , Antagonistas de Leucotrieno/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/terapia , Acetatos/efectos adversos , Administración Sublingual , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Antígenos de Plantas/administración & dosificación , Antígenos de Plantas/efectos adversos , Antígenos de Plantas/inmunología , Asma/etiología , Asma/inmunología , Asma/fisiopatología , Betula/inmunología , Recuento de Células , Ciclopropanos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Eosinofilia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Antagonistas de Leucotrieno/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obstrucción Nasal , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/complicaciones , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/inmunología , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/fisiopatología , Sulfuros
5.
Allergy ; 61(10): 1209-15, 2006 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16942571

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Numerous factors affect the evolution of respiratory allergy, in children, but little is known in adults. We assessed in a prospective study the influence of the type of allergen on the progression of disease. METHODS: Outpatients, with respiratory allergy underwent skin tests and pulmonary function/methacholine challenge at baseline and after 3 years. Patients were subdivided in pure rhinitis or rhinitis + bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR). In polysensitized subjects a single relevant allergen (mites, grasses, birch, Parietaria) was identified based on symptom distribution and when needed on nasal challenge. RESULTS: 6750 patients (age range 12-46) were studied. Of them, 17.8% were monosensitized but this percentage decreased to 10.4% after 3 years (P < 0.05). Subjects with pure rhinitis were 81% at the beginning and 48% at the end. After 3 years, the patients with bronchial responsiveness increased from 18% to 58% for mites, 22% to 49% for birch, 18% to 44% for grasses, 17% to 32% for Parietaria, with a significant difference among allergens (P < 0.05). Almost the same was seen in monosensitized subjects, being mites most likely to cause a worsening. All patients with BHR at baseline received immunotherapy. In these patients the onset of new sensitizations was significantly lower than in the group (pure rhinitis) receiving drugs only and lower airways symptoms disappeared more frequently. CONCLUSION: The different type of allergen influences the course of the disease, as well as the use of immunotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Inmunoterapia/métodos , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Alérgenos/inmunología , Alérgenos/uso terapéutico , Animales , Betula/inmunología , Hiperreactividad Bronquial/patología , Hiperreactividad Bronquial/fisiopatología , Hiperreactividad Bronquial/terapia , Pruebas de Provocación Bronquial , Niño , Desensibilización Inmunológica/métodos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Cloruro de Metacolina , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácaros/inmunología , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Parietaria/inmunología , Poaceae/inmunología , Polen/inmunología , Estudios Prospectivos , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/inmunología , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/fisiopatología , Pruebas Cutáneas/métodos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Infez Med ; 14(2): 85-91, 2006 Jun.
Artículo en Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16891853

RESUMEN

For the period 2002-2005 we verified and compared the data of the prevalence and resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) isolated in Mantova Hospital (Italy) with the data from the international database. From the first six-month period of 2004 a significant increase was found (9% vs 28.8%) in the prevalence of multi-drug resistant PA (MDR-PA). The principal wards involved were the Intensive Care Unit and the Department of Respiratory Diseases. A significant increase in resistance rates was observed for all antimicrobials tested, in particular for aztreonam, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, gentamycin and imipenem. The lowest dual resistance rates were observed between amikacina with piperacillin/tazobactam, while the highest were for those that included ciprofloxacin and beta-lactams (aztreonam, cefepime). In this study we confirm the importance of continuous surveillance of laboratory data and tightening local control measures for nosocomial infections in order to prevent the spread and selection of MDR-PA.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Vigilancia de la Población , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Líquidos Corporales/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Departamentos de Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Urbanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/prevención & control , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación
8.
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis ; 57(2): 144-6, 2002 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12357847

RESUMEN

Ragweed is spreading in Europe and in northern Italy, particularly in the Lombardia and Friuli areas. It constitutes a cause of significant morbidity for asthma and rhinoconjuntivitis involving as much as 12% of the general population in those countries most at risk. The public campaign to fight ragweed promoted in 1999 by the Lombardia Region failed to achieve significant results since the count of ragweed pollen in the subsequent years is similar to the previous and reached peaks of 700 pollens per m3.


Asunto(s)
Ambrosia/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad/etiología , Hipersensibilidad/prevención & control , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/epidemiología , Italia/epidemiología
9.
Allergol. immunopatol ; 28(6): 311-317, oct. 2000.
Artículo en En | IBECS | ID: ibc-8587

RESUMEN

Background: allergy to Ambrosia is a disease of growing importance in Europe. Injective and non injective immunotherapy have been recognised as safe and effective but no evidence is currently available for sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in patients sensitised to Ambrosia. This study was planned to assess the effects and the safety of SLIT in patients clinically sensitised to Ambrosia. Methods: 19 patients clinically sensitised to Ambrosia and treated with SLIT were compared to 14 patients treated only with drugs. Diary cards with symptoms and drug consumption were filled-in by patients during the pollen season whereas specific nasal challenge and skin prick test were run two months before and after the pollen season. Patients and doctors were also asked to express their subjective assessment about symptoms and drug consumption during the season. Results: SLIT-treated patients had less symptoms and a significantly minor drug intake (p = 0.04) as compared to untreated patients. Nasal challenge test improved significantly in the SLIT group (p = 0.0001) but not in the control group (p = 0.6875) with a significant difference between groups at the end (p = 0.0413) but not at the beginning of the trial (p = 0.213). The decrease in skin reactivity was significant in the control group (p = 0.0186) and highly significant in the SLIT group (p < 0.0001), with no difference between groups (p = 0.2987). Subjective assessment from both patients and doctors was favorable to SLIT (p = 0.0005 for symptoms; p = 0.0019 for drug consumption). Only one minor local side effect was registered during SLIT. Conclusions: according to our data, SLIT in patients allergic to Ambrosia is safe and able to improve both subjective and objective parameters (AU)


Antecedentes: la alergia a Ambrosia, es una enfermedad de importancia creciente en Europa. Tanto la inmunoterapia subcutánea como la no inyectada, han demostrado ser seguras y eficaces, pero actualmente no se dispone de evidencia sobre la inmunoterapia sublingual (ITSL) en pacientes sensibles a Ambrosia. Este estudio se desarrolló para valorar los efectos y la seguridad del ITSL en pacientes clínicamente sensibles a Ambrosia.Métodos: 19 pacientes sensibles a Ambrosia y tratados con ITSL, se compararon con 14 pacientes tratados solamente con medicación antialérgica. Durante la época de polinización los pacientes rellenaron diariamente cartillas indicando los síntomas y la medicación consumida. Se realizaron pruebas del pinchazo cutáneo y pruebas de provocación nasal específica dos meses antes y después de la polinización. Tanto los pacientes como los médicos evaluaron subjetivamente los síntomas y medicación durante este período.Resultados: los pacientes tratados con ITSL mostraron menor sintomatología y una reducción significativa del consumo de medicamentos (p = 0,04) comparado con los pacientes no tratados. La provocación nasal mejoró significativamente en el grupo tratado con ITSL (p = 0,0001) pero no en el grupo control (p = 0,6875) con una diferencia significativa al final (p = 0,0413) pero no al principio del ensayo (p = 0,213). La disminución de la reactividad de la piel fue significativa en el grupo control (p = 0,0186) y altamente significativa para el grupo ITSL (p < 0,0001), con poca diferencia entre ambos grupos (p = 0,2987). La valoración subjetiva tanto de médicos como de pacientes fue favorable para la ITSL (p = 0,0005 en los síntomas, y p = 0,0019 en el consumo de medicamentos). Solo se registró un caso de reacción local leve con la ITSL.Conclusiones: según nuestros datos, la ITSL en pacientes alérgicos a Ambrosia es seguro, y capaz de mejorar tanto los parámetros subjetivos como los objetivos. (AU)


Asunto(s)
Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Adolescente , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Alérgenos , Proteínas de Plantas , Polen , Desensibilización Inmunológica , Administración Sublingual , Hipersensibilidad , Pruebas Cutáneas , Pruebas de Provocación Nasal
10.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 10(3): 155-61, 2000.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10923590

RESUMEN

Epidemiological studies on the pollens responsible for allergic diseases throughout Italy are lacking. Routine diagnostic panels consist prevalently of grass, Parietaria, weeds, birch, olive and mugwort. Considering the great variety of Italian geographical areas and the observation of the growing allergological importance of new botanical species (e.g., ambrosia), a survey on pollen species considered "minor" was necessary. A panel of "emerging" pollens (birch, hazelnut, alder, hornbeam, cypress, ragweed) and a routine panel were used to skin prick test 2,934 consecutive outpatients with respiratory pathology of suspected allergic origin, in 21 centers across Italy. A specific questionnaire was compiled. It was found that 20.1% of patients did not react to allergens tested, 28.2% were positive for at least one emerging pollen and 51.7% did not react to emerging pollens but tested positive for at least one allergen from the routine panel. The prevalence of single pollen species was related to geographical areas. Ragweed pollen was shown to provoke asthma much more frequently than other pollens. Hitherto scarcely considered pollens play a considerable role in causing allergic diseases in Italy. In the great majority of patients, positivity for these pollens was associated with positivity to the better recognized group of pollen allergens, although in some cases they were the primary pathogenic agent. We suggest that these more recently considered allergens be included in routine diagnostic panels.


Asunto(s)
Polen/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad Respiratoria/epidemiología , Adulto , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Hipersensibilidad Respiratoria/clasificación , Pruebas Cutáneas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
11.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 28(2): 71-3, 2000.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10804097

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: sensitization to fungi spores is often associated with sensitization to other allergens and so it is difficult to estabilish the exact cause of illness. OBJECTIVE: the aim of the study was to evaluate a group of patients monosensitized to Alternaria and to establish the prevalence, periodicity and clinical profile of this kind of sensitization. METHODS: 37 subjects who were monosensitized to Alternaria (prick-test positive), according to a previous epidemiological study were evaluated. Clinical symptoms and the period of their occurrence were taken into consideration as well as immunological parameters (RAST). RESULTS: 20 patients (over 50%) included in the study proved to be affected by asthma associated with other allergic symptoms and 22 patients (60%) presented perennial symptoms. The RAST carried out on 34 monosensitized subjects proved positive in 11 and negative in 23. CONCLUSIONS: Alternaria sensitization is characterized by a perennial periodicity with severe respiratory symptoms (asthma) which occur primarily in children. Prick test is preferable to and more reliable than RAST as a diagnostic test.


Asunto(s)
Alternaria/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Asma/epidemiología , Asma/inmunología , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/epidemiología , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prueba de Radioalergoadsorción , Estaciones del Año , Pruebas Cutáneas , Esporas Fúngicas/inmunología
12.
Allergol. immunopatol ; 28(2): 71-73, mar. 2000.
Artículo en En | IBECS | ID: ibc-8565

RESUMEN

Background: sensitization to fungi spores is often associated with sensitization to other allergens and so it is difficult to estabilish the exact cause of illness. Objective: the aim of the study was to evaluate a group of patients monosensitized to Alternaria and to establish the prevalence, periodicity and clinical profile of this kind of sensitization. Methods: 37 subjects who were monosensitized to Alternaria (prick-test positive), according to a previous epidemiological study were evaluated. Clinical symptoms and the period of their occurrence were taken into consideration as well as immunological parameters (RAST). Results: 20 patients (over 50%) included in the study proved to be affected by asthma associated with other allergic symptoms and 22 patients (60%) presented perennial symptoms. The RAST carried out on 34 monosensitized subjects proved positive in 11 and negative in 23. Conclusions: Alternaria sensitization is characterized by a perennial periodicity with severe respiratory symptoms (asthma) which occur primarily in children. Prick test is preferable to and more reliable than RAST as a diagnostic test (AU)


Introducción: la sensibilización a esporas de hongos se asocia frecuentemente con la sensibilización a otros alergenos, con lo que es difícil establecer la causa exacta de la enfermedad. Objetivo: la finalidad del estudio fue evaluar a grupos de pacientes monosensibilizados a Alternaria y establecer la prevalencia, periodicidad y perfil clínico de esta clase de sensibilización. Métodos: se estudiaron 37 pacientes monosensibilizados a Alternaria (prick test positivo) seleccionados en un estudio epidemiológico previo. También se consideraron los síntomas clínicos y su frecuencia, así como algunos parámetros inmunológicos (RAST). Resultado: 20 pacientes (por encima del 50 por ciento) padecían asma asociada con otros síntomas alérgicos y 22 pacientes (60 por ciento) presentaban síntomas perennes. El RAST llevado a cabo en 34 pacientes monosensibilizados, fue positivo en 11 y negativo en 23. Conclusiones: la sensibilización a Alternaria se caracterizó por ser perenne, cursar con síntomas respiratorios graves (asma) y tener lugar principalmente en niños. Es preferible y más fiable como test diagnóstico el test cutáneo que el RAST. (AU)


Asunto(s)
Persona de Mediana Edad , Preescolar , Niño , Adolescente , Adulto , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Esporas Fúngicas , Estaciones del Año , Asma , Alternaria , Hipersensibilidad , Italia , Pruebas Cutáneas , Prueba de Radioalergoadsorción
13.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 28(6): 311-7, 2000.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11269898

