Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Prev Vet Med ; 52(1): 63-73, 2001 Nov 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11566379

RESUMEN

A survey of bovine viral-diarrhoea virus (BVDV) infection was carried out in a non-vaccinated cattle population from the Asturias region of Spain in 1997 to assess seroprevalence and identify risk factors associated with infection. Twenty-eight herds were included; 529 cows were bled. Information regarding the herd and each animal sampled were recorded through a personal interview with the farmer. The true prevalence was estimated to be 21%. According to the antibody-age profiles and the herd-management characteristics, no persistently infected animals were suspected at that time within the herds sampled. Random-effects logistic regression found two major factors associated with seropositivity: age and cow origin. Results suggested that BVDV infection could be controlled in that area by livestock-trade control (without vaccines). In addition, an increasing risk of abortion was not observed when cows were seropositive to both BVDV and Neospora caninum infections.


Asunto(s)
Diarrea Mucosa Bovina Viral/epidemiología , Virus de la Diarrea Viral Bovina/patogenicidad , Aborto Veterinario/etiología , Factores de Edad , Crianza de Animales Domésticos , Animales , Diarrea Mucosa Bovina Viral/etiología , Bovinos , Coccidiosis/complicaciones , Recolección de Datos , Estudios Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Neospora , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Pruebas Serológicas
2.
Vet Rec ; 145(3): 72-5, 1999 Jul 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10460027

RESUMEN

The seroprevalence of Neospora caninum infection was estimated from a sample of 889 cattle from 43 dairy herds in three counties in the Asturias region of Spain. The true prevalence of infection was estimated to be 30.6 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval (CI) 27.6 to 33.6). Seropositivity was associated with abortion during the previous year (odds ratio (OR)=3.31, P<0.001) and was slightly higher among purchased cattle (37.6 per cent), than among cattle raised on the farm (29.1 per cent) (P=0.078). Seropositive cows were more likely than seronegative cows to have had a seropositive dam (OR=2.3, P=0.011), suggesting that congenital transmission contributed to about 56 per cent of the infections. Herds with a true seroprevalence above 10 per cent had more dogs on the farm, than herds with a lower prevalence (P=0.032). The ORS relating abortion to seropositivity in individual herds ranged from 0.7 to 19, indicating that some herds experienced few abortions caused by N. caninum, while others experienced more abortions due to the organism. Overall, 38.7 per cent of the abortions were estimated to have been attributable to N. caninum.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Veterinario/epidemiología , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/epidemiología , Coccidiosis/veterinaria , Neospora , Aborto Veterinario/parasitología , Animales , Anticuerpos Antiprotozoarios/sangre , Bovinos , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/parasitología , Coccidiosis/epidemiología , Coccidiosis/parasitología , Perros , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Femenino , Modelos Logísticos , Embarazo , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , España/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA