Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
J Acad Nutr Diet ; 2024 Feb 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38331189

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Global trends toward childhood obesity have been associated with several factors, including suboptimal infant feeding practices, the increasing availability of ultraprocessed foods in the world's food supply, and the corresponding changes in children's dietary patterns. OBJECTIVE: To describe infants' dietary patterns and assess their associations with weight status outcomes in a nationally representative sample of US infants. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analyses were performed on data collected from infants participating in the 2009-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: Participants included 744 infants aged 6 to 12 months who had data from at least 1 day of valid 24-hour dietary recall data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rapid weight gain and overweight/obesity risk. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Principal component analysis was used to identify dietary patterns considering the energy intake of 39 Nova food subgroups (expressed in calories per day), including breast milk. Associations were evaluated using logistic regression adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 42% infants experienced rapid weight gain, and 33% were at risk of overweight/obesity. Most infants (65.5%) were started on solid foods early. Three main dietary patterns were derived. The first pattern, labeled Natural or Minimally Processed Foods, had positive loadings for a variety of natural or minimally processed foods, some processed culinary ingredients, and a few processed and ultraprocessed foods. The second pattern, labeled Infant Formula, had high negative loading for breast milk, and high positive loading for infant formula and breakfast cereal. The third pattern, labeled Ultraprocessed Foods, had negative loadings for natural or minimally processed foods and processed culinary ingredients, positive loadings for other processed foods and for a variety of ultraprocessed foods, and negative loading for infant formula. Infants who adhere to the Ultraprocessed Foods dietary pattern were more likely to present rapid weight gain (adjusted odds ratio 1.3, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.5) and overweight/obesity risk (adjusted odds ratio 1.2, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.4). CONCLUSIONS: Higher adherence to a dietary pattern characterized by ultraprocessed foods was associated with a greater likelihood of both rapid weight gain and overweight/obesity risk early in life. Promoting breastfeeding and increasing consumption of unprocessed/minimally processed foods during early infancy while restricting ultraprocessed foods are key components to reducing the growing burden of childhood obesity.

2.
Eur J Nutr ; 63(2): 377-396, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37989797

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate the role of adiposity in the associations between ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption and head and neck cancer (HNC) and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort. METHODS: Our study included 450,111 EPIC participants. We used Cox regressions to investigate the associations between the consumption of UPFs and HNC and OAC risk. A mediation analysis was performed to assess the role of body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) in these associations. In sensitivity analyses, we investigated accidental death as a negative control outcome. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 14.13 ± 3.98 years, 910 and 215 participants developed HNC and OAC, respectively. A 10% g/d higher consumption of UPFs was associated with an increased risk of HNC (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-1.34) and OAC (HR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.05-1.47). WHR mediated 5% (95% CI 3-10%) of the association between the consumption of UPFs and HNC risk, while BMI and WHR, respectively, mediated 13% (95% CI 6-53%) and 15% (95% CI 8-72%) of the association between the consumption of UPFs and OAC risk. UPF consumption was positively associated with accidental death in the negative control analysis. CONCLUSIONS: We reaffirmed that higher UPF consumption is associated with greater risk of HNC and OAC in EPIC. The proportion mediated via adiposity was small. Further research is required to investigate other mechanisms that may be at play (if there is indeed any causal effect of UPF consumption on these cancers).


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Humanos , Adiposidad , Estudios Prospectivos , Alimentos Procesados , Análisis de Mediación , Obesidad , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiología , Adenocarcinoma/etiología , Comida Rápida/efectos adversos , Dieta , Manipulación de Alimentos
3.
Lancet Planet Health ; 7(3): e219-e232, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36889863