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Allergy to Ambrosia is a disease of growing importance in Europe. Injective and non-injective immunotherapy have been recognised as safe and effective but no evidence is currently available for sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in patients sensitised to Ambrosia. This study was planned to assess the effects and the safety of SLIT in patients clinically sensitised to Ambrosia. METHODS: 19 patients clinically sensitised to Ambrosia and treated with SLIT were compared to 14 patients treated only with drugs. Diary cards with symptoms and drug consumption were filled-in by patients during the pollen season whereas specific nasal challenge and skin prick test were run two months before and after the pollen season. Patients and doctors were also asked to express their subjective assessment about symptoms and drug consumption during the season. RESULTS: SLIT-treated patients had less symptoms and a significantly minor drug intake (p = 0.04) as compared to untreated patients. Nasal challenge test improved significantly in the SLIT group (p = 0.0001) but not in the control group (p = 0.6875) with a significant difference between groups at the end (p = 0.0413) but not at the beginning of the trial (p = 0.213). The decrease in skin reactivity was significant in the control group (p = 0.0186) and highly significant in the SLIT group (p < 0.0001), with no difference between groups (p = 0.2987). Subjective assessment from both patients and doctors was favorable to SLIT (p = 0.0005 for symptoms; p = 0.0019 for drug consumption). Only one minor local side effect was registered during SLIT. CONCLUSIONS: According to our data, SLIT in patients allergic to Ambrosia is safe and able to improve both subjective and objective parameters.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos , Desensibilización Inmunológica/métodos , Hipersensibilidad/terapia , Proteínas de Plantas/administración & dosificación , Administración Sublingual , Adolescente , Adulto , Antígenos de Plantas , Femenino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/inmunología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas de Provocación Nasal , Proteínas de Plantas/uso terapéutico , Polen/inmunología , Pruebas Cutáneas
14.
Allergy ; 51(5): 313-9, 1996 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8836335

RESUMEN

The aims of the present study were as follows: 1) to evaluate the medical outcomes of two treatment and educational asthma programs 2) to determine by cost-analysis both cost and economic outcome of the programs 3) to perform a cost-benefit analysis (determining the net cost-benefit) and a cost-effectiveness analysis (determining the cost per unit of effect and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio) from the perspective of health program policy makers (HPP; indirect costs, i.e., loss of productivity, excluded) and of society as a whole (SaW, all costs included). Patients were randomly assigned to a complete (CP; n = 32) or reduced (RP; n = 33) program: the RP group received a reduced education (self-reading of an educational booklet on asthma), while the CP group attended an "asthma school", consisting of six lessons based on the same booklet and including educational videotapes. Both programs included peak-flow monitoring and treatment according to international guidelines, and follow-up. The outcome variables (asthma attacks, urgent medical examinations, admission days, working days lost) did not differ significantly between CP and RP. Morbidity savings were $1894.70 (CP) and $1697.80 (RP) according to SaW, and $1349.50 and $1301.80, respectively, according to HPP. The net cost-benefit was $1181.50 for CP and $1028.00 for RP, and the cost-benefit ratio per dollar spent was 1:2.6 for CP and 1:2.5 for RP, according to SaW. One day of admission prevented had a cost of $110.20 (CP) and $94.10 (RP). CP gave slightly better results and was slightly more cost-effective than RP in improving patients' welfare. It cannot be excluded that the retrospective analysis used to determine baseline costs might have inflated differences for both groups. Sensitivity analysis was slightly in favor of RP when the outcome variables were tested at their upper and lower 95% CI.


Asunto(s)
Asma/economía , Asma/terapia , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Adulto , Asma/prevención & control , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Recolección de Datos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
15.
Minerva Med ; 80(2): 169-71, 1989 Feb.
Artículo en Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2927708

RESUMEN

The results achieved in the treatment of 160 cases of spontaneous pneumothorax in 1976-1986 are examined. Pleural aspiration drainage was practised in 141 cases and produced a permanent cure. 5 cases were surgically treated. Hospitalisation time was less than 16 days in 110 cases.


Asunto(s)
Neumotórax/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Succión , Factores de Tiempo , Cicatrización de Heridas
16.
Minerva Med ; 79(12): 1053-6, 1988 Dec.
Artículo en Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2850513

RESUMEN

Four-hundred and thirty-six patients recognized affected by primitive lung neoplasia have been examined to prove possible correlation between the endoscopic aspects, histologic type and central or peripheral localization of the neoplasia. The diagnostic sensibility of the different cytohistological techniques used in fiberoptic bronchoscopy have been valued too. For the peripheral localizations the diagnosis has been obtained in most cases by using fine needle percutaneous aspiration.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Pequeñas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma Bronquioloalveolar/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma Bronquioloalveolar/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Biopsia con Aguja , Broncoscopía , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Pequeñas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Citodiagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Pulmón/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
17.
Minerva Med ; 79(7): 563-8, 1988 Jul.
Artículo en Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3043259

RESUMEN

After considering the bacterial flora which is most common in relapses in patients with bronchitis, 40 patients with chronic bronchitis have been treated with tetroxoprim a recently synthetized benzyl pyrimidine associated with sulfadiazine. One 350 mg tablet was administered every 12 hours for different periods, from 7 to 14 days. This study has shown how tetroxoprim has a wide antibacterial range, how it is well tolerated and extremely powerful in treating relapses of chronic infections in bronchi.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Bronquitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Sulfadiazina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Bronquitis/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Crónica , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Sulfadiazina/administración & dosificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...