Effects of curcumin and ursolic acid in prostate cancer: A systematic review.

The major barriers to phytonutrients in prostate cancer therapy are non-specific mechanisms and bioavailability issues. Studies have pointed to a synergistic combination of curcumin (CURC) and ursolic acid (UA). We investigate this combination using a systematic review process to assess the most likely mechanistic pathway and human testing in prostate cancer. We used the PRISMA statement to screen titles, abstracts, and the full texts of relevant articles and performed a descriptive analysis of the literature reviewed for study inclusion and consensus of the manuscript. The most common molecular and cellular pathway from articles reporting on the pathways and effects of CURC (n = 173) in prostate cancer was NF-κB (n = 25, 14.5%). The most common molecular and cellular pathway from articles reporting on the pathways and effects of UA (n = 24) in prostate cancer was caspase 3/caspase 9 (n = 10, 41.6%). The three most common molecular and cellular pathway from articles reporting on the pathways and effects of both CURC and UA (n = 193) in prostate cancer was NF-κB (n = 28, 14.2%), Akt (n = 22, 11.2%), and androgen (n = 19, 9.6%). Therefore, we have identified the potential synergistic target pathways of curcumin and ursolic acid to involve NF-κB, Akt, androgen receptors, and apoptosis pathways. Our review highlights the limited human studies and specific effects in prostate cancer.

Restriction Spectrum Imaging-Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Improve Prostate Cancer Imaging in Men on Active Surveillance.

PURPOSE: Restriction spectrum imaging-magnetic resonance imaging is a short duration enhanced diffusion-weighted technique that seeks to standardize sequences and predict upgrading. We test this technology for active surveillance biopsies. Our objective is to investigate the utility of restriction spectrum imaging-magnetic resonance imaging to improve upgrading detection in a prostate cancer active surveillance cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively enrolled men on active surveillance undergoing repeat biopsy from January 2016 to June 2019. Subjects underwent prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and restriction spectrum imaging-magnetic resonance imaging reviewed by a urological radiologist for PI-RADS® scored lesions, followed by magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy by a urologist. Restriction spectrum imaging-magnetic resonance imaging analysis with proprietary research software (CorTechs Labs, San Diego, California) generated a restricted signal map. We compared the restricted signal map and apparent diffusion coefficient values using T-test, ANOVA, and logistic regression analyses for prediction of upgrading. RESULTS: Of 123 enrolled men we identified 74 restriction spectrum imaging-magnetic resonance imaging regions of interest (targeted lesions) in 110 subjects, with 105 subjects completing biopsy. The restricted signal map was significant per PI-RADS score for true-positive lesion detection (mean difference 28, SD 0.7, p=0.001), and better than apparent diffusion coefficient (mean difference -15, SD 55, p=0.6). Restriction spectrum imaging generated restricted signal map values >50 improved sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value (81.0%, 81.8%, 54.2% and 94.2%) over PI-RADS ≥3 (71.4%, 38.9%, 23.7% and 83.7%, respectively) for Gleason upgrading. Overall restriction spectrum imaging is able to improve the AUC of 0.70 (95% CI 0.49-0.92, p=0.03) to 0.90 (95% CI 0.82-0.98, p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Restriction spectrum imaging-magnetic resonance imaging enhances the standard PI-RADS system by providing a noninvasive radiological biomarker to predict upgrading in active surveillance.

Comparison of rectal swab, glove tip, and participant-collected stool techniques for gut microbiome sampling.

BACKGROUND: Studies of the gut microbiome are becoming increasingly important. Such studies require stool collections that can be processed or frozen in a timely manner so as not to alter the microbial content. Due to the logistical difficulties of home-based stool collection, there has been a challenge in selecting the appropriate sample collection technique and comparing results from different microbiome studies. Thus, we compared stool collection and two alternative clinic-based fecal microbiome collection techniques, including a newer glove-based collection method. RESULTS: We prospectively enrolled 22 adult men from our prostate cancer screening cohort SABOR (San Antonio Biomarkers of Risk for prostate cancer) in San Antonio, TX, from 8/2018 to 4/2019. A rectal swab and glove tip sample were collected from each participant during a one-time visit to our clinics. A single stool sample was collected at the participant's home. DNA was isolated from the fecal material and 16 s rRNA sequencing of the V1-V2 and V3-V4 regions was performed. We found the gut microbiome to be similar in richness and evenness, noting no differences in alpha diversity among the collection methods. The stool collection method, which remains the gold-standard method for the gut microbiome, proved to have different community composition compared to swab and glove tip techniques (p< 0.001) as measured by Bray-Curtis and unifrac distances. There were no significant differences in between the swab and glove tip samples with regard to beta diversity (p> 0.05). Despite differences between home-based stool and office-based fecal collection methods, we noted that the distance metrics for the three methods cluster by participant indicating within-person similarities. Additionally, no taxa differed among the methods in a Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) analysis comparing all-against-all sampling methods. CONCLUSION: The glove tip method provides similar gut microbiome results as rectal swab and stool microbiome collection techniques. The addition of a new office-based collection technique could help easy and practical implementation of gut microbiome research studies and clinical practice.

Transsphenoidal surgery for Rathke's cleft cyst can reduce headache severity and frequency.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of transsphenoidal surgery for Rathke's cleft cyst(RCC) on headache frequency, severity, and duration. METHODS: The medical records of 43 consecutive patients who underwent transsphenoidal resection of a pathologically-proven RCC at our institution by the senior author (E.R.L.) between April 2008 and April 2014 were reviewed. Patients were called by telephone and asked to answer questions about the severity, location, type, duration,and quality of their headaches, both pre- and postoperatively.This information was joined with detailed data collected directly from each patient's medical record regarding headaches upon presentation and at 1-week,6-week, 3-month, and annual post-operative appointments. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (53 %) responded to our telephone survey after repeated attempts at contact. Median follow-up was 64 months (range 6­83 months). Of these patients, 19 (82.6 %) reported pre-operative headaches,compared to 12 (52.2 %) who reported post-operative headaches (OR = 1.75, p = 0.02). Average headache severity on a 1­10 scale decreased from 6.4 (SD = 2.0)pre-operatively to 3.4 (SD = 1.9) post-operatively (p = 0.006), while average maximum severity decreased from 8.6 (SD = 2.2) pre-operatively to 4.0 (SD = 3.3)post-operatively (p<0.001). The frequency of headaches also decreased, from 18.1 (SD = 12.6) per month pre-operatively to 3.7 (SD = 8.4) per month post-operatively(p<0.001). Overall, 14 patients (60.9 %) reported improvement in their headaches, and three patients(13.0 %) reported that their headaches had completely resolved. CONCLUSIONS: In a carefully selected patient population,transsphenoidal surgery for RCC can reduce headache monthly frequency, average typical severity, and average maximum severity with minimal risk of morbidity or mortality.