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Food processing has been hypothesised to play a role in cancer development; however, data from large-scale epidemiological studies are scarce. This study investigated the association between dietary intake according to amount of food processing and risk of cancer at 25 anatomical sites using data from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. METHODS: This study used data from the prospective EPIC cohort study, which recruited participants between March 18, 1991, and July 2, 2001, from 23 centres in ten European countries. Participant eligibility within each cohort was based on geographical or administrative boundaries. Participants were excluded if they had a cancer diagnosis before recruitment, had missing information for the NOVA food processing classification, or were within the top and bottom 1% for ratio of energy intake to energy requirement. Validated dietary questionnaires were used to obtain information on food and drink consumption. Participants with cancer were identified using cancer registries or during follow-up from a combination of sources, including cancer and pathology centres, health insurance records, and active follow-up of participants. We performed a substitution analysis to assess the effect of replacing 10% of processed foods and ultra-processed foods with 10% of minimally processed foods on cancer risk at 25 anatomical sites using Cox proportional hazard models. FINDINGS: 521 324 participants were recruited into EPIC, and 450 111 were included in this analysis (318 686 [70·8%] participants were female individuals and 131 425 [29·2%] were male individuals). In a multivariate model adjusted for sex, smoking, education, physical activity, height, and diabetes, a substitution of 10% of processed foods with an equal amount of minimally processed foods was associated with reduced risk of overall cancer (hazard ratio 0·96, 95% CI 0·95-0·97), head and neck cancers (0·80, 0·75-0·85), oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (0·57, 0·51-0·64), colon cancer (0·88, 0·85-0·92), rectal cancer (0·90, 0·85-0·94), hepatocellular carcinoma (0·77, 0·68-0·87), and postmenopausal breast cancer (0·93, 0·90-0·97). The substitution of 10% of ultra-processed foods with 10% of minimally processed foods was associated with a reduced risk of head and neck cancers (0·80, 0·74-0·88), colon cancer (0·93, 0·89-0·97), and hepatocellular carcinoma (0·73, 0·62-0·86). Most of these associations remained significant when models were additionally adjusted for BMI, alcohol and dietary intake, and quality. INTERPRETATION: This study suggests that the replacement of processed and ultra-processed foods and drinks with an equal amount of minimally processed foods might reduce the risk of various cancer types. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK, l'Institut National du Cancer, and World Cancer Research Fund International.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias del Colon , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Factores de Riesgo , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Manipulación de Alimentos
4.
JAMA Neurol ; 80(2): 142-150, 2023 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36469335

RESUMEN

Importance: Although consumption of ultraprocessed food has been linked to higher risk of cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, and obesity, little is known about the association of consumption of ultraprocessed foods with cognitive decline. Objective: To investigate the association between ultraprocessed food consumption and cognitive decline in the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a multicenter, prospective cohort study with 3 waves, approximately 4 years apart, from 2008 to 2017. Data were analyzed from December 2021 to May 2022. Participants were public servants aged 35 to 74 years old recruited in 6 Brazilian cities. Participants who, at baseline, had incomplete food frequency questionnaire, cognitive, or covariate data were excluded. Participants who reported extreme calorie intake (<600 kcal/day or >6000 kcal/day) and those taking medication that could negatively interfere with cognitive performance were also excluded. Exposures: Daily ultraprocessed food consumption as a percentage of total energy divided into quartiles. Main Outcomes and Measures: Changes in cognitive performance over time evaluated by the immediate and delayed word recall, word recognition, phonemic and semantic verbal fluency tests, and Trail-Making Test B version. Results: A total of 15 105 individuals were recruited and 4330 were excluded, leaving 10 775 participants whose data were analyzed. The mean (SD) age at the baseline was 51.6 (8.9) years, 5880 participants (54.6%) were women, 5723 (53.1%) were White, and 6106 (56.6%) had at least a college degree. During a median (range) follow-up of 8 (6-10) years, individuals with ultraprocessed food consumption above the first quartile showed a 28% faster rate of global cognitive decline (ß = -0.004; 95% CI, -0.006 to -0.001; P = .003) and a 25% faster rate of executive function decline (ß = -0.003, 95% CI, -0.005 to 0.000; P = .01) compared with those in the first quartile. Conclusions and Relevance: A higher percentage of daily energy consumption of ultraprocessed foods was associated with cognitive decline among adults from an ethnically diverse sample. These findings support current public health recommendations on limiting ultraprocessed food consumption because of their potential harm to cognitive function.


Asunto(s)
Disfunción Cognitiva , Ingestión de Energía , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Masculino , Estudios Longitudinales , Estudios Prospectivos , Obesidad , Disfunción Cognitiva/epidemiología , Disfunción Cognitiva/etiología
5.
Nutrients ; 13(2)2021 Feb 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33672720

RESUMEN

The present study aims to describe ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption in a representative sample of French adults and to evaluate the association between UPF consumption and socioeconomic characteristics and nutritional profile of the diet. This is a cross-sectional study using food consumption data from the Étude Nationale Nutrition Santé (ENNS), conducted with 2642 participants (18-74 years old), between February 2006 and March 2007 in France. Dietary data were collected through three 24-h dietary recalls. All food and beverages were classified according to the NOVA classification. The energy contribution of NOVA food groups to total energy intake was presented by categories of sociodemographic characteristics. Linear and logistic regression models were used to estimate the association between the percentage of UPF in the diet with nutritional indicators. The mean daily energy consumption of the adult French population was 2111 kcal, of which 31.1% came from UPF. This percentage was higher among younger individuals, and in the urban area, and lower among individuals with incomplete high school and individuals who were retired. The consumption of UPF was positively associated with the dietary energy density and the dietary contents of total carbohydrates, free sugar, and total and saturated fat, as well as with inadequate dietary energy density, saturated fat, free sugar, and fiber intakes.


Asunto(s)
Dieta/estadística & datos numéricos , Comida Rápida/estadística & datos numéricos , Manipulación de Alimentos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Encuestas sobre Dietas , Escolaridad , Empleo , Ingestión de Energía , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Nutritivo , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
6.
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol ; 41(3): 224-230, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31438746

RESUMEN

Background: We evaluated the association between mother-child bonding and maternal depression at 6-8 months after birth with bonding impairment at 12-15 months in a sample of mothers at high risk of postnatal depression.Methods: A prospective cohort study with 346 low-income postpartum women with antenatal depression. The Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire (PBQ) and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) were used, at 6-8 and 12-15 months after delivery, to assess the mother-infant bonding and postnatal depression (PPD), respectively.Results: The percentage of the main outcome, bonding impairment (BI) at 12-15 months, was 9.9% (95% CI 6.6-13.7). Using logistic regression models, BI was associated with: having an occupation (OR = 2.82; 95% CI 1.00-7.94, p = .049), unplanned pregnancy (OR = 3.46; 95% CI 1.01-11.8, p = .047), and presence of BI at 6-8 months (OR= 13.0; 95% CI 3.76-45.4, p ≤ .001). Maternal depression was marginally associated with BI at 12-15 months.Conclusions: BI affects 1 in 10 mothers, and although BI and PPD are strongly associated at 6-8 and 12-15 months after delivery, BI at 6-8 months is the main predictor of later BI. Based on the study findings, PPD screening in combination with BI assessment is highly recommended during the first year of child's life.


Asunto(s)
Depresión Posparto/psicología , Relaciones Madre-Hijo/psicología , Apego a Objetos , Adolescente , Adulto , Brasil/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Cuestionario de Salud del Paciente , Pobreza , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto Joven
7.
Salud Publica Mex ; 61(2): 147-154, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30958957

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the consumption of ultra-processed food and drink products and its association with the nutrient profile of the Colombian diet in 2005. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Food consumption based on 24-hour dietary records from 38 643 men and women was classified into four NOVA groups according to the extent and purpose of food processing. RESULTS: Ultra-processed food and drink products represented 15.9% of the total energy daily intake, compared to 63.3% from minimally processed food, 15.8% from processed culinary ingredients, and 4.9% from processed food. Non-ultra-processed food items had a healthier nutritional profile compared to ultra-processed items in terms of contribution to total calories from protein, carbohydrates, total fat, saturated fat, free sugar, fiber and energy density. CONCLUSIONS: Ultra-processed food products have a less healthy nutrient profile than non-ultra-processed ones. An increase in the consumption of these foods must be prevented within Colombia.


OBJETIVO: Evaluar el consumo de alimentos y bebidas ultraprocesadas y su asociación con el perfil nutricional dentro de la Encuesta Nacional de Nutrición de 2005 en Colombia. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: El consumo de alimentos basados en registros alimentarios de 24 horas de 38 643 individuos se clasificó en cuatro grupos de NOVA. RESULTADOS: Los productos de alimentos y bebidas ultraprocesados representaron 15.9% de la ingesta diaria total de energía, en comparación con 63.3% de los alimentos mínimamente procesados, 15.8% de los ingredientes culinarios procesados y 4.9% de los procesados. Los alimentos mínimamente procesados tenían un perfil nutricional más saludable en comparación con los artículos ultraprocesados en términos de contribución a las calorías totales, de proteínas, carbohidratos, grasa total, grasa saturada, azúcar libre, densidad de fibra y densidad de energía. CONCLUSIONES: Los alimentos ultraprocesados tienen un perfil nutricional menos saludable que los alimentos no procesados.


Asunto(s)
Bebidas , Dieta , Ingestión de Energía , Alimentos , Valor Nutritivo , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Colombia , Registros de Dieta , Carbohidratos de la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Grasas de la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Proteínas en la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Manipulación de Alimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nutrientes , Tamaño de la Porción , Edulcorantes/administración & dosificación , Adulto Joven
8.
Salud pública Méx ; 61(2): 147-154, Mar.-Apr. 2019. tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1058967

RESUMEN

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the consumption of ultra-processed food and drink products and its association with the nutrient profile of the Colombian diet in 2005. Materials and methods: Food consumption based on 24-hour dietary records from 38 643 men and women was classified into four NOVA groups according to the extent and purpose of food processing. Results: Ultra-processed food and drink products represented 15.9% of the total energy daily intake, compared to 63.3% from minimally processed food, 15.8% from processed culinary ingredients, and 4.9% from processed food. Non-ultra-processed food items had a healthier nutritional profile compared to ultra-processed items in terms of contribution to total calories from protein, carbohydrates, total fat, saturated fat, free sugar, fiber and energy density. Conclusions: Ultra-processed food products have a less healthy nutrient profile than non-ultra-processed ones. An increase in the consumption of these foods must be prevented within Colombia.


Resumen: Objetivo: Evaluar el consumo de alimentos y bebidas ultraprocesadas y su asociación con el perfil nutricional dentro de la Encuesta Nacional de Nutrición de 2005 en Colombia. Material y métodos: El consumo de alimentos basados en registros alimentarios de 24 horas de 38 643 individuos se clasificó en cuatro grupos de NOVA. Resultados: Los productos de alimentos y bebidas ultraprocesados representaron 15.9% de la ingesta diaria total de energía, en comparación con 63.3% de los alimentos mínimamente procesados, 15.8% de los ingredientes culinarios procesados y 4.9% de los procesados. Los alimentos mínimamente procesados tenían un perfil nutricional más saludable en comparación con los artículos ultraprocesados en términos de contribución a las calorías totales, de proteínas, carbohidratos, grasa total, grasa saturada, azúcar libre, densidad de fibra y densidad de energía. Conclusiones: Los alimentos ultraprocesados tienen un perfil nutricional menos saludable que los alimentos no procesados.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Preescolar , Niño , Adolescente , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Bebidas , Ingestión de Energía , Dieta , Alimentos , Valor Nutritivo , Edulcorantes/administración & dosificación , Carbohidratos de la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Grasas de la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Proteínas en la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Registros de Dieta , Nutrientes , Colombia , Tamaño de la Porción , Manipulación de Alimentos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...